Western Populations are Intentionally being Replaced

[LibertyEagle]

https://x.com/wallstreetsilv/status/1816868554014081110

[LibertyEagle]

UN Replacement Migration

https://www.un.org/development/desa/...tmigration.pdf

[LibertyEagle]

To be honest, this is one of the things that has always driven me nuts about the libertarian movement. No one I saw anyway was talking about this stuff. But, Rothbard knew about it and Ron Paul sure did.

[jkr]

i knew...

SHE KNEW...

[ClaytonB]

To be honest, this is one of the things that has always driven me nuts about the libertarian movement. No one I saw anyway was talking about this stuff. But, Rothbard knew about it and Ron Paul sure did.

Well, if the omnipotent welfare-warfare-State did not have trillions of dollars of cash printed up out of thin air to play all these endless political games with, they wouldn't matter. They'd be little more than peacocks ruffling their feathers at each other. While I agree that the border is an existential problem, we got here by blindly handing over the reins of power and essentially the entire wealth of our nation to the popular crowd, you know, the "cool kids" in high school. What did you think was going to happen? And when you resolve this particular existential crisis, what reason do you have to believe there won't just be another existential crisis behind it, at least as bad or worse?? The socialist playbook has not changed in over 200 years, read The Law by Bastiat or The Six Lessons by Mises. It's the same game repeated over-and-over-and-over, generation after generation, and yet we never learn, because the cool kids are just so damned cool -- obviously, we must blindly hand over the reins of power and our nation's wealth to them so they can squander it on whatever insanity happens to install itself in their minds in this generation. Maybe one day, if I give them enough power and wealth, a tiny spark of their coolness might happen to fall my way and, for a brief shining moment, someone somewhere might think that I'm one of the cool kids. Maybe!!!

[Intrepid]

Much easier to create a one world government if you get rid of borders, national identity, demographics and culture. Basically make the people of Earth just one homogenous population of humans with nothing that resembles a so-called "nation".

Our overlords will be here soon.

[69360]

The real problem is population collapse. American birthrate of 1.66 is below the replacement threshold. The real answer to this problem isn't stopping immigration it's convincing Americans to have more children.

If you are complaining about being replaced, did you do your part and have more than two children? I did.

[jkr]

The real problem is population collapse. American birthrate of 1.66 is below the replacement threshold. The real answer to this problem isn't stopping immigration it's convincing Americans to have more children.

If you are complaining about being replaced, did you do your part and have more than two children? I did.

YOU MUST HAVE A JOB...good for you

[WarriorLiberty]

i knew...

SHE KNEW...

Look at the French Opening Ceremony this was a mocking of the last supper of Jesus and a insult of two billion Christians.

[LibertyEagle]

Well, if the omnipotent welfare-warfare-State did not have trillions of dollars of cash printed up out of thin air to play all these endless political games with, they wouldn't matter. They'd be little more than peacocks ruffling their feathers at each other. While I agree that the border is an existential problem, we got here by blindly handing over the reins of power and essentially the entire wealth of our nation to the popular crowd, you know, the "cool kids" in high school. What did you think was going to happen? And when you resolve this particular existential crisis, what reason do you have to believe there won't just be another existential crisis behind it, at least as bad or worse?? The socialist playbook has not changed in over 200 years, read The Law by Bastiat or The Six Lessons by Mises. It's the same game repeated over-and-over-and-over, generation after generation, and yet we never learn, because the cool kids are just so damned cool -- obviously, we must blindly hand over the reins of power and our nation's wealth to them so they can squander it on whatever insanity happens to install itself in their minds in this generation. Maybe one day, if I give them enough power and wealth, a tiny spark of their coolness might happen to fall my way and, for a brief shining moment, someone somewhere might think that I'm one of the cool kids. Maybe!!!

Clayton, I read The Law when I was 15 years old and that was a long time ago. I have never been an advocate of giving government more power. In fact, I am not exactly a newbie here, and have said numerous times that as far as federal government goes, I want to get rid of every bit of it that is outside of it’s constitutional boundaries. Etc.

As far as the rest you said, if libertarians realized that being for open borders, they were carrying the water for those trying to destroy our country, would they have continued to hold that position?

Where you can get me is not being against Trump building the wall. I may very well be doing the same thing there. I think of these things often. A wall is a shortcut frustration of our government encouraging our country to be overrun. I know that. I very well could be carrying the globalists water on this issue. But, I will be honest. We let all this slide for so long, our back is up against the wall. If we do nothing at all, our country will most definitely be overthrown and soon.

[ClaytonB]

Clayton, I read The Law when I was 15 years old and that was a long time ago. I have never been an advocate of giving government more power. In fact, I am not exactly a newbie here, and have said numerous times that as far as federal government goes, I want to get rid of every bit of it that is outside of it’s constitutional boundaries. Etc.

I should have put a <vent> tag on that post, as it wasn't directed at you, personally. This "border issue" has suddenly become a "thing" where it was never a "thing" before the rise of the omnipotent welfare-State. Prior to WWII was America being overrun with illegals entering the border? Legal immigration to the US was certainly in high demand but, for some reason, we had no problems with border-crossers. Anyone venturing it was liable to be caught and either incarcerated or immediately deported. The point is there was no "flood" of "illegal border crossers" because those wanting to come here wanted to come here for freedom to work and build their own destiny legally. We didn't have a gold-plated welfare system attracting foreign crooks just looking to get on the dole. We've raised at least 2 or 3 generations of women to despise the idea of settled life, and so now the only way these women can be bred is by men with the morality of dogs. And we're absolutely mystified why we have foreigners, many of them crooks in their home-country, running the border gauntlet in order to get into the US by hook or by crook so they can be paid to breed American women who won't settle down and have children any other way than by being lured by animalistic lust. We are being served exactly the dinner we ordered. There is no mystery here and my "vent/rant" is towards those who keep trying to make the border some kind of libertarian issue, as though libertarianism is about being a pollyanna regarding the border. This is a total shifting of the subject, because the root cause of the border issue is not liberty, it is the out-of-control, omnipotent welfare-State! Stop paying foreigners to come here and impregnate US women that no American man in his right mind will start a family with, and the foreigners will stop coming here, legally or illegally!!

As far as the rest you said, if libertarians realized that being for open borders, they were carrying the water for those trying to destroy our country, would they have continued to hold that position?

It's just a distraction from the real issue, see above.

Where you can get me is not being against Trump building the wall. I may very well be doing the same thing there. I think of these things often. A wall is a shortcut frustration of our government encouraging our country to be overrun. I know that. I very well could be carrying the globalists water on this issue. But, I will be honest. We let all this slide for so long, our back is up against the wall. If we do nothing at all, our country will most definitely be overthrown and soon.

Sure, I'm in that same boat. I don't think the wall in itself actually solves anything. But sometimes the symbolic measures against something have to precede actual measures, just like soldiers on a battlefield putting on a display of strength before actually entering into battle. So, let him build his wall if that will get people aware of the actual issues and start thinking about how to actually put a stop to the problem. The wall is more like a speed-bump, but putting in the speed-bump might get people thinking about the changes we need to make so that the border won't be an issue, as it wasn't an issue before we built the omnipotent welfare-State in the US....

[LibertyEagle]

Texans could stop the invasion in Texas, if we weren’t stopped. And we have been more than once.

[Two.L]

Such is the power of a slow march through our institutions.