Gayle Rubin's radical theory of the politics of sexuality

[Occam's Banana]

[RELATED: Critical Theory threads]

The Origin of Queer Theory: Gayle Rubin’s “Thinking Sex”
The New Discourses Podcast with James Lindsay, Episode 79 (06 June 2022)
Thinking Sex Series, Part 1 of 3

People have very rapidly realized, whether in Groomer Schools, marketing, or so many other corners of society that we’ve been suckered into supporting Queer Theory under the banner of a gay and lesbian civil rights movement. We’ve also figured out very quickly that Queer Theory is a branch of Identity Marxism: Queer Marxism, which takes “normalcy” as its special form of bourgeois property to abolish through (Queer) class struggle. Where, though, did Queer Theory come from? It is relatively widely accepted that the first real Queer Theory paper is Gayle Rubin’s 1984 essay “Thinking Sex,” which calls for a new radical politics of sexuality. To help people understand what Queer Theory is and always has been about, James Lindsay proudly hosts a three-part New Discourses Podcast series reading through “Thinking Sex” in full and offering his commentary on it. In this first part, we learn that Queer Theory from its very beginnings is profoundly interested in both child pornography and pedophilia. It’s almost shocking to hear. Join James to understand Queer Theory from its very origins.

https://rumble.com/v17k816

[Occam's Banana]

Gayle Rubin's "Thinking Sex" Part 2: Erasing Boundaries
The New Discourses Podcast with James Lindsay, Episode 80 (13 June 2022)
Thinking Sex Series, Part 2 of 3

In the previous episode of the New Discourses Podcast, host James Lindsay presented the first third of the first Queer Theory paper to have been written, Gayle Rubin’s shocking 1984 essay “Thinking Sex.” In this episode, he continues with a second part of Rubin’s essay in which it becomes clear that Queer Theory is all about breaking down all boundaries and categories between acceptable and unacceptable sexual behavior using explicitly Marxist-style analysis (Queer Theory is Queer Marxism). Before getting to this section of the essay, however, James also presents a short article from 2016 explaining the fruit Queer Theory is bearing, which makes its Marxist underpinnings completely apparent. Join James to understand more about the origins of Queer Theory.

https://rumble.com/v18cxrw-gayle-rub...oundaries.html

[Occam's Banana]

The Queer Subversion of Feminism: Gayle Rubin’s “Thinking Sex” Part 3
The New Discourses Podcast with James Lindsay, Episode 81 (20 June 2022)
Thinking Sex Series, Part 3 of 3

In the previous two episodes of the New Discourses Podcast, host James Lindsay reads through the first two thirds of Gayle Rubin’s shocking 1984 essay, “Thinking Sex,” widely regarded as the first essay in Queer Theory. In it, as Rubin’s subtitle indicates, “Notes for a Radical Theory of the Politics of Sexuality,” she takes feminism (especially sex-negative radical feminism) to task for being insufficiently radical as a politics of sexuality. In fact, she accuses it (not entirely wrongly) of being resoundingly conservative with regard to sex and sexuality. In this episode of the New Discourses Podcast, James walks you through this most tedious portion of the essay where the seeds of subverting feminism itself are planted. Within just a couple of decades from this point, the Queer Marxist movement will have used Rubin’s call for a “radical theory of the politics of sexuality” to completely undermine the women’s movement and basically kill it and the category of “woman” itself. Join him to understand how it started.

https://rumble.com/v195a0i

[Occam's Banana]

THREAD: Groomer Schools

[Occam's Banana]

THREAD: Welcome to hell. I mean Queer Pedagogy

[Occam's Banana]

https://twitter.com/ConceptualJames/...05486146367488

[acptulsa]

https://twitter.com/AuronMacintyre/s...29049748815872

[Occam's Banana]

h/t @Anti Federalist: “To die for the love of boys: what could be more beautiful?”

https://twitter.com/JoshWalkos/statu...86580793487363

https://twitter.com/JoshWalkos/statu...86603295866888


https://twitter.com/JoshWalkos/statu...16680916828161

[Occam's Banana]

"Speaking of cissexuals. If there are transsexuals, logically there must be cissexuals. One is not to be thought without the other at all."

My, how very "binary" of him! (Also of note: people like this don't seem to have any problem with "logic" when it suits their purpose.)

https://twitter.com/SarahisCensored/...54091003019270