Rand Paul Drops the Whistleblower's Name Live During a Radio Interview

[revgen]

Rand Paul Goes There – Drops ‘Whistleblower’ Eric Ciaramella’s Name on Live Broadcast – Demands Testimony (AUDIO)
by Cristina Laila November 13, 2019



Rand Paul finally went there — after threatening to out the CIA whistleleaker, the Kentucky Senator dropped Eric Ciaramella’s name during an interview on DC-based WMAL.



“I think Eric Ciaramella needs to be pulled in for testimony, and then I think it will be ultimately determined at that point,” Rand Paul said.

“But I think he is a person of interest in the sense that he was at the Ukraine desk when Joe Biden was there when Hunter Biden was working for the Ukrainian oligarch. So simply for that alone, I think he’s a material witness who needs to be brought in.”

“I think the whistleblower needs to come in because he needs to be asked about, did he know about the conflict of interest?” Paul added.

“He was there during the time of Joe Biden and Hunter Biden working for $50,000 a month for a Ukrainian oligarch, so he needs to be asked about that.”

Pencil neck Schiff isn’t going to be too happy about this!

Far left activist Attorney Mark Zaid, who represents the so-called ‘whistleblower’ in the Ukraine impeachment inquiry, warned Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) last Tuesday against publicizing the name of the ‘whistleblower’ Eric Ciaramella.

Zaid said Rand Paul and President Trump would be responsible for any harm that befalls his client.

Senator Paul joined Bret Baier last Tuesday and said there is NO LAW that prevents him from disclosing the identity of the leaker.

Rand Paul also argued that the 6th Amendment of the Constitution affords you the right to confront your accuser in court.

Freshman Republican Dan Bishop also dropped Eric Ciaramella’s name this week arguing “He’s not Voldemort…he’s a Deep State conspirator.”

Thank you Senator Paul and Rep. Bishop!

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...stimony-audio/

[TheTexan]

Do we know yet who the whistleblower is? I wonder who it might be.

Until he or she reveals himself I guess we'll probably never know.

[Brian4Liberty]

Remember the good old days when all of the politicians, pundits and media refused to name whistleblowers like Snowden and Manning? I don’t either.

[Swordsmyth]

Remember the good old days when all of the politicians, pundits and media refused to name whistleblowers like Snowden and Manning? I don’t either.

I remember when we didn't have members of this site agreeing with the MSM that secret accusers are a good idea.

[Origanalist]

I remember when we didn't have members of this site agreeing with the MSM that secret accusers are a good idea.

Do you? Please show us that time. I myself can remember a time when people could make a post without trying to stir up $#@!.

[TheTexan]

I myself can remember a time when people could make a post without trying to stir up $#@!.

Ah, good 'ol March 2016.

Those were the days.

[Dary]

Try typing Eric Ciaramella's name correctly into a YouTube comment and watch your comment disappear.

So if that ain't the guy, why does YouTube keep deleting comments with his name spelled correctly?

Toooo funny.

[Swordsmyth]

Ah, good 'ol March 2016.

Those were the days.

They were saner.
TDS is progressive. (pun intended and accurate)

[Brian4Liberty]

Ah, good 'ol March 2016.

Those were the days.

[r3volution 3.0]

How exciting..

Where do I catch next week's episode of the ongoing fake partisan nonsense soap opera?

[Anti Globalist]

Remember the good old days when all of the politicians, pundits and media refused to name whistleblowers like Snowden and Manning? I don’t either.

Its almost as if politicians and pundits are hypocrites.

[r3volution 3.0]

This reminds of me of AF's recent thread.

It's simply impossible for a Trump person to criticize any other Trump person or reject any pro-Trump narrative.

...no matter how obviously insane he or it may be.

It's sad, but it's also none of my concern.

[CCTelander]

This reminds of me of AF's recent thread.

It's simply impossible for a Trump person to criticize any other Trump person or reject any pro-Trump narrative.

...no matter how obviously insane he or it may be.

It's sad, but it's also none of my concern.

And they have the unmitigated gall to constantly accuse Trump detractors of having some sort of mental illness (TDS).

Trump uber alles.

[Swordsmyth]

This reminds of me of AF's recent thread.

It's simply impossible for a Trump person to criticize any other Trump person or reject any pro-Trump narrative.

...no matter how obviously insane he or it may be.

It's sad, but it's also none of my concern.

And they have the unmitigated gall to constantly accuse Trump detractors of having some sort of mental illness (TDS).

Trump uber alles.

The fact that you two (you are two different people and not two sockpuppets of the same troll, right?) believe what he said is a further demonstration of your TDS.

[r3volution 3.0]

The fact that you two (you are two different people and not two sockpuppets of the same troll, right?) believe what he said is a further demonstration of your TDS.

...

...you aren't French by chance?

[Swordsmyth]

...

...you aren't French by chance?

I'm as American as you can get and I have many different European ancestors but the closest I get to French is a little Norman.

[r3volution 3.0]

And they have the unmitigated gall to constantly accuse Trump detractors of having some sort of mental illness (TDS).
Trump uber alles.

A serious insult to pre-1914 Germany, and one based on silly British propaganda.

The victors do in fact write the history, and also the pop culture references.

That Germany lost that war is an unmitigated catastrophe for civilization.

...but that's another story.