Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678 LastLast
Results 151 to 180 of 211

Thread: Bad stuff going down in Maricopa county

  1. #151
    ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE | REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT-PETITIONER KARI LAKE
    https://www.scribd.com/document/6219...al-Reply-Brief

    Long thread / analysis:

    https://twitter.com/tracybeanz/statu...90915482955776


    [...]

    https://twitter.com/tracybeanz/statu...33693680193536



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #152
    Starts about 45 min in



    Maybe this-n will work?

    Last edited by tod evans; 01-29-2023 at 08:43 PM.



  4. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  5. #153

    https://twitter.com/kelliwardaz/stat...65333751644163
    "Foreign aid is taking money from the poor people of a rich country, and giving it to the rich people of a poor country." - Ron Paul
    "Beware the Military-Industrial-Financial-Pharma-Corporate-Internet-Media-Government Complex." - B4L update of General Dwight D. Eisenhower
    "Debt is the drug, Wall St. Banksters are the dealers, and politicians are the addicts." - B4L
    "Totally free immigration? I've never taken that position. I believe in national sovereignty." - Ron Paul

    Proponent of real science.
    The views and opinions expressed here are solely my own, and do not represent this forum or any other entities or persons.

  6. #154
    Quote Originally Posted by tod evans View Post
    Starts about 45 min in

    Maybe this-n will work?
    ...
    Better try a Rumble version...
    "Foreign aid is taking money from the poor people of a rich country, and giving it to the rich people of a poor country." - Ron Paul
    "Beware the Military-Industrial-Financial-Pharma-Corporate-Internet-Media-Government Complex." - B4L update of General Dwight D. Eisenhower
    "Debt is the drug, Wall St. Banksters are the dealers, and politicians are the addicts." - B4L
    "Totally free immigration? I've never taken that position. I believe in national sovereignty." - Ron Paul

    Proponent of real science.
    The views and opinions expressed here are solely my own, and do not represent this forum or any other entities or persons.

  7. #155
    Think it might be time for Lake to throw in the towel already.
    "Perhaps one of the most important accomplishments of my administration is minding my own business."

    Calvin Coolidge

  8. #156

    Kari Lake Accused of Breaking Law by Proving Democrats Broke Law

    Not only this. Now it turns out in an interview with Bannon that the pictures were public record, introduced in the AZ Senate during election fraud hearings. Katie Hobbs is a true fascist who now wants to throw Kari in jail.



    Kari Lake Accused of Breaking Law by Proving Democrats Broke Law, and Having Gall to Legally Show Fraud Ballots with Bad Signature Matches

    "Even though it is public record to see who voted in any given election, since anyone can go to city hall or county records and see who voted last year, or the year before, or who hasn’t voted in 20 years, Democrats in Arizona are up in arms because Kari Lake had the gall to show impossible signature matches on mail-in ballots, ripping the lid off fraudulent mail-in ballots.

    It is who you voted for that is “secret” and where you get the term “secret ballot.” Every year thousands of candidates pick up copies of their district voter rolls, so they can see whose door to knock on (likely voters who voted recently), and who not to bother with.

    For some reason Maricopa County Elections has a real problem with people poking around the signature matching closet. In Kari Lake’s famous lawsuit after the election, one of her main accusations was no signature matching on tens of thousands of mail-in ballots. Judge Peter Thompson tossed out that count, depriving Lake of her chance to prove it in court."....
    ...
    Even a routine extension of voting hours was denied, almost always granted when lines are long as it was in 2016, when Bernie Sanders voters were the disenfranchised of the hour as Maricopa officials had settled on Hillary. In 2016 voting hours were extended past 8pm to 11pm.

  9. #157
    Just more intimidation tactics, they've been doing it all along. It seems they picked the wrong gal to $#@! with this time though.
    "The Patriarch"

  10. #158
    Quote Originally Posted by Anti Globalist View Post
    Think it might be time for Lake to throw in the towel already.
    I completely disagree. That's what they count on, it's way past time to stop doing it.
    "The Patriarch"

  11. #159
    Quote Originally Posted by Anti Globalist View Post
    Think it might be time for Lake to throw in the towel already.
    You must be fun at parties.
    "He's talkin' to his gut like it's a person!!" -me
    "dumpster diving isn't professional." - angelatc
    "You don't need a medical degree to spot obvious bullshit, that's actually a separate skill." -Scott Adams
    "When you are divided, and angry, and controlled, you target those 'different' from you, not those responsible [controllers]" -Q

    "Each of us must choose which course of action we should take: education, conventional political action, or even peaceful civil disobedience to bring about necessary changes. But let it not be said that we did nothing." - Ron Paul

    "Paul said "the wave of the future" is a coalition of anti-authoritarian progressive Democrats and libertarian Republicans in Congress opposed to domestic surveillance, opposed to starting new wars and in favor of ending the so-called War on Drugs."

  12. #160

    Kari Lake Opens Pandora’s Box: Mass Signature Fraud in 2020 on Mail-in Ballots, Trump Won AZ

    AZ Republicans must order a complete signature audit. Could catch on in other states too.

    Kari Lake Opens Pandora’s Box: Massive Signature Fraud in 2020 on Mail-in Ballots, Trump Likely Won AZ. To Trigger Official Full Signature Audit?

    https://coronanews123.wordpress.com/...gnature-audit/

    An examination conducted by a citizens’ election integrity organization in Arizona of mail-in ballots in the 2020 presidential election, presented to the AZ Senate on January 23, 2023, concludes that out of 380,000 mail-in ballots reviewed for Maricopa County, over 20% of the ballot envelope signatures do not match the signatures on record. Over 1,800 envelopes had no signature at all. Maricopa County cast about 2 million votes total for president in 2020.

    The discovery was made in the course of reporting on election fraud in the 2022 gubernatorial race between Kari Lake and Katie Hobbs. The response from Arizona Democrats? Shoot the messenger. The Democratic Attorney General for AZ, who also is accused of benefiting from fraudulent ballots, has announced an investigation and possible prosecution of Republican Kari Lake for posting images of bad signature matches on Twitter, even though the images were already public record from the broadcast hearing, and even though the law allows for signatures to be “reproduced” in the course of “reportorial work” and “election purposes.”

    The presentation was accompanied by sworn affidavits, under penalty of perjury, of signature verifiers in that election, such as Andrew Myers, who say they witnessed higher-level managers “reversing and approving” signatures that “level 1 workers” had rejected. Myers stated that he believed that “level 2 managers were changing about 90% of the rejected signatures to accepted.”

    If the facts presented by We the People AZ Alliance (WPAA) are even partly correct, then the true winner of the 2020 Arizona presidential contest is in serious question. The election was declared won by Joe Biden by a margin of just .3%, or about 10,000 votes. The magnitude of the numbers suggest that Trump may have actually won in a landslide.

    Extensive signature matching of mail-ins was never included in the AZ Cyber Ninjas audit frequently cited in the media and by those who ridicule “election deniers,” a new term in the American political vocabulary. Nor were comprehensive signature match audits part of audits which were conducted in other battleground states in 2020, leading President Trump to complain that the results of the audits were predictable because re-counting the same “fraudulent” ballots would lead to the same fraudulent results. Trump repeatedly called for, but did not obtain, full signature matching audits.

    Trump especially continues to insist that complete signature matching should have been conducted for Fulton County, Georgia (Atlanta.)

    Image of failed match signatures, presented to AZ Senate on Jan. 23, 2023


    Arizona was one of five key battleground states in 2020: AZ, MI, PA. GA, and WI. In all five irregularities were alleged by Republicans such as 100,000-plus sudden vote jumps, all for Biden, in the wee hours of the morning.

    In all five states multiple, state-wide audits are cited by attackers of “election deniers” as proof that the results were fair, often in tired, exasperated, even nasty tones denigrating “MAGA morons.” In not one of the five states was thorough signature matching of mail-in ballots ever performed.
    Last edited by James_Madison_Lives; 02-04-2023 at 02:00 PM.



  13. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  14. #161
    "YOUR WELCOME" with Michael Malice #245: Kari Lake
    Michael Malice (“YOUR WELCOME”) is joined by Arizona gubernatorial candidate, Kari Lake, to discuss her lawsuit regarding the 2022 Arizona election, the surprising powers that be in Maricopa County, and the odd voting day issues that seemed to only happen in highly Republican areas. Kari also shares how she dealt with attacks throughout her campaign, and her strategic advice to young Americans who may be defending themselves against the Left.
    https://odysee.com/@MichaelMalice:6/...l-malice-245:a

  15. #162

    Riveting AR testimony.Cartel bribes, money laundering, kickbacks


    https://twitter.com/i/status/1629509584321912833



    https://rumble.com/v2avkm2-we-have-t...f=6zof&mrefc=3

    I can't get the video's to show, sorry. I forgot how to do that
    Last edited by showpan; 02-27-2023 at 09:16 AM.
    Do you want to know who you are? Don't ask. Act! Action will delineate and define you.
    Thomas Jefferson

  16. #163
    Ken Bennett's response exposed himself. All the proof is at the town hall already.



    Do you want to know who you are? Don't ask. Act! Action will delineate and define you.
    Thomas Jefferson

  17. #164
    Too bad this won't result in Katie Hobbs being removed.
    "Perhaps one of the most important accomplishments of my administration is minding my own business."

    Calvin Coolidge

  18. #165
    Another mark of a tyrant is that he likes foreigners better than citizens, and lives with them and invites them to his table; for the one are enemies, but the Others enter into no rivalry with him. - Aristotle's Politics Book 5 Part 11

  19. #166
    Quote Originally Posted by Anti Globalist View Post
    Too bad this won't result in Katie Hobbs being removed.
    Probably not, just like Biden or anyone else. What's interesting is how this all plays out now. Wells Fargo gets caught AGAIN with fictitious money laundering accounts. Names are no longer being withheld. Multiple states doing the same thing and almost all the money laundering through real estate is on permanent record at all the town recorder offices. The IRS investigations alone are going to be huge....lol....you know they didn't report it.
    Do you want to know who you are? Don't ask. Act! Action will delineate and define you.
    Thomas Jefferson

  20. #167
    https://twitter.com/DC_Draino/status...90169814147074

    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    We believe our lying eyes...

  21. #168
    Kari Lake scores win as Arizona Supreme Court sends part of her lawsuit back to trial court
    Lake vowed to appeal to the state's top court after losing at the appellate level.
    https://justthenews.com/politics-pol...uit-back-trial
    Charlotte Hazard (23 March 2023)

    The Arizona Supreme Court ruled Wednesday to send a piece of former GOP gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake's election lawsuit back to trial court to examine whether or not Maricopa County followed signature verification policies in 2022.

    The order states: "IT IS FURTHER ORDERED remanding to the trial court to determine whether the claim that Maricopa County failed to comply with A.R.S. § 16-550(A) fails to state a claim pursuant to Ariz. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for reasons other than laches, or, whether Petitioner can prove her claim as alleged pursuant to A.R.S. § 16-672 and establish that 'votes [were] affected "in sufficient numbers to alter the outcome of the election"' based on a 'competent mathematical basis to conclude that the outcome would plausibly have been different, not simply an untethered assertion of uncertainty.'"

    The Arizona Supreme Court declined to review the rest of the appeal.

    The entire ruling can be read here: Arizona Supreme Court Document .pdf

    Since losing to current Arizona Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs, Lake has contested the results of the 2022 election in court, arguing that thousands of Republican voters were disenfranchised on Election Day, when voting machine errors occurred in at least 60% of the voting centers in Maricopa County.

    Lake vowed to appeal to the state's top court after losing at the appellate level.

    "If the Arizona Supreme Court refuses to take this case, and lets that lower court judge's opinion stand, they are basically putting their stamp of approval on the most corrupt election we've ever seen in this country," Lake told the "Just the News, No Noise" TV show Monday.



