Peer-Reviewed Study Says Mysterious, Unidentified Nano-Structures in Vaccines Are Real

[James_Madison_Lives]

The International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research is mainstream science.


https://coronanews123.wordpress.com/...ines-are-real/


Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla and strange self-assembling metallic structures found in Pfizer and Moderna

https://coronanews123.wordpress.com/...ines-are-real/


Whatever informed consent means, no one gave informed consent to have self-assembling nano-robots injected into their bodies. As such Pfizer and Moderna seem to have clearly violated the Nuremberg Code, which put Nazi doctors after World War II on the gallows. The Nuremberg Code, requires:

“free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit,…”

No one knows what these metallic structures are, or what they do. It might be high time to have Pfizer CEO Albert Bourlas waterboarded until he tells us.

Below: Screenshot of peer-reviewed study in International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research
“Real-Time Self-Assembly of Stereomicroscopically Visible Artificial Constructions in Incubated Specimens of mRNA Products Mainly from Pfizer and Moderna: A Comprehensive Longitudinal Study,” International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research (Direct to Study)

"For a biological science paper the study makes a fascinating and sometimes hair-raising read. The all-important abstract to the study begins:

“Systematic analyses of observable real-time injuries at the cellular level in recipients of the “safe and effective” COVID-19 injectables are published herein a peer-reviewed context for the first time.The global administration of these often-mandated products from late 2020 triggered a plethora of independent research studies of the modified RNA injectable gene therapies, most notably those manufactured by Pfizer and Moderna. The contents of COVID-19 injectables were examined under a stereomicroscopeat up to 400X magnification. Carefully preserved specimens were cultured in a range of distinct mediato observe immediate and long-term cause-and-effect relationships between the injectables and living cells under carefully controlled conditions. From such research,reasonable inferences can be drawn about observed injuries worldwide that have occurred since the injectables were pressed upon billions of individuals.”

“In addition to cellular toxicity, our findings reveal numerous —on the order of 3~4 x106 per milliliter ofthe injectable—visible artificial self-assembling entities ranging from about 1to 100μm,or greater,of many different shapes. There were animated worm-like entities, discs, chains, spirals, tubes, right-angle structures containing other artificial entities within them, and so forth. All these are exceedingly beyond any expected and acceptable levels of contamination of the COVID-19 injectables,and incubation studies revealed the progressive self-assembly of many artifactual structures. As time progressed during incubation,simple one-and two-dimensional structures over two or three weeks became more complex in shape and size developing into stereoscopically visible entities in three-dimensions. They resembled carbon nanotube filaments, ribbons, and tapes, some appearing as transparent,thin,flat membranes, and others as three-dimensional spirals, and beaded chains. Some of these seemed to appear and then disappear over time.Our observations suggest the presence of some kind of nanotechnology in the COVID-19 injectables.”

Passages include:

“When the new original vial of Pfizer concentrate was examined under the stereomicroscope, it showed only a few moving worm-like entities or a few small particles,but contrastingly when it was diluted in a1:6ratio (0.3ml:1.8 ml) with normal saline following the recommended practice for injection into a human recipient, the contents appeared to wake up,come to life and get activate, revealing a profusion of various shapes of rods, key-shaped structures, and other formations within a few minutes. These new entities did not resemble any known, natural, or identifiable organic entities(Figure 5b —new Pfizer).”

And:

“Progressive death to sperm cells occurred within a few hours after exposure, even in low concentrations, to the various injectables. This rapid destruction of sperm cells did not align with our initial expectations, but the process was consistent with reactions observed in the blood specimens where we also saw less rapid but also progressive damage.”

Below: example of unidentified metallic nano-structure found in COVID vaccines by authors.


As usual Dr. John Campbell does an admirable job of boiling the study down into layman’s terms.
Dr. John Campbell discussion of study (view at Rumble)
<font size="4">

Official UK data has suggested that excess deaths around the world have been primarily among the vaccinated. And in May 2024, a world renown pathologist, Professor Dr. Arne Burkhardt MD, made a presentation at the European Parliament which estimated that in 77% of the autopsies he had performed at the request of families of persons who died unexpectedly after the vaccine, the vaccine “had an important effect on the death process.”

Excess Deaths in countries around the world have ranged from none to 38%. For 2021, the year of the vaccine roll-out and vaccine mandates, excess deaths in the US were 17.8%, and 9.8% in 2022.
In the US in the last quarter of 2021, excess deaths were up 40%, mostly among working age people.

Life insurance executive Scott Davison, CEO of insurance giant One America, said in January 2022:

“Just to give you an idea of how bad that is, a three-sigma or a one-in-200-year catastrophe would be 10% increase over pre-pandemic…So 40% is just unheard of.”

GLOBAL EXCESS DEATHS ALL-CAUSES 2020 – 2022. Source: “Excess mortality across countries in the Western World since the COVID-19 pandemic: ‘Our World in Data’ estimates of January 2020 to December 2022” (CLICK HERE FOR LARGER IMAGE)

COUNTRY		2020	2021	2022
Albania Australia Austria Belgium Bosnia and Herzegovina Bulgaria Canada Croatia Cyprus Czechia Denmark Estonia Faeroe Islands Finland France Germany Greece Greenland Hungary Iceland Ireland Italy Kosovo Latvia Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Moldova Monaco Montenegro Netherlands New Zealand North Macedonia Norway Poland Portugal Romania San Marino Serbia Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland UnitedKingdom UnitedStates		26.7% -2.1% 8.7% 15.7% 18.2% 14.3% 4.2% 9.6% 4.8% 13.2% -1.4% 0.7% -14.1% 0.8% 7.6% 2.6% 4.8% -4.6% 7.7% 0.6% 4.2% 15.5% 34.5% 2.0% 18.6% 14.5% 2.7% 7.0% 14.5% 5.2% 8.4% 8.5% -6.3% 28.2% -0.4% 13.9% 8.4% 13.1% 32.2% 15.5% 8.6% 13.8% 16.6% 8.3% 11.7% 12.8% 15.3%	40.7% 2.5% 8.9% 2.9% 34.8% 38.5% 4.1% 22.7% 14.6% 23.0% 2.8% 18.2% -1.2% 4.4% 5.3% 6.7% 14.2% -5.1% 19.6% 1.3% 8.3% 10.5% 30.8% 23.8% -0.1% 30.2% -1.8% 6.5% 30.3% 22.4% 36.3% 9.7% -1.5% 42.7% 3.3% 22.8% 9.9% 28.8% 19.2% 34.8% 36.9% 10.2% 6.4% 2.6% 5.0% 9.7% 17.8%	5.6% 12.8% 10.2% 6.6% 11.0% 11.4% 6.8% 12.6% 15.4% 4.4% 5.6% 10.6% 10.0% 13.4% 6.5% 9.5% 11.4% -8.4% 5.1% 16.1% 9.4% 11.2% -10.8% 8.7% 3.1% 17.9% -4.4% 6.0% 7.3% 10.8% 7.6% 7.7% 6.4% 12.4% 12.0% 5.5% 8.4% 4.0% -0.5% 10.3% 10.3% 4.6% 9.8% 5.5% 9.2% 7.6% 9.8%

Pathologist Dr. Arne Burkhardt, Dr. Arne Burkhardt, Universities of Hamburg, Berne and Tübingen. (view at Rumble) (Presentation slides)


A lawsuit filed in June 2024 by the Attorney General of the State of Kansas, Chris Kobach, against Pfizer for, among other things, destroying clinical trials data, and falsely claiming that its COVID vaccine prevented transmission from person to person, has been joined by four other states, Utah, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas.

In December of 2021 doctors and scientists, including a former Chief Science Officer for Pfizer, filed criminal complaint at the International Criminal Court in the Hague (ICC) which named Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla for Crimes Against Humanity."

[Brian4Liberty]

https://x.com/USAB4L/status/1833284858417913950

[WarriorLiberty]

https://x.com/USAB4L/status/1833284858417913950

Remember that time when Japan stopped the mRNA Moderna vaccine batches because they found black particles? whatever they were.

These black particles should not be in any vaxs.

[Anti Globalist]

Luckily I didn't take the Covid vaccine so I don't have to worry about these metallic structures.

[Voluntarist]

Has the study been replicated?

I ask because it's the sorry state of science these days. Studies tend to be peer reviewed by people who agree with the hypothesis that's being investigated. All the Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Climate Change studies have been "peer reviewed" - by people who believe in and have a vested interest in Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Climate Change being true.. Don't get me wrong, that's a good first step, particularly if the researcher seeks out reviewers who have that "test engineer" or "applied science" perspective of "I intend to break this thing". But that's seldom the case anymore.

Who were the "Peer Reviewers"? What comments did they make?

I mean, come on, one of the two authors of the study was Daniel Broudy, PhD, Professor of Applied Linguistics. That really should have raised red flags.

The other is Young Mi Lee, MD, Practicing Physician, Hanna Women’s Clinic, specializing in obstetrics and gynecology, and who is also a reproductive endocrinologist ... not a microbiologist. Oh, but she's considered an expert in stereomicroscopy ... which is another way of saying she's good at using low-powered binocular microscopes ... not the type of thing you'd be using to examine nanotechnology. They're talking about objects in the range of 1 to 100μm (that's millionths of a meter - electron microscope territory, not low powered binocular microscopes). Red flags all around.

[acptulsa]

Red flags all around.

At least they have the sense to admit they have no idea what they're looking at. They aren't using X-rays, so they have no idea if what they're seeing is metallic or biological. The 1960's style cartoon drawings don't help; it's almost like sites do things like that just to destroy their own credibility.

But as the vaxxed walk around growing "calamari" in their veins, it's hard to deny there's something weird growing out of those jabs.

[Valli6]

I remember this interesting episode from a 90s remake of the Outer Limits where a guy injects himself with experimental nano bots. At first it helps him - corrects his eyesight and starts curing his cancer - but then it starts doing things like making him have a lot of extra ribs to protect his inner organs.
"The New Breed" stars Richard Thomas (John-boy Walton).


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lxu0nyekpk0

Funny, I remember posting a comment elsewhere when the vaccines first came out saying something like, "Don't take the new vaccine! It's full of nano bots that stay in your system!" I was joking!

[Invisible Man]

The International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research is mainstream science.

Is it though?

I'm having a hard time figuring that out. The journal hasn't been around long.

I also notice that authors have to pay them a fee to publish their articles. Is that normal?

https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR

[Voluntarist]

Is it though?

I'm having a hard time figuring that out. The journal hasn't been around long.

I also notice that authors have to pay them a fee to publish their articles. Is that normal?

They're called Paper Mills.

In research, a paper mill is a business that publishes poor or fake journal papers that seem to resemble genuine research, as well as sells authorship.

There's an RPF thread on these types of Paper Mills: Study reveals scale of ‘science scam’ in academic publishing ... I saw the second post in that thread and thought of Tim Minchin's lyric, "So you want to live in paradise, with a ten foot c0ck and a few hundred virgins."

And then there was that other RPF thread with the research paper about "Fukushima meltdown appears to have sickened American infants" which turns out to have been published in one of those paper mills.

[luctor-et-emergo]

Is it though?

I'm having a hard time figuring that out. The journal hasn't been around long.

I also notice that authors have to pay them a fee to publish their articles. Is that normal?

https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR

Well, science is supposed to be a self cleaning thing. This might very well be peer-reviewed, but if all those peers have the same opinion, for now it might seem like sensible science. Until someone comes around that rebuts it, it should stand as science if it's anywhere legitimate. I've had a quick look, it does look like it's an organization that at least on the surface tries to do the right thing, but also seems to have an opinion on things. It's good for a scientist to have opinions, but when publishing research, it should be in a neutral way. But science would suffer if you do not allow people to publish their own papers, how good or bad they may be. In the end, all you learn in many years of university is to judge the quality of a paper, and some random stuff you most likely never use again.

And yes, paying to publish is rather normal.

[Brian4Liberty]

Contamination of injectable drugs and vaccines is nothing new. It is actually common. The question being is the contamination dangerous.

The fact that the Covid vaccines were an entirely new type of "vaccine", with a new manufacturing process, rushed, with little testing or history, increases the probability of contamination...



Particulate matter in injectable drug products

[Occam's Banana]

There's an RPF thread on these types of Paper Mills: Study reveals scale of ‘science scam’ in academic publishing ... I saw the second post in that thread and thought of Tim Minchin's lyric, "So you want to live in paradise, with a ten foot c0ck and a few hundred virgins."

I was going to post a link to that thread, but you beat me to it.

The link you provided is to the second page of the thread, however.

Here's the main thread link: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...mic-publishing

And here is a link to the post with the video you mentioned (on the second page, at 30 posts/page): http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...=1#post7219930

Also, just to note, that other thread is about more than just "paper mills". It's also about the falsification of data and other fraudulent or questionable practices in science and academia.