Duplicate Sarah Jeong "tweets" substituting "Jews" for "Whites" results in suspension

[Anti Federalist]

Twitter Suspends Candace Owens’ Account for Mimicking Sarah Jeong’s Racism

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/...jeongs-racism/

5 Aug 2018

Twitter slapped Turning Point USA Communications Director Candace Owens with a temporary suspension after she highlighted racist posts made by Sarah Jeong, the recent New York Times hire whose long history of bigoted tweets about white people has placed the newspaper at the center of a public outcry. The beleaguered platform then reversed the ban, calling it an “error” in an email to Owens.

Owens’ tweets mimicked the wording of Jeong’s, with one important difference: Owens substituted the words “Jewish people” for “white people,” in an attempt to show that some forms of racism are considered more acceptable than others.

Donald Trump Jr. made a similar point in an exclusive interview with Breitbart News this weekend, when he said “people would be losing their minds” if Jeong had made her bigoted comments about black people or Hispanics.

Twitter, already under fire from Republicans (including the president) over political bias, now appears to have proven her point.

Even though Jeong made the following tweets, she has not been suspended, and the tweets remain undeleted.


sarah jeong
@Sarahjeong
Dumbass $#@!ing white people marking up the internet with their opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants
12:41 AM - Nov 29, 2014
155
901 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy

sarah jeong
@Sarahjeong
Are white people genetically predisposed to burn faster in the sun, thus logically being only fit to live underground like groveling goblins
10:23 PM - Dec 23, 2014
289
239 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Meanwhile, Owens did receive a temporary suspension, as well as an order to delete her tweets, for using precisely the same language as Jeong, swapping “Jewish people” for “white people.”

Owens even clarified in the tweet itself that she was repeating Jeong’s statements, not making original statements of her own. Twitter still banned her.



“I actually AGREE with Twitter” said Owens, in a comment to Breitbart News. “These tweets are an example of hateful conduct. It begs the question — why was it okay when the hate was directed at White people? Why are her tweets still up?”

“In every way imaginable — Twitter has just proved my point. Racism in this country has been sanctioned against white people.”

After word of the suspension began to go viral on social media, Twitter reversed itself and reinstated Owens’ account. Twitter claims the suspension was an “error,” which seems to be their standard response when conservatives are suspended, shadowbanned, or do not show up in searches, as was the case with Rep. Matt Gaetz.

@realCandaceO
BLOWN AWAY by the amount of patriots that just came to my side to make this happen.
I will be periscoping LIVE about this entire debacle, in 30 mins.
I am blessed to know you all. 🇺🇸
1:10 PM - Aug 5, 2018
17.8K
7,264 people are talking about this
Twitter Ads info and privacy

The New York Times has defended its decision to hire Jeong, even as further evidence of her history of deranged racism on social media piles up. Jeong says she “deeply regrets” her racist tweets (of which there are hundreds) but maintains that they were merely “satire” and “counter-trolling.”

[phill4paul]

Well, played.

[timosman]

The tweet from OP is no longer available. The official narrative is she was suspended for this:

[tod evans]

Keep pushin' dumbasses.........

[Suzanimal]

[Valli6]

Oddly, she tweeted the one replacing "white" with black at 9:07 AM and that one is still there.

Others have done similar without being noticed:

The one referring to jews was tweeted later at 9:33 AM and has been removed. What's the thinking there? Is the first one okay "because she's black"? but the 2nd is bad because she's not jewish? Or do jews need more protection from being offended than black people?
Non-black, non-jews WHITE people want to know

[Swordsmyth]

Oddly, she tweeted the one replacing "white" with black at 9:07 AM and that one is still there.

Others have done similar without being noticed:

The one referring to jews was tweeted later at 9:33 AM and has been removed. What's the thinking there? Is the first one okay "because she's black"? but the 2nd is bad because she's not jewish? Or do jews need more protection from being offended than black people?
Non-black, non-jews want to know

There are many Jews in positions of power who consider themselves and their people to be both superior to all other races/ethnicities/whatever and the ultimate victims who are grievously abused by all others and must be protected from any criticism legitimate, humorous or otherwise.

[AuH20]

You can't criticize the top dogs.

[juleswin]

A writer for a website created to promote and glorify the Jewish state of Israel is suspended on twitter for posting jokey antisemitic tweet? And some people laugh at WWE because it was too silly.

What have people learned from the disaster of the Obama years? Do they understand the true nature of deep state power? The true continuity of agenda that takes place even as the pendulum swings from left to right? Or are they simply going to fall for the same trick, again and again, until the final nail is placed in the coffin of human freedom?

James Corbett

[Anti Federalist]

A writer for a website created to promote and glorify the Jewish state of Israel is suspended on twitter for posting jokey antisemitic tweet? And some people laugh at WWE because it was too silly.

What's that got to do with it?

The point is the hypocrisy.

[Brian4Liberty]

“Twitter lists the SPLC as a ‘safety partner’ working with Twitter to combat ‘hateful conduct and harassment,’” Hassan impressed. “The platform also includes the Trust and Safety Council, which ‘provides input on our safety products, policies and programs,’ according to Twitter. Free speech advocates have criticized it as Orwellian.”

https://onenewsnow.com/media/2018/06...-cahoots-wsplc

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...uot-Error-quot

[juleswin]

What's that got to do with it?

The point is the hypocrisy.

True but these two groups are still working for the same deep state holding everyone down. I just refuse to take sides, let those Mfers kill em fighting.

[AuH20]

https://onenewsnow.com/media/2018/06...-cahoots-wsplc

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...uot-Error-quot

SPLC? This has to be the Twilight Zone. Then again the SPLC was involved in Oklahoma City Bombing.

[dannno]

NYT Writer Forced To Apologize To Sarah Jeong After Criticizing Jeong's Racist Tweets

https://www.dailywire.com/news/34311...ign=modelnames

On Thursday, New York Times feature writer Elizabeth Williamson has been forced to apologize for having tweeted out disapproving feelings regarding new Times editorial board hire Sarah Jeong. Jeong became the subject of national controversy last week after dozens of anti-white tweets resurfaced, and the Times defended her despite her non-apology.

Williamson originally tweeted out a column from the Times’ Bret Stephens, with the comment, “Here’s @BretStephensNYT offering a classy welcome to a colleague who has yet to prove she dserves one.” Jeong’s tweets, it should be noted, weren’t merely anti-white — she had routinely ripped into the Times over the years.
Nonetheless, it was Williamson who had to say sorry after tweeting, not Jeong. She tweeted:

[DamianTV]

There's NO Rule of Law... when the crime that is charged, not based upon what law was broken, but by who committed it.

"There is no crueler tyranny than that which is perpetuated under the shield of law and in the name of justice."
- Charles de Montesquieu

"Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are."
- Benjamin Franklin

The only voices being recognized right now are ones that want the Bill of Rights absolutely and wholly repealed. What is not clearly understood is the people these libtards are hurting the most is themselves. They are destroying their own Right to Free Speech and Religion and Press. They are surrendering their Gun Rights, as well as everyone elses, because guns are so scary, while missing the point that guns are supposed to be terrifying, and those Gun Rights exists so they may resist a Tyrannical Govt. They fail to comprehend that the people at the top do NOT have their best interests. The people at the top have made these people Useful idiots. If the people at the top get what they want, a total Technocracy and there is no Freedom or opportunity to just be left alone, they might regret the decisions they made to attack others not based on what is said, but who said it.

[timosman]

[sam1952]

“it’s ok to be white”