  22. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  23. #169
    AZ Supreme Court revives Kari Lake claim on signature verification
    The high court ordered Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Peter Thompson to review that element of Lake's case again to determine if Lake can prove “votes (were) affected ‘in sufficient numbers to alter the outcome of the election.’”
    https://thepostmillennial.com/breaki...e-verification
    The Post Millennial (23 March 2023)

    The Arizona Supreme Court declined to hear the majority of Republican Kari Lake’s appeal on Wednesday during a challenge to her loss in the governor’s race but kept the case alive by sending one of Lake's claims back to a lower court for review.

    Lake made seven legal claims in her case, six of which the state's high court said were properly dismissed by lower courts. However, according to an opinion released Wednesday written by Chief Justice Robert Brutinel the trial court erroneously dismissed Lake’s claim challenging the application of signature verification procedures on early ballots in Maricopa County and as a result sent the claim back to the lower court to reconsider.

    Lake lost to Democrat Katie Hobbs by just over 17,000 votes, but has contested the results.

    In her challenge, the former TV anchor claimed there were problems with ballot printers at some polling locations in Maricopa County, which is where over 60 percent of Arizona’s voters live.

    The ballots were printed too light to be read by the on-site tabulators at polling locations and as a result lines backed up in some areas. Lake also alleged that thousands of ballots were "injected" into the election and that problems with tabulation machines disenfranchised "thousands" of voters.

    County officials countered, claiming those at the locations had the opportunity to vote and that all ballots were counted because the ones affected by the printer malfunctions were taken to more sophisticated counters at election headquarters.

    According to the opinion by the state’s high court, Lake's challenges were "insufficient to warrant the requested relief under Arizona or federal law."

    However, Lake’s sixth legal claim, alleging that Maricopa County did not follow signature verification procedures, was ordered to be reviewed by a county judge.

    According to the Arizona Republic, the county and appeals courts originally ruled Lake’s signature-related challenge applied to the policies themselves, not how the policies were applied in 2022, and dismissed her claim based on grounds that she filed her legal challenge too late.

    But the state’s Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that was an error saying, "Lake could not have brought this challenge before the election."

    In her claim, Lake cited Arizona law requiring signatures on early ballot envelopes be checked against the signature already in a voter's file, and sets the process and timeline for verifying, or "curing," a ballot if the signature doesn't appear to match. Lake claimed Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer's office accepted "a material number" of ballots with unmatched signatures.

    The high court ordered Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Peter Thompson to review that element of Lake's case again to determine if the claim was properly dismissed previously, or if Lake can prove “votes (were) affected ‘in sufficient numbers to alter the outcome of the election.’”

    Previously, the Arizona Court of Appeals ruled Lake’s claims demonstrated “difficulties” on Election Day but that the lower court was correct in concluding “that voters were able to cast their ballots, that votes were counted correctly, and that no other basis justifies setting aside the election results.”

  24. #170
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian4Liberty View Post
    Like every other institution the left has infiltrated and co-opted. Their only principle is BAMN, so by definition, they are anti-justice and opposed to rule of law. Quite ironic for a judicial system.

    Schumer recently bragged that his near term goal is to force through as many judicial nominations as possible.

    https://twitter.com/SenSchumer/statu...78998942314500
    "Foreign aid is taking money from the poor people of a rich country, and giving it to the rich people of a poor country." - Ron Paul
    "Beware the Military-Industrial-Financial-Pharma-Corporate-Internet-Media-Government Complex." - B4L update of General Dwight D. Eisenhower
    "Debt is the drug, Wall St. Banksters are the dealers, and politicians are the addicts." - B4L
    "Totally free immigration? I've never taken that position. I believe in national sovereignty." - Ron Paul

    Proponent of real science.
    The views and opinions expressed here are solely my own, and do not represent this forum or any other entities or persons.

  25. #171
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    We believe our lying eyes...

  26. #172
    'That’s Not Signature Review, Your Honor': Kari Lake's Legal Team Cracks The 2022 Arizona Election Case Wide Open With Damning Testimony

    The second trial of Kari Lake v. Katie Hobbs et. al. started off with several dramatic moments, but the most striking so far has been the revelation from the Lake legal team pertaining to Maricopa County's own log file data. The startling data and expert testimony show the county's signature verifiers "are not physically capable" of verifying signatures at the rate the logs indicate.

