The Satanic Temple Has Evolved Into An Anti-Trump Movement, And Leftists Are Flocking To It

[Swordsmyth]

https://twitter.com/realJeffreyP/sta...97778093936641

Go there and read the whole thread.

[Swordsmyth]

https://twitter.com/realJeffreyP/sta...05646223437824

[Swordsmyth]

https://twitter.com/realJeffreyP/sta...48803262144516

[Swordsmyth]

Some of the tweets were scrubbed but they are found at another site that copied them:

There was a time, somewhere around 2010 or 2011, when I remembered a former friend, low-ranking #ArizonaMafia member Luis Borbon, had stopped by an office where I was working, on his way back to Phoenix, to discuss unrelated business. He was driving a very large white vehicle pic.twitter.com/5SvXfzDyLw
— Jeffrey Peterson(@realJeffreyP) August 22, 2019

with a bunch of dogs packed in the back. At the time it seemed extremely strange, I asked him about it and he remarked that he had brought the dogs from Mexico and was dropping them off at a location near the Phoenix airport. Later that evening pic.twitter.com/aYQGZ0fQCn
— Jeffrey Peterson(@realJeffreyP) August 22, 2019

We had been out with some of our political group of friends and they were laughing, joking about Luis's trip, how he had driven a bunch of dogs from Mexico up in to Phoenix and dropped them off. I remember during the time they were joking, he had remarked that whatever
— Jeffrey Peterson(@realJeffreyP) August 22, 2019

had happened, didn't matter anyways, because it was the end of the line for the poor dogs. I had no idea what that meant at the time. But now I'm starting to have an idea why. It was not the only time this happened …
— Jeffrey Peterson(@realJeffreyP) August 22, 2019

For a while Luis had a nickname, "El Perrero", which means "the dogcatcher", in Spanish.
Foolishly, I assumed his trips and assigned duties, which often involved driving up and down the I-10 corridor in AZ between Phoenix and Hermosillo, involved some kind of public service,
— Jeffrey Peterson(@realJeffreyP) August 22, 2019

not as a delivery man for biological materials, which is admittedly a still unproven theory, but one that I think is probably close to reality, that I'm still developing about Borbon. More info in a few minutes.
— Jeffrey Peterson(@realJeffreyP) August 22, 2019

THREAD. A year ago today, I published a controversial thread about a time I overheard individuals talking about cloning experiments at a Democrat party fundraiser. At the time I did not disclose the identities of the individuals involved in such endeavors however I will …
— Jeffrey Peterson(@realJeffreyP) August 22, 2019

name them tonight. First of all, here is a link to the thread i published a year ago today about overhearing conversations related to cloning.https://t.co/KbV4WF4n7K
(continued)
— Jeffrey Peterson(@realJeffreyP) August 22, 2019

Although at the time I published the above thread, many people were skeptical, I said at the time it was a true account. And it was. One of the specific individuals I overheard speaking with Nancy Pelosi regarding cloning experiments was John Sperling pic.twitter.com/9rrRmUElIG
— Jeffrey Peterson(@realJeffreyP) August 22, 2019

Sperling was the founder of the University of Phoenix, one of the largest (if not the largest) for-profit universities in the United States.
I clearly overheard Sperling speaking with Pelosi about advanced cloning experiments on living beings, including animals and humans.
— Jeffrey Peterson(@realJeffreyP) August 22, 2019

The other individual I heard both Pelosi and Sperling speaking about relating to cloning experiments being done on remote islands, was Jeff Bezos, CEO of Amazon.
Bezos was not there. But they were talking about him. And Pelosi kept saying, "He's doing mine." "He's doing mine." pic.twitter.com/woJBfMdJKy
— Jeffrey Peterson(@realJeffreyP) August 22, 2019

I understand that sounds completely insane. That is what I heard. I will also note that Pelosi was drinking and seemed tipsy to me. But it didn't sound like a joke to me. On several occasions when I was around her she was drinking a lot.
I will write more about this in time.
— Jeffrey Peterson(@realJeffreyP) August 22, 2019

Continuing on with several threads I have published tonight regarding biological experiments and potential connections to political operators I used to know in Arizona, I point out the following recent articlehttps://t.co/cl2XSI0gWg
— Jeffrey Peterson(@realJeffreyP) August 22, 2019

As it turns out, there were several facilities like the one mentioned in this article. I do not have conclusive proof yet but it appears that several of the stories researchers have been working on relating to cloning, biological experiments, and things I saw such as
— Jeffrey Peterson(@realJeffreyP) August 22, 2019

the time with #ArizonaMafia member Luis Borbon had been shuttling around ostensibly hundreds or more dogs up from Mexico, it seems like all of this could have had something to do with biological experiments.
The dates, locations, and circumstances all seem to tell a story.
— Jeffrey Peterson(@realJeffreyP) August 22, 2019

I understand these news articles may be disturbing to some people. I find them disturbing myself. However I believe they are parts of a puzzle that tell an important story. I have reported (continued)https://t.co/6Eqoeemclp
— Jeffrey Peterson(@realJeffreyP) August 22, 2019

things I saw over time. I believe my former group of #ArizonaMafia friends were involved with and may still be involved with biological experiments at the TGEN experimental facility in Phoenix, AZ. I believe they may be involved with the harvesting of human and animal body
— Jeffrey Peterson(@realJeffreyP) August 22, 2019

parts. I cannot certify this because it's just a theory. I could be completely wrong. But I don't think so. And as previously discussed on social media, I believe a large part of the reason Napolitano herself left as DHS Secretary in the wake of the #FastNFurious weapons scandal

— Jeffrey Peterson(@realJeffreyP) August 22, 2019

was to be strategically located in the University of California system not necessarily due to its educational influence but to to her strategic ability to be involved in biotech matters including the harvesting and experimentation of human body parts. I can tell you they are very

— Jeffrey Peterson(@realJeffreyP) August 22, 2019

much involved in those things. As my prior indicated, Napolitano herself has late-stage cancer and all of this may tie back in to her efforts to cure herself. I can't be sure but it seems like that would be a logical theory. I do know they're in it for profit motivations,

— Jeffrey Peterson(@realJeffreyP) August 22, 2019

We learn things we may have never suspected. Something I learned is that senior figures of the Democrat party are advocating for biological experiments on large quantities of innocent dogs.
If you love animals as I do, you may be further outraged to learn this, as I am. #MAGA pic.twitter.com/AySLadc7XI
— Jeffrey Peterson(@realJeffreyP) August 22, 2019

https://t.co/pGHBLyr3gh

— Jeffrey Peterson(@realJeffreyP) August 22, 2019

I am publishing a few pictures of Bill Clinton with Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong. Some of you may already have seen these but for those who have not, I will leave them here. pic.twitter.com/ZdsKRDe3lw
— Jeffrey Peterson(@realJeffreyP) August 22, 2019

Dr. Soon-Shiong may be the most advanced genetics doctor in the world. He is very much involved with the Clintons, the Clinton Foundation and the #ArizonaMafia's TGEN research institute in Arizona. Cloning researchers, this is probably one of the top names to dig with for info. pic.twitter.com/OpGPNGDgif

— Jeffrey Peterson(@realJeffreyP) August 22, 2019

[kpitcher]

Now that trump is saying he's the chosen one I can see why the satanic temple would be against him. Either that or he will bring balance to the force.

[Swordsmyth]

Now that trump is saying he's the chosen one I can see why the satanic temple would be against him. Either that or he will bring balance to the force.

The American people did choose him to fight back in the trade war.

[Swordsmyth]

Christianity “which set the stage for modern white supremacy.”

[Slave Mentality]

https://twitter.com/realJeffreyP/sta...05646223437824

No more arrogant than posting up Jesus pics in your lame BS morality tweet, Jeff.

[Swordsmyth]

https://twitter.com/realJeffreyP/sta...46443384426496

[Swordsmyth]

https://twitter.com/realJeffreyP/sta...85733275340802

[Swordsmyth]

The Satanic temple leader also admitted that well over 50% of the temple’s members are gay saying: “It would be a conservative estimate to say that more than 50 percent of our membership is LGBTQ.”
Greaves also boasts about the organization’s involvement in gay pride parades noting that “Our chapters are always involved with Pride parades in the United States, they’re always doing something for the LGBTQ community and they’re always open about inclusion.”
“We will always fight them, we will fight them to the death to ensure that there are equal rights for the gay community.”


More at: https://www.breakingisraelnews.com/1...-evangelicals/

[Swordsmyth]

LGBT Activists Hate Christianity — and Want to Destroy It

[Swordsmyth]

https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status...43949230739457

[Swordsmyth]

ANTIFA Domestic Terrorists Support LGBT Exploitation of Kids in Child Drag Show

[Swordsmyth]

Fox News radio host and commentator Todd Starnes has been ousted from the network, its website contract and the premium subscription service Fox Nation, the company told TheWrap on Wednesday.
He made headlines as recently as Monday for comments during his his radio program that Democrats do not believe in the Christian God and instead may worship Moloch, a pagan god often associated with child sacrifice.

More at: https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/...183148222.html

[r3volution 3.0]

Well, if that doesn't herald Satan's imminent return to Earth I just don't know what does...

[Swordsmyth]

Fox News radio host and commentator Todd Starnes has been ousted from the network, its website contract and the premium subscription service Fox Nation, the company told TheWrap on Wednesday.
He made headlines as recently as Monday for comments during his his radio program that Democrats do not believe in the Christian God and instead may worship Moloch, a pagan god often associated with child sacrifice.

More at: https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/...183148222.html

“We just assume they’re praying to God,” Starnes replied. “I’m not quite sure.”

“Apparently the god they worship is the pagan god of the Old Testament, Moloch, who allowed for child sacrifice,” Jeffress answered. “The God of the Bible doesn’t sanction the killing of millions and millions of children in the womb. I think the god they are worshiping is the god of their own imagination.”
Liberals took to Twitter following the news to apparently validate Dr. Jeffress’ suspicions, and confirm that they do in fact worship the pagan deity.

Lesson: don't $#@! with Moloch. https://t.co/ZMsE5nyshZ
— David Roberts (@drvox) October 2, 2019

Fellow liberals, I regret to inform you Fox News has discovered our worship of the Pagan dark God Moloch. https://t.co/ma5GojEZWu
— Brianna Wu (@BriannaWu) October 2, 2019

DON'T MESS WITH OUR GOD, MOLOCH https://t.co/dBHv5Zfky4
— Oliver Willis (@owillis) October 2, 2019

ALL HAIL MOLOCH HIS WILL BE DONE. https://t.co/GGcmxRZ39m
— Daniel W. Drezner (@dandrezner) October 2, 2019

(hail moloch)
— rat king (@MikeIsaac) October 2, 2019

Praise be Moloch! https://t.co/QE0m5Tj7zb
— Ken Reid (@KennethWReid) October 2, 2019

While liberals try to make a mockery out of the issue, there is troubling evidence that this pagan deity is revered by elite circles.
Infowars founder Alex Jones initially infiltrated and exposed the Bohemian Grove, a private male-only club of the world’s most influential power brokers that meets in Sonoma County, California each summer. He filmed one of their bizarre rituals from afar back in 2000 where he claims he saw them burn an effigy of a child in front of a giant stone idol they referred to as Moloch.


In addition, a peculiar reference to offering a sacrifice for Moloch was found in Hillary Clinton’s e-mail trove released to the public by WikiLeaks in 2016.
“W ith (sic) fingers crossed, the old rabbit’s foot out of the box in the attic, I will be sacrificing a chicken in the backyard to Moloch,” the e-mail read.

More at: https://bigleaguepolitics.com/democr...f-pagan-deity/

[Swordsmyth]

Biden refers to 63 million Trump supporters as ‘Dregs of Society’ in a speech at an LGBTQ+P event. The P stands for pedophile

[Zippyjuan]

Biden refers to 63 million Trump supporters as ‘Dregs of Society’ in a speech at an LGBTQ+P event. The P stands for pedophile

Fake news (from a fake news site?). The conference was on Human Rights. He did not call all Trump supporters "dregs of the Earth". What was actually said was:

"There is a small percentage of the American people- virulent people- some of them the dregs of society" No political party was given for that "small percentage" (which was included in the article at the link but the headline massively misstates it). Instead, it tries to stir up civil conflict and even war:

Like it or not, and believe it or not, America is right now in a state of Civil War, and instead of North versus South we have Red versus Blue. The war will not be over until one of two things happen. Either the Democrats succeed in ramming their anti-Israel, pro-transgender, pro-Socialist agenda down our throats, or the verbal hostilities break out into physical hostilities and we fight until the dead bodies line the streets of Washington, DC. But if you think this is going away, or is just a ‘passing phase in our long American story’, you could not be more wrong.

The name of the site? "Now The End Begins".

Context (see 2:15):

https://www.c-span.org/video/?c47498...remark-context

[Swordsmyth]

Fake news (from a fake news site?). The conference was on Human Rights. He did not call all Trump supporters "dregs of the Earth". What was actually said was
"There is a small percentage of the American people- virulent people- some of them the dregs of society" No political party was given for that "small percentage".

Context (see 2:15):

https://www.c-span.org/video/?c47498...remark-context

"Human Rights" = LGBTQ+P
And he was referring to anyone who opposes the perverts as "the dregs of society"

[Zippyjuan]

"Human Rights" = LGBTQ+P
And he was referring to anyone who opposes the perverts as "the dregs of society"

Fake news.

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...Fun-and-Profit

[Swordsmyth]

Fake news.

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...Fun-and-Profit

You are Fake News.
And stop trying to recruit more trolls openly.

[Swordsmyth]

On Tuesday, a British court ruled that belief in the Bible was “incompatible with human dignity.”

That statement came in a case involving Dr. David Mackereth, a devout Christian who had worked as an emergency doctor for the National Health Service for 26 years. He said he was fired from his job because he refused to call a biological man a woman. The court’s ruling stated: “Belief in Genesis 1:27, lack of belief in transgenderism and conscientious objection to transgenderism in our judgment are incompatible with human dignity and conflict with the fundamental rights of others, specifically here, transgender individuals.” The court added. “… in so far as those beliefs form part of his wider faith, his wider faith also does not satisfy the requirement of being worthy of respect in a democratic society, not incompatible with human dignity and not in conflict with the fundamental rights of others.”

More at: https://www.dailywire.com/news/briti...-human-dignity

[Swordsmyth]

Actual Witches Hunt Trump With Pre-Halloween "Binding Spell"

[Swordsmyth]

Men who dress as women love Halloween, and not just for the costuming opportunities. They are often keenly attuned to the dark spirits of the season and willing to do those spirits’ bizarre, depraved bidding.

It’s one more reason to keep vulnerable children away from homosexual/gender indoctrination sessions, “drag” tutorials, and parents-excluded “safe sex” discussions at your local library. These wicked people are eagerly seducing and grooming children right under our eyes, if we let them.
Drag queens are a scary presence for little kids. The young, mesmerized faces hearing the allegedly “inclusive” lessons and watching the sexual gyrations tell the real story. Something’s strange in this neighborhood, and youngsters get it, even if their clueless parents giggle and nod alongside the corrupted librarians.
The truth is, gender-benders’ public readings and sexualized performances are often influenced by an otherworldly realm. It turns out that many “drag” identifiers follow paganism, witchcraft, or Satanism. They don’t even try to hide this close connection.
For instance, in a recent tweet, the Church of Satan said, “We can confirm that there are a lot of Satanic drag queens. And they are fabulous.”
And the San-Francisco-based Satanic Temple is made up mostly of “LGBTQ” identifiers, even holding a “Pink Mass” at times. A movie made about the group is called Hail Satan, where the leaders say they’ll fight Christian conservatives “to the death.”
Are they serious about following Satan? Who knows, and who cares? Anyone who adopts his name is, tragically, fair game. Satan will exploit and manipulate these fools to his hearts’ desire, and they may never know it.
A drag-devil partnership is popping up everywhere. There are reports of Austin, Texas–area “drag” followers engaging in occult rituals (including black masses) in public parks to “hex” two city council members, courageous people who publicly objected to the perverted “story hours” at local public libraries.
And a church in Chula Vista, Calif. was vandalized in September with satanic symbols. Some of the members had spoken out against a local “drag queen” event. This doesn’t reflect well on the themes of love and acceptance that “drag queens” insist motivate their events.
Anna Bohach, the 500 Mom Strong leader, wrote about this movement:

Long gone are the caricatures of drag queens as clownishly quaint entertainment for a sub-group of a sub-group of sexually-isolated fetish followers. Nowadays, they want, nay, they demand, that you openly declare your support for their desires, which is focused, like a laser-beam, on your children.

In Long Beach, California in 2017, a photo surfaced of a devil-horned library presenter whom one homosexual website dubbed a “Satanic goddess.” Quickly dismissed as a joke, one has to ask, so what? Does any discerning parent want someone to read books to their children — or do anything with our kids — who dresses like a freak and jokes about such serious matters?

At least 1.5 million Americans are witches and pagans, according to some reports, which is comparable to the membership of the Presbyterian Church (USA).
Current politics drives some occult activities, with “LGBTQ” identifiers often leading the charge. Hexes and curses against conservative political figures have become common since the 2016 election. One article described the new hexing trend:

Dakota Bracciale, a 29-year-old transgender/***** witch and co-owner of Catland Books and witch shop in Brooklyn, is pleased with the outcome of the ritual hex placed on US Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh in October [2018.]

Another man, Michael Hughes, has been organizing witchcraft rituals to “bind” Donald Trump since 2017 and is doing so this year a week before Halloween.
So those who claim that Halloween is just about candy and costumes need to think again. It is shaping up as a significant force, and not in a positive direction.
Around the country this October, there were numerous “drag queen” story events with Halloween themes: Tucson (for “all ages”); Dallas; Atlanta; Riverside, Calif.; Philadelphia; St. Petersburg. In Ames, Iowa, an all-ages drag show (where children could perform if they wanted) received substantial community push-back. Good for them!
But apparently, there’s a new venue for child propaganda sessions: college campuses. Michigan State University recently held a “drag” event for little children and some students. And just as we’ve been alerting parents, it was timed to coincide with “Coming Out” day on October 11. So the goal of these female impersonators was clearly to influence minor children to embrace and then announce a homosexual or gender-confused identity.
Why was this allowed at a publicly funded institution?
Yet the red flags didn’t end there. One of the transvestites introduced the MSU “act” by discussing male cross-dressing through the ages. He said, “Whether it's jesters or shamans, every culture has this experience of getting into costume."
A shaman is essentially a witch doctor. So once again, the occult influence in “drag” venues keeps rearing its ugly head.

More at: https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion...cult-practices

[Swordsmyth]

Satanic Feminism is based on Faxneld’s doctoral dissertation, which was awarded the Donner Institute Prize for Eminent Research on Religion. It discusses how prominent feminists—primarily between 1880 and 1930—used Satan as a symbol of their rejection of the so-called “patriarchal traits of Christianity”. It shows that these women were inspired by the period’s most influential new religion, Theosophy, and how the anti-Christian discourses of radical secularism affected feminism.
Satanic Feminism sheds a new light on the early feminist movement. It discusses neglected or unknown aspects of the intellectual connections of early feminism with Satanism in a way that nobody before Faxneld has dared to do. In doing so, he richly illustrates how leading figures of the early feminist movement, such as the suffragette Elizabeth Cady Stanton, the actress Sarah Bernhardt and the poet Renée Vivien, viewed God as the precursor of patriarchy and Satan as an ally in the fight against it.
This feminist view of Satan as the liberator of women, according to Faxneld, was “intertwined with prominent anticlerical, left-wing, and esoteric currents of its time”. Examples in his book include feminists employing Lucifer as a symbol of revolution and eulogising him as an anti-patriarchal figure. As Faxneld points out, Satanism and feminist politics were interwoven from the first appearance of the theme of Satan as a benevolent revolutionary figure and the liberator of womankind.
In these anti-biblical narratives, Satan is “seen as an ally in the struggle against patriarchy supported by God the Father and his male priests. Eve’s ingestion of the forbidden fruit becomes a heroic act of rebellion against the tyranny of God and Adam.” Thus Satan becomes a powerful ally in the struggle against a tyrannical patriarchy supported by God the Father and his Son.
According to Faxneld, in the Scandinavian folk beliefs recorded by the feminists in the nineteenth century, “Satan could function as a helper of women when it comes to getting rid of an unwanted child.” Faxneld is particularly interested in the process whereby a sinister figure from the Bible, Satan, is elevated into “something positive and specifically with feminist connotations for certain people”. To understand why this would be so, he argues that the elevation of Satan as a feminist hero “constituted an important part of a much broader cultural tendency to dislodge all biblical characters from the position fixed by centuries of tradition, and therefore destabilising the entire [social] order of Christianity”.
Nineteenth-century feminists singled out Christianity along with the state as a key institution supporting the subjugation of women. In such a view, “the Christian ideal of wifely obedience, and marriage as such”, was seen as “incompatible with woman’s right to govern herself”. So they viewed Satan as a positive figure and Christianity was an obstacle that had to be removed for women to be emancipated.
The first major systematic attempt at feminist Bible criticism was a book called The Women’s Bible (in two volumes, 1895 to 1898) by the American suffragette Elizabeth Cady Stanton and her revising committee. This committee included members from England, Finland, England, Scotland, Austria and France, thus making it an international project.
The Women’s Bible amounts to a satanic inversion of the biblical account of the Fall. Stanton and her colleagues felt they had to deal with the patriarchal use of the story in Genesis 3. One way of doing so, which seems to have been rather widespread, was to turn the biblical narrative on its head, thus making Eve a heroine and the serpent benevolent. So Eve is eulogised in her consumption of the forbidden fruit in the Garden of Eden, and depicted in collusion with Satan as a liberator from her male counterpart. With a benevolent Satan, Eve’s actions in the Garden become laudable, and women are thus superior to men “for being the first to heed Satan’s advice”.
Stanton was not just another feminist—she was widely recognised as the leading figure of the early women’s rights movement. In her introduction to The Woman’s Bible, she proclaims church and clergy “the very powers that make woman’s emancipation impossible”, and explains to her female readers that “your political and social degradation are but an outgrowth of your status in the Bible”. Stanton then likens Satan to the great Greek philosophers Socrates and Plato, since “his powers of conversation and asking puzzling questions, were no doubt marvellous, and he roused in the woman that intense thirst for knowledge”. In the introduction of The Women’s Bible, Stanton
brings up the teaching that Eve caused the Fall of Man, and how this has been used to subjugate women ever since. In the detailed commentary on Genesis 3, she rejects the general idea of the Fall and states her view that the Darwinian theory of the gradual growth of the race from a lower to a higher type of animal life is more hopeful and encouraging.
The Women’s Bible is notorious for telling the history of how devil-worshipping witches were turned into champions of science and women’s rights, demon-lovers were portrayed as allies in the struggle against patriarchal oppression, and so on. In a letter to the editor of the Critic, after the publication of the notorious book, Stanton notes the following implication of her deconstruction of Genesis 3: “Take the snake, the fruit tree and the woman from the tableau, and we have no fall, nor frowning judge, no Inferno, no everlasting punishment—hence no need of a Savior.”
Stanton’s undertaking was not unique in feminist circles. As Faxneld points out, across Europe we can find many examples of how Genesis 3 was repeatedly treated in highly critical fashion by those early feminists, for instance, in the widely popular Penthesileia: A Women’s Breviary for Man-hating Moments (1907), by the German feminist Leonie Meyerhof.
The founder of the spiritualistic movement called Theosophy, Helena Blavatsky, is notorious for promoting Satanic inversions of Genesis 3, arguing that “Satan, the enemy of God, is in reality, the highest divine Spirit”. Blavatsky’s books Isis Unveiled (1877) and The Secret Doctrine (1888) were hugely successful, the first book selling roughly half a million copies up until 1980. These books depict the Fall positively, as a significant event that implies an up-valuation of women: “She is no longer responsible for mankind’s fall into sin but is instead actively involved in the gaining of spiritual wisdom from the benevolent snake.”
According to Blavatsky, Satan—or Lucifer, or the Devil, as she often uses the names interchangeably—brought mankind spiritual wisdom and is “the spirit of Intellectual Enlightenment and Freedom of Thought”. Beginning in September 1887 she published a journal in England called Lucifer, which infamously spread the notion of a connection between the use of pro-Satan symbolism and the struggle for women’s rights.
There was another feminist periodical in the United States also called Lucifer. Through its choice of name, in combination with a heavy emphasis on women’s rights, it disseminated the image of Satan and female emancipation as related. As Dr Faxneld notes, Lucifer was an influential American feminist organ for more than twenty-five years. By 1879 it reached readers in at least thirty-seven American states and at least eight other countries. In 1907 it was decided to change the title to The American Journal of Eugenics, and to make eugenic issues which had been part of the feminist discourse more or less its sole concern.
Faxneld notes that no woman in the nineteenth century could match Sarah Bernhardt in influence and popularity. The French stage actress starred in some of the most popular French plays of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, including La Dame aux Camelias by Alexandre Dumas and Ruy Blas by Victor Hugo. Georges Bernier wrote that Bernhardt “had the gift of being worshipped by officialdom, high society, people of the lower classes, as well as by elitist coteries of writers and artists”.
According to Faxneld, Bernhardt frequently played with “a symbolism closely connected to Satanism, and, for example, sculpted a figurine that can be seen as a portrait of herself as the Devil”. Parisian lesbians used her as a role model when forging subversive sexual identities because “much of her behaviour was clearly disruptive of gender roles: wearing men’s clothes on and off the stage”.
Sylvia Townsend Warner also receives special treatment in Satanic Feminism. Warner “was educated by an atheist father of great learning and was intimately acquainted with the Bible from an early age”. Her debut novel, Lolly Willowes, or The Loving Huntsman (1926), tells the tale of Laura “Lolly” Willowes, who ends up becoming a witch liberated and empowered by Satan. This novel, says Faxneld, “is quite possibly the most explicit and conspicuous literary example ever of programmatic Satanic feminism”. As he points out, Lolly Willowes is the pinnacle of the nineteenth-century feminist tradition of presenting Satan as a “benign and compassionate liberator”. “Warner makes the theme of Satan as the emancipator primarily of women fully explicit, even to the point of saying that his assistance to men does not really count.”
Lolly Willowes caused a major stir and received highly favourable reviews. The book draws on contemporary understandings of witch cults and worked very much within a tradition of Satanic feminism. There were important aspects of the text that directly relate to “demonic lesbianism, a view of Christianity as a central pillar of patriarchy, and nature being coded as Satan’s feminine realm where he can offer immunity from the pressures of a male-dominated society”.

More at: https://quadrant.org.au/magazine/201...der-the-spell/

[Swordsmyth]

VIDEO: DRAG QUEEN SIMULATES CUTTING BABY OUT OF HER WOMB, DRINKING BLOOD

[Sonny Tufts]

, quoting Robert Jeffress:“The God of the Bible doesn’t sanction the killing of millions and millions of children in the womb."

Correct. That deity waits until they're after they're born to kill them. Exodus 12:29.

[Sonny Tufts]

double post

[Swordsmyth]

Correct. That deity waits until they're after they're born to kill them. Exodus 12:29.

After they commit sins worthy of death.