Originally Posted by
dannno
No, but Ivermectin has been shown in studies to be effective against a variety of parasites, viruses, bacteria and even cancer.
It has an impeccable safety profile and is extremely inexpensive, making it a veritable wonder drug of sorts.
It has even been given a Nobel Prize.
Here's an interesting use case. Apperently the blood of birds who take Ivermectin may be fatal to the moquito that carries West Nile Virus.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37348378/
Predicted reduction in transmission from deployment of ivermectin-treated birdfeeders for local control of West Nile virus
Karen M Holcomb 1, Chilinh Nguyen 2, Nicholas Komar 3, Brian D Foy 4, Nicholas A Panella 3, Marissa L Baskett 5, Christopher M Barker 6
Affiliations Expand
PMID: 37348378 PMCID: PMC10529638 DOI: 10.1016/j.epidem.2023.100697
Abstract
Ivermectin (IVM)-treated birds provide the potential for targeted control of Culex mosquitoes to reduce West Nile virus (WNV) transmission. Ingestion of IVM increases mosquito mortality, which could reduce WNV transmission from birds to humans and in enzootic maintenance cycles affecting predominantly bird-feeding mosquitoes and from birds to humans. This strategy might also provide an alternative method for WNV control that is less hampered by insecticide resistance and the logistics of large-scale pesticide applications. Through a combination of field studies and modeling, we assessed the feasibility and impact of deploying IVM-treated birdfeed in residential neighborhoods to reduce WNV transmission. We first tracked 105 birds using radio telemetry and radio frequency identification to monitor their feeder usage and locations of nocturnal roosts in relation to five feeder sites in a neighborhood in Fort Collins, Colorado. Using these results, we then modified a compartmental model of WNV transmission to account for the impact of IVM on mosquito mortality and spatial movement of birds and mosquitoes on the neighborhood level. We found that, while the number of treated lots in a neighborhood strongly influenced the total transmission potential, the arrangement of treated lots in a neighborhood had little effect. Increasing the proportion of treated birds, regardless of the WNV competency status, resulted in a larger reduction in infection dynamics than only treating competent birds. Taken together, model results indicate that deployment of IVM-treated feeders could reduce local transmission throughout the WNV season, including reducing the enzootic transmission prior to the onset of human infections, with high spatial coverage and rates of IVM-induced mortality in mosquitoes. To improve predictions, more work is needed to refine estimates of daily mosquito movement in urban areas and rates of IVM-induced mortality. Our results can guide future field trials of this control strategy.
Keywords: Bird dispersal; Endectocide; SEIR compartment model; Spatially implicit patch model; Vector control.
Connect With Us