Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 43

Thread: A man’s penis becomes a female penis once a man declares himself to be transgender

  1. #1

    Exclamation A man’s penis becomes a female penis once a man declares himself to be transgender

    Transgender Actor Asserts Existence of ‘Biologically Female Penis’

    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...-female-penis/

    21 Feb 2019
    11:10

    A man’s penis becomes a female penis once a man declares himself to be transgender, says Indya Moore, one of the players in a transgender-themed TV show on FX network.

    The declaration is built on the transgender claim that men who say they are women are actually women. But once the men are women, their bodies are women’s bodies. So men’s penises become female penises.

    Moore extended the “female penis” claim by declaring the existence of ‘male vaginas,’ which are presumably carried by women who are living as men.

    The “female penis” claim went viral because it spotlights the logic of the transgender ideology, which insists the Department of Justice must blur and forbid any legal or civic recognition of the biological distinctions between the two different and complementary male and female sexes.

    This policy must be imposed to ensure that children and adults can easily discard their female or male sex by simply declaring they have an opposite-sex “gender,” or have a “gender identity” which is between male and female, say transgender activists.

    A person’s “gender,” say activists, is their personal feeling about being female or male, or something in between. For example, Moore’s feelings are described as “binary,” or neither male nor female.

    Moore’s feelings-are-more-important-than-biology logic was explained by another transgender writer:

    Moore took the often-heard rallying cry “trans women are women” one step further: She argued that if trans women are biological women, by definition, a trans woman’s penis is “a biologically female penis.” That’s a radical point missing in mainstream discussions on trans bodies, as trans women are often made to feel as if they should be ashamed of their genitals if they don’t have a vagina.

    “Don’t use science to justify your bigotry,” Moore tweeted at critics of the “female penis” claim. “The world is way too weird for that s**t.”

    The transgender effort to suppress any recognition that men and women are different and complementary would not matter except for the movement’s political alliance with wealthy progressives and radical feminists who wish to destroy the political power of the male-and-female family.

    For example, editors at the New York Times invited a February 7 op-ed which smeared women who reject the political claim that gender is more important than biology. Author Sophie Lewis described the vast majority of women as “terfs”:

    … the most vocal trans-exclusionary voices are, ostensibly, “feminist” ones, and anti-trans lobbying is a mainstream activity. Case in point: Ms. Parker told the podcast “Feminist Current” that she’d changed her thinking on trans women after spending time on Mumsnet, a site where parents exchange tips on toilet training and how to get their children to eat vegetables. If such a place sounds benign, consider the words of British writer Edie Miller: “Mumsnet is to British transphobia,” she wrote “what 4Chan is to American fascism.”

    The term coined to identify women like Ms. Parker and Dr. Long is TERF, which stands for Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminist. In Britain, TERFs are a powerful force. If, in the United States, the mainstream media has been alarmingly ready to hear “both sides” on the question of trans people’s right to exist, in Britain, TERFs have effectively succeeded in framing the question of trans rights entirely around their own concerns: that is, how these rights for others could contribute to “female erasure.” Many prominent figures in British journalism and politics have been TERFs; British TV has made a sport of endlessly hosting their lurid rudeness and styling it as courage; British newspapers seemingly never tire of broadsides against the menace of “gender ideology.” (With time, the term TERF has become a catchall for all anti-trans feminists, radical or not.)

    Lewis’ radical support for the transgender ideology is logical because she wants to minimize the role of male-and-female families. A review of her book, Full Surrogacy Now: Feminism Against Family, says:

    Rather than making [birth] surrogacy illegal or allowing it to continue as is, Sophie Lewis argues we should be looking to radically transform it. Surrogates should be put front and center, and their rights to the babies they gestate should be expanded to acknowledge that they are more than mere vessels. In doing so we can break down our assumptions that children necessarily belong to those whose genetics they share.

    This might sound like a radical proposal but expanding our idea of who children belong to would be a good thing. Taking collective responsibility for children, rather than only caring for the ones we share DNA with, would radically transform notions of kinship. Adopting this expanded concept of surrogacy helps us to see that it always, as the saying goes, takes a village to raise a child.

    But Lewis’ ‘Terf’ smear is also aimed at lesbians who wish to maintain a clear distinction between women and men. For example, former tennis star Martina Navratilova is being slammed by political activists for her growing opposition to transgenderism in sports. The Guardian reported February.

    The former Wimbledon champion Martina Navratilova has been criticised for “disturbing, upsetting, and deeply transphobic” comments after she argued that allowing transgender women [men] to compete in women’s sporting tournaments was “insane and cheating”.

    The tennis player and gay rights campaigner first drew criticism from equalities activists and trans athletes when she tweeted in December: “You can’t just proclaim yourself a female and be able to compete against women. There must be some standards, and having a penis and competing as a woman would not fit that standard.”



    “To put the argument at its most basic: a man can decide to be female, take hormones if required by whatever sporting organisation is concerned, win everything in sight and perhaps earn a small fortune, and then reverse his decision and go back to [fathering] babies if he so desires.

    “It’s insane and it’s cheating. I am happy to address a transgender woman in whatever form she prefers, but I would not be happy to compete against her. It would not be fair.”

    The Guardian also saw fit to quote a man who is living as a woman describing Navratilova as beset by “transphobia,” as if the former tennis star is mentally ill.

    Navratilova’s criticism of the transgender ideology is increasingly echoed by other women and lesbians who say the ideology will erase society’s understanding of women — and of lesbians — as biologically, sexually, and socially very different from men.

    This “biology matters” argument is also being made by Andrew Sullivan, a British-born gay advocate who led the political push to allow single-sex marriages. In a February article titled “The Nature of Sex,” Sullivan argues that a pending Democratic-drafted bill which provides legal recognition and rights to people who try to live as members of the opposite sex:

    could put all single-sex institutions, events, or groups in legal jeopardy. It could deny lesbians their own unique safe space, free from any trace of men. The bill, in other words, “undermines the fundamental legal groundwork for recognizing and combating sex-based oppression and sex discrimination against women and girls.”

    The transgender push to create legal rights for people living as members of the opposite sex would also threaten the legal rights won by gays and lesbians, Sullivan writes:

    If you abandon biology in the matter of sex and gender altogether, you may help trans people live fuller, less conflicted lives; but you also undermine the very meaning of homosexuality. If you follow the current ideology of gender as entirely fluid, you actually subvert and undermine core arguments in defense of gay rights. “A gay man loves and desires other men, and a lesbian desires and loves other women,” explains Sky Gilbert, a drag queen. “This defines the existential state of being gay. If there is no such thing as ‘male’ or ‘female,’ the entire self-definition of gay identity, which we have spent generations seeking to validate and protect from bigots, collapses.” Contemporary transgender ideology is not a complement to gay rights; in some ways it is in active opposition to them.

    And the truth is that many lesbians and gay men are quite attached to the concept of sex as a natural, biological, material thing. Yes, we are very well aware that sex can be expressed in many different ways. A drag queen and a rugby player are both biologically men, with different expressions of gender. Indeed, a drag queen can also be a rugby player and express his gender identity in a variety of ways, depending on time and place. But he is still a man. And gay men are defined by our attraction to our own biological sex. We are men and attracted to other men. If the concept of a man is deconstructed, so that someone without a penis is a man, then homosexuality itself is deconstructed. Transgender people pose no threat to us, and the vast majority of gay men and lesbians wholeheartedly support protections for transgender people. But transgenderist ideology — including postmodern conceptions of sex and gender — is indeed a threat to homosexuality, because it is a threat to biological sex as a concept.

    A growing percentage of progressives oppose any recognition of the reality that men and women are different. But conservatives and feminists are championing the normal view that women and men are different, Sullivan wrote:Pol

    It might be a sign of the end-times, or simply a function of our currently scrambled politics, but [in late January], four feminist activists — three from a self-described radical feminist organization Women’s Liberation Front — appeared on a panel at the Heritage Foundation. Together they argued that sex was fundamentally biological, and not socially constructed, and that there is a difference between women and trans women that needs to be respected. For this, they were given a rousing round of applause by the Trump supporters, religious-right members, natural law theorists, and conservative intellectuals who comprised much of the crowd. If you think I’ve just discovered an extremely potent strain of weed and am hallucinating, check out the video of the event.

    Polls show the transgender ideology is deeply unpopular, especially among women and parents.

    In 2017, Obama told NPR that his promotion of the transgender ideology made it easier for Donald Trump to win the presidency. Multiple polls show that most Americans wish to help and comfort people who think they are a member of the opposite sex, even as they also reject the transgender ideology’s claim that a person’s legal sex is determined by their feeling of “gender identity,” not by biology. A U.K. survey shows a similar mix of some sympathy for people with lopsided opposition to the ideology.

    The transgender movement is diverse, so its different factions have different goals and priorities. It includes sexual liberationists, progressives, feminists who wish to blur distinctions between the two sexes, and people who glamorize the distinctions between the two sexes. It includes high-profile children, people who are trying to live as members of the opposite sex, and people trying to “detransition” back to their sex, men who demand sex from lesbians, masculine autogynephiles who say are entitled to women’s’ rights, wealthy donors, politicians, political professionals, and revenue-seeking drug-companies and medical service providers.

    Transgender advocates claim that two million Americans say they are transgender to a greater or lesser extent. But very few people who describe themselves as transgender undergo cosmetic surgery of the genitals. Only about 4,118 Americans surgically altered their bodies in hospitals from 2000 to 2014 to appear like members of the opposite sex, according to a pro-transgender medical study.

    Yet the gender ideology is rapidly gaining power, aided by huge donations from wealthy individuals and medical companies. In Ohio, for example, in February, a judge forced parents of a teenage girl to give up custody so she can begin a lifetime of drug treatments and surgery that will allow her to appear as a male.

    The progressive push to bend Americans’ attitudes and their male-and-female civic society around the idea of “gender identity” has already attacked and cracked many of the popular social rules that help Americans manage the cooperation and competition among and between complementary, different, and equal men and women.

    These pro-gender claims have an impact on different-sex bathrooms, shelters for battered women, sports leagues for girls, hiking groups for boys, K-12 curricula, university speech codes, religious freedoms, free speech, the social status of women, parents’ rights in childrearing, children’s safety, practices to help teenagers, health outcomes, women’s ideals of beauty, culture and civic society, scientific research, prison safety, civic ceremonies, school rules, men’s sense of masculinity, law enforcement, military culture, and children’s sexual privacy.



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2
    "Perhaps one of the most important accomplishments of my administration is minding my own business."

    Calvin Coolidge

  4. #3
    People are stupid. Stupid people are easily confused. When stupid people become confused, they become easily dependent on those who say "I have the answer" to a problem that the Giver of Answers created to begin with. This is called the Hegalian Dialectic: Problem, Reaction, Solution. Note that every single stage of the Hegalian Dialectic is carefully crafted to so that the Solution always benefits those who created the problem to begin with, because Reactions are predictable.

    Whether it is guilting or shaming people for being "normal" or manipulation of money, the outcome is always the same, more power for those who already rule your lives, and less Individuality and Independence, thus, less True Freedom.
    1776 > 1984

    The FAILURE of the United States Government to operate and maintain an
    Honest Money System , which frees the ordinary man from the clutches of the money manipulators, is the single largest contributing factor to the World's current Economic Crisis.

    The Elimination of Privacy is the Architecture of Genocide

    Belief, Money, and Violence are the three ways all people are controlled

    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    Our central bank is not privately owned.

  5. #4
    The poor kids growing up today...

  6. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by tod evans View Post
    The poor kids growing up today...
    Yep. Well, if you destroy someones sense of Self Identity when it is still forming, it allows you to install an assigned identity, one that is loyal to party politics above their own personal opinions, one that is easily controllable thru various dependencies, and one that does not cause trouble for Rulers.

    "It is fortunate for Rulers that the Common Man does not think."
    1776 > 1984

    The FAILURE of the United States Government to operate and maintain an
    Honest Money System , which frees the ordinary man from the clutches of the money manipulators, is the single largest contributing factor to the World's current Economic Crisis.

    The Elimination of Privacy is the Architecture of Genocide

    Belief, Money, and Violence are the three ways all people are controlled

    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    Our central bank is not privately owned.

  7. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by DamianTV View Post
    Yep. Well, if you destroy someones sense of Self Identity when it is still forming, it allows you to install an assigned identity, one that is loyal to party politics above their own personal opinions, one that is easily controllable thru various dependencies, and one that does not cause trouble for Rulers.

    "It is fortunate for Rulers that the Common Man does not think."
    Ya' know...........If my 'date' turns out to have a penis they're going to see the root of their problem.......Literally.

    $#@! a bunch of weirdos!

  8. #7
    A person’s “gender,” say activists, is their personal feeling about being female or male, or something in between. For example, Moore’s feelings are described as “binary,” or neither male nor female.
    If Moore is binary, he wouldn't have a female penis or a male penis. He'd just have a penis.

    “Don’t use science to justify your bigotry,” Moore tweeted at critics of the “female penis” claim. “The world is way too weird for that s**t.”
    LOL
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Paul View Post
    The intellectual battle for liberty can appear to be a lonely one at times. However, the numbers are not as important as the principles that we hold. Leonard Read always taught that "it's not a numbers game, but an ideological game." That's why it's important to continue to provide a principled philosophy as to what the role of government ought to be, despite the numbers that stare us in the face.
    Quote Originally Posted by Origanalist View Post
    This intellectually stimulating conversation is the reason I keep coming here.

  9. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by DamianTV View Post
    People are stupid. Stupid people are easily confused. When stupid people become confused, they become easily dependent on those who say "I have the answer" to a problem that the Giver of Answers created to begin with. This is called the Hegalian Dialectic: Problem, Reaction, Solution. Note that every single stage of the Hegalian Dialectic is carefully crafted to so that the Solution always benefits those who created the problem to begin with, because Reactions are predictable.

    Whether it is guilting or shaming people for being "normal" or manipulation of money, the outcome is always the same, more power for those who already rule your lives, and less Individuality and Independence, thus, less True Freedom.
    I agree, Hegelian isn't always spelled out in a fashion that those unfamiliar with it
    fully able to grasp the concept, the point of the concept in my view and as I have
    written all over the web for years, is that the SOLUTION is the goal , the SOLUTION
    is EVENT.
    The following is not directed at you , you already get the concept, it's for
    any new member that might come along and is not familiar with
    this grand tool of deception, ''from an old playbook'' , tried and true.
    ======

    Hegelian Dialect;

    The reader or uninitiated needs to do a tiny bit of mental gymnastics in order to grasp
    the classic definition itself.

    Classic Hegelian definition involves these 3 steps ;

    Problem
    Reaction
    Solution

    The way I have explained it is that;

    The Solution is actually what a 'Hegelian Dialect' practitioner starts with,
    that point should be better 'driven' in the classic definition;

    Whereby the reality or actual practice is;
    1 Solution
    2 Problem / Reaction


    A Hegelian' could care less about 'the problem' he can
    change that up anytime so long as it satisfies the 'solution' .

    Ergo; The ''false religion'' of Global Warming (anthropomorphic)

    IMV Al Gore , a globalist front, needed a tax base to accelerate the roll
    out of the NWO, he found it in his CO2 , scam.

    Again Classic;
    Problem
    Reaction
    Solution
    Actual Practice
    Solution
    Problem/reaction


    Of course the solution was what he had in mind to begin with ,
    trillions could be had to fund Globalism in terms of taxation if he
    could 'invent a suitable problem,- - - - bingo, Global Warming- - - - ackk!!!!!
    ''We are all going to DIE!!!!
    The very air we breath could be taxed , eventually charging us all for our
    natural right to breath as we are 'polluters' everytime' we exhale.

    Had there been sincerity in stopping AGW, they would have started
    planting massive forests 20 years ago, they wanted the 'solution' to
    be taxes and regulation , never wanted the solution to be
    a 'real' solution, the problem of course was just an invention, a vehicle
    to justify Global Taxation.

    A recent observation I made here, where 'they'
    flip the problem in opposite directions and it works
    both ways perfectly ;

    Promotion of LGBT Threatens to Destabilize Our Population and Decimate Our Rich Culture

    Promotion of LGBT Threatens to Destabilize Our Population and Decimate Our Rich Culture

    ''Change my mind''

    We have been psychologically beaten down, demonized and denounced
    for having more than 2.3 kids for 40 years, the tide is now going out , it
    has worked.
    Self loathing Liberals and agenda twenty-one have brought our population
    growth to a crawl giving them and excuse to dilute our rich culture with
    low iq 3rd world compliant people that hate us, 80% of which will be on
    welfare.
    The kicker being the Liberal neocultural promotion of
    LGBT to continue to chip away at maintaining our cultural roots.
    They are destroying us Economically and Culturally.
    Low Iq anti western populations breed like flies, no consideration of
    responsibility, once they've reached sufficient mass, and your right
    of self-protection under the 2nd amendment is erased, the genocide
    will begin, if the 3rd world blob is too slow in the task, NATO Troops
    will be brought in as 'closers' .
    Hegelian (Dialectic)
    http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthr...00#post6750100

    Before the youtube purge;

    Classic Hegelian Dialectic
    Problem
    Reaction
    Solution - - - - - - However , for those unfamiliar with
    this tactic, the solution (New Taxes) is the Goal or the
    first step , in this process, the Reaction is for example
    Liberals, liberals screaming and writhing over the
    ''falling sky'' , end of times hysteria,
    the 'Problem' was 'created' to fuel the goal
    which again is TAXES , accelerated funding of Globalization.


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTTaXqVEGkU



    Summary:

    Hegelian (my view);

    Solution (What are you hoping to achieve gain, steal, grab)
    Problem (What horrific event or condition can you invent , vaccine hysteria, GW, etc to facilitate your goal)
    Reaction (Your 'horrific' event / condition / problem will have the public throwing cash your way or begging
    you to take their freedom/rights away so you can protect them)








    .
    Last edited by Stratovarious; 02-22-2019 at 05:10 AM.



  10. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  11. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Suzanimal View Post
    If Moore is binary, he wouldn't have a female penis or a male penis. He'd just have a penis.



    LOL
    You actually read what AF posted?
    Openly Straight Man, Danke, Awarded Top Rated Influencer

    Ⅎ˥ƎSWIH ˥˥I⋊ ⊥,NᗡIᗡ N
    IƎ⊥SԀƎ

    Quiz: Test Your "Income" Tax IQ!

    Short Income Tax Video

    The Income Tax Is An Excise, And Excise Taxes Are Privilege Taxes

    The Federalist Papers, No. 15:

    Except as to the rule of appointment, the United States have an indefinite discretion to make requisitions for men and money; but they have no authority to raise either by regulations extending to the individual citizens of America.

  12. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Danke View Post
    You actually read what AF posted?
    Duh - It was about the female penis.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Paul View Post
    The intellectual battle for liberty can appear to be a lonely one at times. However, the numbers are not as important as the principles that we hold. Leonard Read always taught that "it's not a numbers game, but an ideological game." That's why it's important to continue to provide a principled philosophy as to what the role of government ought to be, despite the numbers that stare us in the face.
    Quote Originally Posted by Origanalist View Post
    This intellectually stimulating conversation is the reason I keep coming here.

  13. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by tod evans View Post
    Ya' know...........If my 'date' turns out to have a penis they're going to see the root of their problem.......Literally.

    $#@! a bunch of weirdos!
    Exactly.

    So lets clarify for everyone:

    THERE IS NO $#@!ING SUCH THING AS A FEMALE PENIS.

    This is the part of Confusion that is INTENTIONAL in order to have Rulers tell people who and what they want them to be.

    Confuse your Enemy. Since we have the numbers, the Confusion is Intentional so that we war against ourselves on EVERY front, gender, sexual orientation, sexual identity, political identity, and all to be made into obedient controllable sheep. XX and XY chromosomes. Very rarely do we get in betweens, so there is no such thing as a "gender change" either because you can not simply change a Y chromosome into an X chromosome regardless of how many junk cutting surgeries a person gets.

    These people that want gender changes have had to first had their mental image of their own gender utterly destroyed. Once it happens in the mind, then they want it done to their bodies. And all for what? So they can feel like a "normal weirdo"? The world truly was a better place with "Dont Ask Dont Tell".

    Edit:

    The real problem is not that someone comes out of the "closet" with the expectation of being accepted for what they are; what they are doing is charging out of the closet and attacking anyone who is not just like them.
    Last edited by DamianTV; 02-22-2019 at 06:26 AM.
    1776 > 1984

    The FAILURE of the United States Government to operate and maintain an
    Honest Money System , which frees the ordinary man from the clutches of the money manipulators, is the single largest contributing factor to the World's current Economic Crisis.

    The Elimination of Privacy is the Architecture of Genocide

    Belief, Money, and Violence are the three ways all people are controlled

    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    Our central bank is not privately owned.

  14. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by DamianTV View Post
    Exactly.

    So lets clarify for everyone:

    THERE IS NO $#@!ING SUCH THING AS A FEMALE PENIS.

    This is the part of Confusion that is INTENTIONAL in order to have Rulers tell people who and what they want them to be.

    Confuse your Enemy. Since we have the numbers, the Confusion is Intentional so that we war against ourselves on EVERY front, gender, sexual orientation, sexual identity, political identity, and all to be made into obedient controllable sheep. XX and XY chromosomes. Very rarely do we get in betweens, so there is no such thing as a "gender change" either because you can not simply change a Y chromosome into an X chromosome regardless of how many junk cutting surgeries a person gets.

    These people that want gender changes have had to first had their mental image of their own gender utterly destroyed. Once it happens in the mind, then they want it done to their bodies. And all for what? So they can feel like a "normal weirdo"? The world truly was a better place with "Dont Ask Dont Tell".

    Edit:

    The real problem is not that someone comes out of the "closet" with the expectation of being accepted for what they are; what they are doing is charging out of the closet and attacking anyone who is not just like them.
    Agreed,
    today no one really cares what 'they' want to be, but there are still just two genders.

    One problem is the complete revamping of society just to accommodate a few 'freaks' , as
    well as promote the proliferation of them.

    Another is, the fact that the operations that some of them go through will be paid for by
    the state or us, eventually bankrupting the system worse than the illegal alien impact,
    then two years later they will go get their surgery reversed , then rinse and repeat.


    lgbt is the magic bullet or at least one of them that Agenda 21 has been waiting for, it is
    probably a psyop period.

  15. #13
    Transgender Actor Asserts Existence of ‘Biologically Female Penis’
    So it doesn't matter if you are AC/DC, as long as you plug in right? LOL
    ClydeCoulter on the Liberty Movement:
    Yeah, they'll argue over roads and religion, but there are certain themes that bind, among those are freedom and the search for truth and justice.

    Loyalists gonna loyal.

  16. #14
    Why isn't Indya Moore woke enough to call a transgender man's penis a vagina.

  17. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by Danke View Post
    You actually read what AF posted?
    I can post more pictures if you'd like...

  18. #16
    In his/her efforts to help us continue to negotiate our way forward with usable words for these things, I wonder if Indya Moore can come up with a word that we could all use for anyone (regardless of gender identity) who has a penis, and a corresponding word for anyone (regardless of gender identity) who has a vagina.

    And once agreeing on those words to distinguish people with penises from people with vaginas, I wonder how long it would take for some of those people with penises to insist that they aren't whatever that word is and take offense to being labeled that way.



  19. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  20. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by DamianTV View Post
    So lets clarify for everyone:

    THERE IS NO $#@!ING SUCH THING AS A FEMALE PENIS.
    You must not be married.

    In my experience, my male penis became my wife's penis as soon as I took my vows. (I don't remember that being in the vows, but I guess I didn't really read the fine print.)
    "And now that the legislators and do-gooders have so futilely inflicted so many systems upon society, may they finally end where they should have begun: May they reject all systems, and try liberty; for liberty is an acknowledgment of faith in God and His works." - Bastiat

    "It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere." - Voltaire

  21. #18
    All of this reinventing of the language to mix up terms for the sexes is doomed to fail in my opinion. It's an unsustainable fad.

    That said, some of their neologisms are more unsustainable than others. And this "female penis" one is up there among the most unsustainable. Sorry, Indya, but a female penis is something that females keep in their dresser drawers most of the time, not hanging permanently from their groin areas.

    If you want to come up with something more workable for the anatomical features that have traditionally been called penises and vaginas, then consider co-opting the words we're used to for belly buttons: outies and innies. When all's said and done, these terms won't last very long either. But they'll catch on better than "female penis."

  22. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by Stratovarious View Post
    Agreed,
    today no one really cares what 'they' want to be, but there are still just two genders.

    One problem is the complete revamping of society just to accommodate a few 'freaks' , as
    well as promote the proliferation of them.

    Another is, the fact that the operations that some of them go through will be paid for by
    the state or us, eventually bankrupting the system worse than the illegal alien impact,
    then two years later they will go get their surgery reversed , then rinse and repeat.


    lgbt is the magic bullet or at least one of them that Agenda 21 has been waiting for, it is
    probably a psyop period.
    Yep. Oh, update, its now Agenda 2030, not Agenda 21, they changed it...
    1776 > 1984

    The FAILURE of the United States Government to operate and maintain an
    Honest Money System , which frees the ordinary man from the clutches of the money manipulators, is the single largest contributing factor to the World's current Economic Crisis.

    The Elimination of Privacy is the Architecture of Genocide

    Belief, Money, and Violence are the three ways all people are controlled

    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    Our central bank is not privately owned.

  23. #20
    Quote Originally Posted by DamianTV View Post
    Yep. Oh, update, its now Agenda 2030, not Agenda 21, they changed it...
    So that's what 2030 is , I've seen the date, didn't know about that being the update to the old '21.
    Heard or know of any significant changes?

  24. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by DamianTV View Post
    Yep. Oh, update, its now Agenda 2030, not Agenda 21, they changed it...
    Is this like;
    Change the name every 5 years cause 'sht' is still sht' but maybe
    we look better if we keep chgg' the name?

  25. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by Stratovarious View Post
    So that's what 2030 is , I've seen the date, didn't know about that being the update to the old '21.
    Heard or know of any significant changes?
    If its Agenda 21 / 2030, same thing. I dont really have any new updates on it since everyone is getting censored all to $#@! now... But yeah, same damn thing, use Global Warming and Taxes and Propaganda and Starvation and War to reduce the population of all humans on earth to only 500 million, so over 90% of people to die. Of course thats all Rumormille, but, how many things have we seen already come to pass as it is already?
    1776 > 1984

    The FAILURE of the United States Government to operate and maintain an
    Honest Money System , which frees the ordinary man from the clutches of the money manipulators, is the single largest contributing factor to the World's current Economic Crisis.

    The Elimination of Privacy is the Architecture of Genocide

    Belief, Money, and Violence are the three ways all people are controlled

    Quote Originally Posted by Zippyjuan View Post
    Our central bank is not privately owned.

  26. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by Suzanimal View Post
    If Moore is binary, he wouldn't have a female penis or a male penis. He'd just have a penis.



    LOL
    That would be "non-binary", also know as extra fruity.

    The trouble here isn't that these nutjobs want to be something else, it's when they force the rest of us to deny fact and go along with their fantasy bull$#@!. Having a penis is factual evidence of maleness, period. That legitimizes any one of us to call that a male, becasue the evidence points in that direction.
    Quote Originally Posted by Andrew Ryan
    In Washington you can see them everywhere: the Parasites and baby Stalins sucking the life out of a once-great nation.

  27. #24
    What about the hermaphrodites man?
    ClydeCoulter on the Liberty Movement:
    Yeah, they'll argue over roads and religion, but there are certain themes that bind, among those are freedom and the search for truth and justice.

    Loyalists gonna loyal.



  28. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  29. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by DamianTV View Post
    If its Agenda 21 / 2030, same thing. I dont really have any new updates on it since everyone is getting censored all to $#@! now... But yeah, same damn thing, use Global Warming and Taxes and Propaganda and Starvation and War to reduce the population of all humans on earth to only 500 million, so over 90% of people to die. Of course thats all Rumormille, but, how many things have we seen already come to pass as it is already?
    Yes,
    I see it all coming to a head, everything points to this.
    I've already written about this but here's a bit of it again, just here in the US; They DEMONIZED us for over populating
    in the US for 70 years, now we're under populated, 1st job done, 2nd job , bring in the Muslims to breed like
    flies TO refix the problem globalists created, now America is as dumb as rocks, we have the
    worker bees,,,,,,,,,,,then they eliminate 80% of them and keep the best and dumbest workers.

    And lets not forget;
    Hillary's fun camps for adults ......

    She can't wait to get her brain in a jar and live forever , 'transhumanism' .

  30. #26
    @RJB

    Does a female penis count as a dick pix?
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron Paul View Post
    The intellectual battle for liberty can appear to be a lonely one at times. However, the numbers are not as important as the principles that we hold. Leonard Read always taught that "it's not a numbers game, but an ideological game." That's why it's important to continue to provide a principled philosophy as to what the role of government ought to be, despite the numbers that stare us in the face.
    Quote Originally Posted by Origanalist View Post
    This intellectually stimulating conversation is the reason I keep coming here.

  31. #27
    Quote Originally Posted by Suzanimal View Post
    @RJB

    Does a female penis count as a dick pix?
    I am a forum attorney specializing in taking people's money who wish to become unbannable. For a biological answer to this question, talk to HB or Danke.

  32. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by Suzanimal View Post
    @RJB

    Does a female penis count as a dick pix?
    Also you get a neg rep for seeking legal advice from me without compensating me for my valuable time.

  33. #29
    Quote Originally Posted by RJB View Post
    I am a forum attorney specializing in taking people's money who wish to become unbannable. For a biological answer to this question, talk to HB or Danke.
    Sorry, can't help on this one. It's beyond my realm of expertise. I avoid sending or receiving dick pix as best as possible. If the danke has sent me dick pix, the forum and FB have filtered them. Perhaps someone else here has gotten danke's dick pix? Highly likely eduardo.
    Quote Originally Posted by Torchbearer
    what works can never be discussed online. there is only one language the government understands, and until the people start speaking it by the magazine full... things will remain the same.
    Hear/buy my music here "government is the enemy of liberty"-RP Support me on Patreon here Ephesians 6:12

  34. #30
    Hmmm. Do we need a new sub-forum? The Transgender Daily?

    Moore took the often-heard rallying cry “trans women are women” one step further: She argued that if trans women are biological women, by definition, a trans woman’s penis is “a biologically female penis.” That’s a radical point missing in mainstream discussions on trans bodies, as trans women are often made to feel as if they should be ashamed of their genitals if they don’t have a vagina.
    Better to take that one step backward. “Trans-women are trans-women”. This is the accepted terminology for someone who is born biologically male but wants to live as a woman. Accept it. No amount of surgery or deceptive labeling will change that fact.
    "Foreign aid is taking money from the poor people of a rich country, and giving it to the rich people of a poor country." - Ron Paul
    "Beware the Military-Industrial-Financial-Corporate-Internet-Media-Government Complex." - B4L update of General Dwight D. Eisenhower
    "Debt is the drug, Wall St. Banksters are the dealers, and politicians are the addicts." - B4L
    "Totally free immigration? I've never taken that position. I believe in national sovereignty." - Ron Paul
    They are what they hate.” - B4L


    The views and opinions expressed here are solely my own, and do not represent this forum or any other entities or persons.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. Don't get penis surgery in a warehouse
    By tod evans in forum Open Discussion
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-11-2016, 08:59 AM
  2. Okay for cop to rub cocaine on his penis/Keeps job
    By tod evans in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 08-04-2014, 09:08 AM
  3. Great Day to be a Penis in Japan
    By RestoreTheRepublic in forum Open Discussion
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 04-06-2009, 07:52 PM
  4. How Not to Break Your Penis
    By Rael in forum Open Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-24-2009, 08:51 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •