Do you not understand that lives are at stake, comrade? (Not to mention the very planet itself ...)
And the only price we must pay to save those lives (and the planet) is "a cold dinner here and there" ...
To Save the Climate, Give Up the Demand for Constant Electricity
https://bostonreview.net/science-nat...nt-electricity
David McDermott Hughes (05 October 2020)
Waiting to ensure uninterrupted power for everyone as we transition away from fossil fuels will cost too much time - and too many lives.
Many decades ago electricity became the new oxygen, and the vast majority of Americans today believe they need it every moment of every waking or sleeping hour. The United States has built a vast infrastructure for generating, transmitting, and consuming it - all almost entirely based on planet-destroying fossil fuels and nuclear power.
[...]
What applies in the pandemic also applies - and also with desperate urgency - in the climate crisis. We can live with some intermittency and rationing - at least until batteries and other forms of energy storage are up and running everywhere. Hospitals certainly need 100 percent reliable equipment - perhaps some “continuous” businesses and cell towers too. And, in cities, elevators, streetlights, and subways must run reliably. One could imagine battery-assisted, semi-smart micro-grids connecting such infrastructure as well as home medical devices. But we don’t need the entire residential third of U.S. electricity consumption to run off lithium or to operate seamlessly. We don’t need Nest or permanent telecommuting.
For a while, let’s eat a cold dinner here and there. Continuity costs too much. Climate change kills, and it kills vulnerable people first. Intermittency saves lives, and it saves vulnerable people first. Let the pause take its place in continuous climate activism.
[bold emphasis added - OB]
Connect With Us