Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Supreme Court Rules Gun Maker May Be Held Liable, Despite Vaccine Makers Having ZERO Liability

  1. #1

    Supreme Court Rules Gun Maker May Be Held Liable, Despite Vaccine Makers Having ZERO Liability

    (title altered due to length, wouldn't fit)
    Supreme Court rules gun maker may be held responsible for death of children in mass shooting, even though VACCINE makers have zero liability
    https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-11-...ne-makers.html

    (Natural News) In response to liberal anti-gun hysteria, the United States Supreme Court has decided to allow a lawsuit filed by the alleged victims of the Sandy Hook massacre to move forward in suing Remington Arms Co., the manufacturer of the firearms supposedly used by Adam Lanza to commit mass murder.

    Rejecting arguments made by Remington that the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act of 2005 effectively shields the company from liability in the event that its products are misused, the Supreme Court has declined to comment on the matter, which means that the case has been given the green light to proceed.

    Unlike the vaccine industry, which is fully protected against all liability involving injuries and deaths caused by vaccines, Remington could soon face legal repercussions simply for selling firearms to the American public.

    Because Lanza is said to have donned multiple Bushmaster XM-15 rifles, a popular AR-15-style rifle manufactured by Remington, during his shooting spree, Remington could have to compensate those who were injured during the melee, as well as the remaining family members of those who were reported dead.

    According to these victims and survivors, Lanza chose this particular model of rifle because of “its military and assaultive qualities, in particular, its efficiency in inflicting mass casualties.” They claim that Remington had previously “marketed” the XM-15 rifle “in association with the military,” which makes the company guilty of a crime.

    The Connecticut Supreme Court had put the case on hold pending the Supreme Court’s review, which had the potential to see the case thrown out. But because of the Supreme Court’s refusal to get involved, it will no move forward, which has 2020 Democratic presidential hopeful Joe Biden celebrating.

    “There’s a straight line from those brave Newtown parents, to the activism of the Parkland students, to the millions of others who’ve said ‘enough’ in the long years between and since those tragedies. They’re using every tool of democracy: in the streets, at the polls, and today, in the courts,” Biden is quoted as saying.

    How many 2020 presidential contenders are also willing to take up the charge in repealing the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NVCIA)?

    If elected president, Biden has promised to repeal the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act of 2005 in its entirety, as well as “take other critical steps that we know cut down on gun violence.” In Biden’s opinion, this includes “banning and buying back assault weapons, expanding background checks, and closing key sales loopholes, just to start.”

    However, Biden has yet to comment about repealing the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NVCIA), which completely exempts the vaccine industry from facing any legal scrutiny over its products, which have maimed and killed millions of innocent children over the years.

    In case you’re unfamiliar with it, the NVCIA allows vaccine manufacturers to sell highly dangerous products completely risk-free, placing all of the burden on taxpayers to foot the bill in rare cases where a kangaroo “vaccine court” decides to award the family of injured and dead children at least some compensation for their losses.

    Neither Biden nor any of the other Democratic contenders have brought up the NVCIA even once, at this point – and to be fair, neither has President Trump. But in light of this latest move by the Supreme Court against Remington, it only seems fair that the vaccine industry also be held accountable for its role in harming and killing children with vaccine “medicine.”

    So, politicians: Who’s it going to be? Which one of you will be the first to take a stand in defense of the children who are having their lives destroyed by Big Vaccine?

    ...
    Full article at link.

    ---

    *rubs hands together deviously* Well this ought to be fun...
    1776 > 1984

    The FAILURE of the United States Government to operate and maintain an
    Honest Money System , which frees the ordinary man from the clutches of the money manipulators, is the single largest contributing factor to the World's current Economic Crisis.

    The Elimination of Privacy is the Architecture of Genocide

    Belief, Money, and Violence are the three ways all people are controlled

    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    Our central bank is not privately owned.



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    Guns are used to kill intentionally , not through fault of the guns design or composition.
    Vaccines kill and destroy lives trough fault of design and composition.


    The evidence that Mandated Vaccines save lives is anecdotal at best.
    The evidence that Guns save lives is voluminous.

    The only reason we are still marginally free is because we are armed, mandated vaccines do not
    save populations from genocide, they don't guarantee the right to life , guns do.

  4. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by DamianTV View Post
    (title altered due to length, wouldn't fit)
    Supreme Court rules gun maker may be held responsible for death of children in mass shooting, even though VACCINE makers have zero liability
    https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-11-...ne-makers.html



    Full article at link.

    ---

    *rubs hands together deviously* Well this ought to be fun...
    Here's the real question. What good is a conservative majority on the SCOTUS if it will make absurd rulings like this? And understand the theory under which Remington is being sued. It's not for making the gun. It's for advertising the gun as "manly." Videogame manufacturers can't be sued for glorifying gun violence. Movie studios can't be sued for glorifying gun violence. But gun manufactures can be sued, not for glorifying gun violence, but glorifying their own product?
    9/11 Thermate experiments

    Winston Churchhill on why the U.S. should have stayed OUT of World War I

    "I am so %^&*^ sick of this cult of Ron Paul. The Paulites. What is with these %^&*^ people? Why are there so many of them?" YouTube rant by "TheAmazingAtheist"

    "We as a country have lost faith and confidence in freedom." -- Ron Paul

    "It can be a challenge to follow the pronouncements of President Trump, as he often seems to change his position on any number of items from week to week, or from day to day, or even from minute to minute." -- Ron Paul
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian4Liberty View Post
    The road to hell is paved with good intentions. No need to make it a superhighway.
    Quote Originally Posted by osan View Post
    The only way I see Trump as likely to affect any real change would be through martial law, and that has zero chances of success without strong buy-in by the JCS at the very minimum.

  5. #4
    This is a very bad precedence being set. Here is another example where man interpreting the law has been clearly compromised by an underhanded agenda.
    My website: https://www.theherbsofthefield.com/

    "No one is useless in this world who lightens the burdens of another.” ~ Charles Dickens

  6. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
    Here's the real question. What good is a conservative majority on the SCOTUS if it will make absurd rulings like this? And understand the theory under which Remington is being sued. It's not for making the gun. It's for advertising the gun as "manly." Videogame manufacturers can't be sued for glorifying gun violence. Movie studios can't be sued for glorifying gun violence. But gun manufactures can be sued, not for glorifying gun violence, but glorifying their own product?
    The law contains an exception for gun companies that do something illegal and since the plaintiffs claim the gun company did something illegal and that claim has not been adjudicated it would be unheard of for SCOTUS to rule on that claim before it went to trial.
    Last edited by Swordsmyth; 11-19-2019 at 05:46 PM.
    Never attempt to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and annoys the pig.

    Robert Heinlein

    Give a man an inch and right away he thinks he's a ruler

    Groucho Marx

    I love mankind…it’s people I can’t stand.

    Linus, from the Peanuts comic

    You cannot have liberty without morality and morality without faith

    Alexis de Torqueville

    Those who fail to learn from the past are condemned to repeat it.
    Those who learn from the past are condemned to watch everybody else repeat it

    A Zero Hedge comment

  7. #6
    The Supreme Court didn't issue a ruling. It simply chose not to hear Remington's appeal at this time.

    Edit: added "not"
    Last edited by Sonny Tufts; 11-20-2019 at 01:47 PM.
    We have long had death and taxes as the two standards of inevitability. But there are those who believe that death is the preferable of the two. "At least," as one man said, "there's one advantage about death; it doesn't get worse every time Congress meets."
    Erwin N. Griswold

    Taxes: Of life's two certainties, the only one for which you can get an automatic extension.
    Anonymous

  8. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Swordsmyth View Post
    The law contains an exception for gun companies that do something illegal and since the plaintiffs claim the gun company did something illegal and that claim has not been adjudicated it would be unheard of for SCOTUS to rule on that claim before it went to trial.
    The "illegal" thing Remington did was to exercise it's 1st amendment right to say that guns are "macho." Video game companies and movie studios have a 1st amendment right to say that but not gun companies apparently.
    9/11 Thermate experiments

    Winston Churchhill on why the U.S. should have stayed OUT of World War I

    "I am so %^&*^ sick of this cult of Ron Paul. The Paulites. What is with these %^&*^ people? Why are there so many of them?" YouTube rant by "TheAmazingAtheist"

    "We as a country have lost faith and confidence in freedom." -- Ron Paul

    "It can be a challenge to follow the pronouncements of President Trump, as he often seems to change his position on any number of items from week to week, or from day to day, or even from minute to minute." -- Ron Paul
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian4Liberty View Post
    The road to hell is paved with good intentions. No need to make it a superhighway.
    Quote Originally Posted by osan View Post
    The only way I see Trump as likely to affect any real change would be through martial law, and that has zero chances of success without strong buy-in by the JCS at the very minimum.

  9. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by jmdrake View Post
    The "illegal" thing Remington did was to exercise it's 1st amendment right to say that guns are "macho." Video game companies and movie studios have a 1st amendment right to say that but not gun companies apparently.
    I agree that the law that is being claimed to have been broken is a violation of the 1stA but it would be very unlikely for SCOTUS to rule on that issue before lower courts did.
    Never attempt to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and annoys the pig.

    Robert Heinlein

    Give a man an inch and right away he thinks he's a ruler

    Groucho Marx

    I love mankind…it’s people I can’t stand.

    Linus, from the Peanuts comic

    You cannot have liberty without morality and morality without faith

    Alexis de Torqueville

    Those who fail to learn from the past are condemned to repeat it.
    Those who learn from the past are condemned to watch everybody else repeat it

    A Zero Hedge comment



  10. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  11. #9
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	FB_IMG_1574548865534.jpg 
Views:	0 
Size:	29.7 KB 
ID:	7229
    Openly Straight Man, Danke, Awarded Top Rated Influencer

    Ⅎ˥ƎSWIH ˥˥I⋊ ⊥,NᗡIᗡ NƎI⊥SԀƎ

    Quiz: Test Your "Income" Tax IQ!


    Short Income Tax Video

    The Income Tax Is An Excise, And Excise Taxes Are Privilege Taxes

    The Federalist Papers, No. 15:

    Except as to the rule of appointment, the United States have an indefinite discretion to make requisitions for men and money; but they have no authority to raise either by regulations extending to the individual citizens of America.



Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-08-2017, 11:43 AM
  2. US Supreme Court Rules Government Officers Liable
    By mrsat_98 in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-22-2014, 05:44 PM
  3. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 03-30-2013, 01:51 PM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-09-2011, 11:48 AM
  5. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-26-2011, 06:27 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •