28 Pages:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e8bvM-XGR0g
More discussion about general overclassification at 2:01:09:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iLJZMgBTbl4
So basically, they can classify anything they want, then it's up to someone to challenge them on it, and go to some type of government arbitration court. Very convenient. And there are no penalties when the people who redact are caught red-handed lying about the reason for classification.Originally Posted by tsai3904
Scenario:
- A document states that a theoretical government official sold weapons to terrorists, and their private foundation took the cash that was paid by said terrorists.
- That information is redacted from documents, and when questioned about why the redaction, the answer is that it's for national security, at which point, everyone has to accept that explanation.
"Foreign aid is taking money from the poor people of a rich country, and giving it to the rich people of a poor country." - Ron Paul
"Beware the Military-Industrial-Financial-Pharma-Corporate-Internet-Media-Government Complex." - B4L update of General Dwight D. Eisenhower
"Debt is the drug, Wall St. Banksters are the dealers, and politicians are the addicts." - B4L
"Totally free immigration? I've never taken that position. I believe in national sovereignty." - Ron Paul
Proponent of real science.
The views and opinions expressed here are solely my own, and do not represent this forum or any other entities or persons.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Connect With Us