2000 Mules: Election Fraud Documentary

[mrsat_98]

http://2000mules.com/

2000 mules. Election Fraud movie. Is it game over ?

[Mod edit] Trailer:

[Mod edit] To Watch:

OFFICIAL MOVIE: 2000 Mules

This is the official 2000 Mules movie.

Below are the instructions to purchase and watch:

1. Purchase the movie or an annual subscription at 2000mules.locals.com.
2. Make sure your email addresses on Rumble and Locals match. If they do not match, this movie will not be available on Rumble and will only be available for you on Locals.
3. If you are using the website or app, reload the page. The movie will play directly on this page. If not, you can still watch it directly on Locals.com.
4. If you are using ROKU, you must access the film under the SUSBSCRIPTIONS tab and under DINESH D'SOUZA account for it to work. This means you must be subscribed to his channel and must login.

[TheCount]

No

[TheTexan]

Yes

[ClaytonB]

No

You mean,

[69360]

So a video about election fraud made by a dude who had a felony conviction for illegal campaign donations will put Trump back in office? Sure.

[TheCount]

So a video about election fraud made by a dude who had a felony conviction for illegal campaign donations will put Trump back in office? Sure.

The American people haven't bought enough pillows yet.

[nobody's_hero]

So a video about election fraud made by a dude who had a felony conviction for illegal campaign donations will put Trump back in office? Sure.

I doubt it will put trump back in office, but if illegal campaign contributions is a disqualifier then Zuckerberg's $350 million to make sure that ballot drop boxes were disproportionately distributed to liberal precincts would undoubtedly top anything this filmmaker did.

[Invisible Man]

Is there going to be something else in this documentary besides the other stuff that's already been debunked?

[donnay]

Good for D'Souza! Shinning a light on the corruption is a start.

[nobody's_hero]

Is there going to be something else in this documentary besides the other stuff that's already been debunked ignored?

Fixed.

(and no, probably not)

[kahless]

Two more weeks?

[dannno]

So a video about election fraud made by a dude who had a felony conviction for illegal campaign donations will put Trump back in office? Sure.

Do you think donating to campaigns should be illegal?

[RonWrightor]

I don't understand: T=-

They used WWE style hyping to get the guy elected, I mean, COME ON. @69360 I don't know him, but I know its foolish to think that a conviction--of almost any stripe--is proof of anything but prosecutorial discretion.

[dannno]

I don't understand: Trump was a hinderance. A sink. A bloated orange puppet.

They used WWE style hyping to get the guy elected, I mean, COME ON. @69360 I don't know him, but I know its foolish to think that a conviction--of almost any stripe--is proof of anything but prosecutorial discretion.

He was a great friend to Rand Paul and worked with him on a lot of issues. You will never see that happen with an establishment puppet.

[RonWrightor]

He was a great friend to Rand Paul and worked with him on a lot of issues. You will never see that happen with an establishment puppet.

no sense in rehashing it. Divisive, unproductive. Just furious. Ron Paul should have been elected president in 2012, at the latest. The guys that smothered our guy (earned, not given) hyped Trump (as the heel to people who identified with being the heel) and thats the last I will say. Hope you are doing good, man.

[dannno]

The guys that smothered our guy (earned, not given) hyped Trump (as the heel to people who identified with being the heel) and thats the last I will say.

Fox News wasn't pro Trump at all, until he became so popular that if they came out against him they would lose 90% of their audience.. even then, it was only a few anchors on there who were really pro-Trump, and yes Hannity was one of them. I don't know if it was for ratings or what. However, the network itself was ready at any moment to turn their back on him. Problem is they have a few anchors like Tucker and Judge Jeanine and a couple others who really got on board, but they are opinion people, not news anchors.

You have to look at the establishment as a whole. Fox News was the worst network ever when Bush was President. MSNBC actually had some decent anti-war commentary back then. Once Obama got in, MSNBC went completely down the drain. Fox feigned outrage at Obama for ratings.

Trump actually has most of his true support from independent media and the people, not the corporate oligarchy.

[TheTexan]

Trump actually has most of his true support from independent media and the people, not the corporate oligarchy.

What's ironic about it, is that the Left assumes that anyone who supports Trump, or anyone right of center really, must for sure keep Fox on 24/7 on their TV

[nobody's_hero]

Fox News wasn't pro Trump at all, until he became so popular that if they came out against him they would lose 90% of their audience.. even then, it was only a few anchors on there who were really pro-Trump, and yes Hannity was one of them. I don't know if it was for ratings or what. However, the network itself was ready at any moment to turn their back on him. Problem is they have a few anchors like Tucker and Judge Jeanine and a couple others who really got on board, but they are opinion people, not news anchors.

You have to look at the establishment as a whole. Fox News was the worst network ever when Bush was President. MSNBC actually had some decent anti-war commentary back then. Once Obama got in, MSNBC went completely down the drain. Fox feigned outrage at Obama for ratings.

Trump actually has most of his true support from independent media and the people, not the corporate oligarchy.

I go back and forth with my skepticism. If Trump was really giving TPTB everything they wanted, I don't think they would have gone through such lengths as to have Biden stand in front of a green-screen and give pre-recorded press conferences around election time and leading up to inauguration. They really bent over backwards to accommodate Biden (because Lord knows, they couldn't let him try to read the script).

"Office of the president elect" - Created 2020, by ABC News, to make sure his arm doesn't disappear in the camera when he scratches his head or something

Anyway, Trump might be good for ruining Liz Cheney at the moment, I'll consider that a win

[donnay]

2000 Mules Trailer
https://rumble.com/v1238uc-2000-mules-trailer.html

[Anti Globalist]

Good trailer.

[mrsat_98]

https://youtu.be/HfMA1Ax0nrg

Could it be a phishing expedition.

[Brian4Liberty]

[Brian4Liberty]

You WON'T Believe This About 2020!

I spoke to my friend Dinesh D'Souza about his thoughts on Elon Musk buying Twitter, his upcoming movie "2,000 Mules," the 2020 election and more...You won't want to miss it!

[James_Madison_Lives]

All the juicy links and document images are here:

https://uncoverdc.com/2022/04/27/bal...true-the-vote/

Trump won. The gaslighting is over. How dare you ask questions about election results. All eyes on Wisconsin, Michigan, PA and AZ.

Trailer



Rumble backup video: https://rumble.com/embed/vzh2um/?pub=4

[dannno]

Already got my ticket for tomorrow. First time going to a movie theater in a long time.. I think the third time in the last ten years.. Playing on May 2 and 4 in theaters, then an online viewing on the 7th.

https://2000mules.com/

[dannno]

bump

[TheTexan]

popcorn.gif

[dannno]

Great film, highly recommended.

They bought 10 trillion cell phone pings, I guess big marketing firms and corporations buy them all the time. They don't have personal data stored, but they do have unique identifiers so you can track the individual phones.

The ballot boxes are supposed to be recorded 24/7 by local governments, and you can FOIA request the footage. Sufficed to say, some of the cameras were mysteriously missing footage. They did data analysis on the pings, then synced up the times they visited the drop boxes with the video footage they did get and compiled all of the data.

Looks like Trump won by a wide pretty wide margin, just based on the data they delved into. If they expanded the search, to say, somebody who visited at least 5 drop boxes, instead of at least 10, it wasn't even close. Then there is all the other fraud... pallets of ballots in the middle of the night, rigged vote counting machines, malicious vote counters, etc..

[mrsat_98]

Ahh the reason the abortion case was leaked.

[TheTexan]

Great film, highly recommended.

They bought 10 trillion cell phone pings, I guess big marketing firms and corporations buy them all the time. They don't have personal data stored, but they do have unique identifiers so you can track the individual phones.

The ballot boxes are supposed to be recorded 24/7 by local governments, and you can FOIA request the footage. Sufficed to say, some of the cameras were mysteriously missing footage. They did data analysis on the pings, then synced up the times they visited the drop boxes with the video footage they did get and compiled all of the data.

Looks like Trump won by a wide pretty wide margin, just based on the data they delved into. If they expanded the search, to say, somebody who visited at least 5 drop boxes, instead of at least 10, it wasn't even close. Then there is all the other fraud... pallets of ballots in the middle of the night, rigged vote counting machines, malicious vote counters, etc..

What's really funny is that there are several distinct types of fraud that occurred (and/or broken election laws).

Any 1 of those would be big enough to sway the election.

I suppose I will just add this to the list...