Your Neurological Rights

[Pauls' Revere]

https://english.elpais.com/spanish_n...-thoughts.html

These types of devices can revolutionize industry, but they can also destroy our mental privacy. Brain activity generates not only conscious thoughts, but also subconscious ones. Recording brain activity will sooner or later allow access to the subconscious.

On account of these and other developments, a group of 25 scientific experts – clinical engineers, psychologists, lawyers, philosophers and representatives of different brain projects from all over the world – met in 2017 at Columbia University, New York, and proposed ethical rules for the use of these neurotechnologies. We believe we are facing a problem that affects human rights, since the brain generates the mind, which defines us as a species. At the end of the day, it is about our essence – our thoughts, perceptions, memories, imagination, emotions and decisions.

To protect citizens from the misuse of these technologies, we have proposed a new set of human rights, called “neurorights.” The most urgent of these to establish is the right to the privacy of our thoughts, since the technologies for reading mental activity are more developed than the technologies for manipulating it.

[nikcers]

[bv3]

Well, having a nebulous technology implanted into my brain sure beats reading all the time. Sign me the $#@! up.

[Working Poor]

I support Neuro privacy for sure.

[pcosmar]

Frey Effect.. the science in a nutshell
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwave_auditory_effect

[Pauls' Revere]

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com...es-are-coming/

Neuroscientist Marcel Just and colleagues at Carnegie Mellon University are using fMRI brain imaging to decipher what a person is thinking. By using machine learning to analyze complex patterns of activity in a person’s brain when they think of a specific number or object, read a sentence, experience a particular emotion or learn a new type of information, the researchers can read minds and know the person’s specific thoughts and emotions. “Nothing is more private than a thought,” Just says, but that privacy is no longer sacrosanct.

[Mach]

Be careful, chief....................... such premises are fed to you in link and information from what others piece, together...... I have to say, I don't know where to "start."

[Mach]

chchch.... shshshsh.................... it's Halloween.

[Mach]

Frey Effect.. the science in a nutshell
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwave_auditory_effect

Hmmmmm......... Numerous individuals suffering from auditory hallucinations, delusional disorders,[14] or other mental illnesses have claimed that government agents use forms of mind control technologies based on microwave signals to transmit sounds and thoughts into their heads as a form of electronic harassment, referring to the alleged technology as "voice to skull" or "V2K".[15]


Frequencies?


I give you people scientific history, what that "means" (eh-heh, tIhad to edit to add a "M") is I give you answers....

[GlennwaldSnowdenAssanged]

There is obviously some kind of mind control that has our current society in such a state of delusion.

[Pauls' Revere]

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/functio...es-2020-09-06/

Who among us hasn't wished we could read someone else's mind, know exactly what they're thinking? Well that's impossible, of course, since our thoughts are, more than anything else, our own -- private, personal, unreachable. Or at least that's what we've always, well, thought.

60 Minutes Rewind: Revisit our first report on mind reading, from 2009

As we reported last fall, advances in neuroscience have shown that, on a physical level, our thoughts are actually a vast network of neurons firing all across our brains. So if that brain activity could be identified and analyzed, could our thoughts be decoded? Could our minds be read? Well a team of scientists at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh has spent more than a decade trying to do just that. We started our reporting on their work 10 years ago, and what they've discovered since, has drawn us back.

https://www.cmu.edu/news/stories/arc...0-minutes.html

Additionally, this will also be used to facilitate the way A.I. robots "think" about objects they see and words they hear.

https://www.cs.cmu.edu/link/mind-readers

For Mitchell, this new insight into the function of the human brain presents an opportunity for computer scientists to reconsider some of their architectures. "One of the main problems in artificial intelligence is (deciding) how robots should represent the myriad things they see in the world," he says.

The human brain could store information about the word "tomatoes" much like a dictionary would, lodging it in the frontal cortex where higher reasoning takes place. Instead, the brain seems to use its sensory and motor sections to store the bulk of this information. Doing so may help the brain operate more efficiently, allowing it to make inferences about what it sees and reason about how to act on that information in the same areas of the brain where perception takes place.

"That's very different than how it's done in robots today," Mitchell says. "Maybe there's a reason the brain does it that way and maybe we should give that a little thought."

[Anti Globalist]

I would appreciate if my conscious thoughts could not be heard by others.

[Ender]

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/functio...es-2020-09-06/

Who among us hasn't wished we could read someone else's mind, know exactly what they're thinking? Well that's impossible, of course, since our thoughts are, more than anything else, our own -- private, personal, unreachable. Or at least that's what we've always, well, thought.

60 Minutes Rewind: Revisit our first report on mind reading, from 2009

As we reported last fall, advances in neuroscience have shown that, on a physical level, our thoughts are actually a vast network of neurons firing all across our brains. So if that brain activity could be identified and analyzed, could our thoughts be decoded? Could our minds be read? Well a team of scientists at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh has spent more than a decade trying to do just that. We started our reporting on their work 10 years ago, and what they've discovered since, has drawn us back.

https://www.cmu.edu/news/stories/arc...0-minutes.html

Additionally, this will also be used to facilitate the way A.I. robots "think" about objects they see and words they hear.

https://www.cs.cmu.edu/link/mind-readers

For Mitchell, this new insight into the function of the human brain presents an opportunity for computer scientists to reconsider some of their architectures. "One of the main problems in artificial intelligence is (deciding) how robots should represent the myriad things they see in the world," he says.

The human brain could store information about the word "tomatoes" much like a dictionary would, lodging it in the frontal cortex where higher reasoning takes place. Instead, the brain seems to use its sensory and motor sections to store the bulk of this information. Doing so may help the brain operate more efficiently, allowing it to make inferences about what it sees and reason about how to act on that information in the same areas of the brain where perception takes place.

"That's very different than how it's done in robots today," Mitchell says. "Maybe there's a reason the brain does it that way and maybe we should give that a little thought."

Actually you can "read" a person's thoughts by their body language; the mouth lies all the time but the body never does. You might not pick up all the "details" but you can pretty much see the mood & direction of the mind. Anyone who's a great actor/performer should understand this, but most people do not.

That said I'm totally against this AI carp-

[pcosmar]

There is obviously some kind of mind control that has our current society in such a state of delusion.

Did you notice the Toilet paper Rush,

Ever wonder why? (it happened everywhere at once)

[pcosmar]

That said I'm totally against this AI carp-

AI is not ready for prime time,, even in Carp.

I am opposed to Mind Control and Social Control.

I favor individual Self Control.

[Ender]

AI is not ready for prime time,, even in Carp.

I am opposed to Mind Control and Social Control.

I favor individual Self Control.

Agree one zillion %!!!

[shakey1]

How else are they going to enforce the law against thought crimes?

[Pauls' Revere]

Did you notice the Toilet paper Rush,

Ever wonder why? (it happened everywhere at once)

https://www.urbandictionary.com/defi...cation%20cycle

synchro-defecation cycle
The synchro-defecation theory holds that the defecation patterns of individuals who live together tend to become synchronized over time. The phenomenon is glaringly evident when said individuals share one bathroom.

Similar to the McClintock effect, the theory that the menstrual cycles of women who live together, such as in homes, prisons, convents, bordellos, dormitories, or barracks, tend to become synchronized over time.

[pcosmar]

https://www.urbandictionary.com/defi...cation%20cycle

And just how would that apply to individuals living at opposite sides of the country?

[Pauls' Revere]

And just how would that apply to individuals living at opposite sides of the country?

Unsure, maybe a syncro-frequency or experience on a national level such as anxiety over an election and pandemic.

[pcosmar]

Unsure, maybe a syncro-frequency or experience on a national level such as anxiety over an election and pandemic.

Nothing to do with Hypnotic drugs and subliminal suggestion? Media delivered and disguised as "news".

What percentage of the population is on pharma Drugs??

[Pauls' Revere]

Nothing to do with Hypnotic drugs and subliminal suggestion? Media delivered and disguised as "news".

What percentage of the population is on pharma Drugs??

WE GOT ONE THAT CAN SEE!

[pcosmar]

WE GOT ONE THAT CAN SEE!

I get that without a mask already..

now if I wear a revolver on my thigh,,,,

[Mach]

Reality

https://www.sciencedaily.com/release...0528150507.htm

Neurological disorders such as Parkinson's disease and epilepsy have had some treatment success with deep brain stimulation, but those require surgical device implantation. A multidisciplinary team at Washington University in St. Louis has developed a new brain stimulation technique using focused ultrasound that is able to turn specific types of neurons in the brain on and off and precisely control motor activity without surgical device implantation.

The team, led by Hong Chen, assistant professor of biomedical engineering in the McKelvey School of Engineering and of radiation oncology at the School of Medicine, is the first to provide direct evidence showing noninvasive, cell-type-specific activation of neurons in the brain of mammal by combining ultrasound-induced heating effect and genetics, which they have named sonothermogenetics. It is also the first work to show that the ultrasound- genetics combination can robustly control behavior by stimulating a specific target deep in the brain.

Results of the three years of research, which was funded in part by the National Institutes of Health's BRAIN Initiative, were published online in Brain Stimulation May 11, 2021.

The senior research team included experts from both the McKelvey School of Engineering and the School of Medicine, including Jianmin Cui, professor of biomedical engineering; Joseph P. Culver, professor of radiology, of physics and of biomedical engineering; Mark J. Miller, associate professor of medicine in the Division of Infectious Diseases in the Department of Medicine; and Michael Bruchas, formerly of Washington University, now professor of anesthesiology and pharmacology at the University of Washington.

"Our work provided evidence that sonothermogenetics evokes behavioral responses in freely moving mice while targeting a deep brain site," Chen said. "Sonothermogenetics has the potential to transform our approaches for neuroscience research and uncover new methods to understand and treat human brain disorders."

Using a mouse model, Chen and the team delivered a viral construct containing TRPV1 ion channels to genetically-selected neurons. Then, they delivered small burst of heat via low-intensity focused ultrasound to the select neurons in the brain via a wearable device. The heat, only a few degrees warmer than body temperature, activated the TRPV1 ion channel, which acted as a switch to turn the neurons on or off.

"We can move the ultrasound device worn on the head of free-moving mice around to target different locations in the whole brain," said Yaoheng Yang, first author of the paper and a graduate student in biomedical engineering. "Because it is noninvasive, this technique has the potential to be scaled up to large animals and potentially humans in the future."

The work builds on research conducted in Cui's lab that was published in Scientific Reports in 2016. Cui and his team found for the first time that ultrasound alone can influence ion channel activity and could lead to new and noninvasive ways to control the activity of specific cells. In their work, they found that focused ultrasound modulated the currents flowing through the ion channels on average by up to 23%, depending on channel and stimulus intensity. Following this work, researchers found close to 10 ion channels with this capability, but all of them are mechanosensitive, not thermosensitive.

The work also builds on the concept of optogenetics, the combination of the targeted expression of light-sensitive ion channels and the precise delivery of light to stimulate neurons deep in the brain. While optogenetics has increased discovery of new neural circuits, it is limited in penetration depth due to light scattering and requires surgical implantation of optical fibers.

Sonothermogenetics has the promise to target any location in the mouse brain with millimeter-scale resolution without causing any damage to the brain, Chen said. She and the team continue to optimize the technique and further validate their findings.