Judge Rules Trump Committed Fraud, Stripping Control of Key Properties

[dannno]

No, the folks who are retarded are those who make knee-jerk assertions without knowing all of the facts. Also retarded is anyone who would pay $600 million for a property with these restrictions.

Tell that to Forbes.. they literally said the basis from the Judge was on the tax assessed value, it's actually worth around $450-$650 million, people involved with the deal (from the bank) testified there was no fraud, the loans were all paid back and everything Trump did was completely normal for this type of business deal.

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

Any Person treated like Trump is getting treated is getting harassed and railroaded.

When did these transactions take place? What about statute of limitations?

[Sonny Tufts]

This changes nothing. Obviously, a new owner could remove those easements

Hardly. When you place a conservation easement or other similar restrictions on property they are binding on all future owners. In Property Law 101 it's called restrictions that "run with the land".

[acptulsa]

Hardly. When you place a conservation easement or other similar restrictions on property they are binding on all future owners. In Property Law 101 it's called restrictions that "run with the land".

All?

So, no easement has ever been removed? Ever?

Nothing like a few insults to one's intelligence with one's coffee.

[Sonny Tufts]

All?

So, no easement has ever been removed? Ever?

Nothing like a few insults to one's intelligence with one's coffee.

You might want to read up on the history of Trump's conservation easement.

https://www.palmbeachpost.com/story/...ew/3572915001/

[Occam's Banana]

https://twitter.com/Travis_in_Flint/...66811689439248

[Anti Federalist]

https://twitter.com/Travis_in_Flint/...66811689439248

Always helps to have "hates white people" on your resume as well.

Equal justice my aching ass.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1717030987060727999

[Sonny Tufts]

Trump has been fined $10,000 for violating the court's order not to refer to court personnel, in this instance the judge's clerk. Although Trump claimed he was referring to Michael Cohen and not the clerk, the judge said, ""As the trier of fact, I find that the witness [Trump] is not credible."

This is Trump's second violation of the order; he was fined $5,000 for the first one. After the second, the judge told Trump "Don't do it again or it will be worse."

https://www.reuters.com/legal/donald...al-2023-10-25/