Libertarian Think Tank Comes Out in Support of Vaccine Passports From ‘Private Sector’

**Danke** · 05-12-2021, 03:25 PM

Originally Posted by Occam's Banana

https://twitter.com/ComicDaveSmith/s...19552598773764

You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to Occam's Banana again.

**James_Madison_Lives** · 05-12-2021, 06:17 PM

Originally Posted by Swordsmyth

Nobody has the right to demand you inject experimental gene juice into your body.
We can't make the companies pay for the adverse reactions of customers who get the frankenshot so they have no right to demand it. (in addition to the basic moral problems with such a mandate)

This ^^^

**Brian4Liberty** · 05-12-2021, 06:31 PM

Let’s call it what it is. “Vaccine passport” sounds innocuous, but it is really about banning people who have not had a vaccine. That is it’s purpose, to exclude people.

**pcosmar** · 05-12-2021, 08:19 PM

Originally Posted by Brian4Liberty

Let’s call it what it is. “Vaccine passport” sounds innocuous, but it is really about banning people who have not had a vaccine. That is it’s purpose, to exclude people.

like a "prohibited Person"..

But are Genetically Modified Humans natural persons or are they Intellectual Property?

**Swordsmyth** · 05-13-2021, 12:28 AM

Originally Posted by Invisible Man

No they don't. And I never said they did, nor did that Cato article.

But they do have a right to refuse to do business with you if you don't inject that into your body, or for any other reason of their choice. And they have a right to do that without taking on any financial liability for any adverse effects of the injection. Those who don't consent to those terms could just refuse to do business with those who insist on them. The market would do all the work necessary of punishing that policy without any help from the government.

No, they do not.
They do not have a right to know if you have taken the frankenshot and they have no right to collude with government to impose the Mark of the Beast.

Even if there was no government involvement (and there is and has to be for the system to work) it would be an unconscionable contract.

**Brian4Liberty** · 05-13-2021, 01:45 PM

The bottom line issue here is not really private business vs. government.

Some people want to force vaccinations, some people don’t. Private vaccine passports is a way to force vaccines through the not-so-free market.

Many “libertarians” have argued in the past for forced vaccinations, even by government. Walter Block once made a case for forced vaccinations. Alan Dershowitz, a supposed civil libertarian, has called for forced vaccinations.

Whether it’s big government, Cato or Reason, it’s extremely popular these days to do the government’s dirty work via “private companies”. The great public-private totalitarian kleptocracy.

**Swordsmyth** · 05-14-2021, 01:09 AM

Originally Posted by Brian4Liberty

The bottom line issue here is not really private business vs. government.

Some people want to force vaccinations, some people don’t. Private vaccine passports is a way to force vaccines through the not-so-free market.

Many “libertarians” have argued in the past for forced vaccinations, even by government. Walter Block once made a case for forced vaccinations. Alan Dershowitz, a supposed civil libertarian, has called for forced vaccinations.

Whether it’s big government, Cato or Reason, it’s extremely popular these days to do the government’s dirty work via “private companies”. The great public-private totalitarian kleptocracy.

Neo-Feudalism.
The "Nobility" claimed to own their fifes as personal property and have a right to tyrannize their subjects, many libertarians would support them and advocate supposedly new and innovative forms of government that will bring back those "good" old days.

Government is the people who rule you, it doesn't make any difference what they call themselves, corporations have no more right to tyrannize than a republic, a democracy, or a king.