Gates Poised to Gain Control Over US Health Policy Through Biden Proposal to Cede Sovereignty to W.H.O.
Dr. Peter Breggin: US must withdraw Provisional Agenda Item 16.2 or it will certainly pass vote by WHO nations
Even the mainstream Politico agrees that Bill Gates controls WHO, writing in May 2017:
“Some billionaires are satisfied with buying themselves an island. Bill Gates got a United Nations health agency in Geneva…Over the past decade, the world’s richest man has become the World Health Organization’s second biggest donor, second only to the United States and just above the United Kingdom…The result, say his critics, is that Gates’ priorities have become the WHO’s.”
This is not some conspiracy website talking.
A look at WHO’s funding confirms that what Gates wants, probably goes at WHO. In addition to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation’s direct contribution, another huge chunk of WHO funding comes from GAVI, the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization, which was founded in Seattle by Gates in 2010.
Much of GAVI’s funding still comes from Gates. This increases his combined ante to WHO to make him the largest stakeholder in the world.
WHO is Gates, and Gates is WHO
But Gates is not a doctor, nor a scientist, nor even a college graduate (he dropped out of Harvard.) According to Paul Allen in his famous memoir, Gates’ first business partner and co-founder of Microsoft, Gates is a ruthless schemer who took advantage of his early partner’s illness and schemed “to rip me off.” Allen does not paint a pretty picture of the man who may soon run everyone’s life, through the emergency powers uncovered by the magic of the health emergency.
Politico writes:
“The [Gates] foundation’s impact on the WHO is enormous,” said [Laurie Garrett, a senior fellow for global health at the Council on Foreign Relations.]. “If they weren’t there, if they walked away with their money, the deleterious impact would be profound, and everyone is all too aware of that.”
Below source: DW.com
Below: Funding contributions over GAVI’s 20-year life (source) (CLICK FOR LARGER IMAGE)
So what is the threat to US sovereignty coming up on May 22, through changes to WHO’s mandate, proposed by the Biden administration? Dr. Peter Breggin, MD, writes:
“On May 22-28, 2022, ultimate control over America’s healthcare system, and hence its national sovereignty, will be delivered for a vote to the World Health Organization’s governing legislative body, the World Health Assembly (WHA).
This threat is contained in new amendments to WHO’s International Health Regulations, proposed by the Biden administration, that are scheduled as“Provisional agenda item 16.2…These regulations are a “binding instrument of international law entered into force on 15 June 2007.”3 U.N. members states can be required by law to obey or acquiesce to them.”
[WHO Provisional Agenda Item 16.2]
Dr. Breggin is a well-known critic of Big Pharma.
The Desert Review reported on May 12th:
“On Jan. 18, 2022, officials from the Biden administration quietly sent the WHO extensive amendments without an official statement or a single press conference. These proposed amendments are written to strengthen the organization’s ability to unilaterally intervene into the affairs of nations merely suspected of having a “health emergency” of possible concern to other nations. If these amendments are approved, the WHO will have the power to declare an “international health emergency,” nullifying the powers of nation states.”
Interestingly, one of GAVI’s top initiatives is a vaccine passport in partnership with Mastercard, which is also committed, according to the GAVI website, “to leading the way toward a World Beyond Cash.”
The elimination of cash globally and the ability to track every transaction every human makes, is a long-held dream of the World Economic Forum, a billionaire’s club founded by German economist Klaus Schwab. Concurrent with such a system would be the ability of the central authority to shut-off anyone’s money, should they cross lines deemed anti-social by the government.
Schwab, who is a mentor to Gates and who chose Gates for his “Young Global Leaders” program years back, wrote of his dream to be able to track and monitor people like packages:
“Any package, pallet or container can now be equipped with a sensor, transmitter or radio frequency identification (RFID) tag that allows a company to track where it is as it moves through the supply chain—how it is performing, how it is being used, and so on….In the near future, similar monitoring systems will also be applied to the movement and tracking of people.” – Klaus Schwab, “The Fourth Industrial Revolution”
Other Schwab “Young Global Leaders” are Justin Trudeau, California Governor Gavin Newsom, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, all at the forefront of enforcing lockdowns, vaccine mandates, vaccine passports, and censorship of unapproved views, which of course must be “misinformation.”
Another of GAVI’s major initiatives is The “Decade of Vaccines.” One of the talents tapped by Gates to steer it is a familiar name: Anthony Fauci. Gates made the announcement committing $10 billion to the project in 2010 at Schwab’s World Economic Forum.
The cast of players driving the push toward mandatory vaccines, vaccine passports, and a total control and surveillance platform for all non-elite humans is fairly small, but they control hundreds of billions of dollars. Seemingly always at the center of the party, is Bill Gates.
It was Bill Gates who funded Professor Neil Ferguson of Imperial College to write the paper which governments took as the rationale for the unprecedented, global “lockdowns,” entitled “Impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to reduce COVID-19 mortality and healthcare demand.” Otherwise known simply as “Report 9.”
Johan Giesecke, former chief scientist for the European Center for Disease Control and Prevention, has called Ferguson’s model “the most influential scientific paper” in memory. He also says it was “one of the most wrong.”
In 2012 Doctors Without Borders criticized Gates and GAVI for focusing on newer, more expensive vaccines or cheaper, more basic ones which have better health outcomes.
Humanosphere.org reported in 2012:
“Twenty percent of the world’s children aren’t even getting the basic vaccines,” said Kate Elder, MSF [Medicines Sans Frontiers i.e. Doctors Without Borders] vaccine policy adviser. The Gates Foundation is driving much of the global health policy decisions around vaccinations, Elder noted, and “Bill Gates’ priority is new vaccines.” The philanthropy’s influence is distorting the agenda to favor new vaccines over basic improvements, she said.”
Humanosphere.org wrote:
“The approach appears aimed more at supporting drug industry desires to promote new products than at finding the most efficient and sustainable means for fighting the diseases of poverty, [Daniel Berman, MSF’s deputy director for access] said.”
Could it be that Gate’s big concern is not actually for the health of poor people?
Bobby Kennedy Jr., the nephew of the president and founder of Children’s Health Defense, doesn’t think so.
In his meticulously footnoted 2020 article “Gates’ Globalist Vaccine Agenda: A Win-Win for Pharma and Mandatory Vaccination,” Kennedy Jr. writes:
“In 2009, the Gates Foundation funded tests of experimental HPV vaccines, developed by Glaxo Smith Kline (GSK) and Merck, on 23,000 young girls in remote Indian provinces. Approximately 1,200 suffered severe side effects, including autoimmune and fertility disorders. Seven died. Indian government investigations charged that Gates-funded researchers committed pervasive ethical violations: pressuring vulnerable village girls into the trial, bullying parents, forging consent forms, and refusing medical care to the injured girls.”
And:
“In 2010, the Gates Foundation funded a phase 3 trial of GSK’s experimental malaria vaccine, killing 151 African infants and causing serious adverse effects, including paralysis, seizure, and febrile convulsions, to 1,048 of the 5,949 children.”
And:
“During Gates’ 2002 MenAfriVac campaign in Sub-Saharan Africa, Gates’ operatives forcibly vaccinated thousands of African children against meningitis. In the village of Gouro, located in northern Chad, approximately 50 of the 500 children vaccinated developed paralysis. South African newspapers complained, “We are guinea pigs for the drug makers.” Nelson Mandela’s former senior economist, Professor Patrick Bond, describes Gates’ philanthropic practices as “ruthless and immoral.””
Dr. Breggin Urges Americans to Call Their Congressmen to Force Biden to Withdraw Amendments Ceding Sovereignty to WHO
Dr. Peter Breggin concludes:
“We must immediately mount an international campaign, especially focused within America, to force the U.S. to withdraw these amendments before they come to a vote. Otherwise, America and the nations of the world will take a giant stride toward forfeiting national sovereignty to WHO and the U.N. “
The message to Congress should be: US must withdraw Provisional Agenda Item 16.2 from WHO consideration and vote.
In December of 2021, a group of UK citizens which include a former chief science officer and vice president at Pfizer filed a formal criminal complaint, at the International Criminal Court in the Hague, charging Gates, Schwab, and many others with Crimes Against Humanity. [copy of ICC complaint]
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by jkr
Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Connect With Us