Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 31 to 50 of 50

Thread: Gun grabbers are not impressive people

  1. #31



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #32
    These clowns really do think words are magical incantations that have the power to shape and change reality.

    https://x.com/JamesTate121/status/1812474974675825129



  4. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  5. #33
    Quote Originally Posted by Occam's Banana View Post
    Scientists must have figured out how to load a Super Bass-O-Matic into a gun.


  6. #34

  7. #35
    Quote Originally Posted by Occam's Banana View Post
    My uncle is an ex-Navy Seal sniper and he told me a single round from an AK-15 will turn a man into a fine, red mist...
    Jer. 11:18-20. "The Kingdom of God has come upon you." -- Matthew 12:28

  8. #36

  9. #37
    THREAD: Anti-Gun Politician Injures Reporter While Shooting At Gun Range

    Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
    Anti-Gun Politician Injures Reporter While Shooting At Gun Range
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d5r1hnNPJcI
    {Colion Noir | 24 October 2024}

    "AR-15s Are weapons of war" Democrat Candidate Lucas Kunce thought he'd show off his gun-handling chops in a campaign stunt. He went out to a shooting range, firing at STEEL targets from a comically close distance of 10-12 yards with reporters, and that's when things went sideways.

    As Kunce fired, a reporter was struck in the arm by a bullet fragment ricocheting off the steel targets.

    Democrat Lance Kunce is the same guy who campaigned against AR-15s during a 2001 campaign run.

    Anyone who knows firearms knows shooting an AR at a steel target within 50 yards is going to cause bullet fragments to fly back.

    But Shooting an AR at a steel target from 10-12 yards is just dumb.

    His goal was to show his expertise with guns, but all he did was demonstrate a lack of understanding about the realities of shooting steel.

    What's crazy is one of the guys wasn't even wearing eye protection during some of this.

    So here’s a reminder to everyone: always wear your eye protection. It’s not just a suggestion; it keeps incidents like this from worsening.


  10. #38
    Quote Originally Posted by Occam's Banana View Post
    The Fudd Brigade is out in force this season.

    https://x.com/gunpolicy/status/1765745385316765921


    Quote Originally Posted by Brian4Liberty View Post

    https://x.com/memejority/status/1845279366701306301
    The Bastiat Collection · FREE PDF · FREE EPUB · PAPER
    Frédéric Bastiat (1801-1850)

    • "When law and morality are in contradiction to each other, the citizen finds himself in the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense, or of losing his respect for the law."
      -- The Law (p. 54)
    • "Government is that great fiction, through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
      -- Government (p. 99)
    • "[W]ar is always begun in the interest of the few, and at the expense of the many."
      -- Economic Sophisms - Second Series (p. 312)
    • "There are two principles that can never be reconciled - Liberty and Constraint."
      -- Harmonies of Political Economy - Book One (p. 447)

    · tu ne cede malis sed contra audentior ito ·

  11. #39
    Quote Originally Posted by Occam's Banana View Post
    The Fudd Brigade is out in force this season.

    https://x.com/gunpolicy/status/1765745385316765921
    “Safe gun storage”? IIRC that means loaded with a full magazine and one in the pipe, and within easy reach in case anything bad happens so as to cause you to need it. Don’t think we need a law to mandate that.
    Chris

    "Government ... does not exist of necessity, but rather by virtue of a tragic, almost comical combination of klutzy, opportunistic terrorism against sitting ducks whom it pretends to shelter, plus our childish phobia of responsibility, praying to be exempted from the hard reality of life on life's terms." Wolf DeVoon

    "...Make America Great Again. I'm interested in making American FREE again. Then the greatness will come automatically."Ron Paul

  12. #40
    Quote Originally Posted by CCTelander View Post
    “Safe gun storage”? IIRC that means loaded with a full magazine and one in the pipe, and within easy reach in case anything bad happens so as to cause you to need it. Don’t think we need a law to mandate that.
    No, no, you clearly don't understand.

    "The bottom line: Basic gun safety is about curbing gun violence, protecting our loved ones, and keeping guns out of the wrong hands."

    You see, if armed robbers, gang-bangers, school shooters, and other criminals would only practice "basic gun safety" (as defined and mandated by federal law and Tim Walz Captain Fudd), then gun violence would be curbed, our loved ones would be protected, and guns would be kept out of the wrong hands.



  13. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  14. #41
    Quote Originally Posted by Occam's Banana View Post
    No, no, you clearly don't understand.

    "The bottom line: Basic gun safety is about curbing gun violence, protecting our loved ones, and keeping guns out of the wrong hands."

    You see, if armed robbers, gang-bangers, school shooters, and other criminals would only practice "basic gun safety" (as defined and mandated by federal law and Tim Walz Captain Fudd), then gun violence would be curbed, our loved ones would be protected, and guns would be kept out of the wrong hands.

    “Wrong hands”? You mean like your left hand if you’re right-handed? But I was always taught to practice with your weak hand too, just in case.

    This stuff is just confusing.
    Chris

    "Government ... does not exist of necessity, but rather by virtue of a tragic, almost comical combination of klutzy, opportunistic terrorism against sitting ducks whom it pretends to shelter, plus our childish phobia of responsibility, praying to be exempted from the hard reality of life on life's terms." Wolf DeVoon

    "...Make America Great Again. I'm interested in making American FREE again. Then the greatness will come automatically."Ron Paul

  15. #42
    Quote Originally Posted by CCTelander View Post
    “Wrong hands”? You mean like your left hand if you’re right-handed? But I was always taught to practice with your weak hand too, just in case.

    This stuff is just confusing.
    It is really complicated, isn't it, comrade.

    We should probably just mind our labors, and leave matters of the State to Tim Walz Captain Fudd.

  16. #43

  17. #44

  18. #45

  19. #46

  20. #47
    Quote Originally Posted by Occam's Banana View Post

    He was probably persuaded by the following back in the day:


    Why Did it Have to be ... Guns?


    By L. Neil Smith. June 29,2021 (lneil@netzero.com)
    PATREON:https://www.patreon.com/lneilsmith
    Attributed to L.Neil Smith's The Libertarian Enterprise
    [Author's note: I first wrote this several years ago, during the the Obama regime, and it's no less true today than it was then. Look for a link to it at the top of every issue of _L. Neil Smith's The Libertarian Enterprise_.] Article Source Page
    smalline

    Over the past 30 years, I’ve been paid to write almost two million words, every one of which, sooner or later, came back to the issue of guns and gun-ownership. Naturally, I’ve thought about the issue a lot, and it has always determined the way I vote.

    People accuse me of being a single-issue writer, a single-issue thinker, and a single-issue voter, but it isn’t true. What I’ve chosen, in a world where there’s never enough time and energy, is to focus on the one political issue which most clearly and unmistakably demonstrates what any politician—or political philosophy—is made of, right down to the creamy liquid center.

    Make no mistake: all politicians—even those ostensibly on the side of guns and gun ownership—hate the issue and anyone, like me, who insists on bringing it up. They hate it because it’s an X-ray machine. It’s a Vulcan mind-meld. It’s the ultimate test to which any politician—or political philosophy—can be put.

    If a politician isn’t perfectly comfortable with the idea of his average constituent, any man, woman, or responsible child, walking into a hardware store and paying cash—for any rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything—without producing ID or signing one scrap of paper, he isn’t your friend no matter what he tells you.

    If he isn’t genuinely enthusiastic about his average constituent stuffing that weapon into a purse or pocket or tucking it under a coat and walking home without asking anybody’s permission, he’s a four-flusher, no matter what he claims.

    What his attitude—toward your ownership and use of weapons—conveys is his real attitude about you. And if he doesn’t trust you, then why in the name of John Moses Browning should you trust him?

    If he doesn’t want you to have the means of defending your life, do you want him in a position to control it?

    If he makes excuses about obeying a law he’s sworn to uphold and defend—the highest law of the land, the Bill of Rights—do you want to entrust him with anything?

    If he ignores you, sneers at you, complains about you, or defames you, if he calls you names only he thinks are evil—like "Constitutionalist"—when you insist that he account for himself, hasn’t he betrayed his oath, isn’t he unfit to hold office, and doesn’t he really belong in jail?

    Sure, these are all leading questions. They’re the questions that led me to the issue of guns and gun ownership as the clearest and most unmistakable demonstration of what any given politician—or political philosophy—is really made of.

    He may lecture you about the dangerous weirdos out there who shouldn’t have a gun—but what does that have to do with you? Why in the name of John Moses Browning should you be made to suffer for the misdeeds of others? Didn’t you lay aside the infantile notion of group punishment when you left public school—or the military? Isn’t it an essentially European notion, anyway—Prussian, maybe—and certainly not what America was supposed to be all about?

    And if there are dangerous weirdos out there, does it make sense to deprive you of the means of protecting yourself from them? Forget about those other people, those dangerous weirdos, this is about you, and it has been, all along.

    Try it yourself: if a politician won’t trust you, why should you trust him? If he’s a man—and you’re not—what does his lack of trust tell you about his real attitude toward women? If "he" happens to be a woman, what makes her so perverse that she’s eager to render her fellow women helpless on the mean and seedy streets her policies helped create? Should you believe her when she says she wants to help you by imposing some infantile group health care program on you at the point of the kind of gun she doesn’t want you to have?

    On the other hand—or the other party—should you believe anything politicians say who claim they stand for freedom, but drag their feet and make excuses about repealing limits on your right to own and carry weapons? What does this tell you about their real motives for ignoring voters and ramming through one infantile group trade agreement after another with other countries?

    Makes voting simpler, doesn’t it? You don’t have to study every issue—health care, international trade—all you have to do is use this X-ray machine, this Vulcan mind-meld, to get beyond their empty words and find out how politicians really feel. About you. And that, of course, is why they hate it.

    And that’s why I’m accused of being a single-issue writer, thinker, and voter.

    But it isn’t true, is it?
    https://jpfo.org/smith/smith-why-hav...htm?awt_a=A4_P

    A classic that deserves to be revisited from time to time.
    Chris

    "Government ... does not exist of necessity, but rather by virtue of a tragic, almost comical combination of klutzy, opportunistic terrorism against sitting ducks whom it pretends to shelter, plus our childish phobia of responsibility, praying to be exempted from the hard reality of life on life's terms." Wolf DeVoon

    "...Make America Great Again. I'm interested in making American FREE again. Then the greatness will come automatically."Ron Paul

  21. #48
    Quote Originally Posted by Occam's Banana View Post
    Last time I went hunting with cap guns, I didn't hit anything
    It's all about taking action and not being lazy. So you do the work, whether it's fitness or whatever. It's about getting up, motivating yourself and just doing it.
    - Kim Kardashian

    Donald Trump / Crenshaw 2024!!!!

    My pronouns are he/him/his



  22. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  23. #49
    Quote Originally Posted by Occam's Banana View Post
    Didn't Alex Jones get fined a billion dollars for saying this?
    WHAT THE F*** DID YOU THINK​ WAS GOING TO HAPPEN???

  24. #50
    Quote Originally Posted by TheTexan View Post
    Last time I went hunting with cap guns, I didn't hit anything
    Maybe you need to resight them. Or get a scope.

    (Or maybe you're just a really bad shot.)

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12


Similar Threads

  1. How to fight the gun-grabbers:
    By Matt Collins in forum Grassroots Central
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-28-2023, 07:46 PM
  2. Another victory against gun grabbers
    By Acala in forum Second Amendment
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-13-2014, 03:55 PM
  3. I've had enough of these gun grabbers; have you?
    By Neil Desmond in forum Second Amendment
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 09-20-2013, 07:02 AM
  4. Gun Grabbers Go Wild!
    By tangent4ronpaul in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 02-16-2011, 08:37 PM
  5. 3rd out of 12 is impressive
    By dude58677 in forum Grassroots Central
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-28-2009, 06:13 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •