"What doesn't kill you makes you stronger"
H/T Genghis Khan
But this question if properly worded starts to make less sense.
Reworded Q: Natural infection vs vaccination: Which gives more protection against infections?
I think a better version of question would be:
"Natural infection" vs "vaccination":
1) which is more likely to cause severe/long term damage to body organs like lungs, brain tissue etc?
2) which offers stronger "gene therapy" characteristics?
3) which is more likely to harm people with compromised immune systems, cause ICU stay and worst case outcome (moving on)?
4) Lastly, if both are products of labs, which is more "natural"?
Leaving these out here for people with knowledge in this field.
Connect With Us