Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 31 to 37 of 37

Thread: If blame is to be assigned for the Jan. 6th protest, our S.C. should top the list

  1. #31
    Should "blame" be assigned for Jan 6 protest

    Or "credit"
    It's all about taking action and not being lazy. So you do the work, whether it's fitness or whatever. It's about getting up, motivating yourself and just doing it.
    - Kim Kardashian

    Donald Trump / Rand Paul (Vice Pres) 2016!!!!



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #32
    Quote Originally Posted by TheTexan View Post
    Should "blame" be assigned for Jan 6 protest

    Or "credit"


    Huh?

    JWK

    When our federal judicial system ignores our written Constitution and assents to legislative acts contrary to our supreme law of the land, it not only opens the door to anarchy, but participates in such treachery.



  4. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  5. #33
    Quote Originally Posted by johnwk View Post
    Huh?

    JWK

    When our federal judicial system ignores our written Constitution and assents to legislative acts contrary to our supreme law of the land, it not only opens the door to anarchy, but participates in such treachery.
    the word "blame" just has such a negative connotation to it
    It's all about taking action and not being lazy. So you do the work, whether it's fitness or whatever. It's about getting up, motivating yourself and just doing it.
    - Kim Kardashian

    Donald Trump / Rand Paul (Vice Pres) 2016!!!!

  6. #34
    I never seen the dem's so happy about such a "tragic" day Pelosi was practically giggling like a school girl
    A savage barbaric tribal society where thugs parade the streets and illegally assault and murder innocent civilians, yeah that is the alternative to having police. Oh wait, that is the police

    We cannot defend freedom abroad by deserting it at home.
    - Edward R. Murrow

    ...I think we have moral obligations to disobey unjust laws, because non-cooperation with evil is as much as a moral obligation as cooperation with good. - MLK Jr.

    How to trigger a liberal: "I didn't get vaccinated."

  7. #35
    Quote Originally Posted by johnwk View Post


    And what does that have to do with what I posted?

    JWK
    It refutes your fatuous claim that "elevating a particular candidate in one state by illegal methods is most certainly an abridgement of the right to vote of people in others states whose legal votes are rendered meaningless, and diminished by the amount of illegal ballots counted in another state."
    We have long had death and taxes as the two standards of inevitability. But there are those who believe that death is the preferable of the two. "At least," as one man said, "there's one advantage about death; it doesn't get worse every time Congress meets."
    Erwin N. Griswold

    Taxes: Of life's two certainties, the only one for which you can get an automatic extension.
    Anonymous

  8. #36
    Quote Originally Posted by Warrior_of_Freedom View Post
    I never seen the dem's so happy about such a "tragic" day Pelosi was practically giggling like a school girl
    OF course she was happy, all conversation went from election fraud televised LIVE inside Congress to Congress is now the victim & deserves protection & pity.

    Plus the other side can now be prosecuted.. Instead of those committing voter fraud

    Incredible move by the Powers that Be. Just as effective as Reichstag fire

  9. #37

    The truth is, the Supreme Court lied in Texas election lawsuit, here is why!

    Quote Originally Posted by Sonny Tufts View Post
    It refutes your fatuous claim that "elevating a particular candidate in one state by illegal methods is most certainly an abridgement of the right to vote of people in others states whose legal votes are rendered meaningless, and diminished by the amount of illegal ballots counted in another state."
    .
    Texas did submit a BILL OF COMPLAINT to the Supreme Court of the United States, and instead of giving it a hearing, examine evidence and listen to sworn witnesses, members on the Court lied and RULED that Texas did not provide a “judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections.”


    But, the irrefutable fact is, elevating a particular candidate in one state by illegal methods is most certainly an abridgement of the right to vote of people, not only in a state doing so, but in other states whose legal votes are rendered meaningless, and diminished by the amount of illegal ballots counted in the offending state, and therefore, states so offended by illegal voting practices in a federal electoral process do have a “judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections.” [1]

    If, after counting the PA election results a particular candidate would win, and election officials in PA do not like that candidate and add a million illegal ballots to the count so their candidate of choice wins, such action not only is an infringement upon the right to vote for PA’s voters, but likewise negatively affects voters in other States. The fact is, the collective vote of voters within each State, for their chosen candidate who is not liked by PA election officials, is diminished by the illegal ballots added to PA’s election results which not only illegally tilts the election results in the State of PA, but also awards PAs Electoral College vote to a candidate who had really lost in the State of PA…[2]

    So, once again, as succinctly stated by Justice Douglas eighty years ago, who you and others apparently disagree with, and without a legitimately expressed reason, when acts of corruption infect a federal electoral process in one state "they transcend mere local concern and extend a contaminating influence into the national domain" ___ Justice DOUGLAS in United States v. Classic (1941)".

    [1] "The U.S. Supreme Court has addressed various circumstances concerning disenfranchisement of votes. For instance, it has held the right to vote is foundational to our Republic and this fundamental right “can be denied by a debasement or dilution of the weight of a citizen’s vote just as effectively as by wholly prohibiting the free exercise of the franchise.” Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 555 (1964). Reynolds, which established the “one person, one vote” doctrine, is the seminal case on voter dilution. Under this concept, a mail-in voting process that would exceed the limits of absentee voting prescribed in Pa. Const. Article VII sec 14 could be construed as violating the “one person one vote.” In that event, the sheer magnitude of the number of mail-in ballots would not be a basis to disregard not only this provision of the Pennsylvania Constitution but also the “one person, one vote” doctrine established by Reynolds, one of the bedrock decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court." See Texas Bill of Complaint

    [2] NOTE: Over 1 million illegal no-excuse mail in ballots were counted in PA’s election results.




    .
    JWK

    “Until you realize how easy it is for your mind to be manipulated, you remain the puppet of someone else’s game.” ― Evita Ochel

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 06-08-2010, 10:20 PM
  2. Comprehensive List of Townhalls to Protest
    By ghemminger in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-09-2009, 12:10 AM
  3. Times, 25 most to blame list for the economy
    By klamath in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 05-11-2009, 12:46 PM
  4. Don't blame me, I voted for Ron Paul - Online List?
    By Thrashertm in forum Grassroots Central
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 01-26-2009, 08:37 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •