Taking things from white people

[Occam's Banana]

Whoever at that "National Conservative" wrote that is a pathetic hypocrite and what's wrong with America. He is literally accepting that modified full-auto's are illegal, which should not be, as outlined in the 2nd Amendment, [...]

They are illegal (whether they should be or not).

Merely saying so does not necessarily make one "accepting" of it (in the sense of approving or endorsing it).

[...] and then he proceeds to want to prosecute people with "illegally" modified guns.

I must have missed that part. Can you tell me where he expressed that he wants that? Maybe he really does want that - I can't say with any certainty that he doesn't - but if so, I can't see where he actually said (or even implied) such a thing. He merely said that the state senators to whom he referred do not want that, but that they simultaneously do want to prohibit non-criminals from owning lawful handguns.

As far as I can tell, "National Conservative" is correct in everything he actually explicitly said. Gun-grabbing statists don't really give a damn about criminals with guns, because criminals with guns don't really pose any threat to them. It's the non-criminals with guns that they fear and despise.

[Anti Federalist]

Whoever at that "National Conservative" wrote that is a pathetic hypocrite and what's wrong with America. He is literally accepting that modified full-auto's are illegal, which should not be, as outlined in the 2nd Amendment, and then he proceeds to want to prosecute people with "illegally" modified guns.

And then we have "National Conservative" followers who Pete and Repeat this pathetic crap.

I remember years ago raising the issue that CCW, Full-Auto's and Suppressors should not require any permit/paperwork, but the chest-thumping "republicans" pulled out their cards, displayed them and told me that I was a lunatic. Well, they deserve just what they get.

If the "republicans" across this country would have fought back years ago [instead of playing "show and tell" with their CCW and other cool licensing], the 2 far-left senators wouldn't have anything to ban. And we would be on stronger footing to put a quicker stop to it.

All he's doing is pointing out the fact that often there is no prosecution for "gun crimes", but yet there will be leftists who will attempt to disarm everybody.

But beyond that, you're right, the last restrictions to roll back will be those in the 1934 NFA, which is why I support GOA and FPC.

Thread: SCOTUS will hear FPC's "ATF 'frame or receiver' rule" lawsuit (VanDerStok v. Garland)

[PAF]

They are illegal (whether they should be or not).

Merely saying so does not necessarily make one "accepting" of it (in the sense of approving or endorsing it).



I must have missed that part. Can you tell me where he expressed that he wants that? Maybe he really does want that - I can't say with any certainty that he doesn't - but if so, I can't see where he actually said (or even implied) such a thing. He merely said that the state senators to whom he referred do not want that, but that they simultaneously do want to prohibit non-criminals from owning lawful handguns.

As far as I can tell, "National Conservative" is correct in everything he actually explicitly said. Gun-grabbing statists don't really give a damn about criminals with guns, because criminals with guns don't really pose any threat to them. It's the non-criminals with guns that they fear and despise.

...that illegally modify their handguns...

I admit to dropping the ball on forming coherent sentences at times, but for somebody who works for an organization and has followers, I would expect that he would word things better/differently. To me he is accepting of the fact, whether it is/isn't/should be/shouldn't be. I personally have been in the front line for years harping on gun rights so this is something that hits a huge ass nerve with me.

Anyway... carry on.


Edit: Upon thinking about your statement: "They are illegal (whether they should be or not)." Is that because the 2nd Amendment says so? Or because some politician wrote something contrary to the 2ndA and stoopid gun-owners follow it like sheep?

[Anti Federalist]

https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1792294685546823746

[Occam's Banana]

Edit: Upon thinking about your statement: "They are illegal (whether they should be or not)." Is that because the 2nd Amendment says so? Or because some politician wrote something contrary to the 2ndA and stoopid gun-owners follow it like sheep?

It's because people with the will and wherewithal to do so will use force (or credible threats of force) against those who do not comply with their wishes. Neither the 2nd Amendment nor any other thing "some politician[s] wrote" really has anything to do with it, except as window dressing.

[PAF]

It's because people with the will and wherewithal to do will use force (or credible threats of force) against those who do not comply with their wishes.

Neither the 2nd Amendment nor any other thing "some politician[s] wrote" really has anything to do with it, except as window dressing.

...

I remember years ago raising the issue that CCW, Full-Auto's and Suppressors should not require any permit/paperwork, but the chest-thumping "republicans" pulled out their cards, displayed them and told me that I was a lunatic. Well, they deserve just what they get.

If the "republicans" across this country would have fought back years ago [instead of playing "show and tell" with their CCW and other cool licensing], the 2 far-left senators wouldn't have anything to ban. And we would be on stronger footing to put a quicker stop to it.

[Occam's Banana]

...

"[...] far-left senators wouldn't have anything to ban."

Of course they would.

The absence of CCW licensure (or any other rights-limiting schemes) certainly wouldn't thwart or stymie them.

If anything, it would just goad them into trying to impose something even worse.

[PAF]

"[...] far-left senators wouldn't have anything to ban."

Of course they would.

A litmus test; to see how far arm-less people can push armed people around.

The absence of CCW licensure (or any other rights-limiting schemes) certainly wouldn't thwart or stymie them.

A litmus test; to see how far arm-less people can push armed people around.

If anything, it would just goad them into trying to impose something even worse.

A litmus test; to see how far arm-less people can push armed people around.


But, I'm sure the attorney's will work something out.

[Anti Federalist]

[Anti Federalist]

//

[PAF]

//

Too many corporations that people deal with on a day-to-day basis are merged with government, and partnered with the WEF. People are not going to boycott business that they work for, or do business every day with, it doesn't matter who is elected, R or D, they are preselected/preapproved and will continue the Agenda.

If there ever is a civil war, or a world war for that matter, people will forced to take things as local as possible. The problem is, all of this can avoided if people did that now. But they won't. They simply aren't extremist enough, nor do they want to be, even if it leads to the cure.

Government is not going to save you. All of this dems did this! repubs did that! doesn't matter, the people are still going to go along with it all and vote, believing that it will actually make a difference.

So, there ya go.

[unknown]

[Anti Federalist]

https://x.com/ramzpaul/status/1793293863295098905

[acptulsa]

[Brian4Liberty]

Taking things from white black people

https://x.com/Jerone4Congress/status...00948164972546

[Anti Federalist]

https://x.com/FrankDeScushin/status/1793668248015454304

[Anti Federalist]

The story of Yakub, told in comic book form.

I have no idea if this is ironic, comic, serious or tongue in cheek.

Still a fun read.

I can recall, way back in a mostly all black high school, a young Nation of Islam follower preaching this to me and using it as justification to kill every white person on earth.

https://x.com/smackfrank/status/1727316024163496355

https://x.com/smackfrank/status/1727316032413749735

https://x.com/smackfrank/status/1727316040483545263

https://x.com/smackfrank/status/1727316048289120756

https://x.com/smackfrank/status/1727396560571617712

https://x.com/smackfrank/status/1727396569853387212

https://x.com/smackfrank/status/1727396592636866655

[Anti Federalist]

https://twitter.com/NatCon2022/statu...14241988976679

[TheTexan]

https://x.com/Jerone4Congress/status...00948164972546

That's some massive trolling right there

[Anti Federalist]

[Anti Federalist]

[Anti Federalist]

https://twitter.com/classicsgroyp/st...66788517216418

[Anti Federalist]

https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/stat...82622164758987

[Occam's Banana]

And this year's Darwin Award goes to...

This guy coulda been a contender - but he didn't die (so I guess that makes him ... what? a dishonorable mention?):

https://x.com/YayAreaNews/status/1794032354970989030

Man survives after SUV explodes when he tried lighting up a cigarette inside
https://www.cbsnews.com/losangeles/n...s-parking-lot/
{Matthew Rodriguez | 24 May 2024}

A man tried lighting up a cigarette in his SUV with propane canisters inside, leading to a sudden explosion with the vehicle flying into pieces in Van Nuys Thursday, according to the Los Angeles Police Department.

Firefighters and police rushed to a supermarket parking lot in the 7200 block of Van Nuys Boulevard after receiving a call about an SUV that exploded around 10:30 p.m., police said. When first responders arrived, the man inside the vehicle told them he had been trying to light a cigarette when the explosion happened.

He suffered minor injuries and was taken to a nearby hospital, according to LAPD.

Investigators with the agency determined it was a propane explosion

Pieces of the parked vehicle flew in every direction, one of which lodged into a nearby tree. The explosion left the Toyota SUV mostly in just mangled pieces. The sound of the explosion could be heard at least a few blocks away, according to man who lives around the corner from the parking lot, who said it was "like an earthquake rattling the windows."

"But it was gone as soon as it started," said Ken Smith, adding that he looked out his window and saw his neighbors standing outside their home and looking around after the loud boom.

LAPD closed the parking lot following the detonation.

No other details have been released by authorities.

[unknown]

[acptulsa]

Nobody is better at destroying the good things that white people have done than white people are. Nobody.

[Anti Federalist]

[Anti Federalist]

https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1794509388993933752

[Anti Federalist]

https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/stat...02356485148823

[Anti Federalist]

https://twitter.com/NatCon2022/statu...28796923560092