Explosive! BACTERIA Killed People In The 1918 Pandemic & Fauci KNEW (Reuters Fact-Check Accide

[donnay]

Explosive! BACTERIA Killed People In The 1918 Pandemic & Fauci KNEW (Reuters Fact-Check Accidentally CONFIRMS Everything It Tries To Debunk)

by Silviu “Silview” Costinescu

War is peace and truth is fake news in Covidiocray.



I hear there’s many more “fact-checks” on this, published by other presstitutes, that all seem copied from the same press-release or something…



First off: a New Scientist short article, as old as 2008, in verbatim copy, to take the bacteria debate out of the way

Bacteria Were The Real Killers In 1918 Flu Pandemic
4 August 2008

by Ewen Callaway

CONSPIRACYCORONAVIRUSFAKE NEWSExplosive! BACTERIA Killed People In The 1918 Pandemic & Fauci KNEW (Reuters Fact-Check Accidentally CONFIRMS Everything It Tries To Debunk)HAFHAFFebruary 19, 2021
Sponsored by RevcontentTrending Now
by Silviu “Silview” Costinescu

War is peace and truth is fake news in Covidiocray.

fauci bacteria 1918 pandemic
Reuters confirming what they were trying to debunk: that bacteria were the real killers in the 1918 flu pandemic.


I hear there’s many more “fact-checks” on this, published by other presstitutes, that all seem copied from the same press-release or something…

nih 1918
First off: a New Scientist short article, as old as 2008, in verbatim copy, to take the bacteria debate out of the way


Bacteria Were The Real Killers In 1918 Flu Pandemic
4 August 2008

by Ewen Callaway

influenza pandemic 1918 us national museum of health and medicine
Image: US National Museum of Health and Medicine

Medical and scientific experts now agree that bacteria, not influenza viruses, were the greatest cause of death during the 1918 flu pandemic.

Government efforts to gird for the next influenza pandemic – bird flu or otherwise – ought to take notice and stock up on antibiotics, says John Brundage, a medical microbiologist at the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center in Silver Spring, Maryland.

Brundage’s team culled first-hand accounts, medical records and infection patterns from 1918 and 1919. Although a nasty strain of flu virus swept around the world, bacterial pneumonia that came on the heels of mostly mild cases of flu killed the majority of the 20 to 100 million victims of the so-called Spanish flu, they conclude.

“We agree completely that bacterial pneumonia played a major role in the mortality of the 1918 pandemic,” says Anthony Fauci, director of National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Disease in Bethesda, Maryland, and author of another journal article out next month that comes to a similar conclusion.

Double Whammy
That pneumonia causes most deaths in an influenza outbreak is well known. Late 19th century physicians recognised pneumonia as the cause of death of most flu victims. While doctors limited fatalities in other 20th-century outbreaks with antibiotics such as penicillin, which was discovered in 1928, but did not see use in patients until 1942.

This is not to say that flu viruses do nothing, says Jonathan McCullers, an expert on influenza-bacteria co-infections at St Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis, Tennessee.

McCullers’ research suggests that influenza kills cells in the respiratory tract, providing food and a home for invading bacteria. On top of this, an overstressed immune system makes it easier for the bacteria to get a foothold.

However, the sheer carnage of 1918 caused many microbiologists to reconsider the role of bacteria, and some pointed their fingers firmly at the virus.

‘Unique Event’
When US government scientists resurrected the 1918 strain in 2005, the virus demolished cells grown in a Petri dish and felled mice by the dozen.

“The 1918 pandemic is considered to be – and clearly is – something unique, and it’s widely understood to be the most lethal natural event that has occurred in recent human history,” Brundage says.

But to reassess this conclusion, he and co-author Dennis Shanks, of the Australian Army Malaria Institute in Enoggera, Queensland, scoured literature and medical records from 1918 and 1919.

The more they investigated, the more bacteria emerged as the true killers, an idea now supported by most influenza experts.

For instance, had a super virus been responsible for most deaths, one might expect people to die fairly rapidly, or at least for most cases to follow a similar progression. However, Shanks and Brundage found that few people died within three days of showing symptoms, while most people lasted more than a week, some survived two – all hallmarks of pneumonia.

Local Bugs
Military health records for barracks and battleships also painted a different picture. New recruits – men unlikely to have been exposed to resident bacteria – died in droves, while soldiers whose immune systems were accustomed to the local bugs survived.

And most compelling, Brundage says, medical experts of the day identified pneumonia as the cause of most deaths.

“The bottom line is we think the influenza virus itself was necessary – but not sufficient – to cause most of the deaths,” he says.

As the world’s health experts prepare for the next influenza pandemic, many have looked to 1918 as a guide, planning for a deadly super-virus.

Coronavirus And The Sun: A Lesson From The 1918 Influenza Pandemic

The H5N1 bird flu strains jetting around the world seem to kill humans without the aid of bacteria, but those viruses aren’t fully adapted to humans, McCullers says. If H5N1 does adapt to humans, bacteria may play a larger role in deaths, he adds.

“Everyone is focused exclusively on the virus, and that’s probably not the best idea,” he says.

Antibiotics and vaccines against bacterial pneumonia could limit deaths in the next pandemic. And while an effective influenza vaccine should nip an outbreak in the bud, such a vaccine could take months to prepare and distribute.

“The idea of stockpiling [bacterial] vaccines and antibiotics is under serious consideration,” says Fauci, who is on a US government taskforce to prepare for the next flu pandemic.

At a recent summit on pandemic influenza, McCullers said health authorities were increasingly interested in the role bacteria might play, but there had been little action taken.

“There’s no preparation yet. They are just starting to get to the recognition stage,” he says. “There’s this collective amnesia about 1918.”

Journal reference: Emerging Infectious Disease (DOI: 10.3201/eid1408.071313)

And This Is The Fun Part Where Reuters Confirms Everything In A Desperate And Hilarious Debunk Attempt:
Ladies and gents, Facebook’s premium smear-machine aka “fact-checkers”, aka establishment’s mouth-pieces licensed to kill competition, aka world’s #1 news agency are back in the spotlight after another comical attempt against one of our reports.

The scenario is similar: they make up straw-men and give them a naive beatdown with a lot of laughable BS show off. But this one is a legendary performance that needs to become a classic reference.

I peed my pants a little from the first paragraph:



What this means is that for a week, these useless nitwits ran the debunk without even getting the incriminated study right.

Like how do they even breathe… ah, wait, they’re maskers…

After a bunch of fill in because they’re paid by word, they land their only point and argument:

To claim the 1918-1919 flu pandemic deaths were caused by bacterial pneumonia alone is inaccurate. (Reuters)

I bolded “alone” because that’s how they attempt to “virus” the discussion.

No one said “alone” before them and no one made the claim they are arguing. So no, they debunked a claim they themselves made up. Or did they?

More so, in exactly the paragraph that precedes their argument, they 200% CONFIRMED the claim that went viral:

Dr. Fauci neglected to let the public know that he was co-author on a paper that found this:

1918-1919 pandemic deaths were mostly from bacterial pneumonia. (See Endnote 17 in our paper.)

Why did that happen? #Maskshttps://t.co/FK6o9HG9Fl

— Colleen Huber, NMD (@ColleenHuberNMD) October 15, 2020

See anyone saying “alone”?

Fauci makes it very clear in his description of the study that bacterial pneumonia was preceded by the influenza virus:

“The weight of evidence we examined from both historical and modern analyses of the 1918 influenza pandemic favors a scenario in which viral damage followed by bacterial pneumonia led to the vast majority of deaths. In essence, the virus landed the first blow while bacteria delivered the knockout punch.” (here). – Reuters

That part bolded in Fauci’s quote is our claim, it proves the official narrative was BS for over a century and now we have Reuters to vouch for it. Thank you, Reuters, we couldn’t advance The Great Awakening so fast if you NPCs weren’t polar opposites to genius! 😉

And guess what, they can’t even beat their own strawman, because the flu may have started something in 1918, but bacteria ALONE delivered the knockout punch. And there would be no knockouts is it wasn’t for knockout punches, ya kno…

So, maybe to claim the 1918-1919 flu pandemic deaths were caused by bacterial pneumonia alone is NOT that inaccurate.

If someone breaks your legs and someone else takes advantage later to kill you, only the latter goes to jail for homicide. And, to be honest, I could use more evidence on the lethal contribution of that first viral blow.



As for the mask connection, science has not definitively demonstrated the direct causal relationship between masks and the 1918 bacterial pneumonia pandemic, but, based on the knowledge available so far, masks are generally associated with higher bacterial risk, from candida to “maskne”.

So don’t tell people to look elsewhere, if you find a better culprit, first write a paper and get the Nobel you deserve.

Until then, we have all the reasons to point at masks as a very likely suspect and demand much more caution.



No one has even attempted that paper in quite a while because no one’s been that dumb, but we can always hope that from Reuters.

https://humansarefree.com/2021/02/ba...auci-knew.html

[jmdrake]

Interesting.

[Working Poor]

I have worn a mask a couple of times because of needing to shop somewhere that would not let me enter without it.Every time I did I felt bad for a few days afterwards. Now if I wear a mask when I get home I run my bacteria rife frequencies. Also I eat lots of plain whole milk yogurt. It is a good idea to limit sugar during flu season...

Our bodies all have millions of bacteria and any of them can over take our systems when our oxygen levels go down.

[Anti Globalist]

Most of this stuff was common knowledge to us already.

[Dr.3D]

Most of this stuff was common knowledge to us already.

Yes, that's why a physician will often give a person who has had the flu and is in the last bouts of it, antibiotics.

We know antibiotics don't kill influenza, the antibiotics are to kill any opportunistic bacteria that make have taken hold while the flu had the person weakened.

[donnay]

Yes, that's why a physician will often give a person who has had the flu and is in the last bouts of it, antibiotics.

We know antibiotics don't kill influenza, the antibiotics are to kill any opportunistic bacteria that make have taken hold while the flu had the person weakened.

The problem with that is, the people who are on antibiotics forget to take a good probiotic that will help restore the good bacteria that was wiped out by antibiotics. Then the vicious cycle continues.

[donnay]

How Experimental Military Vaccines Killed Millions During 1918 Spanish Flu

History tells us that the Spanish Flu in 1918 killed between 50-100 million people. It was considered as the most horrifying disease by medical and pharmaceutical sources.

It is a wartime myth still being perpetuated to coverup the experimental military vaccines which killed millions during the Spanish Flu.

Eleanor McBean, PhD, N.D., the author of ‘Vaccination Condemned‘, describes her personal and family experiences during the 1918 “Spanish Flu” pandemic in detail in her book.

The coverage by McBean who is an unvaccinated survivor will let you revisit this historical event. McBean provides evidence that the historical events of the 1918 “Spanish Flu” were compromised.

The same was done with the Polio and Swine Flu epidemics and which is also being done now.

Myth Of The Spanish Flu
Since Spain was neutral during World War 1, it did not hesitate to report the 1918 Flu epidemic, unlike the combatting countries.

So, Spain was ‘scapegoated’ as the source and hence the name ‘Spanish Flu’ was coined.

A massive military vaccination experiment was conducted in Fort Riley, Kansas – where the first “Spanish Flu” case was reported.

For the first time the pharmaceutical industry got the supply of human test subjects which was sponsored by Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research.

The US military supplied a pool of 6 million men as test subjects for the vaccination experiments.

WW1 U.S. soldiers were given 14 – 25 untested, experimental vaccines within days of each other, which triggered intensified cases of ALL the diseases at once.

The doctors called it a new disease and proceeded to suppress the symptoms with additional drugs or vaccines.



Autopsy done after the war proved that the 1918 flu was not a ‘flu’. It was instead the disease caused by the experimental ‘bacterial meningitis vaccine’ which was given to the people.

Absolute must-read: Explosive! BACTERIA Killed People In The 1918 Pandemic & Fauci KNEW

This disease mimics the symptoms just as flu. A large number of vaccinated soldiers were killed by this experimental vaccine and those who were not vaccinated were not affected.

But What About The Civilians?
Huge quantities of unused experimental vaccines were left unused as WW1 ended abruptly.

The US government started the campaign of spreading fear among the civilians saying that when the soldiers will return to their families the disease will spread to the family members as well.

And by doing this they succeeded in using tens of millions of civilians as test subjects for experimental vaccines. As a result millions of civilians died after wartime, just as the soldiers did.

Hence instead of reducing the risk, it intensified the situation and it was termed as the great ‘Spanish Flu of 1918’ in which only the vaccinated died.

“Seven men dropped dead in a doctor’s office after being vaccinated. Letters were sent to their families that they had been killed in action.” – Eleanor McBean, Minnesota Wellness Directory

Recently, in a similar fashion the WHO’s oral vaccine sparked a Polio outbreak in Africa.

A week after World Health Organisation (WHO) declared that its decade-long vaccination campaign in Africa was successful, its own oral vaccine itself sparked a new Polio outbreak in the continent. The outbreak was been caused by mutation of strain in vaccine.

The COVID Narrative
Neil Ferguson, is the British scientist and professor at The Imperial College, who developed mathematical pandemic computer models for covid-19 based on which national policies were drafted.

However, all the models provided by Neil Ferguson have proven to be misleading and still the world is following his COVID-19 model.

For instance, as per Ferguson model Sweden would experience 100,000 deaths by June 2020 but Sweden peaked only at 2854 deaths total till now (as of writing this article).

The case of Sweden is interesting because the strict lockdowns prescribed by the WHO were not implemented by the Swedish government. The Swedish Model has proven the ineffectiveness of WHO COVID policies.

There’s also the case of Germany where the federal minister hired scientists to develop a fake coronavirus model to justify strick lockdowns.

After a strong fight by activists and lawyers, German court in a landmark ruling declared COVID19 lockdowns imposed by the government were unconstitutional.

WHO’s policies on the type of drug for treatment of COVID-19 were also exposed to be influenced by fake data by a pornstar and a science fiction writer.
The fake corona models were further complement with faulty test protocols.

As GreatGameIndia reported earlier, the standard coronavirus tests threw up a huge number of positive cases daily. These tests are done based on faulty WHO protocols which are designed to include false positives cases as well.

It was only a year later when the pandemic was already declared strict lockdowns imposed worldwide that the WHO admitted its mistake and changed its RT-PCR test criteria.

Last year, a Portuguese appeals court had ruled that PCR tests are unreliable and that it is unlawful to quarantine people based solely on a PCR test.

The threshold cycles used in PCR tests in India is between 37 and 40, which makes the reliability of the PCR test less than 3% and the false positive rate as high as 97%.

Earlier, the WHO’s testing protocol was even questioned by Finland’s national health authority. WHO had called on countries to test as many patients as possible for coronavirus.

In a startling disclosure, Finland’s head of health security, Mika Salminen dismissed WHO advisory saying the WHO doesn’t understand pandemicsand that their Coronavirus testing protocol is illogical and doesn’t work.

So, if the WHO’s testing protocols are indeed based on the most reliable, accurate and well sourced technologies and research methodologies available worldwide, shouldn’t they have known about its negligible effectiveness and its impact in causing panic and chaos?

Indeed the WHO knows it doesn’t work and moreover this is not the first time such criticisms have been voiced.

In the past in 2010, the WHO was caught faking a pandemic and was forced to admit that its methodology of measuring the virality or the spread of the disease, instead of its severity was incorrect.

Source: GreatGameIndia.com/

https://humansarefree.com/2021/04/ex...anish-flu.html