Results 1 to 25 of 25

Thread: COVID-19 MRNA Shots Are Legally Not Vaccines — They’re Experimental Gene Therapies

  1. #1

    Exclamation COVID-19 MRNA Shots Are Legally Not Vaccines — They’re Experimental Gene Therapies

    This is one of the best in-depth articles I have read about the experimental jab, they are pushing on the people to be Big pHARMa's guinea pigs! If you go to the page, there are embed links and videos as well.

    COVID-19 MRNA Shots Are Legally Not Vaccines — They’re Experimental Gene Therapies

    Did you know that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines aren’t vaccines in the medical and legal definition of a vaccine?

    They do not prevent you from getting the infection, nor do they prevent its spread. They’re really experimental gene therapies.

    I discussed this troubling fact in a recent interview with molecular biologist Judy Mikovits, Ph.D. While the Moderna and Pfizer mRNA shots are labeled as “vaccines,” and news agencies and health policy leaders call them that, the actual patents for Pfizer’s and Moderna’s injections more truthfully describe them as “gene therapy,” not vaccines.

    Definition Of ‘Vaccine’
    According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,1 a vaccine is “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease.”

    Immunity, in turn, is defined as “Protection from an infectious disease,” meaning that “If you are immune to a disease, you can be exposed to it without becoming infected.”

    Neither Moderna nor Pfizer claim this to be the case for their COVID-19 “vaccines.” In fact, in their clinical trials, they specify that they will not even test for immunity.

    Unlike real vaccines, which use an antigen of the disease you’re trying to prevent, the COVID-19 injections contain synthetic RNA fragments encapsulated in a nanolipid carrier compound, the sole purpose of which is to lessen clinical symptoms associated with the S-1 spike protein, not the actual virus.

    They do not actually impart immunity or inhibit transmissibility of the disease.

    In other words, they are not designed to keep you from getting sick with SARS-CoV-2; they only are supposed to lessen your infection symptoms if or when you do get infected.

    As such, these products do not meet the legal or medical definition of a vaccine, and as noted by David Martin, Ph.D., in the video above, “The legal ramifications of this deception are immense.”

    15 U.S. Code Section 41
    As explained by Martin, 15 U.S. Code Section 41 of the Federal Trade Commission Act2 is the law that governs advertising of medical practices.

    This law, which dictates what you may and may not do in terms of promotion, has for many years been routinely used to shut down alternative health practitioners and companies.

    “If this law can be used to shut down people of good will, who are trying to help others,” Martin says, “it certainly should be equally applied when we know deceptive medical practices are being done in the name of public health.”

    Per this law, it is unlawful to advertise:

    “… that a product or service can prevent, treat, or cure human disease unless you possess competent and reliable scientific evidence, including, when appropriate, well-controlled human clinical studies, substantiating that the claims are true at the time they are made.”3

    Moderna Admits: mRNA Jabs Are An ‘Operating System’ Designed To Program Humans

    What Constitutes ‘The Greater Good’?
    Martin points to the 1905 Supreme Court ruling in Jacobson vs. Massachusetts,4 which essentially established that collective benefit supersedes individual benefit.

    To put it bluntly, it argued that it’s acceptable for individuals to be harmed by public health directives provided it benefits the collective.

    Now, if vaccination is a public health measure that is supposed to protect and benefit the collective, then it would need to a) ensure that the individual who is vaccinated is rendered immune from the disease in question; and b) that the vaccine inhibits transmission of the disease.

    Only if these two outcomes can be scientifically proven can you say that vaccination protects and benefits the collective — the population as a whole. This is where we run into problems with the mRNA “vaccines.”

    Moderna’s SEC filings, which Martin claims to have carefully reviewed, specifies and stresses that its technology is a “gene therapy technology.”

    Originally, its technology was set up to be a cancer treatment, so more specifically, it’s a chemotherapy gene therapy technology.

    As noted by Martin, who would raise their hand to receive prophylactic chemotherapy gene therapy for a cancer you do not have and may never be at risk for?

    In all likelihood, few would jump at such an offer, and for good reason.

    Moreover, states and employers would not be able to mandate individuals to receive chemotherapy gene therapy for a cancer they do not have. It simply would not be legal.

    Yet, they’re proposing that all of humanity be forced to get gene therapy for COVID-19.

    COVID-19 Vaccines — A Case Of False Advertising
    Now, if the COVID-19 vaccine really isn’t a vaccine, why are they calling it that? While the CDC provides a definition of “vaccine,” the CDC is not the actual law. It’s an agency empowered by the law, but it does not create law itself.

    Interestingly enough, it’s more difficult to find a legal definition of “vaccine,” but there have been a few cases. Martin provides the following examples:

    • Iowa code — “Vaccine means a specially prepared antigen administered to a person for the purpose of providing immunity.” Again, the COVID-19 vaccines make no claim of providing immunity. They are only designed to lessen symptoms if and when you get infected.

    • Washington state code — “Vaccine means a preparation of a killed or attenuated living microorganism, or fraction thereof …” Since Moderna and Pfizer are using synthetic RNA, they clearly do not meet this definition.

    Being a manmade synthetic, the RNA used is not derived from anything that has at one point been alive, be it a whole microorganism or a fraction thereof. The statute continues to specify that a vaccine “upon immunization stimulates immunity that protects us against disease …”

    So, in summary, “vaccine” and “immunity” are well-defined terms that do not match the end points specified in COVID-19 vaccine trials. The primary end point in these trials is: “Prevention of symptomatic COVID-19 disease.” Is that the same as “immunity”? No, it is not.

    There Are More Problems Than One
    But there’s another problem. Martin points out that “COVID-19 disease” has been defined as a series of clinical symptoms.

    Moreover, there’s no causal link between SARS-CoV-2, the virus, and the set of symptoms known as COVID-19.

    How is that, you might ask? It’s simple, really. Since a vast majority of people who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 have no symptoms at all, they’ve not been able to establish a causal link between the virus and the clinical disease.

    Here’s yet another problem: The primary end point in the COVID-19 vaccine trials is not an actual vaccine trial end point because, again, vaccine trial end points have to do with immunity and transmission reduction. Neither of those were measured.

    What’s more, key secondary end points in Moderna’s trial include “Prevention of severe COVID-19 disease, and prevention of infection by SARS-CoV-2.”

    However, by its own admission, Moderna did not actually measure infection, stating that it was too “impractical” to do so.

    That means there’s no evidence of this gene therapy having an impact on infection, for better or worse. And, if you have no evidence, you cannot fulfill the U.S. Code requirement that states you must have “competent and reliable scientific evidence … substantiating that the claims are true.”

    Why Are They Calling Them Vaccines?
    As noted by Martin, you cannot have a vaccine that does not meet a single definition of a vaccine.

    So, again, what would motivate these companies, U.S. health agencies and public health officials like Dr. Anthony Fauci to lie and claim that these gene therapies are in fact vaccines when, clearly, they are not?

    If they actually called it what it is, namely “gene therapy chemotherapy,” most people would — wisely — refuse to take it.

    Perhaps that’s one reason for their false categorization as vaccines. But there may be other reasons as well.

    Here, Martin strays into conjecture, as we have no proof of their intentions. He speculates that the reason they’re calling this experimental gene therapy technology a “vaccine” is because by doing so, they can circumvent liability for damages.

    “You’re being lied to. Your own government is violating its own laws. They have shut down practitioners around the country, time and time again, for violating what are called ‘deceptive practices in medical claims.’ Guess what? They’re doing exactly that thing.” ~ David Martin, Ph.D.

    As long as the U.S. is under a state of emergency, things like PCR tests and COVID-19 “vaccines” are allowed under emergency use authorization. And as long as the emergency use authorization is in effect, the makers of these experimental gene therapies are not financially liable for any harm that comes from their use.

    That is, provided they’re “vaccines.” If these injections are NOT vaccines, then the liability shield falls away, because there is no liability shield for a medical emergency countermeasure that is gene therapy.

    So, by maintaining the illusion that COVID-19 is a state of emergency, when in reality it is not, government leaders are providing cover for these gene therapy companies so that they can get immunity from liability.

    Under The Cover Of ‘Emergency’
    As noted by Martin, if state governors were to lift the state of emergency, all of a sudden the use of RT PCR testing would be in violation of 15 U.S. Code FTC Act, as PCR tests are not an approved diagnostic test.

    “You cannot diagnose a thing [with something] that cannot diagnose a thing,” Martin says. “That a misrepresentation. That is a deceptive practice under the Federal Trade Commission Act. And they’re liable for deceptive practices.”

    Importantly, there’s no waiver of liability under deceptive practices — even under a state of emergency. This would also apply to experimental gene therapies. The only way for these gene therapies to enjoy liability shielding is if they are vaccines developed in response to a public health emergency. There is no such thing as immunity from liability for gene therapies.

    Propaganda And Vaccine Rollout Run By Same Company
    Martin brings up yet another curious point. The middleman in Operation Warp Speed is a North Carolina defense contractor called ATI. It controls the rollout of the vaccine. But ATI also has another type of contract with the Department of Defense, namely managing propaganda and combating misinformation.

    So, the same company in charge of manipulating the media to propagate government propaganda and censor counterviews is the same company in charge of the rollout of “vaccines” that are being unlawfully promoted.


    “Listen,” Martin says. “This is a pretty straight-forward situation. You’re being lied to. Your own government is violating its own laws … They have thrown this book [15 U.S. Code Section 41] on more people than we can count.

    “They have shut down practitioners around the country, time and time again, for violating what are called ‘deceptive practices in medical claims’ … Guess what? They’re doing exactly that thing.”

    Martin urges listeners to forward his video to your state attorney, governor, representatives and anyone else that might be in a position to take affirmative action to address and correct this fraud.

    Defense contractors are violating FTC law, and gene therapy companies — not vaccine manufacturers — are conducting experimental trials under deceptive medical practices.

    They’re making claims of being “vaccines” without clinical proof, and must be held accountable for their deceptive marketing and medical practices.

    CDC Owns Coronavirus Patents
    On a side note, the CDC appears to be neck-deep in this scam pandemic, and is therefore wholly unsuitable to investigate the side effects of these experimental COVID-19 therapies. As noted by Martin, it’s like having a bank robber investigate its own crime.

    Details about this came out in the documentary “Plandemic,” in which Martin explained how the CDC has broken the law — in one way or another — related to its patenting of the 2003 SARS virus.

    Martin is a national intelligence analyst and founder of IQ100 Index, which developed linguistic genomics, a platform capable of determining the intent of communications.

    In 1999, IBM digitized 1 million U.S. patents, which allowed Martin’s company to conduct a review of all these patents, sending him down a proverbial “rabbit trail” of corruption.

    In 2003, Asia experienced an outbreak of SARS. Almost immediately, scientists began racing to patent the virus.

    Ultimately, the CDC nabbed ownership of SARS-CoV (the virus responsible for SARS) isolated from humans.

    So, the CDC actually owns the entire genetic content of that SARS virus. It’s patented under U.S. patent 7776521. They also own patents for detection methods, and for a kit to measure the virus.

    U.S. patent 7279327,5 filed by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, describes methods for producing recombinant coronaviruses.

    Ralph Baric, Ph.D., a professor of microbiology and immunology who is famous for his chimeric coronavirus research, is listed as one of the three inventors, along with Kristopher Curtis and Boyd Yount.


    According to Martin, Fauci, Baric and the CDC “are at the hub” of the whole COVID-19 story.

    “In 2002, coronaviruses were recognized as an exploitable mechanism for both good and ill,” Martin says, and “Between 2003 and 2017, they [Fauci, Baric and CDC] controlled 100% of the cash flow to build the empire around the industrial complex of coronavirus.”

    How The CDC Broke The Law
    The key take-home message Martin delivers in “Plandemic” is that there’s a distinct problem with the CDC’s patent on SARS-CoV isolated from humans, because, by law, naturally occurring DNA segments are prohibited from being patented.

    The law clearly states that such segments are “not patent eligible merely because it has been isolated.”

    So, either SARS-CoV was manmade, which would render the patent legal, or it’s natural, thus rendering the patent on it illegal.


    However, if the virus was manufactured, then it was created in violation of biological weapons treaties and laws.

    This includes the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, passed unanimously by both houses of Congress and signed into law by George Bush Sr., which states:6

    “Whoever knowingly develops, produces, stockpiles, transfers, acquires, retains, or possesses any biological agent, toxin, or delivery system for use as a weapon, or knowingly assists a foreign state or any organization to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both. There is extraterritorial Federal jurisdiction over an offense under this section committed by or against a national of the United States.”

    So, as noted by Martin in the documentary, regardless of which scenario turns out to be true, the CDC has broken the law one way or another, either by violating biological weapons laws, or by filing an illegal patent.

    Even more egregious, May 14, 2007, the CDC filed a petition with the patent office to keep their coronavirus patent confidential.

    Now, because the CDC owns the patent on SARS-CoV, it has control over who has the ability to make inquiries into the coronavirus.

    Unless authorized, you cannot look at the virus, you cannot measure it or make tests for it, since they own the entire genome and all the rest.

    “By obtaining the patents that restrained anyone from using it, they had the means, the motive, and most of all, they had the monetary gain from turning coronavirus from a pathogen to a profit,” Martin says.

    Dangers Of MRNA Gene Therapy

    Did you know that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines aren’t vaccines in the medical and legal definition of a vaccine?

    They do not prevent you from getting the infection, nor do they prevent its spread. They’re really experimental gene therapies.

    Moderna Mrna Operating System
    Moderna Admits: mRNA Jabs Are An ‘Operating System’ Designed To Program Humans

    I discussed this troubling fact in a recent interview with molecular biologist Judy Mikovits, Ph.D. While the Moderna and Pfizer mRNA shots are labeled as “vaccines,” and news agencies and health policy leaders call them that, the actual patents for Pfizer’s and Moderna’s injections more truthfully describe them as “gene therapy,” not vaccines.

    Definition Of ‘Vaccine’
    According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,1 a vaccine is “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease.”


    Immunity, in turn, is defined as “Protection from an infectious disease,” meaning that “If you are immune to a disease, you can be exposed to it without becoming infected.”

    Neither Moderna nor Pfizer claim this to be the case for their COVID-19 “vaccines.” In fact, in their clinical trials, they specify that they will not even test for immunity.

    Unlike real vaccines, which use an antigen of the disease you’re trying to prevent, the COVID-19 injections contain synthetic RNA fragments encapsulated in a nanolipid carrier compound, the sole purpose of which is to lessen clinical symptoms associated with the S-1 spike protein, not the actual virus.

    They do not actually impart immunity or inhibit transmissibility of the disease.


    In other words, they are not designed to keep you from getting sick with SARS-CoV-2; they only are supposed to lessen your infection symptoms if or when you do get infected.

    As such, these products do not meet the legal or medical definition of a vaccine, and as noted by David Martin, Ph.D., in the video above, “The legal ramifications of this deception are immense.”

    15 U.S. Code Section 41
    As explained by Martin, 15 U.S. Code Section 41 of the Federal Trade Commission Act2 is the law that governs advertising of medical practices.

    This law, which dictates what you may and may not do in terms of promotion, has for many years been routinely used to shut down alternative health practitioners and companies.

    “If this law can be used to shut down people of good will, who are trying to help others,” Martin says, “it certainly should be equally applied when we know deceptive medical practices are being done in the name of public health.”

    Per this law, it is unlawful to advertise:

    “… that a product or service can prevent, treat, or cure human disease unless you possess competent and reliable scientific evidence, including, when appropriate, well-controlled human clinical studies, substantiating that the claims are true at the time they are made.”3

    Moderna Admits: mRNA Jabs Are An ‘Operating System’ Designed To Program Humans


    What Constitutes ‘The Greater Good’?
    Martin points to the 1905 Supreme Court ruling in Jacobson vs. Massachusetts,4 which essentially established that collective benefit supersedes individual benefit.

    To put it bluntly, it argued that it’s acceptable for individuals to be harmed by public health directives provided it benefits the collective.

    Now, if vaccination is a public health measure that is supposed to protect and benefit the collective, then it would need to a) ensure that the individual who is vaccinated is rendered immune from the disease in question; and b) that the vaccine inhibits transmission of the disease.

    Only if these two outcomes can be scientifically proven can you say that vaccination protects and benefits the collective — the population as a whole. This is where we run into problems with the mRNA “vaccines.”

    Moderna’s SEC filings, which Martin claims to have carefully reviewed, specifies and stresses that its technology is a “gene therapy technology.”

    Originally, its technology was set up to be a cancer treatment, so more specifically, it’s a chemotherapy gene therapy technology.

    As noted by Martin, who would raise their hand to receive prophylactic chemotherapy gene therapy for a cancer you do not have and may never be at risk for?

    In all likelihood, few would jump at such an offer, and for good reason.

    Moreover, states and employers would not be able to mandate individuals to receive chemotherapy gene therapy for a cancer they do not have. It simply would not be legal.

    Yet, they’re proposing that all of humanity be forced to get gene therapy for COVID-19.

    COVID-19 Vaccines — A Case Of False Advertising
    Now, if the COVID-19 vaccine really isn’t a vaccine, why are they calling it that? While the CDC provides a definition of “vaccine,” the CDC is not the actual law. It’s an agency empowered by the law, but it does not create law itself.

    Interestingly enough, it’s more difficult to find a legal definition of “vaccine,” but there have been a few cases. Martin provides the following examples:

    • Iowa code — “Vaccine means a specially prepared antigen administered to a person for the purpose of providing immunity.” Again, the COVID-19 vaccines make no claim of providing immunity. They are only designed to lessen symptoms if and when you get infected.

    • Washington state code — “Vaccine means a preparation of a killed or attenuated living microorganism, or fraction thereof …” Since Moderna and Pfizer are using synthetic RNA, they clearly do not meet this definition.

    Being a manmade synthetic, the RNA used is not derived from anything that has at one point been alive, be it a whole microorganism or a fraction thereof. The statute continues to specify that a vaccine “upon immunization stimulates immunity that protects us against disease …”

    So, in summary, “vaccine” and “immunity” are well-defined terms that do not match the end points specified in COVID-19 vaccine trials. The primary end point in these trials is: “Prevention of symptomatic COVID-19 disease.” Is that the same as “immunity”? No, it is not.

    There Are More Problems Than One
    But there’s another problem. Martin points out that “COVID-19 disease” has been defined as a series of clinical symptoms.

    Moreover, there’s no causal link between SARS-CoV-2, the virus, and the set of symptoms known as COVID-19.

    How is that, you might ask? It’s simple, really. Since a vast majority of people who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 have no symptoms at all, they’ve not been able to establish a causal link between the virus and the clinical disease.

    Here’s yet another problem: The primary end point in the COVID-19 vaccine trials is not an actual vaccine trial end point because, again, vaccine trial end points have to do with immunity and transmission reduction. Neither of those were measured.

    What’s more, key secondary end points in Moderna’s trial include “Prevention of severe COVID-19 disease, and prevention of infection by SARS-CoV-2.”

    However, by its own admission, Moderna did not actually measure infection, stating that it was too “impractical” to do so.

    That means there’s no evidence of this gene therapy having an impact on infection, for better or worse. And, if you have no evidence, you cannot fulfill the U.S. Code requirement that states you must have “competent and reliable scientific evidence … substantiating that the claims are true.”

    Why Are They Calling Them Vaccines?
    As noted by Martin, you cannot have a vaccine that does not meet a single definition of a vaccine.

    So, again, what would motivate these companies, U.S. health agencies and public health officials like Dr. Anthony Fauci to lie and claim that these gene therapies are in fact vaccines when, clearly, they are not?

    If they actually called it what it is, namely “gene therapy chemotherapy,” most people would — wisely — refuse to take it.

    Perhaps that’s one reason for their false categorization as vaccines. But there may be other reasons as well.

    Here, Martin strays into conjecture, as we have no proof of their intentions. He speculates that the reason they’re calling this experimental gene therapy technology a “vaccine” is because by doing so, they can circumvent liability for damages.

    “You’re being lied to. Your own government is violating its own laws. They have shut down practitioners around the country, time and time again, for violating what are called ‘deceptive practices in medical claims.’ Guess what? They’re doing exactly that thing.” ~ David Martin, Ph.D.

    As long as the U.S. is under a state of emergency, things like PCR tests and COVID-19 “vaccines” are allowed under emergency use authorization. And as long as the emergency use authorization is in effect, the makers of these experimental gene therapies are not financially liable for any harm that comes from their use.

    That is, provided they’re “vaccines.” If these injections are NOT vaccines, then the liability shield falls away, because there is no liability shield for a medical emergency countermeasure that is gene therapy.

    So, by maintaining the illusion that COVID-19 is a state of emergency, when in reality it is not, government leaders are providing cover for these gene therapy companies so that they can get immunity from liability.

    Under The Cover Of ‘Emergency’
    As noted by Martin, if state governors were to lift the state of emergency, all of a sudden the use of RT PCR testing would be in violation of 15 U.S. Code FTC Act, as PCR tests are not an approved diagnostic test.

    “You cannot diagnose a thing [with something] that cannot diagnose a thing,” Martin says. “That a misrepresentation. That is a deceptive practice under the Federal Trade Commission Act. And they’re liable for deceptive practices.”

    Importantly, there’s no waiver of liability under deceptive practices — even under a state of emergency. This would also apply to experimental gene therapies. The only way for these gene therapies to enjoy liability shielding is if they are vaccines developed in response to a public health emergency. There is no such thing as immunity from liability for gene therapies.

    Propaganda And Vaccine Rollout Run By Same Company
    Martin brings up yet another curious point. The middleman in Operation Warp Speed is a North Carolina defense contractor called ATI. It controls the rollout of the vaccine. But ATI also has another type of contract with the Department of Defense, namely managing propaganda and combating misinformation.

    So, the same company in charge of manipulating the media to propagate government propaganda and censor counterviews is the same company in charge of the rollout of “vaccines” that are being unlawfully promoted.

    “Listen,” Martin says. “This is a pretty straight-forward situation. You’re being lied to. Your own government is violating its own laws … They have thrown this book [15 U.S. Code Section 41] on more people than we can count.

    “They have shut down practitioners around the country, time and time again, for violating what are called ‘deceptive practices in medical claims’ … Guess what? They’re doing exactly that thing.”

    Martin urges listeners to forward his video to your state attorney, governor, representatives and anyone else that might be in a position to take affirmative action to address and correct this fraud.

    Defense contractors are violating FTC law, and gene therapy companies — not vaccine manufacturers — are conducting experimental trials under deceptive medical practices.

    They’re making claims of being “vaccines” without clinical proof, and must be held accountable for their deceptive marketing and medical practices.

    CDC Owns Coronavirus Patents
    On a side note, the CDC appears to be neck-deep in this scam pandemic, and is therefore wholly unsuitable to investigate the side effects of these experimental COVID-19 therapies. As noted by Martin, it’s like having a bank robber investigate its own crime.

    Details about this came out in the documentary “Plandemic,” in which Martin explained how the CDC has broken the law — in one way or another — related to its patenting of the 2003 SARS virus.

    Martin is a national intelligence analyst and founder of IQ100 Index, which developed linguistic genomics, a platform capable of determining the intent of communications.

    In 1999, IBM digitized 1 million U.S. patents, which allowed Martin’s company to conduct a review of all these patents, sending him down a proverbial “rabbit trail” of corruption.

    In 2003, Asia experienced an outbreak of SARS. Almost immediately, scientists began racing to patent the virus.

    Ultimately, the CDC nabbed ownership of SARS-CoV (the virus responsible for SARS) isolated from humans.

    So, the CDC actually owns the entire genetic content of that SARS virus. It’s patented under U.S. patent 7776521. They also own patents for detection methods, and for a kit to measure the virus.

    U.S. patent 7279327,5 filed by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, describes methods for producing recombinant coronaviruses.

    Ralph Baric, Ph.D., a professor of microbiology and immunology who is famous for his chimeric coronavirus research, is listed as one of the three inventors, along with Kristopher Curtis and Boyd Yount.

    According to Martin, Fauci, Baric and the CDC “are at the hub” of the whole COVID-19 story.

    “In 2002, coronaviruses were recognized as an exploitable mechanism for both good and ill,” Martin says, and “Between 2003 and 2017, they [Fauci, Baric and CDC] controlled 100% of the cash flow to build the empire around the industrial complex of coronavirus.”

    How The CDC Broke The Law
    The key take-home message Martin delivers in “Plandemic” is that there’s a distinct problem with the CDC’s patent on SARS-CoV isolated from humans, because, by law, naturally occurring DNA segments are prohibited from being patented.

    The law clearly states that such segments are “not patent eligible merely because it has been isolated.”

    So, either SARS-CoV was manmade, which would render the patent legal, or it’s natural, thus rendering the patent on it illegal.

    However, if the virus was manufactured, then it was created in violation of biological weapons treaties and laws.

    This includes the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, passed unanimously by both houses of Congress and signed into law by George Bush Sr., which states:6

    “Whoever knowingly develops, produces, stockpiles, transfers, acquires, retains, or possesses any biological agent, toxin, or delivery system for use as a weapon, or knowingly assists a foreign state or any organization to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both. There is extraterritorial Federal jurisdiction over an offense under this section committed by or against a national of the United States.”

    So, as noted by Martin in the documentary, regardless of which scenario turns out to be true, the CDC has broken the law one way or another, either by violating biological weapons laws, or by filing an illegal patent.

    Even more egregious, May 14, 2007, the CDC filed a petition with the patent office to keep their coronavirus patent confidential.

    Now, because the CDC owns the patent on SARS-CoV, it has control over who has the ability to make inquiries into the coronavirus.

    Unless authorized, you cannot look at the virus, you cannot measure it or make tests for it, since they own the entire genome and all the rest.

    “By obtaining the patents that restrained anyone from using it, they had the means, the motive, and most of all, they had the monetary gain from turning coronavirus from a pathogen to a profit,” Martin says.

    Dangers Of MRNA Gene Therapy

    I’ve written many articles detailing the potential and expected side effects of these gene therapy “vaccines.”

    If all of this is new to you, consider reviewing “How COVID-19 Vaccine Can Destroy Your Immune System,” “Seniors Dying After COVID Vaccine Labeled as Natural Causes” and “Side Effects and Data Gaps Raise Questions on COVID Vaccine.”

    In the lecture above, Dr. Simone Gold — founder of America’s Frontline Doctors, which has been trying to counter the false narrative surrounding hydroxychloroquine — reviews the dangers discovered during previous coronavirus vaccine trials, and the hazards of current mRNA gene therapies, including antibody-dependent immune enhancement.

    Antibody-dependent immune enhancement results in more severe disease when you’re exposed to the wild virus, and increases your risk of death.

    The synthetic RNA and the nanolipid its encased in may also have other, more direct side effects.

    As explained by Mikovits in our recent interview:

    “Normally, messenger RNA is not free in your body because it’s a danger signal. The central dogma of molecular biology is that our genetic code, DNA, is transcribed, written, into the messenger RNA. That messenger RNA is translated into protein, or used in a regulatory capacity … to regulate gene expression in cells.

    So, taking a synthetic messenger RNA and making it thermostable — making it not break down — [is problematic]. We have lots of enzymes (RNAses and DNAses) that degrade free RNA and DNA because, again, those are danger signals to your immune system. They literally drive inflammatory diseases.

    Now you’ve got PEG, PEGylated and polyethylene glycol, and a lipid nanoparticle that will allow it to enter every cell of the body and change the regulation of our own genes with this synthetic RNA, part of which actually is the message for the gene syncytin …

    Syncytin is the endogenous gammaretrovirus envelope that’s encoded in the human genome … We know that if syncytin … is expressed aberrantly in the body, for instance in the brain, which these lipid nanoparticles will go into, then you’ve got multiple sclerosis.

    The expression of that gene alone enrages microglia — literally inflames and dysregulates the communication between the brain microglia — which are critical for clearing toxins and pathogens in the brain and the communication with astrocytes.

    It dysregulates not only the immune system, but also the endocannabinoid system, which is the dimmer switch on inflammation. We’ve already seen multiple sclerosis as an adverse event in the clinical trials … We also see myalgic encephalomyelitis. Inflammation of the brain and the spinal cord …”

    Making matters worse, the synthetic mRNA also has an HIV envelope expressed in it, which can cause immune dysregulation.

    As we discussed in previous interviews, SARS-CoV-2 has been engineered in the lab with gain-of-function research that included introducing the HIV envelope into the spike protein.

    Are You In A High-Risk Group For Side Effects?
    Mikovits’ hypothesis is that those who are most susceptible to severe neurological side effects and death from the COVID-19 vaccines are those who have previously been injected with XMRVs, borrelia, babesia or mycoplasma through contaminated vaccines, resulting in chronic disease, as well as anyone with an inflammatory disease like rheumatoid arthritis, Parkinson’s disease or chronic Lyme disease, for example, and anyone with an acquired immune deficiency from any pathogens and environmental toxins.

    The chart below lists 35 diseases that are likely to render you more susceptible to severe side effects or death from COVID-19 gene therapy injections.



    Many of the symptoms now being reported are suggestive of neurological damage. They have severe dyskinesia (impairment of voluntary movement), ataxia (lack of muscle control) and intermittent or chronic seizures.

    Many cases detailed in personal videos on social media are quite shocking. According to Mikovits, these side effects are due to neuroinflammation, a dysregulated innate immune response, and/or a disrupted endocannabinoid system.

    Another common side effect from the vaccine we’re seeing is allergic reactions, including anaphylactic shock. A likely culprit in this is PEG (polyethylene glycol), which an estimated 70% of Americans are allergic to.

    Experimental Gene Therapy Is A Bad Idea
    Circling back to where we began, COVID-19 vaccines are not vaccines. They are experimental gene therapies that are falsely marketed as vaccines, likely to circumvent liability.

    World governments and global and national health organizations are all complicit in this illegal deception and must be held accountable.

    Ask yourself the question Martin asked in his video: Would you agree to take an experimental chemotherapy gene therapy for a cancer you do not have?

    If the answer is no, then why would you even consider lining up for an experimental gene therapy for COVID-19 — a set of clinical symptoms that haven’t even been causally linked to SARS-CoV-2?

    These injections are not vaccines. They do not prevent infection, they do not render you immune, and they do not prevent transmission of the disease.

    Instead, they alter your genetic coding, turning you into a viral protein factory that has no off-switch. What’s happening here is a medical fraud of unprecedented magnitude, and it really needs to be stopped before it’s too late for a majority of people.

    One Of The Most Powerful Videos I’ve Ever Seen
    The following video from Barbara Loe Fisher is one of the most powerful videos that I have ever seen. I am hopeful that watching this video will inspire you to take up the cause and join the fight for vaccine freedom and independence.

    There is a cultural war and collusion between many industries and federal regulatory agencies that results in a suppression of the truth about vital important health issues.

    If this suppression continues we will gradually and progressively erode our private individual rights that our ancestors fought so hard to achieve. Please take a few minutes to watch this video.

    Protect Your Right To Informed Consent And Defend Vaccine Exemptions
    With all the uncertainty surrounding the safety and efficacy of vaccines, it’s critical to protect your right to make independent health choices and exercise voluntary informed consent to vaccination.

    It is urgent that everyone in America stand up and fight to protect and expand vaccine informed consent protections in state public health and employment laws.

    The best way to do this is to get personally involved with your state legislators and educate the leaders in your community.

    Think Globally, Act Locally
    National vaccine policy recommendations are made at the federal level but vaccine laws are made at the state level. It is at the state level where your action to protect your vaccine choice rights can have the greatest impact.

    It is critical for EVERYONE to get involved now in standing up for the legal right to make voluntary vaccine choices in America because those choices are being threatened by lobbyists representing drug companies, medical trade associations and public health officials, who are trying to persuade legislators to strip all vaccine exemptions from public health laws.

    Signing up for NVIC’s free Advocacy Portal at www.NVICAdvocacy.org gives you immediate, easy access to your own state legislators on your smartphone or computer so you can make your voice heard. You will be kept up to date on the latest state bills threatening your vaccine choice rights and will get practical, useful information to help you become an effective vaccine choice advocate in your own community.

    Also, when national vaccine issues come up, you will have the up-to-date information and call-to-action items you need at your fingertips. So, please, as your first step, sign up for the NVIC Advocacy Portal.

    By Dr. Joseph Mercola, the author of Fat for Fuel: A Revolutionary Diet to Combat Cancer, Boost Brain Power, and Increase Your Energy.

    Sources and References:
    1 CDC.gov Immunizations: The Basics, Definition of Terms
    2 Cornell University 15 US Code Subchapter 1: Federal Trade Commission
    3 FTC.gov Warning Letter
    4 Justia Jacobson v. Massachusetts 1905
    5 United States Patent 7279327 April 19, 2002
    6 S.993 Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989
    https://humansarefree.com/2021/02/co...-vaccines.html
    “The spirits of darkness are now among us. We have to be on guard so that we may realize what is happening when we encounter them and gain a real idea of where they are to be found. The most dangerous thing you can do in the immediate future will be to give yourself up unconsciously to the influences which are definitely present.” ~ Rudolf Steiner



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    Going to do everything in my power to avoid getting this vaccine as long as I can.
    "Perhaps one of the most important accomplishments of my administration is minding my own business."

    Calvin Coolidge

  4. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Anti Globalist View Post
    Going to do everything in my power to avoid getting this vaccine as long as I can.
    If we make sure to tell everyone we communicate with that this is NOT a vaccine, it is an experimental gene therapy. The more people who know this, the less likely they will roll up their sleeves for it.
    “The spirits of darkness are now among us. We have to be on guard so that we may realize what is happening when we encounter them and gain a real idea of where they are to be found. The most dangerous thing you can do in the immediate future will be to give yourself up unconsciously to the influences which are definitely present.” ~ Rudolf Steiner

  5. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by donnay View Post
    This is one of the best in-depth articles I have read about the experimental jab, they are pushing on the people to be Big pHARMa's guinea pigs! If you go to the page, there are embed links and videos as well.


    https://humansarefree.com/2021/02/co...-vaccines.html

    You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to donnay again.
    Pfizer Macht Frei!

    Openly Straight Man, Danke, Awarded Top Rated Influencer. Community Standards Enforcer.


    Quiz: Test Your "Income" Tax IQ!

    Short Income Tax Video

    The Income Tax Is An Excise, And Excise Taxes Are Privilege Taxes

    The Federalist Papers, No. 15:

    Except as to the rule of appointment, the United States have an indefinite discretion to make requisitions for men and money; but they have no authority to raise either by regulations extending to the individual citizens of America.

  6. #5
    have any independent scientists been able to examine exactly what is inside the vial?

    As a side note: I noticed they changed the language on the efficacy of the vaccines. At first they said they're only 50% effective, but now they say they're 90%-95% effective at "reducing symptoms" complete false advertising bull$#@!.
    Last edited by Warrior_of_Freedom; 02-11-2021 at 12:50 PM.
    A savage barbaric tribal society where thugs parade the streets and illegally assault and murder innocent civilians, yeah that is the alternative to having police. Oh wait, that is the police

    We cannot defend freedom abroad by deserting it at home.
    - Edward R. Murrow

    ...I think we have moral obligations to disobey unjust laws, because non-cooperation with evil is as much as a moral obligation as cooperation with good. - MLK Jr.

    How to trigger a liberal: "I didn't get vaccinated."

  7. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Warrior_of_Freedom View Post
    have any independent scientists been able to examine exactly what is inside the vial?

    As a side note: I noticed they changed the language on the efficacy of the vaccines. At first they said they're only 50% effective, but now they say they're 90%-95% effective at "reducing symptoms" complete false advertising bull$#@!.
    Just remember to correct any one who calls it a "vaccine." It's not a vaccine and they are hoping they can stand behind the 'no liability' that all vaccine makers get.
    “The spirits of darkness are now among us. We have to be on guard so that we may realize what is happening when we encounter them and gain a real idea of where they are to be found. The most dangerous thing you can do in the immediate future will be to give yourself up unconsciously to the influences which are definitely present.” ~ Rudolf Steiner

  8. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by donnay View Post
    Just remember to correct any one who calls it a "vaccine." It's not a vaccine and they are hoping they can stand behind the 'no liability' that all vaccine makers get.
    Yeah I always bring that up. It always starts as vaccines are 100% safe, to "Well, a few people get hurt, but the suffering of the few outweighs the benefits to the rest." which is the antithesis to what individualism stands for, then ultimately "This is so safe and effective we need to force you to take it."

    I wonder how RPF's opinions would change if we were faced with a virus that quickly killed people, even young and healthy.
    A savage barbaric tribal society where thugs parade the streets and illegally assault and murder innocent civilians, yeah that is the alternative to having police. Oh wait, that is the police

    We cannot defend freedom abroad by deserting it at home.
    - Edward R. Murrow

    ...I think we have moral obligations to disobey unjust laws, because non-cooperation with evil is as much as a moral obligation as cooperation with good. - MLK Jr.

    How to trigger a liberal: "I didn't get vaccinated."

  9. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Warrior_of_Freedom View Post
    Yeah I always bring that up. It always starts as vaccines are 100% safe, to "Well, a few people get hurt, but the suffering of the few outweighs the benefits to the rest." which is the antithesis to what individualism stands for, then ultimately "This is so safe and effective we need to force you to take it."

    I wonder how RPF's opinions would change if we were faced with a virus that quickly killed people, even young and healthy.
    At this point my opinion would remain that a virus like that would be man-made. They have been monkeying-around with this gain-of-function type viruses for a bioweapon for years.

    However, I still think people who are genuinely healthy, their immune systems would more than likely beat it.
    “The spirits of darkness are now among us. We have to be on guard so that we may realize what is happening when we encounter them and gain a real idea of where they are to be found. The most dangerous thing you can do in the immediate future will be to give yourself up unconsciously to the influences which are definitely present.” ~ Rudolf Steiner



  10. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  11. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by donnay View Post
    At this point my opinion would remain that a virus like that would be man-made. They have been monkeying-around with this gain-of-function type viruses for a bioweapon for years.

    However, I still think people who are genuinely healthy, their immune systems would more than likely beat it.
    Maybe. After all back during the bubonic plague people had terrible hygiene
    A savage barbaric tribal society where thugs parade the streets and illegally assault and murder innocent civilians, yeah that is the alternative to having police. Oh wait, that is the police

    We cannot defend freedom abroad by deserting it at home.
    - Edward R. Murrow

    ...I think we have moral obligations to disobey unjust laws, because non-cooperation with evil is as much as a moral obligation as cooperation with good. - MLK Jr.

    How to trigger a liberal: "I didn't get vaccinated."

  12. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Warrior_of_Freedom View Post
    Maybe. After all back during the bubonic plague people had terrible hygiene
    Correct. They also didn't have sanitation and clean water.
    “The spirits of darkness are now among us. We have to be on guard so that we may realize what is happening when we encounter them and gain a real idea of where they are to be found. The most dangerous thing you can do in the immediate future will be to give yourself up unconsciously to the influences which are definitely present.” ~ Rudolf Steiner

  13. #11
    DR ANDREW WAKEFIELD: THIS IS NOT A VAX, IT IS AN IRREVERSIBLE GENETIC MODIFICATION
    https://www.brighteon.com/4306dd67-8...9-1edd5a59f23f
    “The spirits of darkness are now among us. We have to be on guard so that we may realize what is happening when we encounter them and gain a real idea of where they are to be found. The most dangerous thing you can do in the immediate future will be to give yourself up unconsciously to the influences which are definitely present.” ~ Rudolf Steiner

  14. #12
    So, I just found the CDC Vaccine Adverse Effect Report System (VAERS) Database.

    If you want to see actual (and very scary) data from the CDC instead of off-beat reporting, I suggest you take a look at it. https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html

    Click on the VAERS data search, then in section 3, click on COVID19 Vaccine. After that, you can set up any filters and sorting that you wish.

    The first thing you'll notice is that there are only 10,000 rows allowed, so you'll have to add some filters to limit the data. Once you have limited enough to where you can begin to see the data, the descriptions are horrific! Why any healthy person would take a vaccine to prevent an infection that is 99.9% survivable is beyond me. Simple hysteria and fear mongering.

    At any rate, check out the site and let us know whatever you find interesting. Here are a sampling of reports:

    • Patient developed 104.4 temp approximately 48 hours after being given the vaccine. I treated him with antibiotics, IV fluids, cooling methods. CXR does show a new right perihilar infiltrate. However, his fever came down within the next 24-48 hours. Unfortunately, he suffered a cardiac arrest on 1/21/21 in the early morning and expired.
    • Patient suffered a cardiac arrest and was unable to give details about her symptoms. Per husband, patient did not complain of any symptoms after vaccine administration. She began seizing without warning which was complicated by cardiac arrest of uncertain etiology
    • he passed away; not responsive; mind just seemed like it was racing; body was hyper dried; Restless; not feeling well; ate a bit but not much; kind of pale; Agitated; Vomiting; trouble in breathing; This is a spontaneous report from a contactable consumer (brother of the patient). A 54-year-old male patient received BNT162B2 (PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE), via an unspecified route of administration, on 04Jan2021 (at the age of 54-years-old) as a single dose for COVID-19 immunization. Medical history included diabetes and high blood pressure. Concomitant medications included metformin (MANUFACTURER UNKNOWN) taken for diabetes, glimepiride (MANUFACTURER UNKNOWN) taken for diabetes, lisinopril (MANUFACTURER UNKNOWN), and amlodipine (MANUFACTURER UNKNOWN). The patient experienced not feeling well, ate a bit but not much, kind of pale, vomiting, trouble in breathing, and agitated on 04Jan2021; body was hyper dried and restless on 05Jan2021; mind just seemed like it was racing on 06Jan2021; and not responsive and he passed away on 06Jan2021 at 10:15 (reported as: around 10:15 AM). The clinical course was reported as follows: The patient received the vaccine on 04Jan2021, after which he started not feeling well. He went right home and went to bed. He woke up and ate a bit but not much and then was kind of pale. The patient then started to vomit, which continued throughout the night. He was having trouble in breathing. Emergency services were called, and they took his vitals and said that everything was okay, but he was very agitated; reported as not like this prior to the vaccine. The patient was taken to urgent care where they gave him an unspecified steroid shot and unspecified medication for vomiting. The patient was told he was probably having a reaction to the vaccine, but he was just dried up. The patient continued to vomit throughout the day and then he was very agitated again and would fall asleep for may be 15-20 minutes. When the patient woke up, he was very restless (reported as: his body was just amped up and could not calm down). The patient calmed down just a little bit in the evening. When the patient was awoken at 6:00 AM in the morning, he was still agitated. The patient stated that he couldn't breathe, and his mind was racing. The patient's other brother went to him and he was not responsive, and he passed away on 06Jan2021 around 10:15 AM. It was reported that none of the symptoms occurred until the patient received the vaccine. Therapeutic measures were taken as a result of vomiting as aforementioned. The clinical outcome of all of the events was unknown; not responsive was not recovered, the patient died on 06Jan2021. The cause of death was unknown (reported as: not known by reporter). An autopsy was not performed. The batch/lot number for the vaccine, BNT162B2, was not provided and has been requested during follow up.; Reported Cause(s) of Death: not responsive and he passed away
    • After being observed for approximately 20 minutes and patient walked to her car without assistance I was called to assess the patient in the parking lot for troubles breathing. EMS was called as I made my way outside. Upon my arrival patient was leaning out of the car and stating that she could not breath. She was able to tell me that she was allergic to penicillin. Oxygen was immediately placed on the patient with minimal relief. Lung sounds were coarse throughout. She then began to vomit about every 20-30 seconds. Epipen was administered in the right leg with no relief. Patient continued to complain of troubles breathing and vomiting. A second epipen was administered in the patients right arm again with no relief. A few minutes later patient was given racemic epinephrine through the oxygen mask. There appeared to be mild improvement in her breathing as she appeared more comfortable, but still complaining of shortness of breath and vomiting. When EMS arrived patient was unable to transport herself to the stretcher. When EMS and clinical staff transferred patient to the stretcher she became unresponsive. She appeared to still be breathing. She did not respond to verbal stimuli. Per ED report large amount of fluid was suctioned from the patients lungs following intubation in the ambulance. When patient arrived to the ED she was extubated and re-intubated without difficulty and further fluid was suctioned. At that time patient was found to be in PEA, shock was delivered. Shortly thereafter no cardiac activity was found and patient pronounced dead
    "And now that the legislators and do-gooders have so futilely inflicted so many systems upon society, may they finally end where they should have begun: May they reject all systems, and try liberty; for liberty is an acknowledgment of faith in God and His works." - Bastiat

    "It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere." - Voltaire

  15. #13
    Proof the NHS is Lying - This is Genocide and the Jabs Must Stop Now!
    https://www.brighteon.com/398683c2-e...a-0756bdb70878
    “The spirits of darkness are now among us. We have to be on guard so that we may realize what is happening when we encounter them and gain a real idea of where they are to be found. The most dangerous thing you can do in the immediate future will be to give yourself up unconsciously to the influences which are definitely present.” ~ Rudolf Steiner

  16. #14
    Dr. Sherri Tenpenny Explains How The MRNA Injections Might Cause Mass Deaths 3-6 Months After Being Injected

    Dr. Sherri Tenpenny gives VERY important information! Hyper-immune response in test animals for previous attempts at coronavirus vaccines, like SARS and MERS, has been a persistent problem.

    All is well for awhile, until the animals are exposed to the wild mutated virus.

    Dr. Tenpenny and other scientists have forecast that millions may die, and it will be blamed on a new strain of COVID, making an argument for even more deadly vaccines.

    CNN: ‘Don’t Be Alarmed’ If People Start Dying After Taking The Vaccine

    https://humansarefree.com/2021/02/dr...-injected.html
    “The spirits of darkness are now among us. We have to be on guard so that we may realize what is happening when we encounter them and gain a real idea of where they are to be found. The most dangerous thing you can do in the immediate future will be to give yourself up unconsciously to the influences which are definitely present.” ~ Rudolf Steiner

  17. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by CaptUSA View Post
    So, I just found the CDC Vaccine Adverse Effect Report System (VAERS) Database.

    If you want to see actual (and very scary) data from the CDC instead of off-beat reporting, I suggest you take a look at it. https://wonder.cdc.gov/vaers.html

    Click on the VAERS data search, then in section 3, click on COVID19 Vaccine. After that, you can set up any filters and sorting that you wish.

    The first thing you'll notice is that there are only 10,000 rows allowed, so you'll have to add some filters to limit the data. Once you have limited enough to where you can begin to see the data, the descriptions are horrific! Why any healthy person would take a vaccine to prevent an infection that is 99.9% survivable is beyond me. Simple hysteria and fear mongering.

    At any rate, check out the site and let us know whatever you find interesting. Here are a sampling of reports:

    • Patient developed 104.4 temp approximately 48 hours after being given the vaccine. I treated him with antibiotics, IV fluids, cooling methods. CXR does show a new right perihilar infiltrate. However, his fever came down within the next 24-48 hours. Unfortunately, he suffered a cardiac arrest on 1/21/21 in the early morning and expired.
    • Patient suffered a cardiac arrest and was unable to give details about her symptoms. Per husband, patient did not complain of any symptoms after vaccine administration. She began seizing without warning which was complicated by cardiac arrest of uncertain etiology
    • he passed away; not responsive; mind just seemed like it was racing; body was hyper dried; Restless; not feeling well; ate a bit but not much; kind of pale; Agitated; Vomiting; trouble in breathing; This is a spontaneous report from a contactable consumer (brother of the patient). A 54-year-old male patient received BNT162B2 (PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE), via an unspecified route of administration, on 04Jan2021 (at the age of 54-years-old) as a single dose for COVID-19 immunization. Medical history included diabetes and high blood pressure. Concomitant medications included metformin (MANUFACTURER UNKNOWN) taken for diabetes, glimepiride (MANUFACTURER UNKNOWN) taken for diabetes, lisinopril (MANUFACTURER UNKNOWN), and amlodipine (MANUFACTURER UNKNOWN). The patient experienced not feeling well, ate a bit but not much, kind of pale, vomiting, trouble in breathing, and agitated on 04Jan2021; body was hyper dried and restless on 05Jan2021; mind just seemed like it was racing on 06Jan2021; and not responsive and he passed away on 06Jan2021 at 10:15 (reported as: around 10:15 AM). The clinical course was reported as follows: The patient received the vaccine on 04Jan2021, after which he started not feeling well. He went right home and went to bed. He woke up and ate a bit but not much and then was kind of pale. The patient then started to vomit, which continued throughout the night. He was having trouble in breathing. Emergency services were called, and they took his vitals and said that everything was okay, but he was very agitated; reported as not like this prior to the vaccine. The patient was taken to urgent care where they gave him an unspecified steroid shot and unspecified medication for vomiting. The patient was told he was probably having a reaction to the vaccine, but he was just dried up. The patient continued to vomit throughout the day and then he was very agitated again and would fall asleep for may be 15-20 minutes. When the patient woke up, he was very restless (reported as: his body was just amped up and could not calm down). The patient calmed down just a little bit in the evening. When the patient was awoken at 6:00 AM in the morning, he was still agitated. The patient stated that he couldn't breathe, and his mind was racing. The patient's other brother went to him and he was not responsive, and he passed away on 06Jan2021 around 10:15 AM. It was reported that none of the symptoms occurred until the patient received the vaccine. Therapeutic measures were taken as a result of vomiting as aforementioned. The clinical outcome of all of the events was unknown; not responsive was not recovered, the patient died on 06Jan2021. The cause of death was unknown (reported as: not known by reporter). An autopsy was not performed. The batch/lot number for the vaccine, BNT162B2, was not provided and has been requested during follow up.; Reported Cause(s) of Death: not responsive and he passed away
    • After being observed for approximately 20 minutes and patient walked to her car without assistance I was called to assess the patient in the parking lot for troubles breathing. EMS was called as I made my way outside. Upon my arrival patient was leaning out of the car and stating that she could not breath. She was able to tell me that she was allergic to penicillin. Oxygen was immediately placed on the patient with minimal relief. Lung sounds were coarse throughout. She then began to vomit about every 20-30 seconds. Epipen was administered in the right leg with no relief. Patient continued to complain of troubles breathing and vomiting. A second epipen was administered in the patients right arm again with no relief. A few minutes later patient was given racemic epinephrine through the oxygen mask. There appeared to be mild improvement in her breathing as she appeared more comfortable, but still complaining of shortness of breath and vomiting. When EMS arrived patient was unable to transport herself to the stretcher. When EMS and clinical staff transferred patient to the stretcher she became unresponsive. She appeared to still be breathing. She did not respond to verbal stimuli. Per ED report large amount of fluid was suctioned from the patients lungs following intubation in the ambulance. When patient arrived to the ED she was extubated and re-intubated without difficulty and further fluid was suctioned. At that time patient was found to be in PEA, shock was delivered. Shortly thereafter no cardiac activity was found and patient pronounced dead
    This site is hard for a commoner like me to use, how did you get to the detailed reports?
    A savage barbaric tribal society where thugs parade the streets and illegally assault and murder innocent civilians, yeah that is the alternative to having police. Oh wait, that is the police

    We cannot defend freedom abroad by deserting it at home.
    - Edward R. Murrow

    ...I think we have moral obligations to disobey unjust laws, because non-cooperation with evil is as much as a moral obligation as cooperation with good. - MLK Jr.

    How to trigger a liberal: "I didn't get vaccinated."

  18. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by Warrior_of_Freedom View Post
    This site is hard for a commoner like me to use, how did you get to the detailed reports?
    Yeah, well, it's a gubbermint site, so...

    1. Click on agree to the disclaimer.
    2. Click on the VAERS Data Search button.
    3. In Section 1, I group the results by VAERS ID, AGE, EVENT CATEGORY, SERIOUS, and the include in the "optional measures" Adverse Event Description
    4. In Section 3, Vaccine Products, click on COVID19 Vaccine
    5. In Section 5, you'll have to limit the event categories, etc. so you don't get over 10,000 results. You can play with these as you wish. (might want to with "deaths" so you can see how it works)
    6. Hit the "Send" button.
    "And now that the legislators and do-gooders have so futilely inflicted so many systems upon society, may they finally end where they should have begun: May they reject all systems, and try liberty; for liberty is an acknowledgment of faith in God and His works." - Bastiat

    "It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere." - Voltaire



  19. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  20. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by CaptUSA View Post
    Yeah, well, it's a gubbermint site, so...

    1. Click on agree to the disclaimer.
    2. Click on the VAERS Data Search button.
    3. In Section 1, I group the results by VAERS ID, AGE, EVENT CATEGORY, SERIOUS, and the include in the "optional measures" Adverse Event Description
    4. In Section 3, Vaccine Products, click on COVID19 Vaccine
    5. In Section 5, you'll have to limit the event categories, etc. so you don't get over 10,000 results. You can play with these as you wish. (might want to with "deaths" so you can see how it works)
    6. Hit the "Send" button.
    oh wow

    "Patient received COVID vaccination around 12:15pm. Patient was monitored for the appropriate amount of time by nursing staff. Patient passed away at 2:15pm."

    Also a lot of the ones I click on seem to be the person dies within a few hours or in exactly 2 weeks they drop dead
    Last edited by Warrior_of_Freedom; 02-12-2021 at 09:50 AM.
    A savage barbaric tribal society where thugs parade the streets and illegally assault and murder innocent civilians, yeah that is the alternative to having police. Oh wait, that is the police

    We cannot defend freedom abroad by deserting it at home.
    - Edward R. Murrow

    ...I think we have moral obligations to disobey unjust laws, because non-cooperation with evil is as much as a moral obligation as cooperation with good. - MLK Jr.

    How to trigger a liberal: "I didn't get vaccinated."

  21. #18
    It looks like all of these "anti-vaxxers" are wrong again (I've learned from Snopes)...
    Look at the "definition" of vaccines.



    Or maybe you're just a little late (8 January you could've been right): http://web.archive.org/web/202101082...ionary/vaccine
    Do NOT ever read my posts. Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: Google-censors-the-world/page3

    The Order of the Garter rules the world: Order of the Garter and the Carolingian dynasty

  22. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by Firestarter View Post
    It looks like all of these "anti-vaxxers" are wrong again (I've learned from Snopes)...
    Look at the "definition" of vaccines.



    Or maybe you're just a little late (8 January you could've been right): http://web.archive.org/web/202101082...ionary/vaccine
    Well they can change the definition all they want, just like they are trying to change history, it doesn't make them correct.

    Many good doctors are speaking out. Those who are courageous enough to shine a light on the evil.
    Last edited by donnay; 02-17-2021 at 06:20 AM. Reason: typo
    “The spirits of darkness are now among us. We have to be on guard so that we may realize what is happening when we encounter them and gain a real idea of where they are to be found. The most dangerous thing you can do in the immediate future will be to give yourself up unconsciously to the influences which are definitely present.” ~ Rudolf Steiner

  23. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by donnay View Post
    Many good doctors are speaking out. Those who are courageous enough to shine a light on the evil.
    Those doctors will simply lose their medical license, and nobody will believe "anti-vaxxers" like you and me, as we don't even have a "doctor" degree!
    Do NOT ever read my posts. Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: Google-censors-the-world/page3

    The Order of the Garter rules the world: Order of the Garter and the Carolingian dynasty

  24. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by Firestarter View Post
    Those doctors will simply lose their medical license, and nobody will believe "anti-vaxxers" like you and me, as we don't even have a "doctor" degree!
    I am not so sure, there are many courageous doctors, nurses, epidemiologists, virologists, and other scientists who are speaking out.

    https://frontlinemds.com

    As for me, I will speak out about these crimes against humanity, to anyone who is willing to listen.
    “The spirits of darkness are now among us. We have to be on guard so that we may realize what is happening when we encounter them and gain a real idea of where they are to be found. The most dangerous thing you can do in the immediate future will be to give yourself up unconsciously to the influences which are definitely present.” ~ Rudolf Steiner

  25. #22
    Thinking about taking the jab? watch this first!
    https://www.brighteon.com/1df63793-a...f-102dac2e942e
    “The spirits of darkness are now among us. We have to be on guard so that we may realize what is happening when we encounter them and gain a real idea of where they are to be found. The most dangerous thing you can do in the immediate future will be to give yourself up unconsciously to the influences which are definitely present.” ~ Rudolf Steiner

  26. #23
    Even Mark Zuckerberg has reservations about this experimental gene therapy...

    “But I do just want to make sure that I share some caution on this [vaccine] because we just don’t know the long-term side effects of basically modifying people’s DNA and RNA…basically the ability to produce those antibodies and whether that causes other mutations or other risks downstream. So, there’s work on both paths of vaccine development,” Zuckerberg said.
    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...atform-policy/

    “The spirits of darkness are now among us. We have to be on guard so that we may realize what is happening when we encounter them and gain a real idea of where they are to be found. The most dangerous thing you can do in the immediate future will be to give yourself up unconsciously to the influences which are definitely present.” ~ Rudolf Steiner

  27. #24
    Even if there was some terrible pandemic, this shouldn't be reason to emergency approve vaccines at warp speed.
    The Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine trial started on 29 April 2020, with estimated completion dates for primary outcomes of 30 July 2021, and secondary outcomes in September 2023

    These mRNA vaccines are completely new technology (synthetically made by a computer literally in days), some call it "gene therapy" (what's in a name?). This makes it all the more genocidal to emergency approve them and then test them in the greatest medical experiment in history on the population at large. With already 2 billions jabbed in violation with the Nuremberg code, under which German Nazis were sentenced that were obviously just small-time eugenics psychopaths compared to the elites and big pharma executives in 2021.

    The following article shows once and for all how dangerous it is to have these experimental mRNA vaccines approved without a proper medical trial.
    The official explanation on how these mRNA vaccines work is that they inject mRNA into the bloodstream that orders the blood cells to create a SARS-CoV-2 protein, which magically "teaches" the immune system to fight COVID-19.
    Because these mRNA vaccines are completely new technology that were approved without proper medical trial we know next to nothing of its long-term adverse effects.

    Injecting synthetic mRNA for medical purposes has been tried and failed over and over again for a variety of disorders for more than 15 years.
    This failed over and over again because mRNA backfired causing the immune system of lab animals attacking the cells that were producing something alien to the body (an autoimmune disorder).

    So then they had the great idea to make mRNA vaccines, speculating that injecting only a small amount of mRNA would cause less harm...
    So Moderna that was founded in 2010 suddenly became a vaccine manufacturer!

    Besides the mRNA technology also the polyethylene glycol (PEG) coating has never been used before in an approved vaccine.
    PEG has been used in several drugs that have triggered anaphylaxis — that can cause rashes, plummeting blood pressure, shortness of breath, and rapid heartbeat. Severe allergy-like reactions that have occurred after being poisoned with the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine shouldn't be surprising: https://archive.is/RoBcJ


    As if all of this isn't enough, mRNA "vaccines" were developed as an offshoot of the eugenics movement - the Wellcome Trust and Galton Institute (formerly British Eugenics Society): Does-COVID-19-vaccine-cause-infertility#post7009559
    Do NOT ever read my posts. Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: Google-censors-the-world/page3

    The Order of the Garter rules the world: Order of the Garter and the Carolingian dynasty



  28. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  29. #25
    Pfizer Macht Frei!

    Openly Straight Man, Danke, Awarded Top Rated Influencer. Community Standards Enforcer.


    Quiz: Test Your "Income" Tax IQ!

    Short Income Tax Video

    The Income Tax Is An Excise, And Excise Taxes Are Privilege Taxes

    The Federalist Papers, No. 15:

    Except as to the rule of appointment, the United States have an indefinite discretion to make requisitions for men and money; but they have no authority to raise either by regulations extending to the individual citizens of America.



Similar Threads

  1. COVID-19 mRNA "vaccines" Are Legally NOT Vaccines
    By Contumacious in forum Coronavirus SARS-CoV2
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-09-2021, 05:58 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-02-2021, 10:28 AM
  3. The Covid Vaccines? they have mRNA nanoparticle delivery mechanism.
    By AngryCanadian in forum Coronavirus SARS-CoV2
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-12-2020, 01:36 PM
  4. 55% of NYC Firefighters reject experimental COVID jab.
    By unknown in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-07-2020, 10:55 PM
  5. Homeland Security Stockpiling Billions of Dollars of Experimental Vaccines
    By Created4 in forum Personal Health & Well-Being
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-16-2015, 04:00 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •