Articles of Impeachment - Full Text

[Swordsmyth]

..

That's nice.

It doesn't mean we should allow Congress to destroy the Constitution with an illegitimate impeachment.

Let me know if they ever impeach him for an actual impeachable offense.

[CCTelander]

All

modern presidents
have exceeded
constitutional limitations
on their power
and thus
could have,
and maybe should have,
been impeached.

-Ron Paul 2019

..

Not only that but but the supporters of both Nixon and Clinton claimed that those impeachments were "coups" and engaged in similar hyperbolic prognostications of doom as are being flung around this time. Partisans do love their melodrama, it seems.

[Swordsmyth]

Not only that but but the supporters of both Nixon and Clinton claimed that those impeachments were "coups" and engaged in similar hyperbolic prognostications of doom as are being flung around this time. Partisans do love their melodrama, it seems.

LOL

There is no comparison.

Nice try though.

RON PAUL: 'Thank God For The Deep State' - CIA Celebrates Coup Against Trump

[CCTelander]

LOL

There is no comparison.

Nice try though.

RON PAUL: 'Thank God For The Deep State' - CIA Celebrates Coup Against Trump

Yes, yes we know. This "coup" is different and will no doubt usher in the end of civilization as we know it. Much like every succeeding election is "the most important election in our lifetimes," and if the wrong cadidate wins it's all over. Whatever.

No, most likely we'll just be "treated" to 4 more years of Trump (no biggie. One sociopathic, authoritarian POS is as good as another), things will continue as before (meaning continue to get worse) and all this whiney hue and cry over this nothing burger impeachment will have served nicely as cover for TPTB while they diligently work to make things worse. Be proud of that. You own it.

[devil21]

That's nice.

It doesn't mean we should allow Congress to destroy the Constitution with an illegitimate impeachment.

Let me know if they ever impeach him for an actual impeachable offense.

But actually destroying it with Trump sponsored USMCA is a-ok, though right? Now THAT is an impeachable offense, since he took an oath to defend and uphold it, but of course this is all a manufactured distraction for the dumbs.

[Swordsmyth]

But actually destroying it with Trump sponsored USMCA is a-ok, though right? Now THAT is an impeachable offense, since he took an oath to defend and uphold it, but of course this is all a manufactured distraction for the dumbs.

The USMCA is bad but it doesn't destroy it like this impeachment would.

Let me know if they try to impeach him for the USMCA.

[PAF]

The USMCA is bad but it doesn't destroy it like this impeachment would.

Let me know if they try to impeach him for the USMCA.

Backpedaling already, I see. That use of the word but again... butt, butt...

[devil21]

The USMCA is bad but it doesn't destroy it like this impeachment would.

You lose any tiny shred of credibility you possibly had when you suggest that impeachment theater destroys the constitution but ushering in the North American Union doesn't. Your real global government agenda shines through with statements like that.

[Swordsmyth]

Backpedaling already, I see. That use of the word but again... butt, butt...

Pathetic, as usual.

[Swordsmyth]

You lose any tiny shred of credibility you possibly had when you suggest that impeachment theater destroys the constitution but ushering in the North American Union doesn't.

The USMCA is NOT the NAU and the President and the Senate are empowered to negotiate and enter into treaties.

This impeachment on made up crimes that didn't happen even if they were crimes is a total destruction of the rule of law and the Constitution.

[PAF]

Pathetic, as usual.

Yet (not but or butt), standing on principle.

[Swordsmyth]

Yet (not but or butt), standing on principle.

Not in the least.

There is no principle to stand on in supporting this coup.

[PAF]

The USMCA is NOT the NAU

Quoted here, folks.

[Swordsmyth]

Quoted here, folks.

It isn't.

It may be an attempt to move towards it but it isn't it.

[PAF]

Not in the least.

There is no principle to stand on in supporting this coup.

I am not the least bit interested in this impeachment circus, as it stands and in the news. It is all a distraction. Face the facts, trump signed that POS, the dems AND repugs are licking their chops. I believe you are here to defend the status quo, throwing slivers of bones here and there to keep up shallow appearances.

That USMCA will usher in the likes of what few understand.

[CCTelander]

You lose any tiny shred of credibility you possibly had when you suggest that impeachment theater destroys the constitution but ushering in the North American Union doesn't. Your real global government agenda shines through with statements like that.

He had any credibility to begin with? Huh.

[Swordsmyth]

I am not the least bit interested in this impeachment circus, as it stands and in the news. It is all a distraction. Face the facts, trump signed that POS, the dems AND repugs are licking their chops. I believe you are here to defend the status quo, throwing slivers of bones here and there to keep up shallow appearances.

That USMCA will usher in the likes of what few understand.

You are the one defending the status quo and promoting the agenda of the deepstate.

[acptulsa]

You are the one defending the status quo and promoting the agenda of the deepstate.

Are you really stupid enough to believe that?

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...se-Impeachment

[Swordsmyth]

Are you really stupid enough to believe that?

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...se-Impeachment

Congress and the deepstate are behind all of those things and this impeachment empowers Congress and the deepstate at the expense of the Constitution and the rule of law.

[acptulsa]

Congress and the deepstate are behind all of those things and this impeachment empowers Congress and the deepstate at the expense of the Constitution and the rule of law.

And how is PAF "defending the status quo and promoting the agenda" again?

No bland spamming of slander, please. If you're going to insist on being an ass, it's time you learned to back it up.

[Origanalist]

You are the one defending the status quo and promoting the agenda of the deepstate.

What?

[CCTelander]

And how is PAF "defending the status quo and promoting the agenda" again?

No bland spamming of slander, please. If you're going to insist on being an ass, it's time you learned to back it up.

Back it up? Why should he bother doing that? He seems to be able tp post vicious, hateful lies about other members with impunity. Why bother even making a semblance of an effort to back them up under those circumstances?

[CCTelander]

What?

I know, right?

[acptulsa]

Back it up? Why should he bother doing that? He seems to be able tp post vicious, hateful lies about other members with impunity. Why bother even making a semblance of an effort to back them up under those circumstances?

The odd part is the administration seeming to back this attempt to turn this place into a ghost town.

If that's what @Bryan wants...

[CCTelander]

The odd part is the administration seeming to back this attempt to turn this place into a ghost town.

If that's what @Bryan wants...

I admit that that does, at times, seem to be the case, but there are other plausible explanations. The possibility that losing such a prolific poster could lead to a sufficient loss of traffic that revenue could drop below the level necessary to keep the place afloat might be one example.

[CCTelander]

///

[presence]

all this whiney hue and cry over this nothing burger impeachment will have served nicely as cover for TPTB while they diligently work to make things worse. Be proud of that. You own it.

indeed.

3/4 Trillion defense act passed this week 377 to 48... financed by China.

not a half $#@! given by anyone on either side of the political spectrum

to put in perspective...

bumper-to-bumper... trumpeteers could have built a border wall of tractor trailer trucks

1000 miles long

packed to GVW capacity with crispy new $1 bills for the same

[Swordsmyth]

Back it up? Why should he bother doing that? He seems to be able tp post vicious, hateful lies about other members with impunity. Why bother even making a semblance of an effort to back them up under those circumstances?

You are describing PAF?

[Swordsmyth]

And how is PAF "defending the status quo and promoting the agenda" again?

No bland spamming of slander, please. If you're going to insist on being an ass, it's time you learned to back it up.

He's here pushing the idea of that we should not oppose the impeachment coup because of the USMCA and making baseless accusations against me for pointing out that the impeachment coup is a much greater threat.

He's not the only one.

[CCTelander]

...supporters of both Nixon and Clinton claimed that those impeachments were "coups" and engaged in similar hyperbolic prognostications of doom as are being flung around this time. Partisans do love their melodrama, it seems.

Yes, yes we know. This "coup" is different and will no doubt usher in the end of civilization as we know it. Much like every succeeding election is "the most important election in our lifetimes," and if the wrong cadidate wins it's all over. Whatever.

No, most likely we'll just be "treated" to 4 more years of Trump (no biggie. One sociopathic, authoritarian POS is as good as another), things will continue as before (meaning continue to get worse) and all this whiney hue and cry over this nothing burger impeachment will have served nicely as cover for TPTB while they diligently work to make things worse. Be proud of that. You own it.

These just needed to be repeated, to add some semblance of reason to this whole mess.