Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Gayle Rubin's radical theory of the politics of sexuality

  1. #1

    Gayle Rubin's radical theory of the politics of sexuality

    [RELATED: Critical Theory threads]

    The Origin of Queer Theory: Gayle Rubin’s “Thinking Sex”
    The New Discourses Podcast with James Lindsay, Episode 79 (06 June 2022)
    Thinking Sex Series, Part 1 of 3

    People have very rapidly realized, whether in Groomer Schools, marketing, or so many other corners of society that we’ve been suckered into supporting Queer Theory under the banner of a gay and lesbian civil rights movement. We’ve also figured out very quickly that Queer Theory is a branch of Identity Marxism: Queer Marxism, which takes “normalcy” as its special form of bourgeois property to abolish through (Queer) class struggle. Where, though, did Queer Theory come from? It is relatively widely accepted that the first real Queer Theory paper is Gayle Rubin’s 1984 essay “Thinking Sex,” which calls for a new radical politics of sexuality. To help people understand what Queer Theory is and always has been about, James Lindsay proudly hosts a three-part New Discourses Podcast series reading through “Thinking Sex” in full and offering his commentary on it. In this first part, we learn that Queer Theory from its very beginnings is profoundly interested in both child pornography and pedophilia. It’s almost shocking to hear. Join James to understand Queer Theory from its very origins.

    https://rumble.com/v17k816
    Last edited by Occam's Banana; 12-06-2022 at 09:01 AM.
    The Bastiat Collection · FREE PDF · FREE EPUB · PAPER
    Frédéric Bastiat (1801-1850)

    • "When law and morality are in contradiction to each other, the citizen finds himself in the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense, or of losing his respect for the law."
      -- The Law (p. 54)
    • "Government is that great fiction, through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
      -- Government (p. 99)
    • "[W]ar is always begun in the interest of the few, and at the expense of the many."
      -- Economic Sophisms - Second Series (p. 312)
    • "There are two principles that can never be reconciled - Liberty and Constraint."
      -- Harmonies of Political Economy - Book One (p. 447)

    · tu ne cede malis sed contra audentior ito ·



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    Gayle Rubin's "Thinking Sex" Part 2: Erasing Boundaries
    The New Discourses Podcast with James Lindsay, Episode 80 (13 June 2022)
    Thinking Sex Series, Part 2 of 3

    In the previous episode of the New Discourses Podcast, host James Lindsay presented the first third of the first Queer Theory paper to have been written, Gayle Rubin’s shocking 1984 essay “Thinking Sex.” In this episode, he continues with a second part of Rubin’s essay in which it becomes clear that Queer Theory is all about breaking down all boundaries and categories between acceptable and unacceptable sexual behavior using explicitly Marxist-style analysis (Queer Theory is Queer Marxism). Before getting to this section of the essay, however, James also presents a short article from 2016 explaining the fruit Queer Theory is bearing, which makes its Marxist underpinnings completely apparent. Join James to understand more about the origins of Queer Theory.

    https://rumble.com/v18cxrw-gayle-rub...oundaries.html

  4. #3
    The Queer Subversion of Feminism: Gayle Rubin’s “Thinking Sex” Part 3
    The New Discourses Podcast with James Lindsay, Episode 81 (20 June 2022)
    Thinking Sex Series, Part 3 of 3

    In the previous two episodes of the New Discourses Podcast, host James Lindsay reads through the first two thirds of Gayle Rubin’s shocking 1984 essay, “Thinking Sex,” widely regarded as the first essay in Queer Theory. In it, as Rubin’s subtitle indicates, “Notes for a Radical Theory of the Politics of Sexuality,” she takes feminism (especially sex-negative radical feminism) to task for being insufficiently radical as a politics of sexuality. In fact, she accuses it (not entirely wrongly) of being resoundingly conservative with regard to sex and sexuality. In this episode of the New Discourses Podcast, James walks you through this most tedious portion of the essay where the seeds of subverting feminism itself are planted. Within just a couple of decades from this point, the Queer Marxist movement will have used Rubin’s call for a “radical theory of the politics of sexuality” to completely undermine the women’s movement and basically kill it and the category of “woman” itself. Join him to understand how it started.

    https://rumble.com/v195a0i

  5. #4

  6. #5

  7. #6

  8. #7
    https://twitter.com/AuronMacintyre/s...29049748815872

    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    You only want the freedoms that will undermine the nation and lead to the destruction of liberty.

  9. #8



  10. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  11. #9
    "Speaking of cissexuals. If there are transsexuals, logically there must be cissexuals. One is not to be thought without the other at all."

    My, how very "binary" of him! (Also of note: people like this don't seem to have any problem with "logic" when it suits their purpose.)

    https://twitter.com/SarahisCensored/...54091003019270

  12. #10
    Queer Theory Is the Doctrine of a Sex-Based Cult
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vdn3CnZ9kg
    {New Discourses | 20 May 2024}

    The New Discourses Podcast with James Lindsay, Episode 140 (20 May 2024)

    Queer Theory is the doctrine of a sex-based cult that has very little to do with gay people and lots of interest in our children. We really need to understand that. Based on remarks James Lindsay delivered at the University of Pittsburgh in February 2024, in this episode of the New Discourses podcast, he makes even more clear why Queer Theory defines a cult and how it works as such, particularly to initiate our kids.

    Last edited by Occam's Banana; 05-20-2024 at 06:45 PM.



Similar Threads

  1. Rand Paul | POLITICS | Rubin Report
    By Mach in forum Rand Paul Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-08-2020, 09:39 AM
  2. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-13-2015, 05:26 PM
  3. Twenty-one Reasons Why Statism Is a Radical and Radically Incoherent Theory
    By disorderlyvision in forum Political Philosophy & Government Policy
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-11-2010, 06:48 PM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-19-2009, 10:35 PM
  5. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-25-2009, 09:52 AM

Select a tag for more discussion on that topic

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •