Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Sutton now has 31 votes on this site...

  1. #1

    Sutton now has 31 votes on this site...

    I'm probably going to hate myself for starting another one of these, but at the http://www.politico.com/nhprimaries/nhmap-popup.html site Sutton now has 31 votes for RP.
    "No matter how loud you shout, you will not drown out the voice of the people! " - William Wilberforce - Amazing Grace

    RON PAUL 2008 - HOPE FOR AMERICA



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    Yes, its been changed, but only after it was discovered that the 31 votes were reported by "mistake" as 0.

  4. #3
    Ah, something is very wrong here, when we have to double check the accuracy of polls, and when we do, we find they 'forgot' to include, one candidates votes.

    This is my first posting about anything to do with voting fraud, but I had to post this, because I can't believe this was discovered.

    How many other votes are we missing, and how do we even know the vote counts overall are accurate?

    I am pissed off at this government crap

  5. #4
    I'm looking for the Windsor votes.
    http://www.ronpaul2012.com/
    Quote Originally Posted by GK Chesterton
    It is often supposed that when people stop believing in God, they believe in nothing. Alas, it is worse than that. When they stop believing in God, they believe in anything.
    Quote Originally Posted by Rt. Hon. Edmund Burke
    Nothing is so fatal to religion as indifference.

  6. #5
    Everything good here now, nothing to see, move on

  7. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Redmenace View Post
    Yes, its been changed, but only after it was discovered that the 31 votes were reported by "mistake" as 0.
    I would like to know how many "mistakes" took place. That one just happened to be an obvious one. I don't believe for a second it was limited to one place.

  8. #7

    They are not dummyes, they play with their power!

    Offcourse they see our anger in here, and we are not going to buy it.

    Thats why they keep their % up for a whilem that they can change the situation if we ot others go mad.

    They had counted 100% from Sutton for over 12 hours, and then suddenly, there pomps up 31 votes... Isnt that strange? Just on evidence more. They think we are stupid, but they read these forums, and Alex Jones News.

    Maybe you see this before, but i take it from DailyPaul:

    Real work indeed!
    Look at the strange tally at the Boston Globe!
    On January 9th, 2008 JW57 says:

    http://www.boston.com/new...

    According to the tallies, Ron Paul WON! I dropped it in Excel. The column tallies don't add up. (and it's not a column labeling problem). There is a hidden column on the far right. To view it, do a search for "145" (this happens to be a number in the hidden column), then you can see the hidden column. Refresh, and the column is gone. Here's what happened "Actual" means "Actual tally of the candidate's column:"

    .... .................. Actual .. Reported .. What happened
    Pcts. Reporting ... 289 .. ...... 289 ... ... no change
    Total Pcts. ... ... .. 301... ..... 301 .. .... no change
    Giuliani ............ 20054 .. .. 20054 ....... no change
    Huckabee ........ 26035 . ... 26035 ....... no change
    Hunter ...... ....... 1195 .. .... 1195 ....... no change
    McCain ... ........... 207 .. .. 86802 ...... McCain's 207 discarded; Paul's total given to McCain.

    Paul .......... ..... 86802 ..... 17831 ...... Romney's total given to Paul
    Romney ...... .... 17831 .... 73806 ...... Tancredo's total given to Romney

    Tancredo ...... .. 73806 ... ...... 66 ...... Thompson's given to Tancredo
    Thompson ............ 66 ... ... 2808 ...... Other given to Thompson
    Other ................ 2808 ... .... 725 ...... Write-ins given to Other
    Write-ins ............. 725 .. ... 4058 ...... 4058 of hidden right column given to Write-ins

    Question:

    What did they do with McCain's vote tally of 207 when they replaced it with Paul's 86,802? If the 207 is not McCain's, then whose is it? Everyone else's votes can be accounted for ...

    I smell VOTE FRAUD.

    ... and why only McCain's tally?
    ... and why was his campaign "stunned"?

    Here's how it works:
    http://www.youtube.com/wa...
    VVVVV R VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV W VVVVV
    VVVVVVV O VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV I VVVVVVVV
    VVVVVVVVVV NEW VVVV WORLD VVVV rEVOLutioN VVVVVVVVVVV



Similar Threads

  1. BOTH Sutton and Greenville intially reported 0 votes for RP
    By PeaceCandidates.com in forum New Hampshire
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-12-2008, 11:45 AM
  2. Sutton now has 31 votes on this site...
    By Constitution Supporter in forum Grassroots Central
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-09-2008, 05:20 PM
  3. Bev Harris says Sutton records 31 votes.
    By AnalogDan in forum New Hampshire
    Replies: 56
    Last Post: 01-09-2008, 12:40 PM
  4. I now call BS ZERO votes for paul in sutton
    By ItsTime in forum New Hampshire
    Replies: 265
    Last Post: 01-09-2008, 11:09 AM
  5. Paul 0 votes in sutton
    By ringrose in forum New Hampshire
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-08-2008, 10:38 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •