If the goal is to keep government out of business then I don't think that there's a reasonable argument for getting government more involved in business.
"Government should be less involved in X but it can't be for some reason and also it needs to outlaw the thing that I don't like" is a common refrain here whenever there's some kind of government control which is... culturally appealing, let's say.
The last time it was this popular was "government shouldn't be involved in marriage, but since it already does regulate marriage it needs to outlaw gay marriage."
Exact same argument so far as I can tell.
No one advocating the CRA pretended that it was somehow actually saving people from government by governing them more.
Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Connect With Us