Rand Paul launches fresh attack on Fauci after NIH admits it DID fund gain of function researc

[donnay]

Rand Paul launches fresh attack on Fauci after NIH admits it DID fund gain of function research: Senator says DOJ is too busy going 'after moms complaining about what they teach in school' to investigate

By RONNY REYES and GINA MARTINEZ FOR DAILYMAIL.COM

Senator Rand Paul slammed COVID tsar Dr. Anthony Fauci after the National Institutes of Health finally admitted to funding gain of function research on bat coronaviruses in it's Wuhan laboratory - despite Fauci's denials to congress that any such research took place.

Paul had confronted Fauci earlier this year of lying about the NIH's involvement in coronavirus research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a claim Fauci fought back against, calling Paul a liar.

The senator had also faced public backlash for attack Fauci, who serves as a director for the NIH's Institute of Infectious Diseases, and who enjoyed a status of popularity as the nation's expert on COVID-19.

Paul told Fox News that while he did feel validated after the new revelation was made on Thursday, the news should focus on a push for the US to end dangerous gain of function research projects.

'This is a civilization-ending kind of research. This research could release something that could destroy civilization,' Paul said.

He ultimately accused Fauci of lying and intentionally 'parsing words' so as to never fully admit that gain of function experiments could have been happening in Wuhan with grant monies from the NIH.

'His declination is this: it's inadvertent, we didn't know they were going to gain function. That is what a gain of function experiment is,' Paul said.

'You don't know when you combine two viruses that they will be more deadly, but it might be if you have half a brain you know if you combine two viruses it might be more deadly'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-research.html

[jmdrake]

He should haul Fraudchi back before the senate and this time bring the scientists who say this is gain of function, and let them testify before and after Fraudchi.

[TheTexan]

[Anti Federalist]

'This is a civilization-ending kind of research. This research could release something that could destroy civilization,' Paul said.

'This is a civilization-ending kind of research. This research could release something that could destroy civilization,' Paul said.

'This is a civilization-ending kind of research. This research could release something that could destroy civilization,' Paul said.

[TheTexan]

'This is a civilization-ending kind of research. This research could release something that could destroy civilization,' Paul said.

'This is a civilization-ending kind of research. This research could release something that could destroy civilization,' Paul said.

'This is a civilization-ending kind of research. This research could release something that could destroy civilization,' Paul said.

[Anti Globalist]

Doesn't matter. The Left loves Fauci to death. They will simply ignore the facts and move on.

[Invisible Man]

Doesn't matter. The Left loves Fauci to death. They will simply ignore the facts and move on.

OK, that's the left.

What about the right? Where are all the Republicans lining up with Rand to take serious action against Fauci? If the Republican party wants to, they can make this an issue that won't go away, one that media will have to address, and that the public will take an interest in, including voters that Democrats need. They can make this an issue in the midterm elections.

But it doesn't look like they're doing that. Yeah, Rand has some allies here. But it sure looks like the party doesn't want this to go anywhere.

[Anti Federalist]

OK, that's the left.

What about the right? Where are all the Republicans lining up with Rand to take serious action against Fauci? If the Republican party wants to, they can make this an issue that won't go away, one that media will have to address, and that the public will take an interest in, including voters that Democrats need. They can make this an issue in the midterm elections.

But it doesn't look like they're doing that. Yeah, Rand has some allies here. But it sure looks like the party doesn't want this to go anywhere.

Because I'm sure their fingerprints are on it as well.

[acptulsa]

OK, that's the left.

What about the right? Where are all the Republicans lining up with Rand to take serious action against Fauci? If the Republican party wants to, they can make this an issue that won't go away, one that media will have to address, and that the public will take an interest in, including voters that Democrats need. They can make this an issue in the midterm elections.

But it doesn't look like they're doing that. Yeah, Rand has some allies here. But it sure looks like the party doesn't want this to go anywhere.

Because I'm sure their fingerprints are on it as well.

Who said it should be called The Trumpcine? I forgot already.

[shakey1]

OK, that's the left.

What about the right? Where are all the Republicans lining up with Rand to take serious action against Fauci? If the Republican party wants to, they can make this an issue that won't go away, one that media will have to address, and that the public will take an interest in, including voters that Democrats need. They can make this an issue in the midterm elections.

But it doesn't look like they're doing that. Yeah, Rand has some allies here. But it sure looks like the party doesn't want this to go anywhere.

So it would seem.

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

Who would indict a person that committed the crime of lying to congress? Is there a sliding scale of a set of guidelines on what crimes are indictable?

[TheTexan]

Who would indict a person that committed the crime of lying to congress? Is there a sliding scale of a set of guidelines on what crimes are indictable?

"Be peaceful, go home" <- this is indictable

engineering a plandemic and lying about it <- this is fine

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

"Be peaceful, go home" <- this is indictable

engineering a plandemic and lying about it <- this is fine

Oh. Now I get it.