Rand Paul questions election results: 'Your govt sent 1.1 million dead people stimulus checks'

[Brian4Liberty]

https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/1325795224657010693

Rand Paul questions election results: 'Your government sent 1.1 million dead people stimulus checks'

Sen. Rand Paul questioned last Tuesday’s election results, comparing the more than 1 million stimulus checks that were sent to dead people to possible voter fraud.

“Your government sent 1.1 million dead people stimulus checks. Wonder how many of these folks also voted absentee?” Paul tweeted Monday morning.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...timulus-checks

[r3volution 3.0]

FFS

When your political enemies take a blow, Rand, you don't go out of your way to prop them up.

If you lack the intestinal fortitude to actually oppose Trump at this point, fine, then say nothing

[fcreature]

FFS

When your political enemies take a blow, Rand, you don't go out of your way to prop them up.

If you lack the intestinal fortitude to actually oppose Trump at this point, fine, then say nothing

Rand knows first hand what voter fraud looks like.

And your read on the politics of this is way off. Trump supports have more enthusiasm than Ron Paul supporters did in 2008 and 2012, and that's saying something. If you think Trump is going away after this election if he loses, you are crazy.

[r3volution 3.0]

Rand knows first hand what voter fraud looks like.

And your read on the politics of this is way off. Trump supports have more enthusiasm than Ron Paul supporters did in 2008 and 2012, and that's saying something. If you think Trump is going away after this election if he loses, you are crazy.

If your point is that Rand risks his seat by criticizing Trumpism, I agree.

My point is that going along to get along in this GOP serves no purpose.

People like Rand, assuming they still believe in small government, need to speak out or the party will just keep getting worse.

[eleganz]

Rand knows first hand what voter fraud looks like.

And your read on the politics of this is way off. Trump supports have more enthusiasm than Ron Paul supporters did in 2008 and 2012, and that's saying something. If you think Trump is going away after this election if he loses, you are crazy.

Spot on.

R3v 3.0's read on politics has been off for a long time.


Rand knows the only chance of getting out of Afghan and others is Trump. Rand is in the fight just as much as Trump is against the neocons and MIC.

[XNavyNuke]

He earned a "DISPUTED" tag on a social media platform with a statement of the obvious. Second sentence was a question, not a claim. The only claim in the tweet was 1 million deceased individuals receiving checks. This was reported by the neo-feudalist's own legacy media (WaPo) back in June. I'm thinking now that social media algorithms simply look for a number and the word "vote" in any persons feed from any individual whose browser history shows they may have strayed outside the borders of the fiefdom.

XNN

[tebowlives]

If your point is that Rand risks his seat by criticizing Trumpism, I agree.

My point is that going along to get along in this GOP serves no purpose.

People like Rand, assuming they still believe in small government, need to speak out or the party will just keep getting worse.

"People like Rand, assuming they still believe in small government" - Assuming????? You don't see the plethora of examples that proves he is?

[r3volution 3.0]

"People like Rand, assuming they still believe in small government" - Assuming????? You don't see the plethora of examples that proves he is?

I believe that he does, but one would be forgiven for thinking otherwise given his behavior the last couple years.

[Voluntarist]

Per registered decision, member has been banned for violating community standards as interpreted by TheTexan (respect his authoritah) as authorized by Brian4Liberty Ruling

May God have mercy on his atheist, police-hating, non-voting, anarchist soul.

[dannno]

I believe that he does, but one would be forgiven for thinking otherwise given his behavior the last couple years.

Or maybe he knows a lot of things that you don't know.

[tebowlives]

I believe that he does, but one would be forgiven for thinking otherwise given his behavior the last couple years.

Because of all the instances he's promoted big government? I guess I missed those. Or maybe they didn't happen.

[r3volution 3.0]

Because of all the instances he's promoted big government? I guess I missed those. Or maybe they didn't happen.

Because of all the instances in which he's promoted a big government president.

Just yesterday, IIRC, I saw Rand on Cavuto vehemently criticizing the massive government spending of this year.

Well, that's good, right?

Yes, but...

He went out of his way to blame it on Mnuchin; he refused, even with prompting from Cavuto, to say lay even the slightest blame on Trump (i.e. the person who hired Mnuchin and must approve everything he does). Why does that matter? TDS? No, it matters because, so long as people think that Trump is somehow fighting for small government, and it's just his advisors or other people (who he has himself appointed!) who are responsible for the fact that federal policy has moved in exactly the opposite direction, people who care about small government will keep voting for Trump, or the Trumps of the world, if Trump himself is done. Let me put it this way. Imagine if Ron Paul had constantly criticized the Obama administration for their gigantic government spending, but blamed it all on some bureaucrat, while claiming that Obama himself was a libertarian.

[Anti Globalist]

Anybody with half a brain would question these election results. You can't find 80 million people in this country that are currently alive that voted for Biden.