Vaccinating children without consent parents

[Firestarter]

On 20 October, a predatorial bill in the District of Columbia was passed with 12:1 to allow children (11 years and older) to consent to vaccines without parents’ permission.
While insurance companies, vaccine providers and schools would conceal that the child had been vaccinated.

On 10 November at 10 a.m. the bill will get a second reading and final vote by the DC Council at their legislative meeting.

Vincent C. Gray stated: “the hope of an imminent coronavirus vaccine gave the bill new urgency”: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...ge-or-consent/

[DamianTV]

This can only happen if people and their children are treated as OWNED PROPERTY OF THE STATE. Otherwise it violates EVERY natural HUMAN RIGHT inherit to a persons existence.

[Firestarter]

This can only happen if people and their children are treated as OWNED PROPERTY OF THE STATE. Otherwise it violates EVERY natural HUMAN RIGHT inherit to a persons existence.

On the other hand, if children don't have this right they are "owned property" of their parents. I don't know if I agree with that.
These days I have more confidence in the ability to think of 8-year-olds than their brainwashed parents...


On 11 November, the DC Council postponed the final vote for this bill to 17 November 2020.
https://archive.is/fUlZg

[DamianTV]

On the other hand, if children don't have this right they are "owned property" of their parents. I don't know if I agree with that.
These days I have more confidence in the ability to think of 8-year-olds than their brainwashed parents...


On 11 November, the DC Council postponed the final vote for this bill to 17 November 2020.
https://archive.is/fUlZg

I couldnt agree more. It also explains why children are sent MANDATORY Public Schools; for no other reason than Indoctrination in order to castrate an average persons ability to THINK. Children are in the process of being indoctrinated, while their parents are FULLY indoctrinated. Also, the MANDATORY nature of Public Education also validates that children are the property of the state.

There is an old addage. Before you stand two men, one is an honest man, the other is a LIAR. How do you tell the difference between the honest man and the liar? You ask both men "will you tell me the truth"? BOTH men will answer YES and affirm that they will tell the truth. The honest mans YES is truth because he is an honest man. The LIARS YES is a LIE. But since both answers are exactly the same, how can we tell the difference between the two? The answer is a Paradox. You cant. At least not based solely on the information provided. Thus, the real answer exists outside if the constraints of the question. We would need to dig deeper, and do some FACT CHECKING. And right there, the FACT CHECKING is typically dismissed by those who want to keep their power over the people. Whether it is in regards to the Election which is full of fraud, and landing us in the middle of a FRAUDSLIDE, or in regards to vaccines being "perfectly safe". The dishonest man will demand that you DO NOT do ANY FACT CHECKING.

[Firestarter]

We would need to dig deeper, and do some FACT CHECKING. And right there, the FACT CHECKING is typically dismissed by those who want to keep their power over the people. Whether it is in regards to the Election which is full of fraud, and landing us in the middle of a FRAUDSLIDE, or in regards to vaccines being "perfectly safe". The dishonest man will demand that you DO NOT do ANY FACT CHECKING.

And when somebody checks the “fact checkers”?
“Censorship” sounds very harsh… but that’s precisely what happens!

After Ron Paul’s video on the COVID-19 hysteria was deleted…

Youtube explained that it doesn’t allow criticism of “the efficacy of the World Health Organization or local health authorities”!

http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives...t-believe-why/

[DamianTV]

And when somebody checks the “fact checkers”?
“Censorship” sounds very harsh… but that’s precisely what happens!

After Ron Paul’s video on the COVID-19 hysteria was deleted…

Youtube explained that it doesn’t allow criticism of “the efficacy of the World Health Organization or local health authorities”!

http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives...t-believe-why/

Control by giving themselves pretty sounding titles. "Arbiters of Information" or "Authority of Information". Bull$#@!. YOU are. Everyone is. That is our responsibility that comes hand in hand with the Freedoms we have, well, had. But that goes away because INFORMATION SHAPES PERCEPTION, and if they exclude any truly negative information on ANY given subject, we start to think of those groups as having legitimate authority. They DONT.

[Anti Globalist]

Definitely feel bad for the children right now. Looks very likely that they will get a forced vaccination.

[Firestarter]

Vincent C. Gray stated: “the hope of an imminent coronavirus vaccine gave the bill new urgency”: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/d...ge-or-consent/

Robert Kennedy Jr. updated his article…
On 17 November, this bill was passed, with an amendment by Gray that the insurer will be notified so they won’t “send an Explanation of Benefits for the vaccination” to keep the parents uninformed!

[Firestarter]

The similar S298B bill in New York plans to make it mandatory for elementary school children born after 1 January 2009 to be poisoned with a human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine.
The bill proposes that the children can be injected with the vaccine not only without the consent of their parents or guardians, but even without their knowledge.
This bill has passed the senate – waiting to be signed by the governor.

Subdivision 6 explicitely includes the possibility to vaccinate the child without consent of the parent (or guardian)…

In the event that such person does not wish to select a health practitioner to administer the immunization, he or she shall be provided with a form which shall give notice that as a prerequisite to processing the application for admission to, or for continued attendance at, the school such person shall state a valid reason for withholding consent or consent shall be given for immunization to be administered by a health officer in the public employ, or by a school physician or nurse. The form shall provide for the execution of a consent by such person and it shall also state that such person need not execute such consent if subdivision eight of this section applies to such child.

When you read subdivision 8 in relation to subdivision 6 it shows that the child can be poisoned with vaccines if the parent refuse to consent: https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2019/s298


Another related bill proposes that health care practitioners (so not only doctors) like those working at the depopulation offices of Planned Parenthood can vaccinate children younger than 18 years old for “sexually transmitted diseases” without the knowledge of their parents: http://web.archive.org/web/20191127203638/https://www.newsday.com/news/region-state/hpv-albany-legislation-mandatory-1.38808088

[Firestarter]

While there has never been any evidence that vaccines actually prevent disease, I have to admit that – while the unvaccinated are healthier than the vaxxed - the adverse effects are relatively benign: The-Truth-About-Vaccines

This sort of confirms that there must be another motive for pushing these vaccines ad nauseum.
For me the only “reasonable” explanation is that these vaccines will sterilise women (girls): Does-COVID-19-vaccine-cause-infertility

This makes it all the more troubling that several bills have been passed to become part of the legislation that allows them to vaccinate children without the consent of their parents (who just to be on the safe side, won’t be informed of this crime against humanity)...