Ron Paul's positions on immigration have everything to do with this thread. That's exactly what this thread is about. This thread was only started as an attempt to make Ron Paul = trump (or vice versa), by someone whose entire purpose here is to shyll for trump and oppose Ron Paul. So if the OP wants to discuss Ron Paul's immigration policy, it is therefore necessary to discuss how it differs from trump's immigration policy, and why
genuine Ron Paul supporters support Ron Paul's immigration policy, while at the same time, opposing trump's immigration policy. In other words, supporting Ron Paul's immigration policy is to oppose trump's immigration policy.
PAF has already kindly provided Ron Paul's immigration policy, with regards to walling our country in (like communist countries such as north korea and east germany). Let's take the next way in which Ron Paul's immigration policy differs from trump's immigration policy, which is the abuse of those held in US custody. The person shylling for trump claims that there is with trump. But abuse of those in US custody absolutely IS officially part of trump's immigration policy:
https://ktla.com/2019/08/15/9th-circ...not-need-soap/
https://www.rollingstone.com/politic...-trump-850744/
In contrast, one of the issues Ron Paul campaigned on was ending abuse of those in US custody. The shylls will doubtless attempt to argue that Ron Paul was campaigning against torture of those in US custody, on an issue other than immigration. To my knowledge, Ron Paul never spoke directly to the issue of abuse of those in custody with specific regards to immigration policy, but given how consistant Ron Paul is in his positions, there is no doubt that he is opposed to abuse of people held in US custody, regardless of the particular government agency involved:
https://original.antiwar.com/paul/20...on-iraq-abuse/
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/electi...t-over-torture
https://www.thenewamerican.com/print...mp-and-torture
Doubtless the trumpettes and shylls will attempt to claim that there is somehow a difference between people in US custody in concentration camps as part of trump's immigration policy, and people in custody as part of unConstitutional undeclared wars. But people in US custody are people in US custody, no matter why they are in Us custody. And abuse is abuse, torture is torture, no matter what form it takes. The sleep deprivation that people in trump's concentration camps are being subject to is considered a form of torture. And just as those who opposed Ron Paul for opposing torture of those in US custody by claiming that torture isn't really torture, those opposed to Ron Paul will doubtless attempt to claim that this particular form of torture (sleep deprivation) isn't really torture.
Connect With Us