Where is "convicted felons can't own guns" in the constitution?

[tod evans]

No..... the rights should be denied based on the crime. White collar crime shouldn't involve removing someone's rtkba. You should only have your rtkba removed if you have proven yourself to be violent and/or especially if a firearm was used in the commission of a crime (robbing a bank). Or if you are adjudicated mentally ill or incompetent by a court of law with full due process (not red flag laws).

My guess is that if they can't use a gun to commit a violent act (considering a violent past) ,
they will use another tool should they decide to become violent again.

A musket hanging on the mantle is "Using and carrying a firearm during the commission of a felony" under federal law.

Real people/common sense does not apply to laws, how they are worded, enforced or interpreted by the courts.

Given that...............Better all free men armed than one who needs to be forced by fiat to be unarmed.

[pcosmar]

Depends on the crime and severity.

What about shooting the man that Raped your Wife..??

I knew a man doing 40 for it.

[Matt Collins]

What about shooting the man that Raped your Wife..??

I knew a man doing 40 for it.

If he was caught in the act and it was self defense, then yes.

After the fact, no. Vigilante justice isn't really acceptable in an ideal world.... the worst criminals out there are still owed due process, fair trial, etc. You can't just murder someone because they committed an atrocious act.

[pcosmar]

If he was caught in the act and it was self defense, then yes.

After the fact, no. Vigilante justice isn't really acceptable in an ideal world.... the worst criminals out there are still owed due process, fair trial, etc. You can't just murder someone because they committed an atrocious act.

Justifiable Homicide.
I have seen a Judge rule so once..

Several men are inside walls for Justifiable self defense. as well as many innocent of what they are accused.

the system is well beyond phucked.