    Kari Lake's attorney Kurt Olsen presented damning expert testimony to the court Wednesday, exposing the serious flaws in the signature verification process and alleging that the signatures were therefore falsely verified thus rendering the election results legally questionable.

    https://twitter.com/charliekirk11/st...83376689074177


    https://twitter.com/KariLakeWarRoom/...94545864761344
    "Foreign aid is taking money from the poor people of a rich country, and giving it to the rich people of a poor country." - Ron Paul
    "Beware the Military-Industrial-Financial-Pharma-Corporate-Internet-Media-Government Complex." - B4L update of General Dwight D. Eisenhower
    "Debt is the drug, Wall St. Banksters are the dealers, and politicians are the addicts." - B4L
    "Totally free immigration? I've never taken that position. I believe in national sovereignty." - Ron Paul

    Proponent of real science.
    The views and opinions expressed here are solely my own, and do not represent this forum or any other entities or persons.

  27. #173

  28. #174
    Another take on the story.

    Kari Lake Election Challenge Fizzles at Second Day of Trial

    MESA, Ariz. (CN) — Kari Lake, a former television-news anchor and failed Republican gubernatorial candidate in the 2022 Arizona elections, has been fighting in court to prove that the governor's race was stolen from her.

    The witnesses she called to testify on her behalf, though, did little to strengthen that case at trial.

    Rather than showing that Arizona did not verify signatures on 2022 mail-in ballots — the sole remaining claim in Lake's stolen-election case — multiple witnesses this week seemed to prove just the opposite. Lake's team has already rested its case, meaning they've presumably presented all available evidence of an allegedly stolen election.

    As far as evidence goes, it wasn't much.

    More than six months after losing the 2022 governor's race to Democrat Katie Hobbs, Lake still claims mail-in ballot signature verifiers “systematically failed to comply with the law" by allegedly not conducting signature verification, resulting in the wrong person occupying the governor’s office.

    Around 1.3 million Arizonans voted by mail in the 2022 state general elections, and more than 2.5 million people voted in total. Lake lost by roughly 17,000 votes.

    Lake first filed suit in December against Hobbs, Democratic Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes and Maricopa County, the state's most populous county and home to Phoenix. The case made it to the Arizona Supreme Court before being sent back to Maricopa County courts with only one claim remaining: allegations that signatures were not adequately verified.

    In the first day of trial on Wednesday, Lake’s attorneys questioned two purported “whistleblowers” who worked for Maricopa County as signature verifiers in 2022. The witnesses told the court they weren’t sure whether election workers could have verified as many signatures as they did in the time frame they were given, insinuating that workers didn’t actually do their jobs.

    However, when questioned at trial about their own experiences, both said they tried to verify signatures to the best of their abilities — throwing water on Lake's only claim, which they were ostensibly there to strengthen. Maricopa County attorney Jack O’Connor made a point of thanking both witnesses for their work.

    Lake’s team again fumbled on day two, once again struggling and failing to prove the only remaining element of Lake's case.

    Her team called Erich Speckin, a self-proclaimed forensic document analyst with over 30 years of experience in verifying handwriting. He echoed the other witnesses' claims of shoddy signature verification, though he also had little to no evidence to back up this assertion.

    Going off a document that apparently summarized data on the keystrokes of 155 signature verifiers, Speckin said there were at least 70,000 instances in which a signature verification determination was made in less than two seconds.

    “I don’t believe it can be done,” he said.

    Lawyers for Arizona, though, raised questions about the validity of that document. Arguing on behalf of the Arizona Secretary of State's Office, attorney Craig Morgan said it was unclear who produced the document, when it was produced or whether it even accurately summarized real data.

    On cross-examination, he also reminded the court that Speckin was called not as an expert on statistical or data analysis but on handwriting comparisons.

    “You cannot say with any certainty whether [the election] was stolen or not,” Morgan said. Speckin agreed.

    Meanwhile, Ray Valenzuela, Maricopa County elections director, said Speckin's data offered a misleading and incomplete picture.

    If the signature on a ballot clearly looks the same as one on file, it can absolutely take only "one to two seconds" to verify signatures, he said. State law doesn’t dictate how long the process should take.

    There were other cases, Valenzuela added, where this verification process could also take "less than a second" — including cases where the signature on the ballot had already been effectively verified.

    If a ballot is submitted without a signature or with an alternative marking instead of a signature — a technique used by some people with disabilities who are unable to sign their names — that ballot is moved into a ballot "curing" process in which election workers contact the voter in an attempt to validate their ballot in another way.

    Once completed, a verification stamp is added to their ballot, which is sent back to the original verifiers. Those ballots can be processed quickly because they've already been verified, Valenzuela said — and yet Speckin's data did not account for circumstances like this, giving the false impression that every mail-in ballot was rushed through verification.

    The remainder of Lake’s case presented no new information at all, instead continuing to focus on how quickly one particular signature verifier previously shown in video evidence could have gone through ballots. Maricopa County Judge Peter Thompson, who is presiding over the case, complained that Lake's lawyers were asking government lawyers to make "quantum leaps in assumptions" about data that Lake's team had never fully explained.

    Morgan, the lawyer for the secretary of state's office, at one point asked Thompson why the trial was even still happening. "We had an entire day of testimony of their witnesses saying [signature verification] actually happened,” undermining the entire basis of Lake's remaining case, he complained.

    Morgan might not have to wait much longer. When court adjourned on Thursday, the state was still questioning Valenzuela — the only witness it plans to call. Attorneys involved in the case expect it will be over by Friday afternoon.
    https://www.courthousenews.com/kari-...-day-of-trial/
    We have long had death and taxes as the two standards of inevitability. But there are those who believe that death is the preferable of the two. "At least," as one man said, "there's one advantage about death; it doesn't get worse every time Congress meets."
    Erwin N. Griswold

    Taxes: Of life's two certainties, the only one for which you can get an automatic extension.
    Anonymous

  29. #175
    Quote Originally Posted by Sonny Tufts View Post


    Uhhhh, thanks ChatGPT...
    Jer. 11:18-20. "The Kingdom of God has come upon you." -- Matthew 12:28

  30. #176
    Lake loses.

    PHOENIX - A judge in Arizona has ruled against 2022 Republican gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake in her latest lawsuit over the gubernatorial election.

    The ruling, which was released by Judge Peter A. Thompson, came after he allowed Lake three days to prove county election officials failed to perform higher-level signature verifications on mail-in ballots that had been flagged.

    Here's what you should know about the ruling, and Lake's lawsuit.

    What was this lawsuit all about?

    As mentioned above, this round of lawsuit relates to allegations made by Lake on the ballot signature verification process.

    The lawsuit was part of a wider appeal by Lake over her previous challenge of results from the 2022 election, which saw her losing to Democrat Katie Hobbs.

    According to previous reports from the Associated Press, the Arizona Supreme Court sent this specific claim back to a trial court to consider in March 2023, because the state's highest court found a lower court had dismissed the claim erroneously.

    What did Lake's lawyer argue in this lawsuit?

    In this specific lawsuit, Lake's lawyer alleged that Maricopa County officials failed to perform any higher level signature verifications on ballots that had been flagged by lower level screeners for any inconsistency.

    Lake's lawyers, according to the AP, were not contesting whether voters’ signatures on ballot envelopes matched those in their voting records.

    On Mat 15, Judge Thompson refused to throw out the lawsuit. At the same time, however, Lake's legal team faced a high bar of not only having to prove her allegation over signature verifications, but to prove that it also affected the outcome of the race.

    What happened during the trial?

    On May 17, the AP reported that Lake's legal team showed a video footage that came from a Maricopa County camera feed. The footage purportedly shows a signature verified incorrectly and hastily by a worker.

    Reynaldo "Rey" Valenzuela, Maricopa County director of elections, testified that the temporary worker simply didn't grasp the technological skills needed for the job and he was re-assigned elsewhere. Signature verifiers are also randomly audited.

    "We review them for consistency," Valenzuela said. "Was there some sort of inconsistency where someone did all good (signatures) or all bad?"

    A lower-level worker also testified that higher-level signature reviewers were overwhelmed and kicked back ballot affidavit envelopes that seemed questionable.

    Three workers on lower-level signature verification who filed declarations in court on Lake’s behalf have said they experienced rejection rates due to mismatched signatures on 15% to 40% of the ballots they encountered.

    Attorneys for Arizona election officials said the workers’ speculation on signature verification efforts does not amount to a violation of the law or misconduct by election workers — and raised questions about whether the three workers could know the outcome of the specific ballots they had flagged.

    What did the judge say in his ruling?

    In his ruling, Judge Thompson wrote that the evidence the court received "does not support Plaintiff's remaining claim," and that a witness, identified only as "Ms. Onigkeit," made it abundantly clear during her testimony that two levels of signature review took place in some fashion.

    "[Ms. Onigkeit] expressed her concern that this review was done hastily and possibly not as thoroughly as she would have liked – but it was done," a portion of the ruling read.

    Another witness, identified only as "Mr. Myers," testified that he took part in one level of signature review and curing process, according to the ruling.

    Meanwhile, Valenzuela, according to the ruling, testified that two levels of signature verification and two levels of auditing took place.

    "Mr. Valenzuela’s testimony, elicited by both parties, is most helpful to the Court, and the most credible," read a portion of the ruling. "While Ms. Onigkeit and Mr. Myers have ground level experience with signature review, Mr. Valenzuela provided the Court with both a hands-on view based on the 1,600 signatures reviewed by him personally in November 2022 and a broad overview of the entire process based upon his 33 years of experience."

    In addition, Judge Thompson stated in the ruling that Valenzuela testified that the final canvass was accurate, and no clear and convincing evidence, or even a preponderance of evidence, contracts him.

    What does this mean?

    In his ruling, Judge Thompson states that the court does not find clear and convincing evidence or a preponderance of evidence of election-related misconduct, and that such misconduct affected the results of the 2022 Election.

    As stated above, Lake's legal team needed to prove that the misconducts they alleged not only happened, but also affected the election results.

    In the same ruling, Hobb's victory in the gubernatorial election was confirmed.

    What is Lake saying about the decision?

    On her Twitter, Lake did not issue a response to the ruling, but did make a tweet that reads "Big announcement tomorrow!"

    What about other people? What are they saying about the ruling?

    Officials with Maricopa County issued a statement from the Chairman of the county's Board of Supervisor, Clint Hickman. The statement reads, in part:

    "Wild claims of rigged elections may generate media attention and fundraising pleas, but they do not win court cases. When ‘bombshells’ and ‘smoking guns’ are not backed up by facts, they fail in court. This is justice, and this is what happened today in Kari Lake’s election contest."
    https://www.fox10phoenix.com/news/ar...ou-should-know
    We have long had death and taxes as the two standards of inevitability. But there are those who believe that death is the preferable of the two. "At least," as one man said, "there's one advantage about death; it doesn't get worse every time Congress meets."
    Erwin N. Griswold

    Taxes: Of life's two certainties, the only one for which you can get an automatic extension.
    Anonymous



  31. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  32. #177
    https://twitter.com/KariLakeWarRoom/...03594895130626

  33. #178

  34. #179
    It doesn't matter how right you are in any legal issue in 2023.

  35. #180
    https://twitter.com/DC_Draino/status...93154977083395

    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    We believe our lying eyes...

Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678 LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Maricopa County: Serious irregularities revealed...
    By phill4paul in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 07-15-2021, 07:36 PM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-28-2020, 08:47 AM
  3. Joe Arpaio out as Maricopa County sheriff
    By Zippyjuan in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 11-10-2016, 01:52 PM
  4. John McCain censured by Maricopa County GOP
    By Cleaner44 in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-21-2014, 09:59 AM
  5. Maricopa County Sheriff rounding up Illegals
    By Maverick in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-21-2008, 11:39 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •