Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: De-balling The Tyrant

  1. #1

    De-balling The Tyrant

    https://freedomisobvious.blogspot.co...ll-tyrant.html





    How do we effectively neuter the Tyrant without resorting to open war as the party to fire the first shot?

    How do we reduce the Tyrant to irrelevancy?
    In a word, we starve him.
    It is that simple, if not quite that easy.
    To wit, we:

    1. Pay him no heed or tribute
    2. Resist him at every turn through non-compliance; make him work maximally for his every violation
    3. Defy him openly, head high so he knows he is flouted
    4. Show him naught but utter, cold, scientific indifference, for that is one of the greatest weapons one has over an enemy. In so doing, the Tyrant is diminished by his own hand, as we cause his sick mind to act against itself. We become as a great black hole, giving him nothing whatsoever. He destroys himself, the beauty in it being that it all transpires in his own mind, the bad place being only one where such people ever go because it is the only place they can go.



    Make the Tyrant sweat for every trespass he commits against you and your fellows. Defend the rights of all men, even those who curse and disparage you. Always be the better man. Always be better than the Tyrant and his own.

    Make the price of playing so high, the Tyrant comes to hate his days for the anguish of his interminable frustrations. Leave him unable to enjoy the ill-gotten fruits of his felonious labors. Become obstreperously intractable to all who would trespass.
    Never forget that the Tyrant cannot succeed without the willing cooperation of those upon whom he directs his crimes. When enough of us stop obeying, turning our backs to him and his petty tantrums, he will become an open embarrassment to himself and before the world, forcing him to that nexus where he must choose to step off, tail tucked, or escalate to physical violence. Either way, we win.


    Either the Tyrant recedes into ignominy as he diminishes and disparages himself in the effective admission of his status as a self-mocking disgrace to Existence itself, or makes his ultimate error in escalating to open, physical violence. In the latter case, we strike the life from the Felon and his lackeys, relegating them to the dustbin of history as just another set of anonymous scoundrels who met their condign ends at the hands of Freemen who would not be subjugated.

    The only way we lose is by aiding and abetting the Tyrant's crimes against us, thereby defeating ourselves through our continued obedience.


    That these artlessly ham-fisted examples of feckless humanity have succeeded so wildly stands as testament to what utter failures have been the rest of us. We should all burn with shame, that those boobs have managed such domnation over us, for without our effective cooperation, it never would have been possible.


    All we see transpiring worldwide should give us cause to reflect and consider with great care that which we have become and to further consider and decide what it is that we wish to become, both individually (most important), and as societies. Do you really want to be slave to a raft of third-rate buffoons? It is one thing to be subjugated by an indomitable adversary worthy of some respect, but to willingly place your head into the noose of an all-thumbs, blithering incompetent to your own destruction... that's just cause for endless, searing shame and embarrassment.


    We should all endeavor to do better.


    Until next time, please accept my best wishes.
    Through lives and lives shalt thou pay, O' king.

    Freedom will be stolen from you in a heartbeat if you do not behave as a wild and ravening beast pursuant to its protection.

    "Government" is naught but a mental construct, a script to which people meekly accept and play out their assigned roles by those with no authority to dictate such.

    freedomisobvious.blogspot.com

    We get what we tolerate and we deserve what we get precisely because we tolerate it.



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    The Politics of Obedience: The Discourse of Voluntary Servitude

    NOTE: Written 1552–53

    Part I

    I see no good in having several lords: Let one alone be master, let one alone be king.

    These words Homer puts in the mouth of Ulysses, as he addresses the people. If he had said nothing further than "I see no good in having several lords," it would have been well spoken. For the sake of logic he should have maintained that the rule of several could not be good since the power of one man alone, as soon as he acquires the title of master, becomes abusive and unreasonable.

    Instead he declared what seems preposterous: "Let one alone be master, let one alone be king." We must not be critical of Ulysses, who at the moment was perhaps obliged to speak these words in order to quell a mutiny in the army, for this reason, in my opinion, choosing language to meet the emergency rather than the truth. Yet, in the light of reason, it is a great misfortune to be at the beck and call of one master, for it is impossible to be sure that he is going to be kind, since it is always in his power to be cruel whenever he pleases.

    As for having several masters, according to the number one has, it amounts to being that many times unfortunate. Although I do not wish at this time to discuss this much-debated question, namely, whether other types of government are preferable to monarchy, still I should like to know, before casting doubt on the place that monarchy should occupy among commonwealths, whether or not it belongs to such a group, since it is hard to believe that there is anything of common wealth in a country where everything belongs to one master. This question, however, can remain for another time and would really require a separate treatment involving by its very nature all sorts of political discussion.

    For the present I should like merely to understand how it happens that so many men, so many villages, so many cities, so many nations, sometimes suffer under a single tyrant who has no other power than the power they give him; who is able to harm them only to the extent to which they have the willingness to bear with him; who could do them absolutely no injury unless they preferred to put up with him rather than contradict him. Surely a striking situation!

    Yet it is so common that one must grieve the more and wonder the less at the spectacle of a million men serving in wretchedness, their necks under the yoke, not constrained by a greater multitude than they, but simply, it would seem, delighted and charmed by the name of one man alone whose power they need not fear, for he is evidently the one person whose qualities they cannot admire because of his inhumanity and brutality toward them.

    A weakness characteristic of human kind is that we often have to obey force; we have to make concessions; we ourselves cannot always be the stronger. Therefore, when a nation is constrained by the fortune of war to serve a single clique, as happened when the city of Athens served the 30 Tyrants, one should not be amazed that the nation obeys but simply be grieved by the situation — or rather, instead of being amazed or saddened, consider patiently the evil and look forward hopefully toward a happier future. Our nature is such that the common duties of human relationship occupy a great part of the course of our life.

    It is reasonable to love virtue, to esteem good deeds, to be grateful for good from whatever source we may receive it, and, often, to give up some of our comfort in order to increase the honor and advantage of some man whom we love and who deserves it. Therefore, if the inhabitants of a country have found some great personage who has shown rare foresight in protecting them in an emergency, rare boldness in defending them, rare solicitude in governing them, and if, from that point on, they contract the habit of obeying him and depending on him to such an extent that they grant him certain prerogatives, I fear that such a procedure is not prudent, inasmuch as they remove him from a position in which he was doing good and advance him to a dignity in which he may do evil. Certainly while he continues to manifest good will, one need fear no harm from a man who seems to be generally well disposed.

    But O, good Lord! What strange phenomenon is this? What name shall we give it? What is the nature of this misfortune? What vice is it, or, rather, what degradation? To see an endless multitude of people not merely obeying, but driven to servility? Not ruled, but tyrannized over? These wretches have no wealth, no kin, nor wife nor children, not even life itself that they can call their own.

    They suffer plundering, wantonness, cruelty, not from an army, not from a barbarian horde, on account of whom they must shed their blood and sacrifice their lives, but from a single man — not from a Hercules nor from a Samson, but from a single little man. Too frequently this same little man is the most cowardly and effeminate in the nation, a stranger to the powder of battle and hesitant on the sands of the tournament — not only without energy to direct men by force, but with hardly enough virility to bed with a common woman!

    Shall we call subjection to such a leader cowardice? Shall we say that those who serve him are cowardly and fainthearted? If two, if three, if four do not defend themselves from the one, we might call that circumstance surprising but nevertheless conceivable. In such a case one might be justified in suspecting a lack of courage. But if a hundred, if a thousand endure the caprice of a single man, should we not rather say that they lack not the courage but the desire to rise against him, and that such an attitude indicates indifference rather than cowardice?

    When not a hundred, not a thousand men, but a hundred provinces, a thousand cities, a million men, refuse to assail a single man from whom the kindest treatment received is the infliction of serfdom and slavery, what shall we call that? Is it cowardice? Of course there is in every vice inevitably some limit beyond which one cannot go. Two, possibly ten, may fear one; but when a thousand, a million men, a thousand cities, fail to protect themselves against the domination of one man, this cannot be called cowardly, for cowardice does not sink to such a depth, any more than valor can be termed the effort of one individual to scale a fortress, to attack an army, or to conquer a kingdom. What monstrous vice, then, is this which does not even deserve to be called cowardice, a vice for which no term can be found vile enough, which nature herself disavows and our tongues refuse to name?

    Place on one side fifty thousand armed men, and on the other the same number. Let them join in battle, one side fighting to retain its liberty, the other to take it away; to which would you, at a guess, promise victory? Which men do you think would march more gallantly to combat — those who anticipate as a reward for their suffering the maintenance of their freedom or those who cannot expect any other prize for the blows exchanged than the enslavement of others?

    One side will have before its eyes the blessings of the past and the hope of similar joy in the future; their thoughts will dwell less on the comparatively brief pain of battle than on what they may have to endure forever — they, their children, and all their posterity. The other side has nothing to inspire it with courage except the weak urge of greed, which fades before danger and which can never be so keen, it seems to me, that it will not be dismayed by the least drop of blood from wounds.

    Consider the justly famous battles of Miltiades, Leonidas, Themistocles, still fresh today in recorded history and in the minds of men as if they had occurred but yesterday, battles fought in Greece for the welfare of the Greeks and as an example to the world. What power do you think gave to such a mere handful of men not the strength but the courage to withstand the attack of a fleet so vast that even the seas were burdened, and to defeat the armies of so many nations, armies so immense that their officers alone outnumbered the entire Greek force? What was it but the fact that in those glorious days this struggle represented not so much a fight of Greeks against Persians as a victory of liberty over domination, of freedom over greed?

    It amazes us to hear accounts of the valor that liberty arouses in the hearts of those who defend it; but who could believe reports of what goes on every day among the inhabitants of some countries? Who could really believe that one man alone may mistreat a hundred thousand and deprive them of their liberty? Who would credit such a report if he merely heard it, without being present to witness the event? And if this condition occurred only in distant lands and were reported to us, which one among us would not assume the tale to be imagined or invented, and not really true?

    Obviously there is no need of fighting to overcome this single tyrant, for he is automatically defeated if the country refuses consent to its own enslavement: it is not necessary to deprive him of anything but simply to give him nothing; there is no need that the country make an effort to do anything for itself provided it does nothing against itself. It is therefore the inhabitants themselves who permit, or, rather, bring about, their own subjection, since by ceasing to submit they would put an end to their servitude.

    A people enslaves itself, cuts its own throat, when, having a choice between being vassals and being free men, it deserts its liberties and takes on the yoke, gives consent to its own misery, or, rather, apparently welcomes it. If it cost the people anything to recover its freedom, I should not urge action to this end, although there is nothing a human should hold more dear than the restoration of his own natural right, to change himself from a beast of burden back to a man, so to speak. I do not demand of him so much boldness; let him prefer the doubtful security of living wretchedly to the uncertain hope of living as he pleases.

    What then? If in order to have liberty nothing more is needed than to long for it, if only a simple act of the will is necessary, is there any nation in the world that considers a single wish too high a price to pay in order to recover rights which it ought to be ready to redeem at the cost of its blood, rights such that their loss must bring all men of honor to the point of feeling life to be unendurable and death itself a deliverance?

    Everyone knows that the fire from a little spark will increase and blaze ever higher as long as it finds wood to burn; yet without being quenched by water, but merely by finding no more fuel to feed on, it consumes itself, dies down, and is no longer a flame. Similarly, the more tyrants pillage, the more they crave, the more they ruin and destroy — the more one yields to them, and obeys them — by that much do they become mightier and more formidable, the readier to annihilate and destroy. But if not one thing is yielded to them, if, without any violence they are simply not obeyed, they become naked and undone and as nothing, just as, when the root receives no nourishment, the branch withers and dies.

    To achieve the good that they desire, the bold do not fear danger; the intelligent do not refuse to undergo suffering. It is the stupid and cowardly who are neither able to endure hardship nor to vindicate their rights; they stop at merely longing for them and lose through timidity the valor roused by the effort to claim their rights, although the desire to enjoy them still remains as part of their nature. A longing common to both the wise and the foolish, to brave men and to cowards, is this longing for all those things which, when acquired, would make them happy and contented.

    Yet one element appears to be lacking. I do not know how it happens that nature fails to place within the hearts of men a burning desire for liberty, a blessing so great and so desirable that when it is lost all evils follow thereafter, and even the blessings that remain lose taste and savor because of their corruption by servitude. Liberty is the only joy upon which men do not seem to insist; for surely if they really wanted it, they would receive it. Apparently they refuse this wonderful privilege because it is so easily acquired.

    Poor, wretched, and stupid peoples, nations determined on your own misfortune and blind to your own good! You let yourselves be deprived before your own eyes of the best part of your revenues; your fields are plundered, your homes robbed, your family heirlooms taken away. You live in such a way that you cannot claim a single thing as your own; and it would seem that you consider yourselves lucky to be loaned your property, your families, and your very lives.

    All this havoc, this misfortune, this ruin, descends upon you not from alien foes, but from the one enemy whom you yourselves render as powerful as he is, for whom you go bravely to war, for whose greatness you do not refuse to offer your own bodies unto death. He who thus domineers over you has only two eyes, only two hands, only one body, no more than is possessed by the least man among the infinite numbers dwelling in your cities; he has indeed nothing more than the power that you confer upon him to destroy you.

    Where has he acquired enough eyes to spy upon you if you do not provide them yourselves? How can he have so many arms to beat you with if he does not borrow them from you? The feet that trample down your cities, where does he get them if they are not your own? How does he have any power over you except through you? How would he dare assail you if he had not cooperation from you? What could he do to you if you yourselves did not connive with the thief who plunders you, if you were not accomplices of the murderer who kills you, if you were not traitors to yourselves?

    You sow your crops in order that he may ravage them; you install and furnish your homes to give him goods to pillage; you rear your daughters that he may gratify his lust; you bring up your children in order that he may confer upon them the greatest privilege he knows — to be led into his battles, to be delivered to butchery, to be made the servants of his greed and the instruments of his vengeance; you yield your bodies unto hard labor in order that he may indulge in his delights and wallow in his filthy pleasures; you weaken yourselves in order to make him the stronger and the mightier to hold you in check. From all these indignities, such as the very beasts of the field would not endure, you can deliver yourselves if you try, not by taking action, but merely by willing to be free.

    Resolve to serve no more, and you are at once freed. I do not ask that you place hands upon the tyrant to topple him over, but simply that you support him no longer; then you will behold him, like a great Colossus whose pedestal has been pulled away, fall of his own weight and break into pieces.

  4. #3
    And so it goes to my assertion that nothing I have ever written is in any way new or even original, save by myself for myself. I consider myself to be very poorly read, mostly because I am what is likely the slowest reader ever born. But in a way this has been an advantage to me because I have had to dope all my ideas out almost exclusively on my own, having gotten but a few basic notions from others. Being of comparatively low intelligence, I need to do the heavy lifting on my own in order to cement my understanding and to ensure to myself that my views are at least reasonably sound.

    But to read this gives me some measure of satisfaction in reinforcing my suspicion that I am at least marginally on the right track on such matters.

    Thanks for posting this.
    Through lives and lives shalt thou pay, O' king.

    Freedom will be stolen from you in a heartbeat if you do not behave as a wild and ravening beast pursuant to its protection.

    "Government" is naught but a mental construct, a script to which people meekly accept and play out their assigned roles by those with no authority to dictate such.

    freedomisobvious.blogspot.com

    We get what we tolerate and we deserve what we get precisely because we tolerate it.

  5. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by osan View Post
    And so it goes to my assertion that nothing I have ever written is in any way new or even original, save by myself for myself. I consider myself to be very poorly read, mostly because I am what is likely the slowest reader ever born. But in a way this has been an advantage to me because I have had to dope all my ideas out almost exclusively on my own, having gotten but a few basic notions from others. Being of comparatively low intelligence, I need to do the heavy lifting on my own in order to cement my understanding and to ensure to myself that my views are at least reasonably sound.

    But to read this gives me some measure of satisfaction in reinforcing my suspicion that I am at least marginally on the right track on such matters.

    Thanks for posting this.
    Don't undersell yourself. And I posted this passage because your OP reminded me of the closing portion (bolded). In any case, the strength of liberty comes from the intrinsic diversity of any community (yes, even if it is all of "one race"). It is the fragile, brittle State that requires interchangeable parts all of exactly 95-105 IQ, no more, and no less. It is the State that is fighting gravity, not liberty. This is why I refuse to give those who are at the center of the State labels like "elites" or "our government" or "our rulers" or "our taxes". They are not elite at anything except lying, murder, stealing and other crimes -- and their government is their government, not ours; those are their rulers, not ours; and those are their taxes, not ours. The moment they shredded the Constitution and cut all ties to representation of the people, they made themselves the enemy of all free men, and painted bright red targets on their chests. I will not shoot at them and I don't encourage anyone else to do so, but there are always among the populace those who will.

    There is a "State-of-last-resort" and it is the most wild of all beasts. No one in heaven or on earth can tame it and even Leviathan is terrified of it. Since the clown-"elites" will not listen to clear reason or sober warning -- even at the cost of our blood, sweat and tears -- no matter how great the tragedy, we must at some point let go of the bridle with which those among us who are still rational have attempted to prevent them from bringing unimaginable destruction upon themselves. They are straining with every fiber of their being to rouse the Beast; the moment they succeed, they will immediately regret it and they will suddenly realize the infinite magnitude of their error.

    “‘They have blown the trumpet,
    They have made all things ready,
    But no one will go into battle,
    For my wrath is on the whole crowd.
    Outside is the sword;
    Inside are plague and famine.
    Those in the country
    Will die by the sword;
    Those in the city
    Will be devoured by famine and plague.
    The fugitives who escape
    Will flee to the mountains.
    Like doves of the valleys,
    They will all moan,
    Each for their own sins.
    Every hand will go limp;
    Every leg will be wet with urine.
    They will put on sackcloth
    And be clothed with terror.
    Every face will be covered with shame,
    And every head will be shaved.
    (Ezekiel 7:14-18)
    Wail, for the day of the Lord is near;
    It will come like destruction from the Almighty.
    Because of this, all hands will go limp,
    Every heart will melt with fear.
    Terror will seize them,
    Pain and anguish will grip them;
    They will writhe like a woman in labor.
    They will look aghast at each other,
    Their faces aflame.
    (Isaiah 13:6-8)

  6. #5
    Secession seems to me as a requisite first step, before other options can be considered.

    If the tyrants choose to deny that option, they alone are then responsible for the consequences that follow. What must be done can be done then with a clear conscience.
    It's all about taking action and not being lazy. So you do the work, whether it's fitness or whatever. It's about getting up, motivating yourself and just doing it.
    - Kim Kardashian

    Donald Trump / Trump Jr 2024!!!!

    My pronouns are he/him/his

  7. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by ClaytonB View Post
    Don't undersell yourself. And I posted this passage because your OP reminded me of the closing portion (bolded). In any case, the strength of liberty comes from the intrinsic diversity of any community (yes, even if it is all of "one race"). It is the fragile, brittle State that requires interchangeable parts all of exactly 95-105 IQ, no more, and no less. It is the State that is fighting gravity, not liberty. This is why I refuse to give those who are at the center of the State labels like "elites" or "our government" or "our rulers" or "our taxes". They are not elite at anything except lying, murder, stealing and other crimes -- and their government is their government, not ours; those are their rulers, not ours; and those are their taxes, not ours. The moment they shredded the Constitution and cut all ties to representation of the people, they made themselves the enemy of all free men, and painted bright red targets on their chests. I will not shoot at them and I don't encourage anyone else to do so, but there are always among the populace those who will.

    There is a "State-of-last-resort" and it is the most wild of all beasts. No one in heaven or on earth can tame it and even Leviathan is terrified of it. Since the clown-"elites" will not listen to clear reason or sober warning -- even at the cost of our blood, sweat and tears -- no matter how great the tragedy, we must at some point let go of the bridle with which those among us who are still rational have attempted to prevent them from bringing unimaginable destruction upon themselves. They are straining with every fiber of their being to rouse the Beast; the moment they succeed, they will immediately regret it and they will suddenly realize the infinite magnitude of their error.

    Wasn't that the basic idea in Lysistrata? Just STOP?
    Through lives and lives shalt thou pay, O' king.

    Freedom will be stolen from you in a heartbeat if you do not behave as a wild and ravening beast pursuant to its protection.

    "Government" is naught but a mental construct, a script to which people meekly accept and play out their assigned roles by those with no authority to dictate such.

    freedomisobvious.blogspot.com

    We get what we tolerate and we deserve what we get precisely because we tolerate it.

  8. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by osan View Post
    Wasn't that the basic idea in Lysistrata? Just STOP?
    I haven't read it. To make a comparison, it's a bit like someone who is bound and determined on their own destruction by a force that they do not understand, but which you do. "I beg of you, plead of you, for your own sake, please stop. If I let go of you, that will be the end of you and there are only so many more bruises that I can take from you before I will not be able to hold onto you any longer." Everyone understands the terrifying power of Nature. And God created that, that is, he's more powerful than that. But some of those who are determined on their own destruction will not be dissuaded by any amount of warnings...

  9. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by ClaytonB View Post
    I haven't read it. To make a comparison, it's a bit like someone who is bound and determined on their own destruction by a force that they do not understand, but which you do. "I beg of you, plead of you, for your own sake, please stop. If I let go of you, that will be the end of you and there are only so many more bruises that I can take from you before I will not be able to hold onto you any longer." Everyone understands the terrifying power of Nature. And God created that, that is, he's more powerful than that. But some of those who are determined on their own destruction will not be dissuaded by any amount of warnings...
    Greek play by Aristophanes. We all had to read it back in the stone age.

    As for the rest, all valid points well taken, but the big difference is that we are not talking about an individual destroying himself, but everyone around him... which leads me to a post I am about to make.
    Through lives and lives shalt thou pay, O' king.

    Freedom will be stolen from you in a heartbeat if you do not behave as a wild and ravening beast pursuant to its protection.

    "Government" is naught but a mental construct, a script to which people meekly accept and play out their assigned roles by those with no authority to dictate such.

    freedomisobvious.blogspot.com

    We get what we tolerate and we deserve what we get precisely because we tolerate it.



  10. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  11. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by osan View Post
    Greek play by Aristophanes. We all had to read it back in the stone age.

    As for the rest, all valid points well taken, but the big difference is that we are not talking about an individual destroying himself, but everyone around him... which leads me to a post I am about to make.
    Look forward to it.



Similar Threads

  1. Was Lincoln a Tyrant?
    By 1stvermont in forum History
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 03-14-2019, 02:29 PM
  2. Mindset of a tyrant
    By dude58677 in forum Grassroots Central
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 07-29-2009, 01:21 PM
  3. Are you a tyrant?
    By Uncle Emanuel Watkins in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 05-29-2008, 11:35 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •