Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 54

Thread: PA Hearing: 604,000 votes for Biden and 3,200 for Trump in 90 minutes

  1. #1

    PA Hearing: 604,000 votes for Biden and 3,200 for Trump in 90 minutes




  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    Supporting Member
    North Wilkesboro, NC
    olehounddog's Avatar


    Posts
    1,918
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Been watching

  4. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by JoshLowry View Post
    If this is not evidence of voter fraud, what is?

  5. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged View Post
    If this is not evidence of voter fraud, what is?
    It sure doesn't seem like an organic dump of votes. Looking forward to this all fleshing out.

  6. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by JoshLowry View Post
    It sure doesn't seem like an organic dump of votes. Looking forward to this all fleshing out.
    Me too! I think Lin Wood is presenting a solid case in GA.

  7. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged View Post
    If this is not evidence of voter fraud, what is?
    I think the problem is going to be that it's evidence to suggest there was fraud, but no direct evidence of the fraud being committed. There's evidence of opportunity, and there's evidence of abnormalities, but there doesn't yet appear to be evidence of the ballots in question being fed into the count. Nor evidence that the ballots are not valid. So far, it's circumstantial.

    But it IS evidence and it IS credible.

    The left will argue that Trump was telling his supporters not to trust mail-ins, so they didn't use them. So, to them, it's not surprising that the mail-in block would be so lopsided.
    "And now that the legislators and do-gooders have so futilely inflicted so many systems upon society, may they finally end where they should have begun: May they reject all systems, and try liberty; for liberty is an acknowledgment of faith in God and His works." - Bastiat

    "It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere." - Voltaire

  8. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by CaptUSA View Post
    I think the problem is going to be that it's evidence to suggest there was fraud, but no direct evidence of the fraud being committed. There's evidence of opportunity, and there's evidence of abnormalities, but there doesn't yet appear to be evidence of the ballots in question being fed into the count. Nor evidence that the ballots are not valid. So far, it's circumstantial.

    But it IS evidence and it IS credible.

    The left will argue that Trump was telling his supporters not to trust mail-ins, so they didn't use them. So, to them, it's not surprising that the mail-in block would be so lopsided.
    Where else was Trump Voter mail in turn out so bad? I remember reading something about the speed of the machines and how it limits the possible number of ballots that can be processed in a given period of time.

  9. #8
    Bobblehead will be by to tell us that this isn't evidence of any sort.



  10. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  11. #9
    There is NO EVIDENCE of voter fraud....

    That’s now BALONEY

  12. #10
    If 600,000 ballots can be processed in 90 minutes, why did it take so long to do the initial count or so long for recounts?

  13. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged View Post
    If 600,000 ballots can be processed in 90 minutes, why did it take so long to do the initial count or so long for recounts?
    I think they were loading votes from memory cards or something.
    "He's talkin' to his gut like it's a person!!" -me
    "dumpster diving isn't professional." - angelatc
    "You don't need a medical degree to spot obvious bullshit, that's actually a separate skill." -Scott Adams
    "When you are divided, and angry, and controlled, you target those 'different' from you, not those responsible [controllers]" -Q

    "Each of us must choose which course of action we should take: education, conventional political action, or even peaceful civil disobedience to bring about necessary changes. But let it not be said that we did nothing." - Ron Paul

    "Paul said "the wave of the future" is a coalition of anti-authoritarian progressive Democrats and libertarian Republicans in Congress opposed to domestic surveillance, opposed to starting new wars and in favor of ending the so-called War on Drugs."

  14. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by CaptUSA View Post
    I think the problem is going to be that it's evidence to suggest there was fraud, but no direct evidence of the fraud being committed. There's evidence of opportunity, and there's evidence of abnormalities, but there doesn't yet appear to be evidence of the ballots in question being fed into the count. Nor evidence that the ballots are not valid. So far, it's circumstantial.

    But it IS evidence and it IS credible.

    The left will argue that Trump was telling his supporters not to trust mail-ins, so they didn't use them. So, to them, it's not surprising that the mail-in block would be so lopsided.
    All you have to do is just start looking at other big cities to see that the only areas with these crazy abnormalities were in the swing states that Biden won.

    Cleveland had like a 50%+ voter turnout, and Milwaukee had like a 90%+ turnout.

    The mail-in ballot ratio was also significantly different in these areas where Biden won, compared to other areas where he lost, including similar types of cities in swing states.
    "He's talkin' to his gut like it's a person!!" -me
    "dumpster diving isn't professional." - angelatc
    "You don't need a medical degree to spot obvious bullshit, that's actually a separate skill." -Scott Adams
    "When you are divided, and angry, and controlled, you target those 'different' from you, not those responsible [controllers]" -Q

    "Each of us must choose which course of action we should take: education, conventional political action, or even peaceful civil disobedience to bring about necessary changes. But let it not be said that we did nothing." - Ron Paul

    "Paul said "the wave of the future" is a coalition of anti-authoritarian progressive Democrats and libertarian Republicans in Congress opposed to domestic surveillance, opposed to starting new wars and in favor of ending the so-called War on Drugs."

  15. #13
    It's like we have a dead body, and the people with motive and opportunity for murder are saying "that doesn't prove anything."
    "Foreign aid is taking money from the poor people of a rich country, and giving it to the rich people of a poor country." - Ron Paul
    "Beware the Military-Industrial-Financial-Corporate-Internet-Media-Government Complex." - B4L update of General Dwight D. Eisenhower
    "Debt is the drug, Wall St. Banksters are the dealers, and politicians are the addicts." - B4L
    "Totally free immigration? I've never taken that position. I believe in national sovereignty." - Ron Paul
    ďThey are what they hate.Ē - B4L


    The views and opinions expressed here are solely my own, and do not represent this forum or any other entities or persons.

  16. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by dannno View Post
    All you have to do is just start looking at other big cities to see that the only areas with these crazy abnormalities were in the swing states that Biden won.

    Cleveland had like a 50%+ voter turnout, and Milwaukee had like a 90%+ turnout.

    The mail-in ballot ratio was also significantly different in these areas where Biden won, compared to other areas where he lost, including similar types of cities in swing states.
    No question. It certainly looks like fraud. But is it provable? So far, the evidence isnít proof. Itís strong circumstantial, but no smoking gun. Yet.

  17. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian4Liberty View Post
    It's like we have a dead body, and the people with motive and opportunity for murder are saying "that doesn't prove anything."
    A man shoots another. He throws the pistol in a river and it is not recoverable. There is no forensic evidence. 100 eyewitnesses come forward and testify that they saw the man shoot another. They describe the crime, the place and the time.

    THERE'S NO EVIDENCE!

    That's the equivalent of the bull$#@! I keep hearing from bobbleheads.

  18. #16
    Does anyone know what time this 600k ballot dump took place? Would it be safe to say that it happened in the morning hours the day after they election while the where supposedly shut down? There was total 2,600,000 mail in ballots? How could they count all those ballots in a few hours and take days and days to count the other 77%? Lets say it took 8 hours to count 23%, the remaining 77% should have been counted in another 27 hours. The counting would have been done much sooner.



  19. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  20. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged View Post
    Does anyone know what time this 600k ballot dump took place? Would it be safe to say that it happened in the morning hours the day after they election while the where supposedly shut down? There was total 2,600,000 mail in ballots? How could they count all those ballots in a few hours and take days and days to count the other 77%? Lets say it took 8 hours to count 23%, the remaining 77% should have been counted in another 27 hours. The counting would have been done much sooner.
    It's auto-magical!

  21. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by phill4paul View Post
    It's auto-magical!
    Oh. Thanks now I get it!

  22. #19
    When you hear 600,000 for Joey and 3200 for Trump, that sounds excessive. When you look at it as 200 for Joe and 1 for Trump, it doesn't seem too terribly unreasonable. S/

  23. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by dannno View Post
    I think they were loading votes from memory cards or something.

    I miss Bubs.

    Also, I watched most of this thing today and it was badass.

  24. #21
    This is just the beginning.

    The snowball will continue to roll downhill until it is a D5 avalanche.
    Never attempt to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and annoys the pig.

    Robert Heinlein

    Give a man an inch and right away he thinks he's a ruler

    Groucho Marx

    I love mankindÖitís people I canít stand.

    Linus, from the Peanuts comic

    You cannot have liberty without morality and morality without faith

    Alexis de Torqueville

    Those who fail to learn from the past are condemned to repeat it.
    Those who learn from the past are condemned to watch everybody else repeat it

    A Zero Hedge comment

  25. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged View Post
    If 600,000 ballots can be processed in 90 minutes, why did it take so long to do the initial count or so long for recounts?
    I'm still more fascinated by how MI, GA, and WI all seemed to quit counting ballots after Fox News declared AZ for Biden shortly after polls closed.
    And then to have some "ballot dumps" in the wee hours of the morning on 11/4...


    I think it also needs to be said that many (most?) of us on here have never been big fans of Trump. But you have to admit, he really did piss off the Deep State, didn't he? I mean, all of 2016-2020 was the Deep State and their little fingers in the MSM trying to drown the dude and he refused to give in. He gained my respect, even though I'm still not a big fan of his. And honestly, I hope he pulls through all of this somehow because Biden/Xiden as a lot of folks are referring to him and his vicious little VP are 100% DS/NWO/UN lackeys. With Trump at the helm, it's possible we delay their plans a little bit longer.
    Last edited by Okie RP fan; 11-25-2020 at 09:29 PM.
    Welcome to the R3VOLUTION!

  26. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged View Post
    If 600,000 ballots can be processed in 90 minutes, why did it take so long to do the initial count or so long for recounts?
    It took longer to print 600,000 Biden ballots than it did to scan them all in
    A savage barbaric tribal society where thugs parade the streets and illegally assault and murder innocent civilians, yeah that is the alternative to having police. Oh wait, that is the police

    We cannot defend freedom abroad by deserting it at home.
    - Edward R. Murrow

    ...I think we have moral obligations to disobey unjust laws, because non-cooperation with evil is as much as a moral obligation as cooperation with good. - MLK Jr.

    How to trigger a liberal: "I didn't get vaccinated."

  27. #24
    Give me physical access to the system and I can do it in a few minutes.

    UPDATE VoteTotals SET BidenVotes = BidenVotes + 600000



  28. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  29. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by FunkBuddha View Post
    Give me physical access to the system and I can do it in a few minutes.

    UPDATE VoteTotals SET BidenVotes = BidenVotes + 600000
    Vote by punchcard. You can count those manually, mechanically or digitally. No funny business with ink etc.
    "I am a bird"

  30. #26
    ..
    Last edited by tebowlives; 11-26-2020 at 01:49 PM. Reason: dup

  31. #27
    Giuliani drives a point home

    Your election is a shame.


  32. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by JoshLowry View Post
    I claim no particular expertise in statistical modeling, but I am trained in statistics, have taught undergraduate-level probabilistic modeling (computer science), and have a wickedly refined sense of the statistical nature things.

    That said, if what the witness has testified is in fact the truth, I must agree with his assessment that the observation is strong indication of something very rotten in Denmark.

    The larger a sample, the closer to the mean will be its character. Six hundred thousand is a very large sample. If the mean separation between the candidates in the original official ballot count was even as high as twenty percent, indicating an extraordinary landslide, there is basically no statistically valid chance that one would see so freakishly lopsided a batch tally as that reported. Simply put, it is statistically not possible to see so vast a variance from the mean in a sample representing nearly 10% of the whole.

    The actual stated numbers lead to a non-credible proportion that runs wildly from the mean. 1 - (3200/604000) = 0.99947. That Biden held 99.947% over so large a block of counts is simply not credible in any way or degree. It is statistically impossible. Even if the batch were taken from inner-city Łber-ghetto parasite-infested Philly, so absurd a skew from the mean is not possible. It wouldn't even be possible in NYC, which almost certainly runs farther left and parasite-skewed.

    A single such variance in tallying would be close enough to impossible, but there is something else that would have had to have happened that was not mentioned in the video. If Biden had truly won as per the official story, then there would perforce have had to have been at least one equally anomalous instance of a batch as violently skewed in Trump's favor in order to put the final result at the thin final margin. A single such anomaly would make the overall probability at zero, which is to say there is no possible way that an "organic" process would yield two huge seismic waves of variance from the mean during counting. It is simply not possible, PERIOD.

    Equally unlikely, even if it appear otherwise to an untrained observer, would be a larger number of less-skewed batch entries, all in Trump's favor, to drag the final result back to the percent or two final result difference. That, too, is vanishingly small in terms of possibility and when coupled with the single enormous variance once again constitutes a practical impossibility.

    The actual numbers, taken from Wikipedia (I know, but it's 4 AM) are as follow:
    Trump 3378263 votes, Biden 3459923. Biden won by just over one percent - nowhere nearly a landslide. Yet, in nearly nine percent of the total tally of 6838186 votes - the batch in question in the OP - he won by 99.947%. «'est impossible.

    What we typically find in elections in terms of overall result v. time is an initial period with large spikes (proportionally speaking, with the absolute numbers being LOW) where the variance is large - this happens ALL THE TIME. But as more precincts report, the variances become proportionally ever smaller in relation to the total tally, which is why the curve normalizes with time, becoming smoother as the percent-reported grows. To have so violent a spike at any time during the counting demands equal compensation in the other direction, i.e. in Trump's favor. So if Trump lost by, say, one percent, he will have had to have done freakishly well in other quarters of the state in order to regain the devastating losses purportedly sustained in the precinct(s) that added up to 99.947%. This is pure fiction of the Twilight Zone variety.

    Now, if we toss all those anomalous votes, which is the solution least injurious to the "dignity" and credibility of the state of Pennsylvania, the numbers come thusly:

    Trump: 3375063, Biden: 2851923 -> Trump takes PA by between 16% and 19%, depending on how you calculate the ratio. That, my friends, is a landslide.

    Anyone denying fraud in such a case would be prima facie either a liar, blitheringly ignorant of statistics, non-trivially brain-damaged, or some combination of all three.

    Accepting the PA result, again assuming the witness speaks truthfully and accurately, would be analogous to believing a claim that they saw a 300 year old anvil in controlled flight from NYC to Los Angeles without the benefit of any aeronautical means whatsoever. Not possible under normal terrestrial conditions.

    So either there was in fact massive fraud in PA, or the witness is a liar and should be imprisoned for life. My vote leans toward the former.
    Last edited by osan; 11-28-2020 at 04:10 AM.
    Through lives and lives shalt thou pay, O' king.

    Freedom will be stolen from you in a heartbeat if you do not behave as a wild and ravening beast pursuant to its protection.

    "Government" is naught but a mental construct, a script to which people meekly accept and play out their assigned roles by those with no authority to dictate such.

    Pray for reset.


  33. #29
    Quote Originally Posted by osan View Post
    I claim no particular expertise in statistical modeling, but I am trained in statistics, have taught undergraduate-level probabilistic modeling (computer science), and have a wickedly refined sense of the statistical nature things.

    That said, if what the witness has testified is in fact the truth, I must agree with his assessment that the observation is strong indication of something very rotten in Denmark.

    The larger a sample, the closer to the mean will be its character. Six hundred thousand is a very large sample. If the mean separation between the candidates in the original official ballot count was even as high as twenty percent, indicating an extraordinary landslide, there is basically no statistically valid chance that one would see so freakishly lopsided a batch tally as that reported. Simply put, it is statistically not possible to see so vast a variance from the mean in a sample representing nearly 10% of the whole.

    The actual stated numbers lead to a non-credible proportion that runs wildly from the mean. 1 - (3200/604000) = 0.99947. That Biden held 99.947% over so large a block of counts is simply not credible in any way or degree. It is statistically impossible. Even if the batch were taken from inner-city Łber-ghetto parasite-infested Philly, so absurd a skew from the mean is not possible. It wouldn't even be possible in NYC, which almost certainly runs farther left and parasite-skewed.

    A single such variance in tallying would be close enough to impossible, but there is something else that would have had to have happened that was not mentioned in the video. If Biden had truly won as per the official story, then there would perforce have had to have been at least one equally anomalous instance of a batch as violently skewed in Trump's favor in order to put the final result at the thin final margin. A single such anomaly would make the overall probability at zero, which is to say there is no possible way that an "organic" process would yield two huge seismic waves of variance from the mean during counting. It is simply not possible, PERIOD.

    Equally unlikely, even if it appear otherwise to an untrained observer, would be a larger number of less-skewed batch entries, all in Trump's favor, to drag the final result back to the percent or two final result difference. That, too, is vanishingly small in terms of possibility and when coupled with the single enormous variance once again constitutes a practical impossibility.

    The actual numbers, taken from Wikipedia (I know, but it's 4 AM) are as follow:
    Trump 3378263 votes, Biden 3459923. Biden won by just over one percent - nowhere nearly a landslide. Yet, in nearly nine percent of the total tally of 6838186 votes - the batch in question in the OP - he won by 99.947%. «'est impossible.

    What we typically find in elections in terms of overall result v. time is an initial period with large spikes (proportionally speaking, with the absolute numbers being LOW) where the variance is large - this happens ALL THE TIME. But as more precincts report, the variances become proportionally ever smaller in relation to the total tally, which is why the curve normalizes with time, becoming smoother as the percent-reported grows. To have so violent a spike at any time during the counting demands equal compensation in the other direction, i.e. in Trump's favor. So if Trump lost by, say, one percent, he will have had to have done freakishly well in other quarters of the state in order to regain the devastating losses purportedly sustained in the precinct(s) that added up to 99.947%. This is pure fiction of the Twilight Zone variety.

    Now, if we toss all those anomalous votes, which is the solution least injurious to the "dignity" and credibility of the state of Pennsylvania, the numbers come thusly:

    Trump: 3375063, Biden: 2851923 -> Trump takes PA by between 16% and 19%, depending on how you calculate the ratio. That, my friends, is a landslide.

    Anyone denying fraud in such a case would be prima facie either a liar, blitheringly ignorant of statistics, non-trivially brain-damaged, or some combination of all three.

    Accepting the PA result, again assuming the witness speaks truthfully and accurately, would be analogous to believing a claim that they saw a 300 year old anvil in controlled flight from NYC to Los Angeles without the benefit of any aeronautical means whatsoever. Not possible under normal terrestrial conditions.

    So either there was in fact massive fraud in PA, or the witness is a liar and should be imprisoned for life. My vote leans toward the former.
    Get out your notebook. Soon @TheCount will be giving you a lesson.

  34. #30
    Quote Originally Posted by JoshLowry View Post
    As I've said before, don't get taken in by the urge to "do something" at the federal level (not saying that you are). That's a disaster waiting to happen.

    Let the states handle it.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 12-05-2020, 10:59 AM
  2. 46 minutes of Joe Biden talking nonsense
    By Anti Federalist in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-27-2020, 06:41 PM
  3. 1 Bar, 3 Votes, 3 Minutes, $3
    By Edu in forum Grassroots Central
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 02-09-2008, 03:42 PM
  4. 1 Casino Bar, 3 Votes, 3 Minutes, $3
    By Edu in forum Nevada
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-17-2008, 05:32 AM
  5. A million votes for RP in 5 minutes
    By davidkachel in forum Grassroots Central
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 10-23-2007, 12:44 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •