The analogy I gave before was if a guy was falsely accused of rape by two women at his home, one woman says she was raped and the other woman says she heard it from the next room. But there is also a third woman who was there that night and left with the two women and she is 100% sure it could not have happened as they were all together the entire night until they left. She is scared to testify because she is shy and doesn't want to get wrapped up in court, and her friends are trying to get her to falsely testify against him (although there is no proof of this, we know it to be happening).
The question is, if the guy calls up the third girl and says he will take her on a cruise if she goes in and testifies and tells the truth in court, is that obstruction of justice? Bribing a witness? No, of course not.. he IS innocent. He isn't bribing her to do something against the law and lie, he is just trying to get the truth to come out. That is aiding justice.
Trump didn't do anything to obstruct justice. Trump was innocent. Everything he did was in order to help aid justice, so you can't say he obstructed justice. He was trying to save money and time and stop dragging his name through the dirt by people who WE KNOW did illegal $#@! to start the investigation in the first place.
Anybody who is on Amash's side on this one is not thinking clearly. It's called TDS.
Site Information
About Us
- RonPaulForums.com is an independent grassroots outfit not officially connected to Ron Paul but dedicated to his mission. For more information see our Mission Statement.
Connect With Us