Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: AUMF vs. Declaration of War - What is the difference?

  1. #1

    AUMF vs. Declaration of War - What is the difference?

    What is the difference between an AUMF vs. a declaration of war?

    I have done some research but it still seems murky. from what i understand a dec. of war is almost a reactive declaration. it is stating that a state of war exists... as if we have been attacked already whereas an AUMF is a proactive declaration and states that the president can use force but not necessarily that a state of war already exists.. i.e. we may or may not have already been attacked.

    So if that is the case... would AUMF's be unconstitutional or constitutional? If congress passed an AUMF it is kind of like a declaration of and kind of not...
    Please consider donating to the Mises Caucus today. We are TAKING OVER the LP.

    We have big plans including creating a program to bring libertarians like Maj Toure and Tom Woods to college campuses.

    We have several LP Mises Caucus Members who won elected office in 2020 including multiple City Council seats.

    Your recurring donation is what helps us to set these ideas into motion.

    Donate today at www.TakeHumanAction.com



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    In my opinion: The international laws of war have been formulated over centuries. These laws involve most actions that are germane to a state of war, covering declarations of war (jus ad bellum) and the waging of war (jus in bello). The latter necessarily follows the former, and if the former principle is not assumed/declared, then the latter legal principle(s) will not apply. Thus, by engaging in AUMF, instead of declaring a war, the State avoids assuming the legal duties regarding the waging of war.

    War crimes? As a matter of definition war crimes can only occur during a state of war. We are not at war, merely engaging in an AUMF. An AUMF is a euphemistic legal strategy that allows the state to enter what is effectively a state of war without incurring the limitations on its behavior that would accompany the declaration of a war. Of course, the USCMJ would still apply to service members, so this fact could be concealed by selective prosecution of service members for 'war crimes,' but note how far down the chain of command. So much for the implications re: international law.

    Regarding the US Constitution? The term, "AUMF" does not appear. It is conceded that the term is different from a declaration of war. "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
    Last edited by bv3; 04-18-2020 at 01:33 PM.



Similar Threads

  1. Congress Should Vote Down the AUMF for the War Against ISIS
    By Brian4Liberty in forum World News & Affairs
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-06-2014, 01:46 AM
  2. Paul Broun on NDAA, AUMF
    By TaftFan in forum Liberty Campaigns
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 06-14-2013, 09:20 PM
  3. Durbin wants to amend 2001 AUMF
    By Warlord in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-07-2013, 03:30 AM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-17-2010, 02:31 PM
  5. What difference would a declaration of war have made?
    By erblo in forum Ron Paul: On the Issues
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-18-2007, 05:48 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •