Elon Musk buys Twitter for $44 billion

[Swordsmyth]

Elon Musk’s Social Media Platform X Revealed: Bias Exposed!

https://www.waynedupree.com/2024/08/...d-Bias-Exposed

[Occam's Banana]

THREAD: UK Marxists working closely with Harris: "Kill Musk's Twitter"

Election Exclusive: British Advisors to Kamala Harris Hope to "Kill Musk's Twitter"
England, not Russia, is the culprit in a real foreign election interference story, as the leaked Stateside plans of an advisory group with close ties to Prime Minister Keir Starmer show
https://www.racket.news/p/election-e...itish-advisors
{Paul D. Thacker & Matt Taibbi | 22 October 2024}

[...]

The documents obtained by The DisInformation Chronicle and Racket show CCDH’s hyperfocus on Musk — “Kill Musk’s Twitter” is the first item in the template of its monthly agenda notes dating back to the early months of this year.

KILL, KILL, KILL: No matter what else the CCDH talks about, “Kill Musk’s Twitter” is its first item of business

[...]

[unknown]

https://x.com/RedWave_Press/status/1861843420416823774

[WarriorLiberty]

https://x.com/RedWave_Press/status/1861843420416823774

Imagine banning users on a social media platform for saying there are only two genders?
lolz

[unknown]

Musk changed his user name.

https://x.com/elonmusk

[unknown]

https://x.com/cyb3rgam3r420/status/1873853864962846843

[unknown]

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1875355425601999255

[Brian4Liberty]

Moor freedumb!

https://x.com/ElijahSchaffer/status/1875590617813938213

[Brian4Liberty]

https://x.com/SomeSymbiont/status/1875600825298645356

[Brian4Liberty]

https://x.com/Villgecrazylady/status...16047249944823

[Brian4Liberty]

https://x.com/heidi_liberty76/status...69261227847953

If X wants to limit my reach for negative posts, what are the top 10 examples of my posts that is considered negative?
4 posts
25 web pages
Based on recent discussions on X, here are some examples of posts that might be considered negative due to their critical or controversial content:

Criticism of Monetization on X: Posts where you express skepticism or criticism about X's monetization strategies, specifically regarding limiting comments to subscribers, suggesting it's more about profit than user experience.
Political Commentary: Any posts where you make strong, possibly polarizing statements about political figures, policies, or current events, which might be seen as negative or inflammatory by some audiences.
Critique of Social Media Practices: Posts criticizing how social media platforms, including X, handle privacy, data, or user interaction, potentially seen as negative if they challenge the platform's policies or decisions.
Negative Experiences with Products or Services: Sharing personal experiences where you've had issues with products or services, particularly if these are shared in a way that might discourage others from using those products or services.
Disagreement with Popular Opinions: Posts where you strongly disagree with widely accepted views or trends on X, especially if they're presented in a confrontational manner.
Negative Commentary on Public Figures: Posts where you critique celebrities, influencers, or other public figures in a negative light, which could be seen as diminishing or attacking their reputation.
Criticism of Corporate Behavior: Highlighting or critiquing unethical business practices or corporate decisions, especially if they involve companies associated with X's advertising or partnerships.
Conspiracy Theories or Skepticism: Sharing or endorsing content that challenges official narratives, which might be labeled as negative or misleading if not backed by mainstream sources.
Negative Personal Experiences: Discussing personal negative experiences, especially if they involve entities or individuals with a presence on X, potentially seen as spreading negativity or seeking sympathy.
Cynicism about Social Movements: Posts that show a cynical or negative view towards social or political movements, particularly if they are currently favored or supported by X's community standards or trends.

These examples are drawn from general observations on how negativity is perceived on social platforms, based on posts found on X. Remember, the perception of what constitutes a "negative post" can vary, and X's algorithms for determining reach might change or might not explicitly target these aspects but could still affect visibility.




Apply this analysis to my X posts
11 posts
25 web pages
Given your recent X posts, here's how they might align with the examples of potentially negative content:

Criticism of Monetization on X: Your post discussing skepticism about the motives behind limiting comments to X subscribers could be seen as negative, critiquing X's business decisions in a way that might not align with the platform's interests.



Political Commentary: Your interactions with posts from @ConceptualJames, @ztisdale, and others imply a strong stance on political issues, particularly concerning communism and Islamism, which could be viewed as negative by those who hold opposing views.

Critique of Social Media Practices: There isn't direct evidence of this from your posts, but the general tone of skepticism towards social media practices, as seen in your engagement with @DailyTechpulse and @NickThePolymath, might suggest a critical outlook that could be perceived as negative.

Negative Experiences with Products or Services: Your mention of issues with debit card usage or editing features on X could be seen as highlighting negative aspects of digital services or X's functionality.

Disagreement with Popular Opinions: Your posts where you challenge or disagree with certain narratives or engage with anti-woke personalities indicate a disagreement with popular or mainstream opinions, which could be seen as negative by some.

Negative Commentary on Public Figures: Your posts don't explicitly critique public figures but engage with content that does, like the interactions with @ConceptualJames, suggesting alignment with such critiques.

Criticism of Corporate Behavior: No specific posts directly critique corporate behavior, but your general tone could be interpreted as critical if extended to corporate decisions.
Conspiracy Theories or Skepticism: While not directly promoting conspiracy theories, your skepticism regarding certain political alignments or social movements might be viewed negatively.

Negative Personal Experiences: Your post about being "swarmed by demons" after getting retweeted by anti-woke figures highlights a negative personal experience on X.

Cynicism about Social Movements: Your engagement with posts that juxtapose leftist radicals with Islamists might be seen as cynical or negative towards these movements, although this is inferred from the content you engage with rather than your own posts.


These observations are based on the patterns in your posts and interactions, which show a tendency towards critical or skeptical content. However, the interpretation of negativity can be subjective, and X's algorithms might not explicitly penalize for these reasons alone but rather for a combination of factors including user reports, engagement metrics, or alignment with broader community guidelines. Remember, the context and the way content is perceived by others on the platform can significantly influence how "negative" a post is considered.
...
https://x.com/i/grok/share/gEoM7f9bzOCkiuaAbULtAQi5O

[Brian4Liberty]

https://x.com/SiadoSirius/status/1875506647403311580

[unknown]

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1875326469968470405

https://x.com/JosephPino_/status/1875334267154358690

[unknown]

Isn't this the dude from Europa: The Last Battle ?

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1875924534605574207

[Brian4Liberty]

It's pretty much official. Censorship on X is as bad as it has ever been. Instead of outright bans, "freedom of reach" is limited to the point of being zero, unless an account is favored by Musk himself.

And it is political censorship. It is not shadow bans on bad behavior, it can be purely unfavored political opinion. And criticism of the algorithm itself is the worst offense. The new first amendment:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech that is not critical of government, or expressing unapproved opinions, or of the official press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

[Brian4Liberty]

https://x.com/EmeraldRobinson/status...56334038249756

[ClaytonB]

It's pretty much official. Censorship on X is as bad as it has ever been. Instead of outright bans, "freedom of reach" is limited to the point of being zero, unless an account is favored by Musk himself.

And it is political censorship. It is not shadow bans on bad behavior, it can be purely unfavored political opinion. And criticism of the algorithm itself is the worst offense. The new first amendment:

Elon Musk's romance with Right/MAGA is aging like milk in a sauna...

[ClaytonB]

PS: In the age of AI-cheap-as-water, why can't users set their own filters? Why does the filter have to be centralized in X hq? Why not let me choose my own AI filter? Why not let users train filters (at their own expense) and share them for others to use? If you're a "free speech absolutist", the point of filters is not to control "the Conversation", it's to permit users to see stuff they want to see, and not see stuff they don't want to see. X hq doesn't have to be involved in that at all (except for providing a metadata API), just let people run their own 3rd-party filters to fetch posts/feeds they will find interesting. This is not rocket science (pun intended)...

[unknown]

It's pretty much official. Censorship on X is as bad as it has ever been. Instead of outright bans, "freedom of reach" is limited to the point of being zero, unless an account is favored by Musk himself.

And it is political censorship. It is not shadow bans on bad behavior, it can be purely unfavored political opinion. And criticism of the algorithm itself is the worst offense. The new first amendment:

Wow.

What a weak minded prick.

[devil21]

my posts on this thread aged well, like fine wine.

[Occam's Banana]

They're calling him a "whistleblower" now
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=We3YBZM30CM
{Decoy Voice | 18 January 2025}

Twitter owner Elon Musk was recently called out over his suspicious video gameplay. Twitch streamer Asmongold then stated he believed his video game character was paid for, which caused Elon to go to X and criticize Zack's gameplay and leak their old DMs. Now the media is blowing this out of proportion, but do they have a point?

[unknown]

They're calling him a "whistleblower" now
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=We3YBZM30CM
{Decoy Voice | 18 January 2025}

Twitter owner Elon Musk was recently called out over his suspicious video gameplay. Twitch streamer Asmongold then stated he believed his video game character was paid for, which caused Elon to go to X and criticize Zack's gameplay and leak their old DMs. Now the media is blowing this out of proportion, but do they have a point?

NERD WARS.

That would actually be kinda cool to be involved in a nerd war with Musk.

[unknown]

Musk broke reddit.