Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 95

Thread: Libertarian Party Becomes Woke Follows Democrats "We Must Support BLM for Justice"

  1. #1

    Exclamation Libertarian Party Becomes Woke Follows Democrats "We Must Support BLM for Justice"


    Tim Pool.
    Libertarian Party Then - "Don't Tread On Me"
    Libertarian Party Now - "We MUST Tread"


    It is not enough to be passively not racist, we must be actively anti-racist.
    #BlackLivesMatter
    #VoteGold



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    "It is not enough to be passively not racist, we must be actively anti-racist." is what Jorgensen actually said (along with the hastag #BlackLivesMatter) and she's getting torn up for it (including by me, who has donated twice so far).

    If she wants to say black lives matter, that's one thing (another tweet clarified it's not the organization Black Lives Matters she was referring to) though personally I agree with the sentence "black lives matter" but am extremely suspicious about the movement.
    It's another thing to say "we must be actively anti-racist". That's thought policing (at the worst possible time) and you can be sure it will not be libertarians who define what is "anti-racist" but people like these:


    That second one I posted about 4 years ago. People like that are why Trump won. If Jo doesn't do damage control she'll lose a huge amount of supporters (including me) and some (not me) will probably vote for Trump out of spite - if there's one thing Trump can be relied on, it's not bowing down to garbage like this

  4. #3
    Hard to believe she is really that stupid . Something is looking off .

  5. #4
    Right at this moment , the lp is headed to lowest ever vote total .

  6. #5
    And this is the LP nominee?

    Yet more evidence that "the Movement" was mostly nothing more than a bunch of punks and leftarians who just wanted to burn $#@! down for the sake of burning $#@! down.

    No wonder everybody was freaking out about the Ron Paul newsletters, when frankly, I found nothing wrong with them.

    The LP is a $#@!ing joke...can't believe I wasted 15 years even remotely associated with assclowns like this.
    Last edited by Anti Federalist; 07-10-2020 at 10:00 PM.
    There are only two things we should fight for.
    One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights. - Smedley Darlington Butler

  7. #6
    lp has nothing to offer , dems already have it

  8. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by emazur View Post
    It's another thing to say "we must be actively anti-racist". That's thought policing (at the worst possible time) and you can be sure it will not be libertarians who define what is "anti-racist" but people like these:
    Would +rep if I could.

    "Libertarian" Party, my ass ... ("Lickspittle" Party is more like it ...)

    Make Orwell Fiction Again.


    Frédéric Bastiat (1801-1850)

    • "When law and morality are in contradiction to each other, the citizen finds himself in the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense, or of losing his respect for the law." - The Law (p. 54)
    • "Government is that great fiction, through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else." - Government (p. 99)
    • "[W]ar is always begun in the interest of the few, and at the expense of the many."
      - Economic Sophisms - Second Series (p. 312)
    • "There are two principles that can never be reconciled - Liberty and Constraint."
      - Harmonies of Political Economy - Book One (p. 447)

    · tu ne cede malis sed contra audentior ito ·
    MOFA (Make Orwell Fiction Again)

  9. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by oyarde View Post
    Hard to believe she is really that stupid . Something is looking off .
    Everything is off with this its almost like they were threaten. "Support them or else"



  10. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  11. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Occam's Banana View Post
    Would +rep if I could.

    "Libertarian" Party, my ass ... ("Lickspittle" Party is more like it ...)

    Make Orwell Fiction Again.
    First thoughts:

    Who, exactly, is "we"?

    And if "we" do not...then what?
    Last edited by Anti Federalist; 07-10-2020 at 10:27 PM.
    There are only two things we should fight for.
    One is the defense of our homes and the other is the Bill of Rights. - Smedley Darlington Butler

  12. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Anti Federalist View Post
    First thoughts:

    Who, exactly, is "we"?

    And if "we" do not...then what?
    First thoughts on your first thoughts:

    "We" are not "they."

    Then "they" move on to more, shall we say, "hands on" techniques of hectoring "we" ...

  13. #11
    The LP is a front for communists and has been for some time.

    They need to lose ballot access to make room for a new 3rd party.
    Never attempt to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and annoys the pig.

    Robert Heinlein

    Give a man an inch and right away he thinks he's a ruler

    Groucho Marx

    I love mankind…it’s people I can’t stand.

    Linus, from the Peanuts comic

    You cannot have liberty without morality and morality without faith

    Alexis de Torqueville

    Those who fail to learn from the past are condemned to repeat it.
    Those who learn from the past are condemned to watch everybody else repeat it

    A Zero Hedge comment

  14. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by AngryCanadian View Post
    [It is not enough to be passively not racist, we must be actively anti-racist.

    https://www.twitter.com/Jorgensen4PO...38042315489284

    Aka "silence is violence".
    "Foreign aid is taking money from the poor people of a rich country, and giving it to the rich people of a poor country." - Ron Paul
    "Beware the Military-Industrial-Financial-Corporate-Internet-Media-Government Complex." - B4L update of General Dwight D. Eisenhower
    "Debt is the drug, Wall St. Banksters are the dealers, and politicians are the addicts." - B4L
    "Totally free immigration? I've never taken that position. I believe in national sovereignty." - Ron Paul
    They are what they hate.” - B4L


    The views and opinions expressed here are solely my own, and do not represent this forum or any other entities or persons.

  15. #13
    According to the doctrine, if you're not antiracist, you're racist. Be careful not to become a good white though.

  16. #14
    I prefer Ron Paul's newsletters over this anti white garbage.

  17. #15
    The LP candidate can't grasp a basic concept of the movement. Government can never be racist, but an individual has the right to be. If you want government to take away a racists rights you are just as bad as the racist.

  18. #16
    I would like to remind you guys that you should not let the perfect be the enemy of the good. Before I count them off, I'll like to know how that rhetoric translate to policy. The libertarian party if elected I believe is still going to be way way better than the dems or republican party.

    Thats my 2 cents



  19. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  20. #17
    Somebody should tell her that two of the founders of BLM called themselves trained Marxists.
    "Perhaps one of the most important accomplishments of my administration is minding my own business."

    Calvin Coolidge

  21. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by oyarde View Post
    Right at this moment , the lp is headed to lowest ever vote total .
    voting is irrelevant.

  22. #19
    Interesting twitter thread defining the rigid mindset of the "woke".
    Cancel culture doesn't just attack free speech. Cancel culture attacks the very foundation of civilization and democracy itself and we need to understand it if we want to fight back effectively.
    https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1...566987776.html
    ... or ... https://twitter.com/wokal_distance/s...80650566987776

  23. #20
    Social liberalism and other liberal progressive, woke social/racial justic values & cultural conditioning are the permanent future, hat tip OIF for historic 10 to 100 mph acceleration in no time.

  24. #21

    https://www.twitter.com/Jorgensen4PO...17713291956224

    “#BlackLivesMatter means standing in solidarity with a mourning black community as we fight together to end qualified immunity, police brutality, sentencing disparities, and the war on drugs, not support of any “organization” by that name.”

    She tried to clarify that she doesn’t mean any specific BLM organization, but then she specified “mourning black community” which is a sore spot with activists who have worked for Police reform for years, only to see this turned into a race thing instead. It’s pandering, which politicians do, but it raises questions from libertarians who wonder what the true agenda is. We have seen some Libertarians come out of the closet recently as “we never liked Ron Paul or his ilk, we are really leftists.”
    Last edited by Brian4Liberty; 07-11-2020 at 10:40 AM.
    "Foreign aid is taking money from the poor people of a rich country, and giving it to the rich people of a poor country." - Ron Paul
    "Beware the Military-Industrial-Financial-Corporate-Internet-Media-Government Complex." - B4L update of General Dwight D. Eisenhower
    "Debt is the drug, Wall St. Banksters are the dealers, and politicians are the addicts." - B4L
    "Totally free immigration? I've never taken that position. I believe in national sovereignty." - Ron Paul
    They are what they hate.” - B4L


    The views and opinions expressed here are solely my own, and do not represent this forum or any other entities or persons.

  25. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    The LP is a front for communists and has been for some time.

    They need to lose ballot access to make room for a new 3rd party.
    The Constitution Party?

    Anyone on the ballot for them?
    When life itself seems lunatic, who knows where madness lies? - Miguel de Cervantes, (Don Quixote)

    Quote Originally Posted by Voluntarist View Post
    The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the Federal Reserve Notes of patriotic central banks

  26. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian4Liberty View Post

    https://www.twitter.com/Jorgensen4PO...17713291956224

    “#BlackLivesMatter means standing in solidarity with a mourning black community as we fight together to end qualified immunity, police brutality, sentencing disparities, and the war on drugs, not support of any “organization” by that name.”

    She tried to clarify that she doesn’t mean any specific BLM organization, but then she specified “mourning black community” which is a sore spot with activists who have worked for Police reform for years, only to see this turned into a race thing instead. It’s pandering, which politicians do, but it raises questions from libertarians who wonder what the true agenda is. We have seen some Libertarians come out of the closet recently as “we never liked Ron Paul or his ilk”, we are really leftists.


    My spidey senses tingle when someone tries to "define" or "qualify" what the definition of something is and then interjects the collectivist "we" "us" "together" "solidarity" terms. Reminds me of the "Real Scotsman argument".

    For reference:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman

    Also, The Nirvana Fallacy: Presenting as a perfect solution.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nirvana_fallacy
    Last edited by Pauls' Revere; 07-11-2020 at 10:50 AM.
    When life itself seems lunatic, who knows where madness lies? - Miguel de Cervantes, (Don Quixote)

    Quote Originally Posted by Voluntarist View Post
    The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the Federal Reserve Notes of patriotic central banks

  27. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by Pauls' Revere View Post


    My spidey senses tingle when someone tries to "define" or "qualify" what the definition of something is and then interjects the collectivist "we" "us" "together" "solidarity" terms. Reminds me of the "Real Scotsman argument".

    For reference:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman
    While I can appreciate her attempt to use a tactic of the Marxists and redefine a term like #BlackLivesMatter, but it represents a dogma at this point. A mandatory statement of faith.

    It’s like saying “Allahu Akbar”, and then explaining that it means that you support freedom of religion.
    "Foreign aid is taking money from the poor people of a rich country, and giving it to the rich people of a poor country." - Ron Paul
    "Beware the Military-Industrial-Financial-Corporate-Internet-Media-Government Complex." - B4L update of General Dwight D. Eisenhower
    "Debt is the drug, Wall St. Banksters are the dealers, and politicians are the addicts." - B4L
    "Totally free immigration? I've never taken that position. I believe in national sovereignty." - Ron Paul
    They are what they hate.” - B4L


    The views and opinions expressed here are solely my own, and do not represent this forum or any other entities or persons.



  28. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  29. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by John-G View Post
    I would like to remind you guys that you should not let the perfect be the enemy of the good. Before I count them off, I'll like to know how that rhetoric translate to policy. The libertarian party if elected I believe is still going to be way way better than the dems or republican party.

    Thats my 2 cents
    The LP is never getting elected. Now they are no better than the D or R party. I don't even think I will vote for president this year.

  30. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian4Liberty View Post
    While I can appreciate her attempt to use a tactic of the Marxists and redefine a term like #BlackLivesMatter, but it represents a dogma at this point. A mandatory statement of faith.

    It’s like saying “Allahu Akbar”, and then explaining that it means that you support freedom of religion.
    Tim Pool said it best its like a religious cult, brainwashing.

  31. #27
    Quote Originally Posted by Pauls' Revere View Post
    The Constitution Party?

    Anyone on the ballot for them?
    Don Blankenship is the nominee.

  32. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by John-G View Post
    I would like to remind you guys that you should not let the perfect be the enemy of the good. Before I count them off, I'll like to know how that rhetoric translate to policy. The libertarian party if elected I believe is still going to be way way better than the dems or republican party.

    Thats my 2 cents
    Agree.

  33. #29
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    The LP is a front for communists and has been for some time.



    They need to lose ballot access to make room for a new 3rd party.

