Taking things from white people

[Anti Federalist]

Because she's a nonwhite foreigner. Having her in the country is resulting in white genocide.

Edit: She's even married to a white man, and they have three mixed race children together.

Oh, right, I get you what you're saying.

Just goes to show, you have no clue as to what I am on about.

I say what is not supposed to be said, I notice that which is not to be noticed, I support that which is not to be supported.

Therefore, due to the conditioning all around us, you can come to no logical conclusion other than I'm just a gap toothed hillbilly racist.

So I would not expect it to compute to you how I would support a Chinese immigrant over a white woman.

[Invisible Man]

Oh, right, I get you what you're saying.

Just goes to show, you have no clue as to what I am on about.

You've been pretty open about what you are on about. Anybody can read it for themselves.

Therefore, due to the conditioning all around us, you can come to no logical conclusion other than I'm just a gap toothed hillbilly racist.

So I would not expect it to compute to you how I would support a Chinese immigrant over a white woman.

I never said anything about being gap-toothed or a hillbilly. But you've been pretty clear and unapologetic on may occasions that you do not support the presence of people like Linda Tang Williams in this country, and certainly not supportive of her advancement of white genocide via miscegenation.

I also have no trouble understanding how you could support her over a white woman, who for other reasons is even worse. But I never said anything about you supporting one thing over another. I said you don't want her, which in the context of the conversation clearly meant you didn't want her to be in New Hampshire. This conclusion follows from the fact that you don't want her to be anywhere in the USA at all.

Are you going to say publicly now that you do not hold those views?

[PAF]

Oh, right, I get you what you're saying.

Just goes to show, you have no clue as to what I am on about.

I say what is not supposed to be said, I notice that which is not to be noticed, I support that which is not to be supported.

Therefore, due to the conditioning all around us, you can come to no logical conclusion other than I'm just a gap toothed hillbilly racist.

So I would not expect it to compute to you how I would support a Chinese immigrant over a white woman.

I get a kick out of these conversations lol.

People are just people trying to live. Someday, folks are going to realize that it is the "state" that causes every one of our problems - for self-interest, greed and profit. I wonder if we are ever invaded by extraterrestrials and the people of earth unite. Keep the government out and we might have a chance - it might be more peaceful.

[Anti Federalist]

People are just people trying to live

That's exactly right.

And some living conditions cause people to thrive and prosper.

Others cause people to live in misery, poverty or oppression.

The hilarious paradox is the first causes people to become atrophied, lazy and apathetic, so that they lose those conditions.

The second can cause people to find the courage and bravery and stamina to rise up and change those conditions.

[Anti Federalist]

Are you going to say publicly now that you do not hold those views?

Let's be clear: what views, specifically?

[Invisible Man]

Let's be clear: what views, specifically?

1. That as a nonwhite person she should not be allowed to live in the USA.
2. That when nonwhites have children with whites this is white genocide.

[PAF]

That's exactly right.

And some living conditions cause people to thrive and prosper.

Others cause people to live in misery, poverty or oppression.

The hilarious paradox is the first causes people to become atrophied, lazy and apathetic, so that they lose those conditions.

The second can cause people to find the courage and bravery and stamina to rise up and change those conditions.

People put their own shackles on, first by voting, and then by following a handful of corrupt individuals "in office". And then they are forced to rely on the government, whether for personal welfare or corporate welfare and protectionism, and that's when things get out of whack. All because of a handful of people and government coercion.

Why didn't you respond to the rest of my quote about extraterrestrials lol?

[Anti Federalist]

1. That as a nonwhite person she should not be allowed to live in the USA.
2. That when nonwhites have children with whites this is white genocide.

Ah, gotcha, yes I can see where you could make that assumption, and there is some truth to it, but only in roundabout way.

My view is simple: the "proposition" that this nation was based on has been smashed, it is as dead as Julius Caesar.

Because of that, the nation is now based on what every other nation in the world and throughout history, has been based on, tribal, ethnic or religious groups.

I have, therefore, adopted the position that, when presented with a political, societal or community question, my first response will be: does this help or hurt white people?

That is now my primary concern.

Just because that is the case does not necessarily mean that I am in constant opposition to other ethnics, I wish all the best for them as well.

My people come first, period.

Now, what we are living through and what was just solidly rejected, is a form of Marxism most closely resembling Maoism.

White genocide is not Williams having three children with her white husband.

White genocide is dropping 3000 Haitian into a white town of 2000 people.

That is a form of ethnic cleansing, very Maoist in it's theory.

Williams suffered under Maoism and is an anti Maoist, therefore I can be reasonably certain that she will oppose things like that.

Thus, I will happily support Williams over a Swamp AWFUL like Goodlander, and welcome her to NH rather than the carpetbagger Goodlander, as that helps white people where as Goodlander will continue policies that hurt white people.

[Anti Federalist]

https://x.com/___eb__/status/1854616550306701470

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

Elon Musk was talking to Rogan about drugs and said something the the effect that if you can say this drug makes me a better person then it is a good drug. He said Meth addicts can't say that.
So translate that to everything else in life. My wife a non white makes me a better person. Take everything on merit.

[Anti Federalist]

https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1853285526586945932

Not a picture anywhere yet.

Teen charged in 92-year-old man’s shooting death in north St. Louis County

https://fox2now.com/news/missouri/te...-louis-county/

by: Joey Schneider

Posted: Nov 8, 2024 / 03:18 PM CST

Updated: Nov 8, 2024 / 03:18 PM CST

ST. LOUIS COUNTY, Mo. – A teenager faces felony charges in the shooting death of an elderly man last week in north St. Louis County.

The St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney’s Office has charged Da’Mon Williams, 18, with second-degree murder and armed criminal action amid the investigation.

Williams is accused in the shooting death of Robert Prewett, 92, on Oct. 30 in the 6900 Block of Parc Charlene Drive.

According to a probable cause statement obtained by FOX 2, when authorities responded to the scene, Prewett was found deceased with three gunshot wounds.

Police later reviewed home surveillance footage, which showed a suspect fleeing from the scene with a tan mask, gloves and jacket. The surveillance video also showed the suspect getting away from the scene toward to a nearby apartment complex, where clothing items were discarded in a dumpster.

Investigators recovered these items, and a DNA analysis later linked Williams to the clothing and shooting scene.

The St. Louis County Police Department reports that Williams was incarcerated in the state of Illinois prior to Friday’s charges. He is being held on $500,000, cash-only bond.

[Anti Federalist]

https://x.com/Mark___Taylor/status/1855319103503823268

[Anti Federalist]

https://x.com/TooWhiteToTweet/status...47721814507794

[Anti Federalist]

https://x.com/iamyesyouareno/status/1855570021432410209

[PAF]

https://x.com/iamyesyouareno/status/1855570021432410209

For your reading pleasure. Don't let psyops muck your mind.


No State Has a Right to Exist. That Includes the State of Israel. ~ Mises.org

All States are Empires of Lies ~ Mises.org

[TheTexan]

For your reading pleasure. Don't let psyops muck your mind.


No State Has a Right to Exist. That Includes the State of Israel. ~ Mises.org

All States are Empires of Lies ~ Mises.org

edit: nevermind, it's just a semantic circle jerk.

[PAF]

All of that ^ is bad philosophy based on an unacknowledged but ingrained ethical foundation of slavery where things like the right to disassociate aren't even considered. (Thanks Abe!)

Nations have a right to exist, because people have the right to voluntarily associate to form nations.

The author of that article should be saying, that no state or government, has the right to prohibit your disassociation.

I take it you didn't read the entire article. I's good to do that from time to time

[TheTexan]

I take it you didn't read the entire article. I's good to do that from time to time

Yea I read the top half only.

Then I read the bottom half and edited my post cus it's just a semantic circle jerk of whether nations are people or whatever. (YAWN)

Pointless article

[PAF]

Yea I read the top half only.

Then I read the bottom half and edited my post cus it's just a semantic circle jerk of whether nations are people or whatever. (YAWN)

Pointless article

Well, the will of the people want to be slaves, so why not go all out. I, on the other hand, don't want fed.gov down my throat anymore than it is, so I'll keep trying for those who are willing to listen and understand.

Thanks for throwing in the towel /s

[TheTexan]

Well, the will of the people want to be slaves, so why not go all out. I, on the other hand, don't want fed.gov down my throat anymore than it is, so I'll keep trying for those who are willing to listen and understand.

Thanks for throwing in the towel /s

I'm not throwing in the towel, I'm just pointing out that it's a dumb useless thing to say that an organization doesn't have the right to exist, on the foundation that only people have rights. Well organizations are simply groups of people. Saying Organization XYZ has the right to do X is a whole lot shorter and easier to say than "The people of Organization XYZ acting collaboratively under that banner have the right to collectively do X".

It's not a meaningful argument, like I said... it's just a semantic circle jerk, and I fully regret my post responding to it entirely.

[PAF]

I'm not throwing in the towel, I'm just pointing out that it's a dumb useless thing to say that an organization doesn't have the right to exist, on the foundation that only people have rights. Well organizations are simply groups of people. Saying Organization XYZ has the right to do X is a whole lot shorter and easier to say than "The people of Organization XYZ acting collaboratively under that banner have the right to collectively do X".

It's not a meaningful argument, like I said... it's just a semantic circle jerk, and I fully regret my post responding to it entirely.

I don't understand illogic rationale. I try to come down to others levels but it still doesn't compute. That said, you and I are both set in our ways. You go your way, I'll go mine. We can bust balls in other threads

[TheTexan]

I try to come down up to others levels but it still doesn't compute.

Fixed that for you.

[PAF]

Fixed that for you.

Gee, Thanks

[PAF]

@TheTexan , we're so f&cked anyway nothing even matters anymore

[TheTexan]

@TheTexan , we're so f&cked anyway nothing even matters anymore

Accurate

[Anti Federalist]

I'm not throwing in the towel, I'm just pointing out that it's a dumb useless thing to say that an organization doesn't have the right to exist, on the foundation that only people have rights. Well organizations are simply groups of people. Saying Organization XYZ has the right to do X is a whole lot shorter and easier to say than "The people of Organization XYZ acting collaboratively under that banner have the right to collectively do X".

It's not a meaningful argument, like I said... it's just a semantic circle jerk, and I fully regret my post responding to it entirely.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government

[TheTexan]

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government

Yea and I get that, it's just way easier and shorter to say, "the United States has a right to defend its borders" than to say "the people of the United States have the right to call upon its organization to perform border defense duties on their collective individual behalf".

Until someone comes up with a shorter way to say that, I'm gonna keep saying the United States does have rights. (because "the United States" implicitly means, the people of the United States)

[Anti Federalist]

https://x.com/Kitler512/status/1855965930838253834

[Anti Federalist]

https://x.com/NatCon2022/status/1855773505368768768

[Anti Federalist]

Haiti and Spirit Airlines.

Two things to both be avoided.

https://x.com/TheInsiderPaper/status...31260952670598