Canada one step closer to euthanizing infants.

[Anti Federalist]

Quebec College of Physicians slammed for suggesting MAID for severely ill newborns

https://nationalpost.com/news/quebec...y-ill-newborns

'Canada cannot begin killing babies when doctors predict there is no hope for them. Predictions are far too often based on discriminatory assumptions about life with a disability'

Author of the article:
Catherine Lévesque
Publishing date:
Oct 11, 2022 • October 11, 2022

OTTAWA — The Quebec College of Physicians is being slammed by advocacy groups for suggesting that it be legal to euthanize severely ill newborns.

Dr. Louis Roy, from the Quebec College of Physicians, told the Commons’ Special Joint Committee of Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) on Friday that his organization believes MAID can be appropriate for infants up to age one who are born with “severe malformations” and “grave and severe syndromes” for which their “prospective of survival is null, so to speak.”

In a statement to the National Post, Inclusion Canada said it was “alarmed” by Roy’s recommendation that Canada “legalize euthanasia for infants with disabilities under the age of one.”

“Most families of children born with disabilities are told from the start that their child will, in one way or another, not have a good quality of life,” said Krista Carr, Inclusion Canada’s executive vice president.

[Occam's Banana]

[...] MAID can be appropriate for infants up to age one who are born with “severe malformations” and “grave and severe syndromes” for which their “prospective of survival is null, so to speak.”

So euthanasia "can be appropriate" for a child with such a prognosis at six months - but not for a child (perhaps the same child) with exactly the same prognosis at sixteen-months.

Why?

Why should it not also be considered "appropriate" up to age five (or ten, or twenty, etc.)?

[Occam's Banana]

So euthanasia "can be appropriate" for a child with such a prognosis at six months - but not for a child (perhaps the same child) with exactly the same prognosis at sixteen-months.

Why?

Why should it not also be considered "appropriate" up to age five (or ten, or twenty, etc.)?

Off the top of my head, I can think of at least a couple of reasons.

Either advocates of this are:
(1) members of a ghoulish death-cult who have no compunctions when it comes to infanticide, or
(2) supporters of granting state-approved/licensed "professionals" the power to issue death warrants, starting for the very young and very old (in order to appeal to sympathy for helpless suffering, and to inure people to the idea), and then gradually expanding to encompass everyone - with "appropriate" eventually morphing into "mandatory" (and all for the "common good", of course).

But (1) and (2) really just reduce to the same thing.

[jkr]

Physicians
Kill
They
Self

[acptulsa]

(2) supporters of granting state-approved/licensed "professionals" the power to issue death warrants, starting for the very young and very old (in order to appeal to sympathy for helpless suffering, and to inure people to the idea)...

... and because they're least able to object.

[Occam's Banana]

https://twitter.com/TPostMillennial/...38070882635778

[Anti Globalist]

If those infants end up receiving the covid vaccine they will be euthanized.

[pcosmar]

Finding a good Doctor is like finding a good mechanic.. ignore the ASE certification. or certificate on the Wall.

still doing my own.

[Occam's Banana]

Canada one step closer to euthanizing infants.

Add "homeless" and "the poors" to the list ...

"MAID [Medical Assistance In Dying] AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO POVERTY"

https://twitter.com/shoe0nhead/statu...55898112643072

Off the top of my head, I can think of at least a couple of reasons.

Either advocates of this are:
(1) members of a ghoulish death-cult who have no compunctions when it comes to infanticide, or
(2) supporters of granting state-approved/licensed "professionals" the power to issue death warrants, starting for the very young and very old (in order to appeal to sympathy for helpless suffering, and to inure people to the idea), and then gradually expanding to encompass everyone - with "appropriate" eventually morphing into "mandatory" (and all for the "common good", of course).

But (1) and (2) really just reduce to the same thing.

[TheTexan]

Add "homeless" and "the poors" to the list ...

"MAID [Medical Assistance In Dying] AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO POVERTY"

https://twitter.com/shoe0nhead/statu...55898112643072

Next step is to pay the poor, to kill themselves

Win/win/win for everybody

[Occam's Banana]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...uthanasia.html

[Occam's Banana]

[Occam's Banana]

[Occam's Banana]

the decision was made [... to ... ] lower the life expectancy of Americans because there wouldn't be enough money in social security [...]

Whether true or not, this perfectly embodies the spirit of modern governance, which can be summarized as follows:

"When the policy doesn't fit reality, try to make reality fit the policy."

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manit...ions-1.3947481

[Voluntarist]

What's all this fuss I hear about youth in Asia???

Where's Emily Litella when you need her?

[Occam's Banana]

Canada To Legalize Euthanasia For "Mature Minors"
In this video I discuss Canada's ever expanding Euthanasia policy that now may be expanded to what the nation refers to as "Mature Minors"
https://odysee.com/@actualjusticewar...a-for-mature:b

[acptulsa]

[Dr.3D]

Next step is to pay the poor, to kill themselves

Win/win/win for everybody

Would be better to pay the politicians to kill themselves.