    Ok, sure. What exactly is your definition of communism?


    https://www.lp.org/platform/

    REAMBLE
    As Libertarians, we seek a world of liberty: a world in which all individuals are sovereign over their own lives and are not forced to sacrifice their values for the benefit of others.

    We believe that respect for individual rights is the essential precondition for a free and prosperous world, that force and fraud must be banished from human relationships, and that only through freedom can peace and prosperity be realized.

    Consequently, we defend each person’s right to engage in any activity that is peaceful and honest, and welcome the diversity that freedom brings. The world we seek to build is one where individuals are free to follow their own dreams in their own ways, without interference from government or any authoritarian power.

    In the following pages we set forth our basic principles and enumerate various policy stands derived from those principles.

    These specific policies are not our goal, however. Our goal is nothing more nor less than a world set free in our lifetime, and it is to this end that we take these stands.
    STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES
    We, the members of the Libertarian Party, challenge the cult of the omnipotent state and defend the rights of the individual.

    We hold that all individuals have the right to exercise sole dominion over their own lives, and have the right to live in whatever manner they choose, so long as they do not forcibly interfere with the equal right of others to live in whatever manner they choose.

    Governments throughout history have regularly operated on the opposite principle, that the State has the right to dispose of the lives of individuals and the fruits of their labor. Even within the United States, all political parties other than our own grant to government the right to regulate the lives of individuals and seize the fruits of their labor without their consent.

    We, on the contrary, deny the right of any government to do these things, and hold that where governments exist, they must not violate the rights of any individual: namely, (1) the right to life — accordingly we support the prohibition of the initiation of physical force against others; (2) the right to liberty of speech and action — accordingly we oppose all attempts by government to abridge the freedom of speech and press, as well as government censorship in any form; and (3) the right to property — accordingly we oppose all government interference with private property, such as confiscation, nationalization, and eminent domain, and support the prohibition of robbery, trespass, fraud, and misrepresentation.

    Since governments, when instituted, must not violate individual rights, we oppose all interference by government in the areas of voluntary and contractual relations among individuals. People should not be forced to sacrifice their lives and property for the benefit of others. They should be left free by government to deal with one another as free traders; and the resultant economic system, the only one compatible with the protection of individual rights, is the free market.


    Note: The Statement of Principles was approved at the Convention in Dallas in 1974.
    1.0 PERSONAL LIBERTY
    Individuals are inherently free to make choices for themselves and must accept responsibility for the consequences of the choices they make. Our support of an individual’s right to make choices in life does not mean that we necessarily approve or disapprove of those choices. No individual, group, or government may rightly initiate force against any other individual, group, or government. Libertarians reject the notion that groups have inherent rights. We support the rights of the smallest minority, the individual.

    1.1 Self-Ownership

    Individuals own their bodies and have rights over them that other individuals, groups, and governments may not violate. Individuals have the freedom and responsibility to decide what they knowingly and voluntarily consume, and what risks they accept to their own health, finances, safety, or life.

    1.2 Expression and Communication

    We support full freedom of expression and oppose government censorship, regulation, or control of communications media and technology. We favor the freedom to engage in or abstain from any religious activities that do not violate the rights of others. We oppose government actions which either aid or attack any religion.

    1.3 Privacy

    Libertarians advocate individual privacy and government transparency. We are committed to ending government’s practice of spying on everyone. We support the rights recognized by the Fourth Amendment to be secure in our persons, homes, property, and communications. Protection from unreasonable search and seizure should include records held by third parties, such as email, medical, and library records.

    1.4 Personal Relationships

    Sexual orientation, preference, gender, or gender identity should have no impact on the government’s treatment of individuals, such as in current marriage, child custody, adoption, immigration, or military service laws. Government does not have the authority to define, promote, license, or restrict personal relationships, regardless of the number of participants. Consenting adults should be free to choose their own sexual practices and personal relationships. Until such time as the government stops its illegitimate practice of marriage licensing, such licenses must be granted to all consenting adults who apply.

    1.5 Abortion

    Recognizing that abortion is a sensitive issue and that people can hold good-faith views on all sides, we believe that government should be kept out of the matter, leaving the question to each person for their conscientious consideration.

    1.6 Parental Rights

    Parents, or other guardians, have the right to raise their children according to their own standards and beliefs, provided that the rights of children to be free from abuse and neglect are also protected.

    1.7 Crime and Justice

    Government force must be limited to the protection of the rights of individuals to life, liberty, and property, and governments must never be permitted to violate these rights. Laws should be limited in their application to violations of the rights of others through force or fraud, or to deliberate actions that place others involuntarily at significant risk of harm. Therefore, we favor the repeal of all laws creating “crimes” without victims, such as gambling, the use of drugs for medicinal or recreational purposes, and consensual transactions involving sexual services. We support restitution to the victim to the fullest degree possible at the expense of the criminal or the negligent wrongdoer. The constitutional rights of the criminally accused, including due process, a speedy trial, legal counsel, trial by jury, and the legal presumption of innocence until proven guilty, must be preserved. We assert the common-law right of juries to judge not only the facts but also the justice of the law. We oppose the prosecutorial practice of “over-charging” in criminal prosecutions so as to avoid jury trials by intimidating defendants into accepting plea bargains.

    1.8 Death Penalty

    We oppose the administration of the death penalty by the state.

    1.9 Self-Defense

    The only legitimate use of force is in defense of individual rights — life, liberty, and justly acquired property — against aggression. This right inheres in the individual, who may agree to be aided by any other individual or group. We affirm the individual right recognized by the Second Amendment to keep and bear arms, and oppose the prosecution of individuals for exercising their rights of self-defense. Private property owners should be free to establish their own conditions regarding the presence of personal defense weapons on their own property. We oppose all laws at any level of government restricting, registering, or monitoring the ownership, manufacture, or transfer of firearms or ammunition.
    2.0 ECONOMIC LIBERTY
    Libertarians want all members of society to have abundant opportunities to achieve economic success. A free and competitive market allocates resources in the most efficient manner. Each person has the right to offer goods and services to others on the free market. The only proper role of government in the economic realm is to protect property rights, adjudicate disputes, and provide a legal framework in which voluntary trade is protected. All efforts by government to redistribute wealth, or to control or manage trade, are improper in a free society.

    2.1 Property and Contract

    As respect for property rights is fundamental to maintaining a free and prosperous society, it follows that the freedom to contract to obtain, retain, profit from, manage, or dispose of one’s property must also be upheld. Libertarians would free property owners from government restrictions on their rights to control and enjoy their property, as long as their choices do not harm or infringe on the rights of others. Eminent domain, civil asset forfeiture, governmental limits on profits, governmental production mandates, and governmental controls on prices of goods and services (including wages, rents, and interest) are abridgements of such fundamental rights. For voluntary dealings among private entities, parties should be free to choose with whom they trade and set whatever trade terms are mutually agreeable.

    2.2 Environment

    Competitive free markets and property rights stimulate the technological innovations and behavioral changes required to protect our environment and ecosystems. Private landowners and conservation groups have a vested interest in maintaining natural resources. Governments are unaccountable for damage done to our environment and have a terrible track record when it comes to environmental protection. Protecting the environment requires a clear definition and enforcement of individual rights and responsibilities regarding resources like land, water, air, and wildlife. Where damages can be proven and quantified in a court of law, restitution to the injured parties must be required.

    2.3 Energy and Resources

    While energy is needed to fuel a modern society, government should not be subsidizing any particular form of energy. We oppose all government control of energy pricing, allocation, and production.

    2.4 Government Finance and Spending

    All persons are entitled to keep the fruits of their labor. We call for the repeal of the income tax, the abolishment of the Internal Revenue Service and all federal programs and services not required under the U.S. Constitution. We oppose any legal requirements forcing employers to serve as tax collectors. We support any initiative to reduce or abolish any tax, and oppose any increase on any tax for any reason. To the extent possible, we advocate that all public services be funded in a voluntary manner.

    2.5 Government Debt

    Government should not incur debt, which burdens future generations without their consent. We support the passage of a “Balanced Budget Amendment” to the U.S. Constitution, provided that the budget is balanced exclusively by cutting expenditures, and not by raising taxes.

    2.6 Government Employees

    We favor repealing any requirement that one must join or pay dues to a union as a condition of government employment. We advocate replacing defined-benefit pensions with defined-contribution plans, as are commonly offered in the private sector, so as not to impose debt on future generations without their consent.

    2.7 Money and Financial Markets

    We favor free-market banking, with unrestricted competition among banks and depository institutions of all types. Markets are not actually free unless fraud is vigorously combated. Those who enjoy the possibility of profits must not impose risks of losses upon others, such as through government guarantees or bailouts. We support ending federal student loan guarantees and special treatment of student loan debt in bankruptcy proceedings. Individuals engaged in voluntary exchange should be free to use as money any mutually agreeable commodity or item. We support a halt to inflationary monetary policies and unconstitutional legal tender laws.

    2.8 Marketplace Freedom

    Libertarians support free markets. We defend the right of individuals to form corporations, cooperatives and other types of entities based on voluntary association. We oppose all forms of government subsidies and bailouts to business, labor, or any other special interest. Government should not compete with private enterprise.

    2.9 Licensing

    Libertarians support the right of every person to earn an honest and peaceful living through the free and voluntary exchange of goods and services. Accordingly, we oppose occupational and other licensing laws that infringe on this right or treat it as a state-granted privilege. We encourage certifications by voluntary associations of professionals.

    2.10 Sex Work

    The Libertarian Party supports the decriminalization of prostitution. We assert the right of consenting adults to provide sexual services to clients for compensation, and the right of clients to purchase sexual services from consenting sex workers.

    2.11 Labor Markets

    Employment and compensation agreements between private employers and employees are outside the scope of government, and these contracts should not be encumbered by government-mandated benefits or social engineering. We support the right of private employers and employees to choose whether or not to bargain with each other through a labor union. Bargaining should be free of government interference, such as compulsory arbitration or imposing an obligation to bargain.

    2.12 Education

    Education is best provided by the free market, achieving greater quality, accountability, and efficiency with more diversity of choice. Recognizing that the education of children is a parental responsibility, we would restore authority to parents to determine the education of their children, without interference from government. Parents should have control of and responsibility for all funds expended for their children’s education.

    2.13 Health Care

    We favor a free market health care system. We recognize the freedom of individuals to determine the level of health insurance they want (if any), the level of health care they want, the care providers they want, the medicines and treatments they will use and all other aspects of their medical care, including end-of-life decisions. People should be free to purchase health insurance across state lines.

    2.14 Retirement and Income Security

    Retirement planning is the responsibility of the individual, not the government. Libertarians would phase out the current government-sponsored Social Security system and transition to a private voluntary system. The proper and most effective source of help for the poor is the voluntary efforts of private groups and individuals. We believe members of society will become even more charitable and civil society will be strengthened as government reduces its activity in this realm.
    3.0 SECURING LIBERTY
    The protection of individual rights is the only proper purpose of government. Government is constitutionally limited so as to prevent the infringement of individual rights by the government itself. The principle of non-initiation of force should guide the relationships between governments.

    3.1 National Defense

    We support the maintenance of a sufficient military to defend the United States against aggression. The United States should both avoid entangling alliances and abandon its attempts to act as policeman for the world. We oppose any form of compulsory national service.

    3.2 Internal Security and Individual Rights

    The defense of the country requires that we have adequate intelligence to detect and to counter threats to domestic security. This requirement must not take priority over maintaining the civil liberties of our citizens. The Constitution and Bill of Rights shall not be suspended even during time of war. Intelligence agencies that legitimately seek to preserve the security of the nation must be subject to oversight and transparency. We oppose the government’s use of secret classifications to keep from the public information that it should have, especially that which shows that the government has violated the law. We oppose the use of torture and other cruel and unusual punishments, without exception.

    3.3 International Affairs

    American foreign policy should seek an America at peace with the world. Our foreign policy should emphasize defense against attack from abroad and enhance the likelihood of peace by avoiding foreign entanglements. We would end the current U.S. government policy of foreign intervention, including military and economic aid. We recognize the right of all people to resist tyranny and defend themselves and their rights. We condemn the use of force, and especially the use of terrorism, against the innocent, regardless of whether such acts are committed by governments or by political or revolutionary groups.

    3.4 Free Trade and Migration

    We support the removal of governmental impediments to free trade. Political freedom and escape from tyranny demand that individuals not be unreasonably constrained by government in the crossing of political boundaries. Economic freedom demands the unrestricted movement of human as well as financial capital across national borders.

    3.5 Rights and Discrimination

    Libertarians embrace the concept that all people are born with certain inherent rights. We reject the idea that a natural right can ever impose an obligation upon others to fulfill that “right.” We condemn bigotry as irrational and repugnant. Government should neither deny nor abridge any individual’s human right based upon sex, wealth, ethnicity, creed, age, national origin, personal habits, political preference, or sexual orientation. Members of private organizations retain their rights to set whatever standards of association they deem appropriate, and individuals are free to respond with ostracism, boycotts, and other free market solutions.

    3.6 Representative Government

    We support election systems that are more representative of the electorate at the federal, state and local levels. As private voluntary groups, political parties should be free to establish their own rules for nomination procedures, primaries and conventions. We call for an end to any tax-financed subsidies to candidates or parties and the repeal of all laws which restrict voluntary financing of election campaigns. We oppose laws that effectively exclude alternative candidates and parties, deny ballot access, gerrymander districts, or deny the voters their right to consider all legitimate alternatives. We advocate initiative, referendum, recall and repeal when used as popular checks on government.

    3.7 Self-Determination

    Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of individual liberty, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to agree to such new governance as to them shall seem most likely to protect their liberty.
    4.0 OMISSIONS
    Our silence about any other particular government law, regulation, ordinance, directive, edict, control, regulatory agency, activity, or machination should not be construed to imply approval.

  34. #30
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian4Liberty View Post

    https://www.twitter.com/Jorgensen4PO...17713291956224

    “#BlackLivesMatter means standing in solidarity with a mourning black community as we fight together to end qualified immunity, police brutality, sentencing disparities, and the war on drugs, not support of any “organization” by that name.”

    She tried to clarify that she doesn’t mean any specific BLM organization, but then she specified “mourning black community” which is a sore spot with activists who have worked for Police reform for years, only to see this turned into a race thing instead. It’s pandering, which politicians do, but it raises questions from libertarians who wonder what the true agenda is. We have seen some Libertarians come out of the closet recently as “we never liked Ron Paul or his ilk, we are really leftists.”
    I know you're not saying she's anti-Paul but everyone can be sure Jo Jorgensen is actually "a huge Ron Paul fan" going back to the 1990s. I've heard her say it in multiple interviews (I think on Kokesh's youtube channel she says it or it was the Free Talk Live interview). But if you want something along those lines see here (obviously misspoke "Senator" instead of "Congressman"): https://news.bitcoin.com/2020-libert...d-19-response/

    "So first of all, it should have never been created. Second, it took a small problem and made it much larger. And third, the first thing I would do if I was President of the United States would be to audit the Federal Reserve.

    I would seek advice from former Senator Ron Paul and ask him his recommendation on who should be in charge of that investigation committee. Eventually, I’d like to see the Fed abolished. Because through the Federal Reserve we get money created out of thin air, which is basically the equivalent of counterfeit money.
    ...
    So a number of people say that they want to back USD with gold. That would be a step in the right direction, but that is not enough. We have competition in cars, competition with computers, and competitive grocery stores. Why not have competition with money? So the people have access to something that is more planned and a monetary system they can better predict. Right now what we have is money that’s created under the whims of Congress and the Federal Reserve Chair.

    I would act in support of a free market in currencies.

    ...
    First I would enact Ron Paul’s Free Competition in Currency Act. This would repeal legal tender laws and taxes on coins and monetary metals. And it would repeal the prohibition on coining money
    Actually outside of the open borders her entire platform is very, very solid. But she made a very stupid mistake with this Tweet.

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-14-2018, 08:19 PM
  2. Replies: 98
    Last Post: 04-03-2013, 06:58 AM
  3. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-24-2012, 08:10 AM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-30-2010, 05:26 PM
  5. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-07-2008, 11:10 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •