Bill to deregulate SBR's

[teenlibert_1776]

https://marshall.house.gov/media/pre...e-shooting-act

“Opponents of the Second Amendment want to use bureaucracy and regulations to obstruct citizens attempting to exercise their God-given right to keep and bear arms. The firearms addressed in this bill are commonly used for hunting, personal defense, and competitive shooting," said Dr. Marshall. "Since I came to Congress, I have fought tooth and nail to stop attempts that would strip our Constitutional right to keep and bear arms. This bill will eliminate regulations designed not to protect Americans, but to deny them their Constitutional rights.”

[PAF]

It is not a constitutional right, it is a natural right. The 2ndA was not for the people, but for government to keep their grubby hands off.

Where the writers of the BoR failed is that there is no provision for violators.

See 18 USC 241 and 242.

[Swordsmyth]

It is not a constitutional right, it is a natural right.

It is both.
The Constitution was created to list and protect natural rights.

[PAF]

It is both.
The Constitution was created to list and protect natural rights.

No. The constitution was written to centralize power. The BoR’s were amended, without provision to prosecute violators of it, in order to persuade folks to ratify it.

The constitution had nothing to do with protecting individual rights, freedom from government intrusion, etc.