Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 91 to 99 of 99

Thread: Noam Chomsky says the "right response" to The Unvaccinated is "to insist that they be isolated

  1. #91
    Quote Originally Posted by DamianTV View Post
    Noam Chomskey should be deprived of his money and forced to live out his days in isolation for being a Super Spreader of LIES. No Trial, No Jury.

    You can have no more freedom than you are willing to give another.
    Drop him and all other commies off at the Mexican border and let them caravan it to their utopia, Venezuela.

  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #92

  4. #93
    Quote Originally Posted by CaptUSA View Post
    Let's use the term "cranial virus" instead of "lies"... He keeps spreading cranial viruses and is unwillingly to stop - we should insist that he is isolated.
    Its a really hard thing to do without actually violating Constitutional Rights.

    I think the trouble is that today, we hear what is REPEATED, not really the original source. Original Source always has to be open and free, including crap that comes out of sociopaths mouths like this.

    Now, the REPEAT is where we have POWER.

    The "News" repeats what a person has said. If they like what has been said, they repeat it. If they do not, they do not repeat it. It is also the source of our problem as they only repeat the things that cause their real customers, Advertisers (*cough* Pfizer) to pay to support. Thus, the Advertisers are really the ones in control of what gets repeated and what does not. This also shows where we have our greatest advantage: ONLINE. This is why sharing links and quoting others is a highly undervalued part of Freedom. We repeat that which has value to the people, not that which stands to give a small group of dominant men who have acquired their wealth through fraud and counterfeit and undue amount of influence over the ordinary man.

    I think our real power over people like this is to NOT REPEAT what these idiots say, and instead REPEAT those that say something that is worth repeating.
    1776 > 1984

    The FAILURE of the United States Government to operate and maintain an
    Honest Money System , which frees the ordinary man from the clutches of the money manipulators, is the single largest contributing factor to the World's current Economic Crisis.

    The Elimination of Privacy is the Architecture of Genocide

    Belief, Money, and Violence are the three ways all people are controlled

    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    Our central bank is not privately owned.

  5. #94
    Never trust a man who sports a Karl Marx beard.
    "Perhaps one of the most important accomplishments of my administration is minding my own business."

    Calvin Coolidge

  6. #95
    Quote Originally Posted by Occam's Banana View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by fisharmor View Post
    The sticking point here is the open fact that the CDC changed the definition of 'vaccine' in 2015. So they're redefining terms whenever convenient [...]

  7. #96
    Quote Originally Posted by A Son of Liberty View Post
    I need someone to explain the rationale behind this vax hysteria to me, because I don't get it. Usually, even in their most incoherent, I can at least parse out a thread of reasoning in leftist arguments. But this vax thing absolutely mystifies me. It is admitted and understood that the vax'd can get and spread the Bug, and I get that the argument in favor of people getting vax'd is that they'll get a milder case of it (supposedly), but how is an unvax'd person a threat, therefore, to a vax'd person? Is the argument that the unvax'd person is passing a more virulent strain of the Bug, somehow, and thus the vax'd are somehow going to end up almost as tho' they are unvax'd? Because that doesn't seem to make logical sense. It seems that, granting that the rest of their arguments are legitimate, the only ones who are at risk are the unvax'd, which seems like a personal choice to me. And I also get the argument that the unvax'd will put greater strain on hospitals, etc. (I get it, but I don't agree with it of course because as we saw at the height of the pandemic in 2020 the only strain, broadly speaking, was on people needing specialized care outside of COVID). But I don't get, for example, the headlines that appeared after Powell died that, somehow, the unvax'd were to blame.

    So, can anyone parse out the logic here for me? Because this one is entering into the realm of Brawndo for me and, for as bad as it is, I didn't think we were there yet.
    Overweight people as a group are more likely to spread disease and clog up hospitals compared to unvaxxed people.

    Imagine if the president tried to mandate a weight limit for employees ...

  8. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  9. #97
    Quote Originally Posted by Occam's Banana View Post

    Turns out NIH is doing it too, having changed the definition of "Gain of Function Research" to obscure the fact that they were funding it.

    There are no crimes against people.
    There are only crimes against the state.
    And the state will never, ever choose to hold accountable its agents, because a thing can not commit a crime against itself.

  10. #98
    Quote Originally Posted by Occam's Banana View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by fisharmor View Post
    The sticking point here is the open fact that the CDC changed the definition of 'vaccine' in 2015. So they're redefining terms whenever convenient [...]
    Up next - redefining "myocarditis":

  11. #99
    I think the old man who yells at clouds should be thinking about where he's going in the next life instead.
    "For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy ... Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed." - J.F.K.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Similar Threads

  1. Noam Chomsky on "The Federal Reserve" (video)
    By whippoorwill in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-29-2013, 12:18 PM
  2. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-11-2013, 03:08 PM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-15-2011, 12:57 PM
  4. Wow! Noam Chomsky Admits "We've Never Had Capitalism"!
    By BuddyRey in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-13-2010, 09:20 PM
  5. Chomsky refutes "libertarian" "anarcho"- capitalism
    By Steeleye in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-14-2009, 09:48 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts