Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Canada one step closer to euthanizing infants.

  1. #1

    Canada one step closer to euthanizing infants.

    Quebec College of Physicians slammed for suggesting MAID for severely ill newborns

    https://nationalpost.com/news/quebec...y-ill-newborns

    'Canada cannot begin killing babies when doctors predict there is no hope for them. Predictions are far too often based on discriminatory assumptions about life with a disability'

    Author of the article:
    Catherine Lévesque
    Publishing date:
    Oct 11, 2022 • October 11, 2022

    OTTAWA — The Quebec College of Physicians is being slammed by advocacy groups for suggesting that it be legal to euthanize severely ill newborns.

    Dr. Louis Roy, from the Quebec College of Physicians, told the Commons’ Special Joint Committee of Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) on Friday that his organization believes MAID can be appropriate for infants up to age one who are born with “severe malformations” and “grave and severe syndromes” for which their “prospective of survival is null, so to speak.”

    In a statement to the National Post, Inclusion Canada said it was “alarmed” by Roy’s recommendation that Canada “legalize euthanasia for infants with disabilities under the age of one.”

    “Most families of children born with disabilities are told from the start that their child will, in one way or another, not have a good quality of life,” said Krista Carr, Inclusion Canada’s executive vice president.
    "Truly, whoever can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." - Voltaire



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    [...] MAID can be appropriate for infants up to age one who are born with “severe malformations” and “grave and severe syndromes” for which their “prospective of survival is null, so to speak.”
    So euthanasia "can be appropriate" for a child with such a prognosis at six months - but not for a child (perhaps the same child) with exactly the same prognosis at sixteen-months.

    Why?

    Why should it not also be considered "appropriate" up to age five (or ten, or twenty, etc.)?
    The Bastiat Collection · FREE PDF · FREE EPUB · PAPER
    Frédéric Bastiat (1801-1850)

    • "When law and morality are in contradiction to each other, the citizen finds himself in the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense, or of losing his respect for the law."
      -- The Law (p. 54)
    • "Government is that great fiction, through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
      -- Government (p. 99)
    • "[W]ar is always begun in the interest of the few, and at the expense of the many."
      -- Economic Sophisms - Second Series (p. 312)
    • "There are two principles that can never be reconciled - Liberty and Constraint."
      -- Harmonies of Political Economy - Book One (p. 447)

    · tu ne cede malis sed contra audentior ito ·

  4. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Occam's Banana View Post
    So euthanasia "can be appropriate" for a child with such a prognosis at six months - but not for a child (perhaps the same child) with exactly the same prognosis at sixteen-months.

    Why?

    Why should it not also be considered "appropriate" up to age five (or ten, or twenty, etc.)?
    Off the top of my head, I can think of at least a couple of reasons.

    Either advocates of this are:
    (1) members of a ghoulish death-cult who have no compunctions when it comes to infanticide, or
    (2) supporters of granting state-approved/licensed "professionals" the power to issue death warrants, starting for the very young and very old (in order to appeal to sympathy for helpless suffering, and to inure people to the idea), and then gradually expanding to encompass everyone - with "appropriate" eventually morphing into "mandatory" (and all for the "common good", of course).

    But (1) and (2) really just reduce to the same thing.

  5. #4
    Physicians
    Kill
    They
    Self
    FLIP THOSE FLAGS, THE NATION IS IN DISTRESS!


    why I should worship the state (who apparently is the only party that can possess guns without question).
    The state's only purpose is to kill and control. Why do you worship it? - Sola_Fide

    Baptiste said.
    At which point will Americans realize that creating an unaccountable institution that is able to pass its liability on to tax-payers is immoral and attracts sociopaths?

  6. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Occam's Banana View Post
    (2) supporters of granting state-approved/licensed "professionals" the power to issue death warrants, starting for the very young and very old (in order to appeal to sympathy for helpless suffering, and to inure people to the idea)...
    ... and because they're least able to object.
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    And?
    Dems cheat.
    Trump stopped them cheating.

    A clear case of Liberty preserving authoritarianism.

  7. #6
    https://twitter.com/TPostMillennial/...38070882635778

  8. #7
    If those infants end up receiving the covid vaccine they will be euthanized.
    "Perhaps one of the most important accomplishments of my administration is minding my own business."

    Calvin Coolidge

  9. #8
    Finding a good Doctor is like finding a good mechanic.. ignore the ASE certification. or certificate on the Wall.

    still doing my own.
    Liberty is lost through complacency and a subservient mindset. When we accept or even welcome automobile checkpoints, random searches, mandatory identification cards, and paramilitary police in our streets, we have lost a vital part of our American heritage. America was born of protest, revolution, and mistrust of government. Subservient societies neither maintain nor deserve freedom for long.
    Ron Paul 2004

    Registered Ron Paul supporter # 2202
    It's all about Freedom



  10. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  11. #9
    Canada one step closer to euthanizing infants.
    Add "homeless" and "the poors" to the list ...

    "MAID [Medical Assistance In Dying] AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO POVERTY"

    https://twitter.com/shoe0nhead/statu...55898112643072


    Quote Originally Posted by Occam's Banana View Post
    Off the top of my head, I can think of at least a couple of reasons.

    Either advocates of this are:
    (1) members of a ghoulish death-cult who have no compunctions when it comes to infanticide, or
    (2) supporters of granting state-approved/licensed "professionals" the power to issue death warrants, starting for the very young and very old (in order to appeal to sympathy for helpless suffering, and to inure people to the idea), and then gradually expanding to encompass everyone - with "appropriate" eventually morphing into "mandatory" (and all for the "common good", of course).

    But (1) and (2) really just reduce to the same thing.

  12. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Occam's Banana View Post
    Add "homeless" and "the poors" to the list ...

    "MAID [Medical Assistance In Dying] AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO POVERTY"

    https://twitter.com/shoe0nhead/statu...55898112643072
    Next step is to pay the poor, to kill themselves

    Win/win/win for everybody
    It's all about taking action and not being lazy. So you do the work, whether it's fitness or whatever. It's about getting up, motivating yourself and just doing it.
    - Kim Kardashian

    Donald Trump / Crenshaw 2024!!!!

    My pronouns are he/him/his

  13. #11

  14. #12

  15. #13

  16. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by Occam's Banana View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian4Liberty View Post
    the decision was made [... to ... ] lower the life expectancy of Americans because there wouldn't be enough money in social security [...]
    Whether true or not, this perfectly embodies the spirit of modern governance, which can be summarized as follows:

    "When the policy doesn't fit reality, try to make reality fit the policy."
    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manit...ions-1.3947481

  17. #15
    What's all this fuss I hear about youth in Asia???

    Where's Emily Litella when you need her?

    Last edited by Voluntarist; 12-06-2022 at 02:53 PM.

  18. #16
    Canada To Legalize Euthanasia For "Mature Minors"
    In this video I discuss Canada's ever expanding Euthanasia policy that now may be expanded to what the nation refers to as "Mature Minors"
    https://odysee.com/@actualjusticewar...a-for-mature:b
    Last edited by Occam's Banana; 01-01-2023 at 09:39 PM. Reason: replaced YouTube with Odysee



  19. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  20. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    And?
    Dems cheat.
    Trump stopped them cheating.

    A clear case of Liberty preserving authoritarianism.

  21. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by TheTexan View Post
    Next step is to pay the poor, to kill themselves

    Win/win/win for everybody
    Would be better to pay the politicians to kill themselves.



Similar Threads

  1. Canada-Euthanizing the poor
    By Pauls' Revere in forum World News & Affairs
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-09-2022, 12:00 AM
  2. Another Step Closer to Chipping the Population
    By DamianTV in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-09-2013, 05:45 PM
  3. One step closer to regulating the internet
    By ExpatinArgentina in forum Individual Rights Violations: Case Studies
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-19-2008, 10:26 AM
  4. Step Closer Ton War With Iran?
    By ziggy_encaoua in forum World News & Affairs
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-28-2007, 04:30 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •