Trump counselor Kellyanne Conway rips 'election stolen' claim as 'playing a dangerous game'

[enhanced_deficit]

Flashback:

Conway rips into Hillary Clinton for suggesting 'election stolen'

White House counselor Kellyanne Conway on Tuesday slammed 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton for appearing to suggest that she had the 2016 election stolen from her.

"She lost that election fairly and squarely, and when she says that election was stolen from her, she’s playing a dangerous game," Conway said while speaking on "The Hugh Hewitt Show."

What she's been telling candidates who went to her: "You can run the best campaign, you can even become the nominee, and you can have the election stolen from you." #BillAndHill pic.twitter.com/gx5az4z0uf
— Teleute (@bigfootmeds) May 5, 2019

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/442451-conway-rips-into-hillary-clinton-for-suggesting-election-stolen

If voting machines were not used in 2016, how can HRC even suggest that election was "stolen" from her?


The Times of Israel:

Affidavit quotes Trump confidant Roger Stone being told by a Jerusalem contact: ‘He is going to be defeated unless we intervene. We have critical intell. The key is in your hands!’

This by no means suggests that pollsters were right and 2016 election was "stolen" from Hillary/Dems as punishment for Iran deal opposed by Israeli Likud wing, ZOA/MAGA funder Adelson.




Potentially-Related

A shadowy Israeli firm is accused of trying to undermine the US-Iran deal

Whistleblower Claims Israeli Firm Black Cube Was Hired to Hack A Foreign Election

"Russian Interference": "Suspected Russian spy" Guccifer 2.0's phone was registered in Israel

Trump political adviser Roger Stone defends his contacts with "Guccifer 2.0" who claimed responsibility for hacking the DNC



Un-Related

Andrew Appel and a Sequoia AVC Advantage voting machine. | Alex Halderman
The Friday Cover

How to Hack an Election in 7 Minutes

With Russia already meddling in 2016, a ragtag group of obsessive tech experts is warning that stealing the ultimate prize—victory on Nov. 8—would be child’s play.
By Ben Wofford
August 05, 2016

When Princeton professor Andrew Appel decided to hack into a voting machine, he didn’t try to mimic the Russian attackers who hacked into the Democratic National Committee's database last month. He didn’t write malicious code, or linger near a polling place where the machines can go unguarded for days.

Instead, he bought one online.

With a few cursory clicks of a mouse, Appel parted with $82 and became the owner of an ungainly metallic giant called the Sequoia AVC Advantage, one of the oldest and vulnerable, electronic voting machines in the United States (among other places it’s deployed in Louisiana, New Jersey, Virginia and Pennsylvania). No sooner did a team of bewildered deliverymen roll the 250-pound device into a conference room near Appel’s cramped, third-floor office than the professor set to work. He summoned a graduate student named Alex Halderman, who could pick the machine’s lock in seven seconds. Clutching a screwdriver, he deftly wedged out the four ROM chips—they weren’t soldered into the circuit board, as sense might dictate—making it simple to replace them with one of his own: A version of modified firmware that could throw off the machine’s results, subtly altering the tally of votes, never to betray a hint to the voter. The attack was concluded in minutes. To mark the achievement, his student snapped a photo of Appel—oblong features, messy black locks and a salt-and-pepper beard—grinning for the camera, fists still on the circuit board, as if to look directly into the eyes of the American taxpayer: Don’t look at me—you’re the one who paid for this thing.

http://www.politico.com/magazine/sto...minutes-214144

From: Do all voting machines have anti-virus installed now?

[RJB]

Possibly Un-related

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...=1#post6870595

[enhanced_deficit]

Possibly Un-related

Was this the trigger?

This by no means suggests that pollsters were right and 2016 election was "stolen" from Hillary/Dems as punishment for Iran deal opposed by Israeli Likud wing, ZOA/MAGA funder Adelson.

[RJB]

Was this the trigger?

Quite possibly, but it could also be Un-related

[rpfocus]

Nobody stole anything from Chump. He lost, and like the infantile crybaby he is, is throwing a toddler fit. His MAGAts are unable to think for themselves and take anything he says as gospel. One thing is for sure: he will be OUT ON HIS FAT ASS shortly, and Trumpism can be relegated to it's rightful place in the dustbin of history.

[Contumacious]

Nobody stole anything from Chump. He lost, and like the infantile crybaby he is, is throwing a toddler fit. His MAGAts are unable to think for themselves and take anything he says as gospel. One thing is for sure: he will be OUT ON HIS FAT ASS shortly, and Trumpism can be relegated to it's rightful place in the dustbin of history.

Until WE THE PEOPLE , those 80 million Americans who voted for him are convinced we demand that he handcuff himself to the oval office and remain there until WE THE PEOPLE say otherwise,

We are not going to let the Deep State, the Fake News Media and the Demo Rats steal another election.


NEVER AGAIN

[enhanced_deficit]

Until WE THE PEOPLE , those 80 million Americans who voted for him are convinced we demand that he handcuff himself to the oval office and remain there until WE THE PEOPLE say otherwise,

We are not going to let the Deep State, the Fake News Media and the Demo Rats steal another election.


NEVER AGAIN

Won't be surprised if Deep State already has duplicate keys of all the handcuffs in WH rooms.


That said, won't the cause be of greater significance if the demand is reworded like this to make it less about a politician but about a purpose:

that he handcuff himself to the oval office and remain there until all the taxpayers funded troops from Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, mideast are brought home and all foreign aid is ended.

[RJB]

Won't be surprised if Deep State already has duplicate keys of all the handcuffs in WH rooms.


That said, won't the cause be of greater significance if the demand is reworded like this to make it less about a politician but about a purpose:

Be that as it may. The only certainty that any of us have of the future is that this thread will result in at least 5 necro-bumps with 10 links to to this thread from possibly Un-related threads. The future is indeed bleak.

[RJB]

And 20 years from now, this thread will resurrect again.

[Anti Globalist]

Democrats in 2016: "If you accept the results of this election, you are a threat to democracy.

Democrats in 2020: "If you don't accept the results of this election, you are a threat to democracy.

If Democrats didn't have double standards, they wouldn't have standards at all.

[RJB]

Democrats in 2016: "If you accept the results of this election, you are a threat to democracy.

Democrats in 2020: "If you don't accept the results of this election, you are a threat to democracy.

If Democrats didn't have double standards, they wouldn't have standards at all.

I probably only know of a handful of people on Earth who don't seem to have double standards. However, I sense that the appearance is simply that they have kept the double standards very well concealed.

This forum's namesake is one of the few consistent people in history.

[enhanced_deficit]

Democrats in 2016: "If you accept the results of this election, you are a threat to democracy.

Democrats in 2020: "If you don't accept the results of this election, you are a threat to democracy.

If Democrats didn't have double standards, they wouldn't have standards at all.

Yea same old same with Soros funded Dems.
That is why so important to give the other party (Adelson funded GOP) a chance next time.

[Mordan]

Democrats in 2016: "If you accept the results of this election, you are a threat to democracy.

Democrats in 2020: "If you don't accept the results of this election, you are a threat to democracy.

If Democrats didn't have double standards, they wouldn't have standards at all.

Democrats in 2016: "If you accept the results of this election, you are a threat to democracy.

Democrats in 2020: "If you don't accept the results of this election, you are a threat to democracy.

If Democrats didn't have double standards, they wouldn't have standards at all.

that's a good one. .keeping it

[showpan]

Nobody stole anything from Chump. He lost, and like the infantile crybaby he is, is throwing a toddler fit. His MAGAts are unable to think for themselves and take anything he says as gospel. One thing is for sure: he will be OUT ON HIS FAT ASS shortly, and Trumpism can be relegated to it's rightful place in the dustbin of history.

So you think Biden won fairly...lmao.....maybe you should go back to the democratic underground forum where you came from.

[rpfocus]

So you think Biden won fairly...lmao.....maybe you should go back to the democratic underground forum where you came from.

LOL DU, eh? Spoken like a true Chumpanzee.

[showpan]

LOL DU, eh? Spoken like a true Chumpanzee.

Yeah, that's exactly where you belong. We can all see you for what you are, spoken like a true libtard.

[Contumacious]

👍👌👍