Paypal Terminates Infowars from Their Service

[TheCount]

Another cheerleader for the beast heard from.

After you nationalize all communications under the control of the post office, which department will you put in charge of your new nationalized financial system?

[Jamesiv1]

In the Spring of 2015 I predicted this would happen.

[juleswin]

After you nationalize all communications under the control of the post office, which department will you put in charge of your new nationalized financial system?

Nationalize? How about just fining and suspending institutions who violate the law?

[juleswin]

Infowars.com terms of service next time anyone wanna feel sorry for infowars. They would ban you from their site if you posted half of the things Alex Jones says about other people on the air.

You will not post anything libelous, defamatory, harmful, threatening, harassing, abusive, invasive of another's privacy, hateful, racially or ethnically objectionable, or otherwise illegal.
You will not make threats to other users or people not associated with the site.

https://www.infowars.com/terms-of-service/

[Brian4Liberty]

Private company, whose business model has nothing to do with speech, engaging in political discrimination.

Other refusals to do business have had to do with demands for custom service, or disruption of public forums, either virtual or physical. For instance posting on Twitter, causing a scene in a restaurant or on business property, or demanding a custom cake or catering an event.

So they are refusing to do business based on something that has nothing to do with the business model itself. This pushs the issue to an extreme corner case. Simply refusing because they don’t like something about someone. Interesting.

[Swordsmyth]

After you nationalize all communications under the control of the post office, which department will you put in charge of your new nationalized financial system?

Nobody is advocating any of that but I understand why you would be confused since that is the way your mind works.

[Swordsmyth]

Private company, whose business model has nothing to do with speech, engaging in political discrimination.

Other refusals to do business have had to do with demands for custom service, or disruption of public forums, either virtual or physical. For instance posting on Twitter, causing a scene in a restaurant or on business property, or demanding a custom cake or catering an event.

So they are refusing to do business based on something that has nothing to do with the business model itself. This pushs the issue to an extreme corner case. Simply refusing because they don’t like something about someone. Interesting.

And once they have created the precedent in the public's mind they will demand that government force all businesses to do the same.

[TheCount]

Nationalize? How about just fining and suspending institutions who violate the law?

Sure. What law?