How they'll set Trump up to be be installed as dictator

[acptulsa]

How they'll set Trump up to be be installed as dictator...



J6.2.0 this time with Marines.

[Anti Federalist]

How they'll set Trump up to be be installed as dictator...



J6.2.0 this time with Marines.

The last paragraph of that article:

The scholars also warned that serious political instability and violence could ensue. That possibility was on Raskin’s mind, too. (Jamie Raskin-Israel-MD)

He conceded that the threat of violence could influence what Democrats do if Trump wins.

But, Raskin added, it wouldn’t necessarily stop them from trying to disqualify him.

“We might just decide that’s something we need to prepare for.”

[acptulsa]

They're pushing the predictive programming so hard, all they'll need to do is march Trump in with two Marines and Ray Epps, and addled libs will swear it's an insurrection. Nobody will even have to break a window.

[nobody's_hero]

They're pushing the predictive programming so hard, all they'll need to do is march Trump in with two Marines and Ray Epps, and addled libs will swear it's an insurrection. Nobody will even have to break a window.

J6.2.0 this time with Marines.

Let's suppose for a moment, that we just ignore them. They're trying to get a reaction out of us, but we're committed to not falling for it. We aren't going to give them what they want. They can keep pummeling us in the face, and we'll just grin because obviously they want us to throw a punch back so they can tell mom. Let's flip that around, and Go Ghandi on them. Any time someone steps on our neck, we just won't fight back.

Do you think doing that, in any way, inhibits the power-brokers from progressing with their agenda?
If we just sat still and silent, not reacting, I mean. . .

If the answer is no, then why bother being concerned that another Jan 6 might happen? If they're already going to spin the narrative how they want to (history shows this is the case), without any reaction or input from us, what does it really matter?

The vast majority of Trump supporters are patiently awaiting their opportunity to go out and vote for the man again, despite how much crap is being flung in their faces. Despite the fact that they already know someone is likely going to f*ck with their votes. Despite the fact that he may not even be on the ballot in November. All things considered, I would rate their tolerance levels equivalent to that of a special needs teacher in a classroom of autistic students.

I don't know how much more passive you expect people to be in the face of such blatant political oppression. But you sit here and mock people for uttering their discontent, as if they're playing right into the hands of the establishment.

[acptulsa]

I don't know how much more passive you expect people to be in the face of such blatant political oppression.

You aren't understanding me at all.

If you want revenge on those $#@!s, coalesce around Kennedy. Or somebody besides these two proven losers. Find someone who really isn't in their vest pocket.

Passive. Passive is refusing to even consider voting outside the two jackasses they want you to think are the only two choices. Passive is reelecting your congressman even though you don't approve of a damned thing Congress has done.

Passive? Me? I'm ready for us all to nut up and start making federal buildings look like the Davidian compound in Waco. Every IRS office in the nation and every branch of the Federal Reserve Bank ought to be fuel for toasting marshmallows. We can at least throw some damned tea overboard.

Rednecks are being a damned sight too passive to suit me these days. The only reason I don't disapprove of that entirely is, everyone's so caught up in the psyop they can't identify the real enemy.

I'm tired of people accusing me of practically approving of the mass importation of criminals, enforced lawlessness, the deliberate cultivation of racism, genuine Muslim-style genital mutilation, all of it. But killing the pawns don't win the chess game. They're about to hoodwink hypocrites who claim to value the Constitution into throwing it away.

I don't care to see $#@!libs win, but I don't hate them and want to $#@! up their game nearly as much as I want the people behind them, licking their chops over the power they're trying to get, to have their plans foiled and get their Nuremberg.

I don't mind mad if only we can aim it the right direction. The people behind this don't give a flying $#@! about gays, or blacks (hell, the more they stir blacks up against us, the more they shoot each other, and the bastards know that and cynically keep up the pressure), or confused children (who they obviously don't want to reproduce), or anything but their own arrogance and power. They're the ones that need comeuppance more than anyone else who ever lived.

Been patiently waiting to vote for Trump. Suckers.

[nobody's_hero]

You aren't understanding me at all.

If you want revenge on those $#@!s, coalesce around Kennedy. Or somebody besides these two proven losers. Find someone who really isn't in their vest pocket.

Passive. Passive is refusing to even consider voting outside the two jackasses they want you to think are the only two choices. Passive is reelecting your congressman even though you don't approve of a damned thing Congress has done.

Passive? Me? I'm ready for us all to nut up and start making federal buildings look like the Davidian compound in Waco. Every IRS office in the nation and every branch of the Federal Reserve Bank ought to be fuel for toasting marshmallows. We can at least throw some damned tea overboard.

Rednecks are being a damned sight too passive to suit me these days. The only reason I don't disapprove of that entirely is, everyone's so caught up in the psyop they can't identify the real enemy.

Kennedy is my backup plan.

And I'll bet you $10 to 1 that Kennedy has more favorability among Trump voters than liberals.

[acptulsa]

Kennedy is my backup plan.

And I'll bet you $10 to 1 that Kennedy has more favorability among Trump voters than liberals.

They used to call that "dollars to donuts". Since both Trump and Biden destroyed the currency and drained our wealth, donuts blew right by the dollar mark.

You're wrong. This is why they're working so hard in so many ways, on so many levels, to keep us from talking to each other in person. Democrats are disgusted, at least the sane ones are (yes, such creatures exist). You'd be surprised how many are completely disillusioned just by the jab, though that, too, does more to shut them up than stir them up. The shame, the embarrassment, the regret because they now have crapped out immune systems, droopy lips, heart problems. The disillusionment both over the institutions they had faith in and their own lack of any good reason to be as arrogant as they have been. The people they've lost to the jab, and the family members who have disowned them over the arrogant maneuvers they executed against the "nonbelievers" in their family. Not to mention that the Almighty DNC won't allow them to opt out of the senile molester, this joke they call "leader". They're paralyzed by shame, even as the shills and the insane among their ranks make more noise than ever.

They aren't half as happy with their lot as you think.

There's only one thing standing between Kennedy and the White House. It's also what's standing between us and restoring liberty:

[nobody's_hero]

They aren't half as happy with their lot as you think.

And as I've said before, they need to prove it.

It's difficult for you to see, because you've established the basis that Trump is unquestionably one of them. If that's your foundation, then nothing I could argue would sway you in the least.

But, let's suppose for a moment that Trump was removed from the equation entirely (imagine he never won in 2016, and he isn't running for office).

—There's still a large remnant of the GOP voter base that reflexively seeks out the least-establishment politician they can find (they might get it *wrong* according to you, but the intent is there).

I am not seeing any such behavior from the left. The one politician they had who was anti-establishment (RFK,jr) was drummed out of the primary contest before it even began, to thunderous applause.

[acptulsa]

I am not seeing any such behavior from the left.

Of course not. A childlike faith in Daddy Government makes them what they are.

Ultimately the real problem is the deadly sin of vanity, and they're playing that to the hilt. Nobody wants to admit that everything they have faith in is the devil incarnate. Not to others. Not to themselves.

This is a nation of lost brats, clinging the their arrogance, afraid they might have to think for themselves. Got news for you. Democrats don't see any of that from y'all, either. Yes, Republicans love bad boys, provided they're famous. But the bad boys they never heard of, those Who Must Not Be Named? Most of your fellow Republicans sneer at them. You remember a guy named Ron Paul, right? If the MSM refuses to splode their pointed heads about them every damned say, Republicans can't even consider them.

The MSM learned that from Reagan. They've had plenty of time to plan this psyop.

[nobody's_hero]

Most of your fellow Republicans sneer at them. You remember a fellow named Ron Paul, right?

The one that is viewed more favorably by Trump supporters than [insert stereotypical neocon candidate (such as Haley)] supporters?

Is he in the race?

[acptulsa]

The one that is viewed more favorably by Trump supporters than...

This is my point.

Everyone's too busy making excuses for their teammates and themselves to take a hard look at the situation. The situation is, we're being $#@!ed. Hard. Who $#@!ing cares if these people are right that the massive evil isn't as bad as that gargantuan evil over there? Want a $#@!ing medal?

I don't want a medal. I want liberty. That's going to take some clear thinking.

[acptulsa]

People get caught up in personalities. Soap operas are much too popular. The 'net is full of quotes that are funny, or snappy, or ballsy, from The Maltese Falcon. But you can't find the quotes full of wisdom. Fortunately, the book has a home on my shelf.

That is an attitude, sir, that calls for the most delicate judgement on both sides, because, as you know, sir, men are likely to forget in the heat of action where their best interest lies and let their emotions carry them away.

That is why they're keeping the heat on and throwing everything they can think of at us which might make us emotional. It's a cold calculation on their part, designed to keep us from being rational about this, and it's working.

[acptulsa]

There are one hell of a lot of shills and useful idiots out there autistically screeching, "You have to vote for Biden or we'll get the second worst president in history!!" or, "You have to vote for Trump or we'll still be stuck with the worst president in history!!" And that's what they are, the two worst presidents in history.

There are no actual prizes in this Cracker Jack box. Just popcorn and nuts.

But if you go have that conversation and look between the noisy shills, or have it in person with Democrat voters whose hair isn't quite titty pink or the color of moss, you'll hear it. This isn't an election, it's an episode of The Biggest Loser.

Everyone's so afraid they'll get their own rights trampled they can't see that "their" candidate is trying to trample the rights of others. Nobody even stops to consider the possibility of finding someone who isn't trying to create a protected (or even a spoiled) class, but wants everyone to be free. That is the folly that is destroying all of us, and everything we've built.

You can only get as much liberty as you give.

[Swordsmyth]

If you want revenge on those $#@!s, coalesce around Kennedy.

You mean the CIA candidate who is an extreme leftist that advocates locking up his political opposition, seizing guns from people a bureaucrat secretly puts on a no fly list for no reason, and only started to give lip service on a couple of issues when he was preparing to run?

[Swordsmyth]

The thread title is delusional projection.
Casting a plan to install some Dem approved candidate as a dictator as a plan to install Trump as a dictator.

[susano]

This must be how it felt when Rome was collapsing.

[unknown]

I don't understand the panic/worry.

Biden is the most popular President in history, easy win.

[acptulsa]

You mean the CIA candidate...

LOLOL

Delusional.



The CIA candidates are the president and ex-president who were already in charge of the CIA as an Executive Branch agency and did exactly nothing to curb it.

These two jackasses--that includes yours, just in case you're having trouble counting to two today--are known quantities. Neither did a damned thing to fix problems, and both made things worse.

[Swordsmyth]

LOLOL

Delusional.



The CIA candidates are the president and ex-president who were already in charge of the CIA as an Executive Branch agency and did exactly nothing to curb it.

These two jackasses--that includes yours, just in case you're having trouble counting to two today--are known quantities. Neither did a damned thing to fix problems, and both made things worse.

The CIA went to extreme lengths to destroy Trump and keep him from being able to do anything.

RFK picked them to run his campaign:

[acptulsa]

I think it's hilarious that you don't even seem to read the headlines you post.

[Swordsmyth]

I think it's hilarious that you don't even seem to read the headlines you post.

I think it's hilarious that you believe in EX CIA operatives.
Especially one whose book portrays the agency glowingly.

[acptulsa]

I think it's hilarious that you believe in EX CIA operatives.

I've met them.

Especially one whose book portrays the agency glowingly.

It's a pitiful thing, but I do actually put a tiny bit more faith in CIA press releases than in your relentless, regurgitated zerohedge spam.

[Swordsmyth]

I've met them.

At the CIA class reunion?

It's a pitiful thing, but I do actually put a tiny bit more faith in CIA press releases than in your relentless, regurgitated zerohedge spam.

So it was at the reunion.

[Anti Federalist]

We are not voting our way out of this $#@!storm.

[acptulsa]

And yet, somewhere deep down inside, we all know that if they really did want him gone, he already would be.

[Anti Globalist]

The only thing Trump is being set up for is throwing the election and wrecking the GOP so bad that even when they are forced to move on from him they'll still be losing elections until the end of time.

[Swordsmyth]

Obvious TDS delusion is obvious.

[acptulsa]

Obvious TDS delusion is obvious.

We all learned that by observing you long ago.

[CCTelander]

We are not voting our way out of this $#@!storm.

^^^^THIS is a fact.^^^^

[acptulsa]

^^^^THIS is a fact.^^^^

True. But that does not mean that this upcoming vote isn't potentially very important as a first step.

Let's just call it a push since you seem to view this exchange as some sort of competition. It's not. I am looking for soluitions and you have provided bupkis in spite of the seemingly big talk to the contrary. I have no idea what your purpose is here, but it is not on the same planet as mine.

Somebody ought to teach you the difference between an assessment of a situation and a solution to a problem. One must do the one to have any hope of doing the other. But when one tries to put the horse before the cart, you just cry that you can't handle the truth, and need to be shown a way out before you can look dispassionately at the trouble.

I don't know if there is a way out. It's a neat trap. But I can think of a promising strategy: Vote Kennedy.

Oh, I'll go for another independent or third party candidate, if a more promising one can be found. But the plan is, pick one and convince some thirty percent of the voting public that they have nothing left to lose by trying. Which is true.

Their idea is, steal it "for Biden" in an even more obvious manner than 2020. Since they have purposely made his administration a nightmare of Biblical proportions, it'll have to be plenty obvious. The number of sane people who want more of the same is vanishingly small, and shrinking. Which they're depending on; their plan needs people to prefer eating glass to suffering Biden to live. Then after their blood lust is sated for the moment by the ugly aftermath, install King Trussolini I.

And if they obviously steal it for Biden while Kennedy is doing just about as well as Trump is? How can they be sure we will let them declare (even as their hand is still in the cookie jar) that Trump was really the one that really won? "Oh, trust us. Yeah, we just lied our asses off about Biden getting any votes at all. But you can believe us when we say more of you voted for Trump than that guy. Trust our lying asses." Will they risk causing us to demand RFKJr? Or will they just skip their intended step? You know. The step where they convince us that elections are quaint anachronisms that we can't trust anyway. Will they instead, probably just as obviously, steal it for Trump in the middle of the night with the mail-in votes of dead Democrats? Because they'll have to use what they're already setting up to do it, and their current plan is seemingly to be anything but subtle stealing it.

What then? If Kennedy is running as hot as either of their puppets, how can they keep the tail from wagging the dog? If nothing else, certain things will certainly be obvious by then, won't they?

One thing is certain. Making Kennedy a serious contender will cool their jets where cancelling all future elections is concerned. They won't work to install that anti-jabber for life. And that, my man, is a plan that might really and truly stop the Constitution from bleeding out in time.

The New York Times has zero credibility. Let that soak in. They've been burning the candle at both ends for a while now. They have used up every scrap of the legacy media's credibility, the CDC's credibility, the Ivy League's credibility. They have completely consumed, discredited and discarded a great many of their most effective tools. They have to go for broke, and if they don't win, they won't have much left to rebuild with. Being wreckers, rebuilding isn't exactly their strong suit to begin with. How much would it take to prevent the outcome they're after? Do we really have to cause them to fall on their faces? Or is this thing so tight that we need only trip them enough to stumble to stop them?

If Trump had stayed in office, all this devaluation from his Warp Speed borrowing would be hitting while he was in the driver's seat, and it would be his press secretary making excuses for it and pretending it's not debilitating. By stealing that election, somebody did him a huge favor. Reconcile that with your theory that I'm just a crackpot, if you can. No wonder he appointed Goofy 9iu11ani to screw up the recount.

You accused me of not being solutions-oriented, but you're the one constantly posting black-pill essays about how Americans are too corrupt to save ourselves. Well, you know, people can be so vain that they can't admit that someone they trusted wasn't worthy of trust. I saw Nixon voters still defending his ass in 1983. And others can be so spiteful that they'll support Candidate X just to drive their least favorite in-law nuts.

But you know what? I think the theory is worth testing. Can the reasonable people who normally agree to disagree get together behind Kennedy? Or is that too adult a thing to expect?