Robert F. Kennedy Jr. On The Record

[Occam's Banana]

h/t @Anti Federalist: RFK Jr. on how a federal ID could fix immigration and election fraud

https://twitter.com/i/status/1703202604308644132

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr on How a Federal ID Could Fix the Border Crisis & Confidence in Our Elections

“If you say you can’t get a job without a Federal ID, the border is going to shut down overnight…It will also do something else…It will make it so that we can tell people you need an ID to vote…There won’t be any more worry about whether or not there’s double voting going on.”

[Firestarter]

When I first posted this, I couldn’t understand how Robert F. Kennedy Jr. running for Democrat president, could help Donald Trump.
Matthew Sheffield:

No surprise: More than half of the main RFK political action committee’s revenue came from a Trump mega donor. Kennedy is a Republican stooge.

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/0...donor-00109101


But now I see a possible strategy in RFK Jr. “promoting” the most controversial Democrat policies. I still don’t see how this will benefit Trump specifically, but this could make some voters switch from Democrat to Republican.
It looks like he has done this twice already...
.

h/t @Anti Federalist: RFK Jr. on how a federal ID could fix immigration and election fraud

.

https://twitter.com/RobertKennedyJr/...05618497474714
to: https://twitter.com/RobertKennedyJr/...06052633186418

[acptulsa]

https://twitter.com/EcommunistForum/...82492064567354

https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/...68361626685647

[Occam's Banana]

https://twitter.com/michaelmalice/st...80504335175836

//

https://twitter.com/michaelmalice/st...63251990704532

[Brian4Liberty]

...
At the time I compiled RFK, I was attempting to reel some of the leftist/democrats to the ideas of Free Markets, and to discuss Ukraine, Captive Agencies, Lobbyists, etc. It was an opening for me, since they would never give the likes of Ron Paul the time of day. But as you can see at the bottom of his record sheet, I did in fact include his Domestic Platform, one that I am not fond of:
...

The question is will RFK Jr be able to convince Democrats of the idea of free, competitive markets, or will it simply be a confirmation of the evils of capitalism, as demonstrated by the crony corporatism of government and big pharma?

Other than Tulsi Gabbard, is RFK Jr the best option for Democrats since RFK himself, or perhaps since John Edwards, who was removed from contention via scandal? Democrats have a habit of removing those who do not tow the company line.

[PAF]

The question is will RFK Jr be able to convince Democrats of the idea of free, competitive markets, or will it simply be a confirmation of the evils of capitalism, as demonstrated by the crony corporatism of government and big pharma?

Using Risk/Reward, I use some of RFK's talking points, since (D)emocrats are more apt to listen to another (D)emocrat. I then expand the conversation to see where it might eventually go.

Other than Tulsi Gabbard, is RFK Jr the best option for Democrats since RFK himself, or perhaps since John Edwards, who was removed from contention via scandal? Democrats have a habit of removing those who do not tow the company line.

Using Risk/Reward, I use some of Tulsi's talking points, since (D)emocrats are more apt to listen to another [now ex] (D)emocrat. I then expand the conversation to see where it might eventually go.


If you have other suggestions and/or 100% PROVEN and APPROVED strategies, kindly drop them into the Suggestion Box for possible consideration.

[Brian4Liberty]

Using Risk/Reward, I use some of RFK's talking points, since (D)emocrats are more apt to listen to another (D)emocrat. I then expand the conversation to see where it might eventually go.

Using Risk/Reward, I use some of Tulsi's talking points, since (D)emocrats are more apt to listen to another [now ex] (D)emocrat. I then expand the conversation to see where it might eventually go.

If you have other suggestions and/or 100% PROVEN and APPROVED strategies, kindly drop them into the Suggestion Box for possible consideration.

I would imagine that a strategy of a) discouraging voting, and b) introducing Democrats to certain ideas via RFK Jr would be most effective (and provide more bang for the buck) in venues where there tend to be a lot of Democrats.

[Firestarter]

In my opinion the only thing we really have “on the record” of RFK Jr. is his promotion of the green agenda that is both a massive financial fraud and a ploy to finalise the technocratic surveillance state.
.

VantagePoint Venture Partners (where Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was a partner) was the seed funder for BrightSource Energy, whose main project was the $2.2 billion costing Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System in the Mojave Desert (in California). Because of its high costs it couldn’t be cost efficient (7 times as expensive as gas) and could only have been built using government subsidies.

The US government provided a $1.6 billon loan guarantee to get the Ivanpah plant built on public land.
In November 2014, Ivanpah's investors applied for a $539 million federal grant to pay off the federal loan (strangely no more information on this…).

In October 2010, governator Schwarzenegger (who was married to a Kennedy) approved the Ivanpah project.
See Interior Secretary Ken Salazar next to Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger at the Mojave Desert holding a plague commemorating the Ivanpah fraud, 17 October 2010.


The Ivanpah project was mainly financed by NRG Energy with $300 million and Google that contributed $168 million.
Bechtel was partners in this scheme by leading the construction of 3 adjacent towers.

Green-energy-is-big-business

[Occam's Banana]

How it started:

https://twitter.com/RobertKennedyJr

How it's going:

https://twitter.com/RobertKennedyJr/...89115522371772

[Brian4Liberty]

https://twitter.com/DanielLMcAdams/s...51167066915309

[Brian4Liberty]

https://twitter.com/DanielLMcAdams/s...66174030381326

[osan]

RFK has never held office, therefore no voting record exists. The following are interviews, tweets and statements [from approximately oldest to newest].

Candidates' words mean little. They lie through their teeth all the time.

I would also note that RFKj's apparent position on the 2A is cancer.

I'd be loathe to trust him.

[osan]

@Occam's Banana

He cannot lose Democrat voters in order to win the Democrat primary.

He made his statement about an “assault weapons” ban just minutes after intimating that guns are not the problem. He indicated that Americans have always had guns, and that Americans used to bring firearms to school for “gun clubs,” and no one thought of shooting at children.

RFK Jr. responded, If we can get a consensus on it, if Republicans and Democrats agreed and it passed Congress, I would sign it.

https://twitter.com/NewsNation/statu...48100775329792

This is an attempt at being slick. It also shows his true character and/or woefully inadequate understanding of rights. Such a ban would be unconstitutional, yet he proudly proclaims his willingness to sign it into effect. The correct response would be along the lines of "I will sign no bill into effect that violates any element of the Constitution, most particularly the Bill of Rights, and in this case the Second Amendment in specific."

RFKj can go pound it.

[Occam's Banana]

Clearly, none of you grasp the nuanced contextual distinctions between "race-based" policies and "racist" policies.

You see, when a policy favors this particular race, it is "racist" (which is a bad thing), but when a policy favors that particular race, it is "race-based" (which is a good thing).

Please do better.

https://twitter.com/RobertKennedyJr/...27565170524161
to: https://twitter.com/RobertKennedyJr/...28276763619331

//

[Occam's Banana]

https://twitter.com/RobertKennedyJr/...43043984195618


https://twitter.com/michaelmalice/st...89431975497816
& https://twitter.com/michaelmalice/st...08120326123693