Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 61 to 81 of 81

Thread: Trump says he will pardon supporters if he wins in 2024

  1. #61
    Quote Originally Posted by Occam's Banana View Post
    Hell, he wouldn't even have to pay for it.

    He could just exhort his acolytes to contribute to their legal help.

    But he couldn't be bothered to do even that much.

    https://twitter.com/michaelmalice/st...50061497311236
    And for that matter, why would they even need Trump to exhort them first ... ?

    https://twitter.com/drunkbeater/stat...30597007933444



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #62
    Quote Originally Posted by Occam's Banana View Post
    And for that matter, why would they even need Trump to exhort them first ... ?

    https://twitter.com/drunkbeater/stat...30597007933444
    Because people like dannno are convinced that it was a setupwith Feds and antifa and any Trump supporters that were there are the left's stooges.

    What dannno doesn't realize, is that is exactly what the Left wants him to think. They want to cast the event as one of dishonor.

    The truth is, almost everyone there was a Trump supporter. And they were angry, frustrated, and justifiably so. The courts and media had failed them, with little recourse remaining except to riot. Which is what they did. At great expense to their personal future.

    These protestors, in my book, are heroes. They stood up with a united voice and said we will not tolerate this.

    They were an inspiration to many, myself included. I was beginning to think people had given up, that they had surrendered. Jan 6 showed me that the fight was still on.

    The Left however, has been working overtime to cast Jan 6 in a negative light. And part of that is a psy-op by the fake right that it was all a fed/antifa setup. Dannno has bought into this idea and he doesn't realize that he's being spoon fed leftist bull$#@!.
    It's all about taking action and not being lazy. So you do the work, whether it's fitness or whatever. It's about getting up, motivating yourself and just doing it.
    - Kim Kardashian

    Donald Trump / Crenshaw 2024!!!!

    My pronouns are he/him/his

  4. #63
    Quote Originally Posted by Occam's Banana View Post
    And for that matter, why would they even need Trump to exhort them first ... ?

    https://twitter.com/drunkbeater/stat...30597007933444
    Who are these people on the right that this guy is talking about? Is viking helmet guy now considered what the right wing is? Is Trump?

    Also, who's one of these people who burned down a city that the left fundraised for them? And what was the name of the city they burned down?
    There is nothing to fear from globalism, free trade and a single worldwide currency, but a globalism where free trade is competitively subsidized by each nation, a continuous trade war is dictated by the WTO, and the single currency is pure fiat, fear is justified. That type of globalism is destined to collapse into economic despair, inflationism and protectionism and managed by resurgent militant nationalism.
    Ron Paul
    Congressional Record (March 13, 2001)

  5. #64
    Quote Originally Posted by Occam's Banana View Post
    Yuuuge electricity. The best electricity. The best.

    We're being governed ruled by a geriatric Alzheimer patient/puppet whose strings are being pulled by an elitist oligarchy who believe they can manage the world... imagine the utter maniacal, sociopathic hubris!



  6. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  7. #65
    Quote Originally Posted by Invisible Man View Post
    Who are these people on the right that this guy is talking about? Is viking helmet guy now considered what the right wing is? Is Trump?
    He is obviously referring to the J6 defendants. Whether you think it is correct or appropriate to refer to them (or Trump) as being "on the right" or "what the right wing is" isn't germane to understanding the point he is making.

    Quote Originally Posted by Invisible Man View Post
    Also, who's one of these people who burned down a city that the left fundraised for them? And what was the name of the city they burned down?
    Don't be obtuse. He's obviously making hyperbolic reference to the Antifa/BLM defendants - many of whom were charged with violent crimes much more serious than anything the J6 defendants have been charged with - who were bailed out with donations from supporters of their "cause" (including Kamala Harris, in contrast to Trump).
    Last edited by Occam's Banana; 01-31-2022 at 08:26 AM.

  8. #66
    Quote Originally Posted by Invisible Man View Post
    Who are these people on the right that this guy is talking about? Is viking helmet guy now considered what the right wing is? Is Trump?

    Also, who's one of these people who burned down a city that the left fundraised for them? And what was the name of the city they burned down?
    Fair questions . I think though overall the communists are always more organized than the avg conservative who mostly just minds own business and goes to work every day . The BLM riots are estimated at over one billion in property damage in 140 cities where the govt claimed Jan 6 riot was 1 1/2 million. The Billion number comes from the Western Journal this month taken from a Sept Axios article I think. That number is low because it was based on the 1 to 2 billion expected insurance claims to be paid out and could be quite a bit higher than that according to the III . According to Property Claims Services which has tracked claims since the 50's it was the most expensive civil unrest ever in the US.
    Do something Danke

  9. #67
    So we know the capital riot cost 1000 times less than the george floyd party at minimum
    Do something Danke

  10. #68
    Quote Originally Posted by Occam's Banana View Post
    He is obviously referring to the J6 defendants. Whether you think it is correct or appropriate to refer to them (or Trump) as being "on the right" or "what the right wing is" isn't germane to understanding the point he is making.
    If he's just contrasting the left with more of the left, that seems germane.

    Quote Originally Posted by Occam's Banana View Post
    Don't be obtuse. He's obviously making hyperbolic reference to the Antifa/BLM defendants - many of whom were charged with violent crimes much more serious than anything the J6 defendants have been charged with - who were bailed out with donations from supporters of their "cause" (including Kamala Harris, in contrast to Trump).
    He's using hyperbole because if he doesn't, there's nothing there. Just one big nonstory about some irrelevant people none of us would have known about committing crimes that all put together didn't amount to rounding errors in daily crime statistics across the country, who were only made newsworthy in the first place by way of media outlets like Breitbart, Sean Hannity, OANN, etc., giving them a name and hyperbolizing that they were burning down cities. And as soon as it ceased to be beneficial to those media outlets and the politicians aligned with them, it ceased to be a story any more. If anything, the angle should be that Kamala et al were unwittingly helping the right wing by tweeting support for those otherwise irrelevant common street thugs who were serving as the boogey men du jour. Because there's no mistaking it, if you approach the story about Antifa burning down cities with the question, "Who benefits?" the answer to that question is 100% those on the right, not the left.
    There is nothing to fear from globalism, free trade and a single worldwide currency, but a globalism where free trade is competitively subsidized by each nation, a continuous trade war is dictated by the WTO, and the single currency is pure fiat, fear is justified. That type of globalism is destined to collapse into economic despair, inflationism and protectionism and managed by resurgent militant nationalism.
    Ron Paul
    Congressional Record (March 13, 2001)

  11. #69
    Quote Originally Posted by Invisible Man View Post
    If he's just contrasting the left with more of the left, that seems germane.
    Apparently not, since you had no trouble at all sussing out exactly to whom he was referring, despite your pretense of uncertainty.

    Quote Originally Posted by Invisible Man View Post
    He's using hyperbole because if he doesn't, there's nothing there. Just one big nonstory about some irrelevant people none of us would have known about committing crimes that all put together didn't amount to rounding errors in daily crime statistics across the country, who were only made newsworthy in the first place by way of media outlets like Breitbart, Sean Hannity, OANN, etc., giving them a name and hyperbolizing that they were burning down cities. And as soon as it ceased to be beneficial to those media outlets and the politicians aligned with them, it ceased to be a story any more. If anything, the angle should be that Kamala et al were unwittingly helping the right wing by tweeting support for those otherwise irrelevant common street thugs who were serving as the boogey men du jour. Because there's no mistaking it, if you approach the story about Antifa burning down cities with the question, "Who benefits?" the answer to that question is 100% those on the right, not the left.
    Well ... I have to admit, "None of the Antifa/BLM riots were of any interest, significance, importance, or consequence - except as a right-wing grift that Kamala Harris, et al. got suckered into supporting" is certainly a take I was not expecting ...


  12. #70
    Quote Originally Posted by Occam's Banana View Post
    Well ... I have to admit, "None of the Antifa/BLM riots were of any interest, significance, importance, or consequence - except as a right-wing grift that Kamala Harris, et al. got suckered into supporting" is certainly a take I was not expecting ...


    Oooooo. A picture of a small fire with a BLM sign in it. Must have been some kind of major societal upheaval going on there. The funny thing is, some person added that text to the meme intending to be ironic without realizing how accurate it was. I'm pretty sure that every single time that line about burning down cities, which is now as much of an overused cliche as the word cuck in rightwing circles, gets used, this is what it's really referring to, a small fire near a BLM sign. That's it.

    Where did all the stories about these cities getting burned down disappear to anyway? It's not like there are any fewer people out there committing acts of arson that we can take pictures of and make big deals about now than there were a couple years ago.

    Maybe they'll kick back up again when it's closer to the time of an election when there's more of a reason to scare people. Stay tuned to Hannity. He'll let you know when to get back on that bandwagon.
    Last edited by Invisible Man; 01-31-2022 at 10:01 AM.
    There is nothing to fear from globalism, free trade and a single worldwide currency, but a globalism where free trade is competitively subsidized by each nation, a continuous trade war is dictated by the WTO, and the single currency is pure fiat, fear is justified. That type of globalism is destined to collapse into economic despair, inflationism and protectionism and managed by resurgent militant nationalism.
    Ron Paul
    Congressional Record (March 13, 2001)

  13. #71
    Quote Originally Posted by Occam's Banana View Post
    Apparently not, since you had no trouble at all sussing out exactly to whom he was referring, despite your pretense of uncertainty.
    I wasn't the one who sussed that out. You and Michael Malice were in the other tweets that were quoted right there in the same post I was replying to.
    There is nothing to fear from globalism, free trade and a single worldwide currency, but a globalism where free trade is competitively subsidized by each nation, a continuous trade war is dictated by the WTO, and the single currency is pure fiat, fear is justified. That type of globalism is destined to collapse into economic despair, inflationism and protectionism and managed by resurgent militant nationalism.
    Ron Paul
    Congressional Record (March 13, 2001)

  14. #72
    Quote Originally Posted by Occam's Banana View Post
    Well ... I have to admit, "None of the Antifa/BLM riots were of any interest, significance, importance, or consequence - except as a right-wing grift that Kamala Harris, et al. got suckered into supporting" is certainly a take I was not expecting ...
    It all makes sense, if you still subscribe to the quaint notion that the international megacorporations who hate competing with upstarts are "The Right".

    Quote Originally Posted by Invisible Man View Post
    Oooooo. A picture of a small fire with a BLM sign in it. Must have been some kind of major societal upheaval going on there. The funny thing is, some person added that text to the meme intending to be ironic without realizing how accurate it was. I'm pretty sure that every single time that line about burning down cities, which is now as much of an overused cliche as the word cuck in rightwing circles, gets used, this is what it's really referring to, a small fire near a BLM sign. That's it.
    So how are the flames rising behind the sign? It would take some mad Photoshop skills to pull that off.
    Last edited by acptulsa; 01-31-2022 at 10:11 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by wizardwatson View Post
    ...sad that this man's greatness is defined by the hatred he attracts and this is why Americans love him.



  15. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  16. #73
    Quote Originally Posted by Invisible Man View Post
    I wasn't the one who sussed that out. You and Michael Malice were in the other tweets that were quoted right there in the same post I was replying to.
    Oh, I see. So you sussed out that it was sussed out. Sorry. My bad.

    Thence, your disingenuous pretense of pseudo-Socratic uncertainty. QED

    Quote Originally Posted by Invisible Man View Post
    Oooooo. A picture of a small fire with a BLM sign in it. Must have been some kind of major societal upheaval going on there. The funny thing is, some person added that text to the meme intending to be ironic without realizing how accurate it was. I'm pretty sure that every single time that line about burning down cities, which is now as much of an overused cliche as the word cuck in rightwing circles, gets used, this is what it's really referring to, a small fire near a BLM sign. That's it.

    Where did all the stories about these cities getting burned down disappear to anyway? It's not like there are any fewer people out there committing acts of arson that we can take pictures of and make big deals about now than there were a couple years ago.

    Maybe they'll kick back up again when it's closer to the time of an election when there's more of a reason to scare people. Stay tuned to Hannity. He'll let you know when to get back on that bandwagon.
    Why are you erasing the lived experience of those survived by George Floyd and then colonizing it with the likes of Sean Hannity?

    For shame. Do better.

  17. #74
    Quote Originally Posted by acptulsa View Post
    So how are the flames rising behind the sign? It would take some mad Photoshop skills to pull that off.
    I'm not saying it's Photoshopped. I'm saying it's not national newsworthy, nor anything different than countless fires that happen every day, and have happened every day throughout the history of civilization, nor a harbinger of white genocide, nor any of the other things it's supposed to be to make people think their lives depended on their voting for a lesser of two evils. But somehow for some, because this picture of a small fire has a BLM sign in it, that makes it worse than all the other small fires we could take pictures of. That BLM sign is the only thing that makes this a picture of somebody burning down a city, whereas without that sign it would be a run-of-the mill act of arson.

    It's always worthwhile to ask the question of who benefits. And when it comes to the otherwise inexplicable spate of stories in the runup to the 2020 election about "Antifa" "burning down cities," the answer to that question is clear. Apparently some twitter influencer types are still getting mileage out of that narrative.
    Last edited by Invisible Man; 01-31-2022 at 11:09 AM.
    There is nothing to fear from globalism, free trade and a single worldwide currency, but a globalism where free trade is competitively subsidized by each nation, a continuous trade war is dictated by the WTO, and the single currency is pure fiat, fear is justified. That type of globalism is destined to collapse into economic despair, inflationism and protectionism and managed by resurgent militant nationalism.
    Ron Paul
    Congressional Record (March 13, 2001)

  18. #75
    This thread has inspired me to start using some variation of the phrase "burning cities" every time I encounter an opportunity to do so.

  19. #76
    Quote Originally Posted by Occam's Banana View Post
    This thread has inspired me to start using some variation of the phrase "burning cities" every time I encounter an opportunity to do so.
    https://twitter.com/michaelmalice/st...44531219308546

  20. #77
    Quote Originally Posted by Occam's Banana View Post
    Cities full of honking trucks >>> cities full of burning buildings

    https://twitter.com/Dispropoganda/st...16375550226438
    //

  21. #78
    https://x.com/business/status/1878365053109387412


  22. #79
    Quote Originally Posted by unknown View Post
    https://x.com/business/status/1878365053109387412

    Theres nothing obvious about that to me. Pardon all of them except the feds and their CIs
    It's all about taking action and not being lazy. So you do the work, whether it's fitness or whatever. It's about getting up, motivating yourself and just doing it.
    - Kim Kardashian

    Donald Trump / Crenshaw 2024!!!!

    My pronouns are he/him/his

  23. #80
    Quote Originally Posted by unknown View Post
    https://x.com/business/status/1878365053109387412

    The whole narrative is absurd on its face - at the same time the USA was both founded on White supremacy, slavery, and genocide, yet always meant to be a place that infinity Africans, Indians, and South Americans could come for a "better life"? - Unknown



  24. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  25. #81
    Quote Originally Posted by unknown View Post
    https://x.com/business/status/1878365053109387412

    Well, duh... those who behaved violently were hired actors. I suspect Pelosi et al did the hiring.
    I also suspect none of them were arrested.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-09-2021, 08:09 PM
  2. Eric Trump 2024 ?
    By enhanced_deficit in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-29-2020, 01:07 PM
  3. Trump would never run in 2024
    By GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged in forum Open Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-06-2020, 08:44 AM
  4. After his RNC speech, Trump supporters call for "Tim Scott 2024"
    By enhanced_deficit in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-27-2020, 06:28 PM
  5. Trump Family Dynasty: Ivanka Trump vs Don Jr. 2024 Prospects
    By enhanced_deficit in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 05-25-2020, 03:08 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •