Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 44

Thread: Does COVID-19 vaccine cause infertility?

  1. #1

    Does COVID-19 vaccine cause infertility?

    From the start of this pandemic, I’ve thought that the main purpose of the corona vaccines is to make women infertile in the latest depopulation scheme.
    If these experimental mRNA-vaccines indeed permanently alter the DNA, this infertility would also be for life.


    The short story is that the COVID-19 vaccine learns the immune system to fight against spike proteins, including syncytin-1, which is essential for the formation of the human placenta.
    An immune response against the spike protein, could also attack synctin-1, which would cause infertility in women: https://2020news.de/en/dr-wodarg-and...-the-petition/
    (https://archive.is/e9yHJ)


    From the petition of German doctor Wolfgang Wodarg and British doctor Michael Yeadon.
    XI. Several vaccine candidates are expected to induce the formation of humoral antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. Syncytin-1 (see Gallaher, B., “Response to nCoV2019 Against Backdrop of Endogenous Retroviruses” - http://virological.org/t/response-to...troviruses/396), which is derived from human endogenous retroviruses (HERV) and is responsible for the development of a placenta in mammals and humans and is therefore an essential prerequisite for a successful pregnancy, is also found in homologous form in the spike proteins of SARS viruses.
    There is no indication whether antibodies against spike proteins of SARS viruses would also act like anti-Syncytin-1 antibodies. However, if this were to be the case this would then also prevent the formation of a placenta which would result in vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile. To my knowledge, Pfizer/BioNTech has yet to release any samples of written materials provided to patients, so it is unclear what, if any, information regarding (potential) fertility-specific risks caused by antibodies is included.

    According to section 10.4.2 of the Pfizer/BioNTech trial protocol, a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP) is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant or breastfeeding, and is using an acceptable contraceptive method as described in the trial protocol during the intervention period (for a minimum of 28 days after the last dose of study intervention).
    This means that it could take a relatively long time before a noticeable number of cases of postvaccination infertility could be observed.
    https://healthimpactnews.com/wp-cont...h_Exhibits.pdf
    (http://web.archive.org/web/20201205151131/https://healthimpactnews.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/12/Wodarg_Yeadon_EMA_Petition_Pfizer_Trial_FINAL_01DE C2020_EN_unsigned_with_Exhibits.pdf)


    The UK has already approved the genocidal Pfizer coronavirus vaccine, with the first victims to be poisoned as early as next week. The official documents confirm that the vaccines haven’t been properly tested.
    Because side effects of the vaccine on pregnant women aren’t known, the vaccine shouldn’t be given to pregnant women.
    There are no or limited amount of data from the use of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2. Animal reproductive toxicity studies have not been completed. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is not recommended during pregnancy.
    For women of childbearing age, pregnancy should be excluded before vaccination. In addition, women of childbearing age should be advised to avoid pregnancy for at least 2 months after their second dose.
    http://web.archive.org/web/20201205000037/https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/940565/Information_for_Healthcare_Professionals_on_Pfizer _BioNTech_COVID-19_vaccine.pdf
    Last edited by Firestarter; 12-05-2020 at 09:22 AM.
    Do NOT ever read my posts. Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: Google-censors-the-world/page3

    The Order of the Garter rules the world: Order of the Garter and the Carolingian dynasty



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    The following article is the most “informative” I’ve found on the hypothesis that the COVID-19 vaccines will sterilise women by mobilising the immune system against syncytins.
    It’s not a “good” article because the writer ignores all of the evidence against the coronavirus “pandemic” and the vaccine trials, with the following conclusion.
    In short, the claim that the vaccines for COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 will cause infertility because of some kind of crossreactive immune response between the spike protein antigens and syncytin proteins is baseless.
    https://archive.is/7Bmc2


    What the writer of the previous propaganda piece forgets to take into account is that the vaccine trials were/are a complete charade, so that it’s far from “baseless” to assume that these vaccines cause severe harm.
    Basically these experimental mRNA vaccines have been approved without knowing their efficacy or adverse effects.

    By staging the pandemic these psychopaths have effectively bypassed doing any form of decent study into the efficacy and adverse effects of these experimental mRNA-vaccines.
    With the result that big pharma can directly start their sick experiments on the population. Human experiments like these are in violation of the Nuremberg code.
    It can’t be seen as voluntarily “consent”, if people get misinformed about these vaccines, and on top of that will be forced to take them, because it is required for work (besides for travelling, or doing “normal” things like going to a bar or restaurant).


    The following confirms that we’re talking about an experiment on humans on a massive scale, which involves “tracking systems” to “ensure that patients each get two doses of the same vaccine and to monitor them for adverse health effects”.
    Maybe somebody should point out that these health effects should be monitored BEFORE everybody gets poisoned with the vaccines in an independent scientific trial…

    Official OWS show that the vaccine human guinea pigs will be monitored for 24 months after the first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine through a “pharmacovigilance system” (what?!?).
    OWS describes one of its “four key tenets” as “traceability” to: 1) “confirm which of the approved vaccines were administered regardless of location (private/public)”; 2) to send a “reminder to return for second dose”; and 3) to “administer the correct second dose”.

    Despite claims that the “pharmacovigilance surveillance system” would intimately involve the FDA. In September, top FDA officials complained they were barred from attending OWS meetings and could not explain the operation’s organisation because it is essentially a top-secret Pentagon program: https://www.thelastamericanvagabond....for-two-years/
    (https://archive.is/HwRgJ)
    Do NOT ever read my posts. Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: Google-censors-the-world/page3

    The Order of the Garter rules the world: Order of the Garter and the Carolingian dynasty

  4. #3
    If it is a DNA altering vaccine, it may not sterilize, but the children of those vaccinated may show many of the genetic edits. Remember, their goal is to keep humanity as stupid as possible.
    1776 > 1984

    The FAILURE of the United States Government to operate and maintain an
    Honest Money System , which frees the ordinary man from the clutches of the money manipulators, is the single largest contributing factor to the World's current Economic Crisis.

    The Elimination of Privacy is the Architecture of Genocide

    Belief, Money, and Violence are the three ways all people are controlled

    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    Our central bank is not privately owned.

  5. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Firestarter View Post
    The following article is the most “informative” I’ve found on the hypothesis that the COVID-19 vaccines will sterilise women by mobilising the immune system against syncytins.
    It’s not a “good” article because the writer ignores all of the evidence against the coronavirus “pandemic” and the vaccine trials, with the following conclusion.
    I looked the author up on LinkedIn. I would expect him to be proficient at writing argument & persuasion papers since he just completed his bachelors last year. Taking medical advice from him is an entirely different story.

    XNN
    "They sell us the president the same way they sell us our clothes and our cars. They sell us every thing from youth to religion the same time they sell us our wars. I want to know who the men in the shadows are. I want to hear somebody asking them why. They can be counted on to tell us who our enemies are but theyre never the ones to fight or to die." - Jackson Browne Lives In The Balance

  6. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by DamianTV View Post
    If it is a DNA altering vaccine, it may not sterilize, but the children of those vaccinated may show many of the genetic edits. Remember, their goal is to keep humanity as stupid as possible.
    No different from what happened with the swine flu vaccinations. Much of these vaccine impacted the children.

  7. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by XNavyNuke View Post
    I looked the author up on LinkedIn. I would expect him to be proficient at writing argument & persuasion papers since he just completed his bachelors last year. Taking medical advice from him is an entirely different story.
    My main problem with this piece, is that the writer completely ignores that the vaccine trials were/are a complete charade.
    I don't believe that this is because he doesn't have the "skills".

    The following article is the best I’ve read on the vaccine trials…
    Quote Originally Posted by Firestarter View Post
    None of trials for the most-likely approved vaccines is designed to test if the vaccine can reduce severe COVID-19 symptoms; and the trials do not even test if the vaccine can stop infection.
    All 4 of these trials report a high rate of adverse events.

    While all 4 trials report that 90% to 100% of participants developed antibodies after vaccination; there is not a single shred of evidence that these are actually COVID-19 antibodies let alone that this is proof that this will prevent a corona infection.


    Pfizer’s study, counts cases based on only a positive (unreliable) test and only 1 symptom — like a cough, chills or diarrhoea — that could easily be caused by something else that COVID-19.

    Astra-Zeneca/Oxford is using a meningitis vaccine as its “placebo”, arguing that “use of saline as a placebo would risk unblinding participants, as those who had notable reactions would know they were in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine group”.
    In other words they admit that the meningitis vaccine is used instead of a placebo to obscure adverse effects of the COVID-19 vaccine!

    Several of these trials, including that of Astra-Zeneca/Oxford, also use acetaminophen (a.k.a. Tylenol or paracetamol) to obscure the adverse effects of the COVID-19 vaccine: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...fety-concerns/
    Health-emergency-DoD-EUAs-forced-vaccines-and-quarantine#post6997920
    Do NOT ever read my posts. Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: Google-censors-the-world/page3

    The Order of the Garter rules the world: Order of the Garter and the Carolingian dynasty

  8. #7
    Vaccinations with the DNA-altering corona vaccines have begun in the UK…


    Most people will quickly dismiss the “conspiracy theories” that the not properly tested corona vaccines will sterilise women, because we are too smart to be fooled like that.
    There is hard evidence that the same psychopaths that make a nice profit from shoving the sustainable development down our throats, are very concerned with the problem of overpopulation and consider vaccines (and health care in general) as the solution to too much useless eaters.


    In 1972, the United Nations, World Health Organization (WHO) and World Bank collaborated on the “Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP)” to “coordinate, promote, conduct, and evaluate research in human reproduction”.
    In 1972, the WHO founded the “Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation” to produce an hCG-laced anti-fertility vaccine.
    This has continued to produce vaccines for “fertility regulation”, see the following report from 1991: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1874951
    (http://archive.is/HG8pN)


    In 1973, Stevens and Chrystle published a report on anti-fertility vaccines, which showed that hCG can be used to sterilise women.
    Here’s the abstract of “Effects of Immunization with Hapten-Coupled HCG on the Human Menstrual Cycle” (1973): http://journals.lww.com/greenjournal..._HCG_on.1.aspx


    In 1976 another study on hCG was published by A. Pala et al “Immunization with hapten-coupled hCG-β subunit and its effect on the menstrual cycle” (1976), only the abstract: http://www.contraceptionjournal.org/...76)90009-3/pdf



    And then there’s the infamous 1974 National Security Council Document 20506: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests. Written by none other than Nobel Prize winner for peace, Henry Kissinger...
    They identified India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia and Columbia as problematic:
    29. While specific goals in this area are difficult to state, our aim should be for the world to achieve a replacement level of fertility, (a two-child family on the average), by about the year 2000. This will require the present 2 percent growth rate to decline to 1.7 percent within a decade and to 1.1 percent by 2000.
    (…)
    In less developed countries growth rates average about 2.4 percent. For the People's Republic of China, with a massive, enforced birth control program, the growth rate is estimated at under 2 percent. India's is variously estimated from 2.2 percent, Brazil at 2.8 percent, Mexico at 3.4 percent, and Latin America at about 2.9 percent. African countries, with high birth as well as high death rates, average 2.6 percent; this growth rate will increase as death rates go down.
    (…)
    Steady increases in the number of acceptors at family planning facilities indicate a likelihood of some fertility reduction in Thailand, Indonesia, the Philippines, Colombia, and other countries which have family planning programs. On the other hand, there is little concrete evidence of significant fertility reduction in the populous countries of India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, etc.1
    (...)
    concentrating on the education and indoctrination of the rising generation of children regarding the desirability of smaller family size.
    (…)
    Considerable reduction in infant and child mortality is possible through improvement in nutrition, inoculations against diseases, and other public health measures if means can be devised for extending such services to neglected LDC populations on a low-cost basis. It often makes sense to combine such activities with family planning services in integrated delivery systems in order to maximize the use of scarce LDC financial and health manpowder (sic.) resources (See Section IV). In addition, providing selected health care for both mothers and their children can enhance the acceptability of family planning by showing concern for the whole condition of the mother and her children and not just for the single factor of fertility.
    (…)
    Research indicates that female wage employment outside the home is related to fertility reduction. Programs to increase the women's labor force participation must, however, take account of the overall demand for labor; this would be a particular problem in occupations where there is already widespread unemployment among males. But other occupations where women have a comparative advantage can be encouraged.
    (…)
    d. Sterilization of men and women has received wide-spread acceptance in several areas when a simple, quick, and safe procedure is readily available. Female sterilization has been improved by technical advances with laparoscopes, culdoscopes, and greatly simplifies abdominal surgical techniques. Further improvements by the use of tubal clips, trans-cervical approaches, and simpler techniques can be developed. For men several current techniques hold promise but require more refinement and evaluation. Approx. Increased Cost $6 million annually.
    https://archive.is/ay8aG


    The Gates Foundation is heavily involved in vaccinating the world.
    In the following 29:32 video Bill Gates, in a presentation for the TED 2010 conference, explains that we need “solutions” that will make the “miracle” of zero CO2 emission happen. By 2050 we must realize an 80% reduction in CO2 emission...
    Gates explains that “people” (P) are at the basis of this “problem” (4:00-4:55)
    It includes the following notorious quote: “The world today has 6.8 billion people … that’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.
    Do NOT ever read my posts. Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: Google-censors-the-world/page3

    The Order of the Garter rules the world: Order of the Garter and the Carolingian dynasty

  9. #8
    Would a loyal to public interest America-First POTUS (who gets the latest intel on vax from some of the most competent agencies in the world) and who was recently called "the most Biblical President" of our time by Christion Evangelical leaders be so aggressively pushing it if it were harmful to Americans reproduction?

    Trump to sign ‘America First’ executive order on Covid-19 vaccines Tuesday

    Mon, Dec 7 2020 3:55 PM


    • President Donald Trump is expected to sign an executive order on Tuesday designed to ensure that U.S. efforts to assist other countries in vaccinating their populations against Covid-19 take on a lower priority than domestic inoculations.
    • In a call with reporters Monday afternoon, a senior administration official described the order as primarily a “reaffirmation of the president’s commitment to America First.”
    • Additionally, the order directs a handful of government agencies, including the State Department and the United States Agency for International Development, to work together to help international partners and allies procure Covid vaccines, the official said.




    There are also rumors of Vaccination Summit to be held at White House this week.

    On a side note, this could cause more petitions like this to spring up:

    Petition Donald Trump: Mandate for all Insurers to offer infertility treatment coverage
    change.org/p/donald-trump-mandate-for-all-insurers-to-offer-infertility-treatment-coverage



  10. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  11. #9
    MSFox did not do the research, that Pfizer merged [partnered] with GlaxoSmithKline in 2019, just months before the "outbreak".


    Fox News reported early Monday that President Trump plans to sign an executive order on Tuesday that prioritizes giving Covid-19 vaccines to American citizens before the government will help other nations, which may be an effort to quell worries about vaccine shortages. But because Pfizer privately funded the work on its Covid-19 vaccine without help from the U.S. government, there is no legal way that President Trump, or the incoming Administration could “force” Pfizer to give the U.S. additional doses before other countries.

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/leahros...h=161c9a062c2d

    All in stages:

    Sanofi, GSK to Provide 200 Million Covid Vaccine Doses to WHO Global Immunization Program

    They are all in this together.
    “The right to life is the source of all rights—and the right to property is their only implementation. Without property rights, no other rights are possible. Since man has to sustain his life by his own effort, the man who has no right to the product of his effort has no means to sustain his life. The man who produces while others dispose of his product, is a slave.”

    An Agorist Primer

  12. #10
    This is what I was actually thinking about. But of course, it's just me, and I don't want to sound like a conspiracy theorist.


    I was thinking what if this virus as well as the vaccine is "their" solution for the world's population.

  13. #11
    The GAVI Alliance was founded in 2000 with the help of the Gates Foundation, other donors include: the Rockefeller foundation, UNICEF, World Health Organization (WHO), and World Bank.
    GAVI has the goal of vaccinating the entire third World.
    Obviously part of the plan is to reduce fertility for depopulation purposes.

    The research by Jurriaan Maessen, is an important source for information on anti-fertility vaccines.
    There are not only vaccines to reduce fertility, but pregnant women are forced to get vaccinated, which has caused abortions in Thailand and the Philippines: http://www.oldthinkernews.com/2010/0...ion-reduction/


    Jurriaan Maessen noted, that Rockefeller had already conceived sterilisation vaccines way back in the 1930s:
    Rockefeller Foundation minion Max Mason, who acted as president in the mid-1930s, on multiple occasions expressed his master’s desire for an “anti-hormone” that would reduce fertility worldwide. Now keep in mind, this is more than 35 years before the Foundation actually mentioned funding “anti-fertility vaccines” in subsequent annual reports from 1969 onward.
    .
    In 1973, the Mexican birth rate was unashamedly described as a “Population Bomb” in the state media.


    In 1974, a group of Mexicans found out (or at least suspected) that a group disguised as inoculation teams “who looked like foreigners” gave shots at schools to sterilise their children. The teams were escorted by the police.
    Vaccination was never done at Mexican schools, so the parents had a good reason to be suspicious.

    The “rumours” began in the north in Nuevo Leon, and then reached Mexico City, where thousands of angry parents “in slum areas” stormed and barricaded schools, and removed their children from them. Some 35-40% of elementary kids were absent Wednesday of that week.
    According to the National Action party: “The rare vaccine, until now never used, much less as part of a campaign which appears to cover many parts of the republic, is given to each child in three places: the umbilicis, the chest, and the spinal column”.
    The government denied the “rumours”, claiming that sterilisation vaccines don’t exist.


    Coercive sterilisations under the banner of “family planning” were taking place all over the globe in 1974. In April 1974, it was reported that the government had sterilised some 1,204 girls and boys under the age of 21 at federally funded clinics across the country. This included a ten year old, an eleven year old, and ten 13 year olds.
    The US government had funded sterilisations on: poor women, the mentally ill, deaf, blind, with Epilepsy, and others who were considered “unfit” to have babies.
    http://archive.is/zxQ34
    Do NOT ever read my posts. Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: Google-censors-the-world/page3

    The Order of the Garter rules the world: Order of the Garter and the Carolingian dynasty

  14. #12
    http://www.antimicrobe.org/h04c.file...dc-05-1132.pdf

    Maurice Hilleman of Merck frequently joined an informal group for intense discussions on clinical trials that were conducted in the spring of 1976 with the vaccines that had been quickly prepared by the industry.
    Should the vaccine be stockpiled? The argument against stockpiling was strong: the vaccine had to be given before the potential epidemic occurred in September and October, and we were racing against time. Initially, Albert Sabin insisted the vaccine should be given to children when school began in September 1976.
    After much consultation and discussion at the highest levels of the US government, the Public Health Service launched a program to immunize 50 million people. Following the largest voluntary mass vaccination campaign since the mass vaccination programs with Salk and Sabin polio vaccines, nearly 25% of the US population, or 45 million persons, were vaccinated by October, 10 short months after the alarm was sounded.


    XNN
    "They sell us the president the same way they sell us our clothes and our cars. They sell us every thing from youth to religion the same time they sell us our wars. I want to know who the men in the shadows are. I want to hear somebody asking them why. They can be counted on to tell us who our enemies are but theyre never the ones to fight or to die." - Jackson Browne Lives In The Balance

  15. #13
    While there has never been any evidence that vaccines actually prevent disease, I have to admit that – while the unvaccinated are healthier than the vaxxed - the adverse effects are relatively benign: The-Truth-About-Vaccines

    This sort of confirms that there must be another motive for pushing these vaccines ad nauseum.
    For me the only “reasonable” explanation is that these vaccines will sterilise women (girls).

    This makes it all the more troubling that several bills have been passed to become part of the legislation that allows them to vaccinate children without the consent of their parents (who just to be on the safe side, won’t be informed of this crime against humanity): Vaccinating-children-without-consent-parents
    Do NOT ever read my posts. Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: Google-censors-the-world/page3

    The Order of the Garter rules the world: Order of the Garter and the Carolingian dynasty

  16. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by Firestarter View Post
    While there has never been any evidence that vaccines actually prevent disease, I have to admit that – while the unvaccinated are healthier than the vaxxed - the adverse effects are relatively benign: The-Truth-About-Vaccines

    This sort of confirms that there must be another motive for pushing these vaccines ad nauseum.
    For me the only “reasonable” explanation is that these vaccines will sterilise women (girls).

    This makes it all the more troubling that several bills have been passed to become part of the legislation that allows them to vaccinate children without the consent of their parents (who just to be on the safe side, won’t be informed of this crime against humanity): Vaccinating-children-without-consent-parents
    I've never been vaxed & am healthier than all my friends.
    There is no spoon.

  17. #15
    I figured that sterilization was one of the effects when a quick headline flashed on CNBC that they'd start testing the vaccines on 12-17 year olds, among other evidence like the HPV vaccine causing sterilization and reports of an AstraZeneca (iirc) whistleblower exposing that sterilization is one of the effects of the covid products. 12-17 is when females start to become fertile. Since the story is that children are otherwise not covid risks such a need to vaccinate them doesn't make much sense.
    "Let it not be said that we did nothing."-Ron Paul

    "We have set them on the hobby-horse of an idea about the absorption of individuality by the symbolic unit of COLLECTIVISM. They have never yet and they never will have the sense to reflect that this hobby-horse is a manifest violation of the most important law of nature, which has established from the very creation of the world one unit unlike another and precisely for the purpose of instituting individuality."- A Quote From Some Old Book

  18. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by devil21 View Post
    I figured that sterilization was one of the effects when a quick headline flashed on CNBC that they'd start testing the vaccines on 12-17 year olds, among other evidence like the HPV vaccine causing sterilization
    Maybe more on Gardasil and Gayle DeLong's report from 2017 in a later post...


    Quote Originally Posted by devil21 View Post
    reports of an AstraZeneca (iirc) whistleblower exposing that sterilization is one of the effects of the covid products.
    I don't know about that whistleblower; do you have any more on that (a link)?
    Michael Yeadon has worked for Pfizer by the way...
    Do NOT ever read my posts. Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: Google-censors-the-world/page3

    The Order of the Garter rules the world: Order of the Garter and the Carolingian dynasty



  19. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  20. #17
    A 2010 study conducted by the Philippine Medical Association (PMA) indicated that Philippine women were “unwittingly vaccinated against their own children”.
    By linking hCG with tetanus antigens in a vaccine, researchers fool a woman’s immune system into producing antibodies against hCG, which makes her allergic to her own embryo.
    Once her immune system is sufficiently stimulated against hCG, the pregnant woman will spontaneously abort the embryo: https://www.pop.org/bad-blood-in-the-philippines/


    The following report shows that influenza vaccination causes abortions in lab animals; Ayoub & Yazbak “Influenza Vaccination During Pregnancy: A Critical Assessment of the Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)” (2006).
    http://www.whale.to/vaccine/ayoub.pdf


    The 1978 WHO task force “Evaluating the safety and efficacy of placental antigen vaccines for fertility regulation”, shows initiatives to use vaccines for reduced fertility.
    It even shows that they already knew then that hCG can cause abortions.
    Although substantial progress has been made over the last few years in the provision of family planning services to many of the World's populations, there is still an urgent need for a greater variety of safe, effective and acceptable methods of fertility regulation to meet widely differing personal, cultural and service requirements.
    Immunization as a prophylactic measure is now so widely accepted that it has been suggested that one method of fertility regulation which might have wide appeal as well as great ease of service delivery would be an anti-fertility vaccine.
    (…)
    In principle, anti-fertility vaccines may: (a) prevent sperm transport and/or fertilization; (b) prevent or disrupt implantation; and (c) prevent blastocyst development.
    (…)
    Several potential complications have to be considered upon immunization of humans with immunogenic conjugates of HCG-derived antigens. Some of these hazards are related to potential disruption of the endocrinological balance and maternal-embryonal relationships; others are related to the possible autoimmunity induced with human-derived material as an autoantigen. Consideration of these potential hazards should provide guidelines for design and evaluation of animal and human studies.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/art...00215-0170.pdf
    Do NOT ever read my posts. Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: Google-censors-the-world/page3

    The Order of the Garter rules the world: Order of the Garter and the Carolingian dynasty

  21. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by Firestarter View Post
    Maybe more on Gardasil and Gayle DeLong's report from 2017 in a later post...



    I don't know about that whistleblower; do you have any more on that (a link)?
    Michael Yeadon has worked for Pfizer by the way...
    Sorry, was GSK, not AZ. Here's a quick search crumb trail to start at:
    https://fromrome.info/2020/12/09/gsk...e-97-of-women/

    (That info first surfaced back in May or June maybe...many months ago)


    (eta: one of the goals of the modern era vaccine regimen is to create illness as a reason to continue to expand the debt money system. the debt money system has required constant expansion in the form of debt. medical issues have been a huge driver of that. a truly healthy population is terrible for a debt money system. now that the debt money system is winding down, there's a need to eliminate "useless eaters" and halt population growth, which was required for debt expansion. always look at the monetary system first for explanations of large scale, big picture issues.)
    Last edited by devil21; 12-14-2020 at 10:03 AM.
    "Let it not be said that we did nothing."-Ron Paul

    "We have set them on the hobby-horse of an idea about the absorption of individuality by the symbolic unit of COLLECTIVISM. They have never yet and they never will have the sense to reflect that this hobby-horse is a manifest violation of the most important law of nature, which has established from the very creation of the world one unit unlike another and precisely for the purpose of instituting individuality."- A Quote From Some Old Book

  22. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by Ender View Post
    I've never been vaxed & am healthier than all my friends.
    Kudos to you for avoiding vaccinations your whole life.
    "Perhaps one of the most important accomplishments of my administration is minding my own business."

    Calvin Coolidge

  23. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by devil21 View Post
    Sorry, was GSK, not AZ. Here's a quick search crumb trail to start at:
    https://fromrome.info/2020/12/09/gsk...e-97-of-women/
    In May 2020 (?), a video was uploaded to and deleted by Youtube that a GSK whistleblower exposed that the COVID-19 vaccine will make 97% of the women infertile...
    As I haven't seen the video, and wouldn't know how to find it, I can only say something on the articles about this video that contain interesting information on sterilisation vaccines.

    In Kenya in October 2015, pharmaceutical company Agriq-Quest Ltd had their licence revoked for sterilising half a million girls using anti-HCG in the tetanus vaccine.

    A study from 1994, presenting "evidence of the feasibility of a vaccine for control of human fertility” describes how the HCG sterilisation vaccines work:
    We report here results of clinical trials on a birth control vaccine, consisting of a heterospecies dimer of the beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) associated noncovalently with the alpha subunit of ovine luteinizing hormone and conjugated to tetanus and diphtheria toxoids as carriers, that induces antibodies of high avidity (K(a) approximately 10(10) M-1) against hCG.
    Whilst, the antibody response declines with time; fertility was regained when titers fell to < 35 ng/ml.
    As fertility came back, "booster shots" are needed!

    This explains that because it doesn't give other indications of sterilisation, it could be used covertly:
    An advantage in choosing hCG as a target for immunocontraception is that its inactivation would not interfere with other physiological processes in the female, such as ovulation and production of sex steroid hormones.
    Another this study from 1989 about “Vaccines are under development for the control of fertility in males and females" adds the following on hCG vaccines:
    Vaccines inducing antibodies against the human chorionic gonadotropin have gone through phase I trials with satisfactory results. A vaccine producing a consistently bioeffective antibody response against gonadotropin-releasing hormone is ready for phase I/II clinical trials in patients of carcinoma of prostate after due experimenation in animals and toxicology studies. Research to identify sperm antigens for incorporation into second generation vaccines is in progress.
    https://healingoracle.ch/2020/05/13/...l-infertility/
    (https://archive.is/frARP)


    The following is a typical "debunking" story, that does such a poor job that this actually makes the original, deleted video more convincing to me...
    There is however some additional information on the original deleted Youtube video.

    Maybe the following (61 from 63) is where the 97% figure comes from.
    The speaker also says that GSK tested 63 women with a vaccine containing anti-hGC antigens that resulted in 61 becoming infertile (5m29s). Those statistics also appear in the 1989 paper and an older one, by one of the same researchers and are not related to GSK.
    See the following example.
    In the video the speaker says he wants to “look at who is running the vaccine trial” and names Dr Andrew Preston from the University of Bath, saying he “spoke on television the other night”. Phoenix says Dr Preston received a £28 million grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which he claims is “interfering and trying to manipulate” human vaccine trials."
    It goes on to explain that this is all preposterous while admitting that Andrew Preston had an important role in the vaccine trials, and admitting that Preston received (part of) a £28 million grant from amongst others the Gates Foundation for another vaccine trial...

    Even more ridiculous is that because one of the referenced studies in the video concerns cancer vaccines, this is no smoking gun (I really don't understand the "debunking argument")!
    Prof Griffin said the 1989 paper referred to in the video “was obviously very deliberately about a vaccine for contraception or cancer research”.
    This is all the more suspicious against the background that HPV vaccines (that have been marketed as cancer vaccines) are known to reduce fertility in women (maybe more on that in a next post):
    https://www.aap.com.au/covid-19-vacc...udy-from-1989/
    (https://archive.is/0iq13)


    If you want to check the named 1989 study for yourself here it is: http://archive.vn/VIpgr


    The cancer study suggests that GnRH vaccines could make men so femine that this would effectively sterilise them.
    The GnRH vaccine has the potential to be effective in both men and women. A study in male rats using diphtheria toxoid as the GnRH vaccine carrier reveals that antibody titers rise, testosterone levels fall, weight of testis decreases, and the prostate disappears.
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1618603/


    To finish this post....
    In August 2019, a couple of months before the first cases of the miraculous coronavirus were reported in Wuhan, China were reported, GlaxoSmithKline and Pfizer merged their consumer health care divisions...
    It is of course Pfizer's sterilisation vaccine that was the first to be approved for the far from fatal COVID-19 (without a proper trial).
    Last edited by Firestarter; 12-31-2020 at 11:15 AM.
    Do NOT ever read my posts. Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: Google-censors-the-world/page3

    The Order of the Garter rules the world: Order of the Garter and the Carolingian dynasty

  24. #21
    "Foreign aid is taking money from the poor people of a rich country, and giving it to the rich people of a poor country." - Ron Paul
    "Beware the Military-Industrial-Financial-Corporate-Internet-Media-Government Complex." - B4L update of General Dwight D. Eisenhower
    "Debt is the drug, Wall St. Banksters are the dealers, and politicians are the addicts." - B4L
    "Totally free immigration? I've never taken that position. I believe in national sovereignty." - Ron Paul
    They are what they hate.” - B4L


    The views and opinions expressed here are solely my own, and do not represent this forum or any other entities or persons.

  25. #22
    What could possibly go wrong? Even if people find out about the sterilisation vaccines there's nothing we could do about it (let's call that a democracy)!


    While the pacified population in the developed world have already seen the number of child births drop dramatically, the population of poor countries is still increasing.
    It looks like the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine is especially designed to "fix" that "population bomb". Oxford-AstraZeneca's vaccine seems developed for precisely those countries in Latin America, Southeast Asia and Africa, where the Galton Institute has called for reducing population growth.
    Almost 160 countries have already bought the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine, and it is expected that India (the country with the second largest population on Earth) will approve this vaccine in a week.

    The lead developers of Oxford-AstraZeneca's sterilisation vaccine - Adrian Hill and Sarah Gilbert - are closely tied to the most infamous eugenics societies in Europe.
    Both Hill and Gilbert come from the Wellcome Trust.

    The Wellcome Trust was originally created by Henry Wellcome, who founded the company that later became GlaxoSmithKline.
    The Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics boasts of the genetic mapping they’ve conducted in Africa. The center also publishes papers that explore genetic dispositions in relation to male fertility and “reproductive success”.
    The Wellcome Centre co-funds vaccines and birth control methods together with the Gates Foundation, which admits promoting population and reproductive control in Africa and South Asia by distributing long-acting, reversible contraceptives (LARCs). The Wellcome Trust has also directly funded developing methods to “improve uptake” of LARCs in places like Rwanda.

    The lead developer of the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine, Adrian Hill, held a senior position at the Wellcome Trust’s Centre for Human Genetics and is also closely affiliated to the Galton Institute.
    Several top positions at the former British Eugenics Society (called Galton Institute since 1989) were taken by psychopaths of the Wellcome Trust, including Galton Institute’s president Turi King and Galton Institute’s Senior Genetics Researcher, Jess Buxton, who was previously ‘genetics researcher’ at the Wellcome Trust. Galton Council Member Elena Bochukova previously worked under Adrian Hill at the Wellcome Trust Center for Human Genetics.
    The Galton Institute was named in honour of the so-called "father of eugenics" Sir Francis Galton. The UK Eugenics Society for more than a century has promoted racist pseudoscience to “improve racial stock” by reducing the "inferior" population (races and/or classes?).

    Hill’s and Gilbert's work on the COVID-19 vaccine is through their position at Oxford's Jenner Institute (that had already started developing the corona vaccine in mid-January 2020).
    The Jenner Institute’s relocation to Oxford was largely facilitated by the Medical Research Council, which donated £1.25 million in 2005 and 2006, after the decision was made to replace the institute’s original sponsors - GlaxoSmithKline, the Medical Research Council, the Department of Health - with the University of Oxford and the Institute for Animal Health (now called Pirbright Institute).

    In June, Adrian Hill explained that his team was in “a race against the virus disappearing” as “We’re in the bizarre position of wanting COVID to stay, at least for a little while. But cases are declining” (it's normal that flu and cold cases in Europe and North America disappear in June...).

    Emeritus professor of molecular genetics at the Galton Institute, David. J Galton, has written that the Human Genome Mapping Project had “enormously increased ... the scope for eugenics ... because of the development of a very powerful technology for the manipulation of DNA” and the new “wider definition of eugenics, would cover methods of regulating population numbers as well as improving genome quality by selective artificial insemination by donor, gene therapy or gene manipulation of germ-line cells”.
    So naturally the experimental COVID-19 vaccines are DNA-altering (I'm afraid this is no joke)!

    Galton didn't stipulate “whether some methods should be made compulsory by the state, or left entirely to the personal choice of the individual”: https://unlimitedhangout.com/2020/12...nics-movement/
    (https://archive.is/ZmgEG)


    The previously mentioned Pirbright Institute is a British charity that in November 2002 was acquired by the Queen Elizabeth II controlled QinetiQ Holdings Limited: Dictator-of-the-British-Empire#post6952864


    To finish this post on eugenics psychopaths placed in powerful positions.

    The father of Elizabeth's PM Boris Johnson (of Oxford's notorious Bullingdon Club), Stanley Johnson, has been writing books promoting depopulation for almost half a century now, starting with “Life without Birth: A Journey Through the Third World in Search of the Population Explosion” (1970).

    Stanley Johnson is a former employee of the World Bank and the European Commission, 2 of the most prominent promoters of the global warming scare.
    Stanley Johnson wrote the introduction and commentary to the UN’s 1993 Rio Earth Summit, wherein the policies of technocratic Agenda 21 were articulated.

    Boris’ maternal grandfather was James Fawcett, who assisted in writing of the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948.
    From 1955 to 1960, Fawcett was general counsel to the IMF and a member of the European Commission of Human Rights from 1962 to 1984 (being its president from 1972 to 1982).
    From 1969 to 1973, Fawcett was also director of studies at the Royal Institute of International Affairs (a.k.a. Chatham House): https://www.winterwatch.net/2019/12/...tema-made-man/
    (http://archive.is/2NsWf)
    Last edited by Firestarter; 01-02-2021 at 04:08 AM.
    Do NOT ever read my posts. Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: Google-censors-the-world/page3

    The Order of the Garter rules the world: Order of the Garter and the Carolingian dynasty

  26. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by Firestarter View Post
    In May 2020 (?), a video was uploaded to and deleted by Youtube that a GSK whistleblower exposed that the COVID-19 vaccine will make 97% of the women infertile...
    As I haven't seen the video, and wouldn't know how to find it, I can only say something on the articles about this video that contain interesting information on sterilisation vaccines.
    Here's the (deleted by Youtube) video on the GSK whistleblower exposing that the COVID-19 vaccines will make 97% of the women infertile (11:21).
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/IalsQvC0XIdl/
    Do NOT ever read my posts. Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: Google-censors-the-world/page3

    The Order of the Garter rules the world: Order of the Garter and the Carolingian dynasty

  27. #24
    Here is another scientific-looking article on infertility vaccines (Immunocontraceptives).
    See the following excerpts...
    .
    A novel contraceptive approach that is gaining substantial attention is “immunocontraception” targeting gamete production, gamete outcome, or gamete function. Amongst these, use of sperm antigens (gamete function) seems to be an exciting and feasible approach. However, the variability of immune response and time lag to attain titer among vaccinated individuals after active immunization has highlighted the potential relevance of preformed antibodies in this league. This review is an attempt to analyze the current status and progress of immunocontraceptive approaches with respect to their establishment as a future fertility control agent.
    (...)


    A novel contraceptive approach that is gaining substantial attention is immunocontraception, which is the use of contraceptive vaccines (CVs) or preformed antibodies to prevent fertilization. As with the conventional vaccines, CVs utilise the body's defense system to wedge an essential step in the reproductive process [6]. A successful contraceptive vaccine must meet a number of criteria; it must be reliable, easy to administer, safe, affordable, widely acceptable, and capable of evoking homogeneous response and must bestow a high level of contraceptive efficacy.
    There are three major categories involved in the development of CVs including gamete production, namely, gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), and luteinizing hormone (LH); gamete outcome, namely, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), or gamete function, namely, zona pellucida (ZP) and sperm antigens [7]. Of all, validation and practicability for the development of antisperm vaccines targeting prefertilization events seem to be much more encouraging and promising.
    (...)


    When GnRH vaccine was tested on human subjects, including breastfeeding women by The National Institute of Immunology, India, and the Population Control Council, USA, the vaccine essentially resulted in castration and halted testosterone production [11]. However, these results were accompanied with impotence and loss of body hair in case of men and affected menopause in women [12]. Hence, an analogue of GnRH was prepared by linking with different carriers in an attempt to make improved vaccine [7].
    (...)


    Immunization of male bonnet monkeys with ovine FSH resulted in testicular dysfunction, oligozoospermia, and subsequent infertility [25]. It was noteworthy that infertility was not associated with any change in testosterone levels thus adding an additional advantage of using FSH based vaccine.
    (...)


    Immunization of adult female sheep (ewe) with LH prohibited pregnancy in all the animals during two breeding seasons.
    (...)


    Anti-hCG vaccine was the first and only birth control vaccine to go through Phase II efficacy trials successfully. The use of vaccine in sexually active women prevented them from becoming pregnant [31].
    (...)


    The term gamete function is associated with the two main cells participating in gamete formation, that is, sperm and ovum. This approach targets the zona antigens of egg and surface antigens of sperm. The targets being nonhormonal provide much better safety upon other approaches. Exploiting ZP antigens as immunocontraceptive may interfere with the normal production of egg in female while sperm-based vaccine will be used in female reproductive tract to block fertilization by interfering with sperm movement or function.
    (...)


    Further studies revealed that the infertility induced in immunized female rabbits was irreversible which could not be restored even after the administration of exogenous gonadotropins. Histological examination of ovaries showed the destruction of oocytes in all the growing follicles along with the depletion of resting follicles [38]. This observation indicated that the infertility was a consequence of ovarian dystrophy rather than inhibition of sperm-oocyte interaction.
    .
    Kiranjeet Kaur and Vijay Prabha - Immunocontraceptives: New Approaches to Fertility Control (2014): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4119744/
    Do NOT ever read my posts. Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: Google-censors-the-world/page3

    The Order of the Garter rules the world: Order of the Garter and the Carolingian dynasty



  28. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  29. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by Firestarter
    This is all the more suspicious against the background that HPV vaccines (that have been marketed as cancer vaccines) are known to reduce fertility in women (maybe more on that in a next post)
    The following “scientific” report from 2017 suggests that the controversial HPV vaccine causes lower birth rates. This study analysed information gathered in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, representing 8 million 25 to 29-year-old women in the US between 2007 and 2014.


    Birth rates in the US have recently fallen to record lows from 118.1 in 2007 to 104.5 in 2015 per 1000 females aged 25–29.
    See the birth rates in the US from 1995 to 2015.



    One factor could be the vaccination against the human papillomavirus (HPV) that “coincidentally” was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2006 and recommended for females aged 11–26 (and since 2011 also for males of the same age group).


    Adverse effects of the HPV vaccine include menstrual disturbances and mood swings. Shortly after the HPV vaccine was licensed, reports of women experiencing Primary Ovarian Failure (POF) emerged.
    The estimated incidence of POF for females under the age of 40 is 1 in 100, but this could be considerably higher because it’s masked by the birth control pill. Between 10% and 30% of women with POF also have (other) autoimmune disorders.


    61% of women who had not been poisoned with the HPV vaccine had been pregnant at least once, compared to only 35% of women who were poisoned with the HPV vaccine. The difference was especially large for women that had been married. Of the married women 75% that didn’t get the vaccine gave birth, while only 50% who were poisoned with the HPV vaccine had been pregnant.
    The pregnancy frequency decreased with increasing numbers of HPV vaccine shots.


    See (part of) Table 3 - Ratios of having been pregnant for women who received an HPV shot versus women who did not.
    See (part of) Table 5 - Births of females aged 25–29 in the US, by number of HPV shots.



    This suggests that at least part of the reason for the recent decline in US birth rates is caused by the HPV vaccine. Why did it take so long before this link was found (some studies have even denied this link)?
    If all married women had been vaccinated with the HPV vaccine, the number of married women having conceived could have fallen with another 1 million.


    There are other (possible) causes for the lower birth rates...
    Higher employment rates (of women) decreases birth rates.
    No epidemiological study on the influence of Aluminium (a component of vaccines) on fertility exists but Karakis et al in 2014 found an association between prenatal exposure to Aluminium and death of the (unborn) baby.
    There could also be a link between Aluminium exposure and POF.


    Gayle DeLong – A lowered probability of pregnancy in females in the USA aged 25–29 who received a human papillomavirus vaccine injection (2017): https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full...4.2018.1477640




    Does anybody find it surprising that in one of those great examples of "science", the study was "retracted"?!?
    The least they could do is come up with a good explanation for deleting the report. Instead they came with the story, we got complaints...
    we were alerted to concerns about the scientific validity of the study...
    All of the post-publication reports we received described serious flaws in the statistical analysis and interpretation of the data in this paper, and we have therefore taken the decision to retract it
    They forgot to detail a single "flaw" in their motivation...




    Big pharma trolls have attacked the author of the report, Gayle DeLong. The frustrating thing is that while they don’t have any evidence to defend the genocidal HPV vaccine, their ad hominem attacks do succeed in discrediting the study.
    Now we can't even read the story anymore...


    The big pharma trolls first quack that Gayle DeLong isn’t even a medical doctor but only an “economist”. DeLong did a statistical analysis of the data. If we take this kind of reasoning to the extreme only mathematicians should be allowed to do a statistical analysis.
    I’ve regularly seen big pharma supporting “doctors” make the claim that after clean water vaccines are the cheapest health intervention. For evidence they regularly point to propaganda of the WHO, that isn’t backed up by any evidence. But we can’t really blame these doctors can we? They aren’t financial “experts” so wouldn’t know...


    That the study contradicts all of the scientific studies on HPV vaccines that – supported and controlled by big pharma – concluded that HPV vaccines have no adverse effects at all.
    So we can only conclude that these studies are biased, but instead they accuse DeLong.


    No explanation on how HPV vaccines cause infertility.
    Why would anybody doing a statistical analysis that shows that the HPV vaccine causes infertility, is expected to explain which poisons in the vaccines causes infertility?


    Bizarrely that DeLong didn’t correct for contraception, with the addition of
    In fairness, if the correlation is not positive but negative (i.e., HPV vaccination is associated with less oral contraceptive use), the results could be more robust than what Gayle found.
    https://www.skepticalraptor.com/skep...aper-blogging/




    Surprise, surprise, after the insults, Gayle DeLong proved that HPV vaccines are associated with LESS contraceptive use (so the infertility caused by HPV vaccines is even larger):
    I find 51.5% of married women who did not receive the shot and 36.6% of married women who received the shot were actively seeking to prevent pregnancy. The 14.9% difference is statistically significant at the 1% level.


    This finding suggests that a greater percentage of married women who received the shot should be conceiving compared with married women who did not receive the shot. However, my original study finds that married women who received the shot are less likely to conceive than married women who did not receive the shot. The finding of my original study is not the result of married women who received the HPV vaccine actively avoiding pregnancy more than women who did not receive the HPV shot.
    https://www.ageofautism.com/2018/06/...ccination.html
    (https://archive.is/OvPy3)
    Last edited by Firestarter; 01-06-2021 at 03:08 PM.
    Do NOT ever read my posts. Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: Google-censors-the-world/page3

    The Order of the Garter rules the world: Order of the Garter and the Carolingian dynasty

  30. #26
    It's killing some people, so for them, yes.
    When a trumpet sounds in a city, do not the people tremble?
    When disaster comes to a city, has not the Lord caused it? Amos 3:6

  31. #27
    Nice. One alternative could also be that given the coinciding of the decline with the financial crisis in 2007-2008, that its behavior also closely resembles the fall in fertility that occurred during the Great Depression.

    Total Fertility Rate in the United States from 1800 to 2020



    Its good to have competing hypotheses.

    XNN
    "They sell us the president the same way they sell us our clothes and our cars. They sell us every thing from youth to religion the same time they sell us our wars. I want to know who the men in the shadows are. I want to hear somebody asking them why. They can be counted on to tell us who our enemies are but theyre never the ones to fight or to die." - Jackson Browne Lives In The Balance

  32. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by XNavyNuke View Post
    Nice. One alternative could also be that given the coinciding of the decline with the financial crisis in 2007-2008, that its behavior also closely resembles the fall in fertility that occurred during the Great Depression.
    There could be other reasons for why fertility has dropped so drastically in the "developed" world.
    I won't present all the other possible reasons...

    There could of course also be other explanation for the drop in fertility during the "Great depression" than the economic situation.

    But that still doesn't explain that the women that were poisoned with the HPV vaccines, who on average used less contraceptives, had fewer childbirths than the women that refused the vaccine.

    Unfortunately the original paper isn't readable anymore, although it's highly unlikely that nowhere on the internet the whole scientific article was copy-pasted and can be read (finding it is another story)!
    .
    Quote Originally Posted by Firestarter View Post
    61% of women who had not been poisoned with the HPV vaccine had been pregnant at least once, compared to only 35% of women who were poisoned with the HPV vaccine. The difference was especially large for women that had been married. Of the married women 75% that didn’t get the vaccine gave birth, while only 50% who were poisoned with the HPV vaccine had been pregnant.
    The pregnancy frequency decreased with increasing numbers of HPV vaccine shots.
    Last edited by Firestarter; 01-07-2021 at 02:19 PM.
    Do NOT ever read my posts. Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: Google-censors-the-world/page3

    The Order of the Garter rules the world: Order of the Garter and the Carolingian dynasty

  33. #29
    Now personally I can't think of any good reason for why pregnant women were excluded from the COVID-19 vaccine trials. Besides that if (hypothetically speaking) the vaccines are designed to cause infertility of women this could lead to abortions. Spontaneous abortions after vaccines would make an end to the corona vaccines (even with the media under complete control).
    Of course not testing the vaccines on pregnant women would be a good reason to not recommend them to pregnant women after the vaccines are (emergency) approved. But this of course would also be a good strategy to hide that the vaccines cause abortions.
    The vaccines have not yet been tested in pregnancy, so until more information is available, those who are pregnant should not routinely have this vaccine. Non-clinical evidence is required before any clinical studies in pregnancy can start, and before that, it is usual to not recommend routine vaccination during pregnancy.
    .
    If the COVID-19 vaccine is designed to prevent pregnancies, they would especially want women that have “childbearing potential” to get vaccinated. Women that have little babies are known to have this potential.
    Now, even though there is no information of the effects of the vaccines on breastfeeding mothers, they are recommended!
    There are no data on the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in breastfeeding or on the breastfed infant. Despite this, COVID-19 vaccines are not thought to be a risk to the breastfeeding infant, and the benefits of breast-feeding are well known. Because of this, the JCVI has recommended that the vaccine can be received whilst breastfeeding. This is in line with recommendations in the USA and from the World Health Organisation.
    https://www.gov.uk/government/public...-breastfeeding
    (https://archive.is/4jfOG)
    Do NOT ever read my posts. Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: Google-censors-the-world/page3

    The Order of the Garter rules the world: Order of the Garter and the Carolingian dynasty

  34. #30
    Now this sounds almost convincining...
    This is a "big" study of 43,448 "healthy" test subjects, half got 2 doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, and the other half placebo.


    An important aspect of "science" is describing what to do beforehand. When they change the trials, this is by definition rigging. This is also evidence that the trial wasn't properly double-blind, because they couldn't makes changes to the protocol (knowing the efficacy) if they didn't know who got the vaccine and who the placebo.
    The report includes 2 months of follow up after the second dose of the vaccine for only half of the trial participants.  
    Due to the high efficacy found in the trial, the original plan of following placebo recipients for 2 years will not be followed due to ethical concerns. Therefore, there will be no placebo group with which to assess long-term efficacy and safety.
    For some reason they only followed half of the trial subjects. So in reality there is only information on some 21,700. Excluding half is another sign of rigging these trials.
    Following the people injected with placebo for a mere 2 months, because it would not "ethical". So basically a proper study is unethical.
    You can't know the efficacy or adverse effects of the vaccine without a (placebo) control group!


    The extremely dangerous COVID-19 virus has a mortality rate of lower than 0.1%, meaning that only people in bad health can die from it (the sort of people that won't get the vaccine because of expected serious adverse effects).
    In vaccine recipients, the most commonly reported systemic events were fatigue and headache (59% after the first dose and 52% after the second dose among younger vaccine recipients; 51% after the first dose and 39% after the second dose among older recipients).
    Fatigue and headache were also reported by many placebo recipients (23% after the first dose and 24% after the second dose among younger vaccine recipients; 17% after the first dose and 14% after the second dose among older recipients). 
    Fever (temperature ≥38 C) was reported after the second dose by 16% of younger vaccine recipients, and by 11% of older recipients. 
    The incidence of serious adverse events was similar in the vaccine and placebo groups (0.6% and 0.5%, respectively).
    Can anybody think of a good reason for why younger test subjects suffer more adverse effects than older people?
    Unfortunately no information on the difference in adverse effects between the genders.


    Pregnant women were excluded from the trial, but not completely.
    Of note, women were screened for pregnancy prior to each trial vaccination, according to a Pfizer-BioNTech briefing document. A total of 23 pregnancies occurred, some after vaccination and some that occurred prior to vaccination but were not detected via screening. Twelve pregnant individuals received the vaccine, and 11 received placebo. No unsolicited adverse events, including spontaneous abortion, occurred.
    https://www.idsociety.org/covid-19-r...ID-19-Vaccine/
    (https://archive.is/TrqPL)




    Now that sounds like the vaccines didn't prevent pregnancies... but why are the amount of pregnancies so low (in more than 2 months)?
    They made sure that the women were using contraceptives (that would of course be a good strategy to hide that the vaccines cause sterilisation!). It is strange that they forgot to mention this in the previous long story on the vaccines.
    The National Institutes of Health recommends that contraception requirements are in place for any clinical trial participants who take part in a trial in the US, such as the Pfizer trials, who engage in heterosexual intercourse, whether or not there is any risk posted by the study to a foetus.
    Women were eligible to participate in the trial for the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine if they were not pregnant or breastfeeding and if they either did not have “childbearing potential”, or if they were using an “acceptable contraceptive method” for at least 28 days after they took their last dose of the vaccine trial.
    https://www.thejournal.ie/factcheck-...19779-Jan2021/
    (https://archive.is/TJKcD)
    Do NOT ever read my posts. Google and Yahoo wouldn’t block them without a very good reason: Google-censors-the-world/page3

    The Order of the Garter rules the world: Order of the Garter and the Carolingian dynasty

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. What Could They Put in the COVID Vaccine?
    By PAF in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-09-2020, 07:21 AM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-10-2020, 06:03 AM
  3. Covid vaccine ready by 11/1/20.
    By Pauls' Revere in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-03-2020, 04:53 PM
  4. Think The Covid Vaccine Will End Lockdowns? Think Again!
    By Brian4Liberty in forum Ron Paul Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-09-2020, 10:42 PM
  5. HPV Vaccine Linked to Soaring Infertility
    By Swordsmyth in forum Personal Health & Well-Being
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 12-03-2018, 05:10 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •