Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: The First Rule of AIPAC Is: You Do Not Talk about AIPAC

  1. #1

    The First Rule of AIPAC Is: You Do Not Talk about AIPAC

    by Thomas Knapp Posted on February 19, 2019

    Washington’s political establishment went berserk when US Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN) publicly noted that US-Israel relations are “all about the Benjamins” – slang for $100 bills, referring to money shoveled at American politicians by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).

    Omar was accused of antisemitism – immediately by Republicans, shortly after by members of her own party – and bullied into apologizing. She may or may not be prejudiced against Jews, but even if she is, that wasn’t her real offense.

    Her real offense was publicly mentioning the irrefutable fact that many members of Congress take their marching orders from a foreign power’s lobbying apparatus (an apparatus not, as required by law, registered under the Foreign Agents Registration Act), at least partly because those marching orders come with promises of significant donations to those politicians’ campaigns.

    AIPAC itself doesn’t make direct donations to political campaigns. But AIPAC and other pro-Israel lobbying groups like Christians United For Israel punch well above their weight in American politics, largely by motivating their supporters to financially support and work for “pro-Israel” candidates in general elections and help weed out “anti-Israel” candidates in party primaries.

    By the way, “pro-Israel” in this context always means “supportive of the jingoism of Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud Party,” and never “supportive of the many Israelis who’d like peace with the Palestinian Arabs.”

    One AIPAC supporter alone, casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, spent $65 million getting Republicans elected, including $25 million supporting Donald Trump, in 2016. But that $25 million was only put into action after Trump retreated from his early position of “neutrality” in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, publicly prostrated himself to AIPAC in a speech at one of its events, and pronounced himself “the most pro-Israel presidential candidate in history.”

    But: We’re not supposed to talk about that. Ever. And it’s easy to see why.

    If most Americans noticed that many members of Congress (as well as most presidents) are selling their influence over US policy to a foreign power, we might do something about it.

    continued..https://original.antiwar.com/thomas-...k-about-aipac/
    "The Patriarch"



  2. Remove this section of ads by registering.
  3. #2

    Don't need a weather man to know which way the wind blows

  4. #3
    So its similar to the first rule of Fight Club.
    "Perhaps one of the most important accomplishments of my administration is minding my own business."

    Calvin Coolidge

  5. #4



Similar Threads

  1. Should we abolish AIPAC?
    By Imaginos in forum World News & Affairs
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: 04-30-2010, 06:42 PM
  2. Is VP serious about what he said in AIPAC
    By shenlu54 in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-06-2009, 12:08 AM
  3. Aipac
    By Liberty in forum U.S. Political News
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-25-2007, 08:51 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •